comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 of 1 half a dozen of the other, you're only guessing there's other evidence, evidence that amazingly has never been released even though it could clear Greenwoods name.
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 4 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s the additional evidence then?
comment by Johnny Football (U9335)
posted 3 minutes ago
We’ve just spent £70m on a striker who due to a medical issue is unlikely to be able to play 2 games a week. All being said, bringing Greenwood back wouldn’t be the worst decision the club has made this summer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn't it the same injury Rashford had (Rashford's being a double stress fracture). He doesn't seem to struggle playing
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 hour, 59 minutes ago
It’s a tricky one.
When this all came out about Greenwood I was of the opinion he should never play for the club again.
However in that time he’s gotten back with the victim and has had a child with her.
What he did was shocking but as long as he has changed his ways I don’t believe he is beyond getting a 2nd chance in life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Getting to play for United again is Far too good to be a ‘second chance in life’
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 of 1 half a dozen of the other, you're only guessing there's other evidence, evidence that amazingly has never been released even though it could clear Greenwoods name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CPS referred to further information that had come to light when explaining their decision not to pursue a trial.
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 4 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s the additional evidence then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don’t know. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 of 1 half a dozen of the other, you're only guessing there's other evidence, evidence that amazingly has never been released even though it could clear Greenwoods name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. Why hasn’t it been released? Which again points it to being the victim reversing her statement. Makes the most sense by far, rather than it suddenly emerging greenwood was actually out doing a talk on domestic violence at a conference at the time of the even…
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 of 1 half a dozen of the other, you're only guessing there's other evidence, evidence that amazingly has never been released even though it could clear Greenwoods name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. Why hasn’t it been released? Which again points it to being the victim reversing her statement. Makes the most sense by far, rather than it suddenly emerging greenwood was actually out doing a talk on domestic violence at a conference at the time of the even…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was a criminal investigation. The evidence is confidential and protected.
Just because Romano hasn’t reported it, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist FFS.
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 of 1 half a dozen of the other, you're only guessing there's other evidence, evidence that amazingly has never been released even though it could clear Greenwoods name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CPS referred to further information that had come to light when explaining their decision not to pursue a trial.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
that's likely to be that they are back together & she was pregnant, which is separate from her dropping the charges.
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 of 1 half a dozen of the other, you're only guessing there's other evidence, evidence that amazingly has never been released even though it could clear Greenwoods name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CPS referred to further information that had come to light when explaining their decision not to pursue a trial.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
that's likely to be that they are back together & she was pregnant, which is separate from her dropping the charges.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What does that have to do with if he assaulted her?
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 of 1 half a dozen of the other, you're only guessing there's other evidence, evidence that amazingly has never been released even though it could clear Greenwoods name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CPS referred to further information that had come to light when explaining their decision not to pursue a trial.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
that's likely to be that they are back together & she was pregnant, which is separate from her dropping the charges.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What does that have to do with if he assaulted her?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely nothing, but it's more information that come to like that would effect the possibility of a conviction, the reason they chose not to prosecute
Comment deleted by Article Creator
I'd invade the pitch, pin him down and tell him to get his legs up. Then come on as a sub second half to applause from the fans
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 4 minutes ago
Oh ffs this is a repetitive, boring, rhetorical, pash,same again post, we all have an opinion on it but for some reason you seem to want to raise it again and again?
I've usually ignored it but this time I've decided you're a dull nonsensical fcker
Each to their own but PLEASE give it a rest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn’t agree more. This is the same nonsense he’s spouted time and time again. If Ted bundy was a Utd player rdd would be telling us it was just a few sxxx games that got out of hand.
comment by Scott Tiffoney (U1734)
posted 3 minutes ago
I'd invade the pitch, pin him down and tell him to get his legs up. Then come on as a sub second half to applause from the fans
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you do the song? The one to the put your hands up for Detroit music?
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 4 minutes ago
Oh ffs this is a repetitive, boring, rhetorical, pash,same again post, we all have an opinion on it but for some reason you seem to want to raise it again and again?
I've usually ignored it but this time I've decided you're a dull nonsensical fcker
Each to their own but PLEASE give it a rest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn’t agree more. This is the same nonsense he’s spouted time and time again. If Ted bundy was a Utd player rdd would be telling us it was just a few sxxx games that got out of hand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye, Baz I'm about as an easy going poster on here as it's just football banter and chatter but some posters have an agenda that they simply cannot let go?
Of course give an opinion and viewpoint but at some point you just get boring with the same old same old?
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 4 minutes ago
Oh ffs this is a repetitive, boring, rhetorical, pash,same again post, we all have an opinion on it but for some reason you seem to want to raise it again and again?
I've usually ignored it but this time I've decided you're a dull nonsensical fcker
Each to their own but PLEASE give it a rest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn’t agree more. This is the same nonsense he’s spouted time and time again. If Ted bundy was a Utd player rdd would be telling us it was just a few sxxx games that got out of hand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye, Baz I'm about as an easy going poster on here as it's just football banter and chatter but some posters have an agenda that they simply cannot let go?
Of course give an opinion and viewpoint but at some point you just get boring with the same old same old?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’ll abuse her again. Domestic abusers are notorious for reoffending
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 of 1 half a dozen of the other, you're only guessing there's other evidence, evidence that amazingly has never been released even though it could clear Greenwoods name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CPS referred to further information that had come to light when explaining their decision not to pursue a trial.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
that's likely to be that they are back together & she was pregnant, which is separate from her dropping the charges.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What does that have to do with if he assaulted her?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely nothing, but it's more information that come to like that would effect the possibility of a conviction, the reason they chose not to prosecute
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spouses can be prosecuted for assaulting each other. The fact they are back together wouldn’t alter their decision to prosecute if the evidence supported it.
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 4 minutes ago
Oh ffs this is a repetitive, boring, rhetorical, pash,same again post, we all have an opinion on it but for some reason you seem to want to raise it again and again?
I've usually ignored it but this time I've decided you're a dull nonsensical fcker
Each to their own but PLEASE give it a rest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn’t agree more. This is the same nonsense he’s spouted time and time again. If Ted bundy was a Utd player rdd would be telling us it was just a few sxxx games that got out of hand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye, Baz I'm about as an easy going poster on here as it's just football banter and chatter but some posters have an agenda that they simply cannot let go?
Of course give an opinion and viewpoint but at some point you just get boring with the same old same old?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t let me stop you leaving the thread mate.
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 of 1 half a dozen of the other, you're only guessing there's other evidence, evidence that amazingly has never been released even though it could clear Greenwoods name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CPS referred to further information that had come to light when explaining their decision not to pursue a trial.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
that's likely to be that they are back together & she was pregnant, which is separate from her dropping the charges.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What does that have to do with if he assaulted her?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely nothing, but it's more information that come to like that would effect the possibility of a conviction, the reason they chose not to prosecute
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spouses can be prosecuted for assaulting each other. The fact they are back together wouldn’t alter their decision to prosecute if the evidence supported it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can't be serious, I never said they couldn't be prosecuted, I said it would harm the chances of getting a conviction, especially when coupled with her withdrawing her statement
Just for clarity, are you saying you don't think them getting back together would effect the chances of getting a conviction?
We don’t know she has withdrawn her statement (unless that is the same as withdrawing as a witness)
A conviction would depend on the facts. If he did assault her as alleged, and the evidence supported this, then a conviction wouldn’t be hindered by their current relationship status.
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 41 seconds ago
We don’t know she has withdrawn her statement (unless that is the same as withdrawing as a witness)
A conviction would depend on the facts. If he did assault her as alleged, and the evidence supported this, then a conviction wouldn’t be hindered by their current relationship status.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Them getting back together wouldn't effect the chances of a prosecution??? I really have heard it all lol.
I won't keep this thread going, that one statement answers everything for me
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 41 seconds ago
We don’t know she has withdrawn her statement (unless that is the same as withdrawing as a witness)
A conviction would depend on the facts. If he did assault her as alleged, and the evidence supported this, then a conviction wouldn’t be hindered by their current relationship status.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Them getting back together wouldn't effect the chances of a prosecution??? I really have heard it all lol.
I won't keep this thread going, that one statement answers everything for me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s true
Going out, engaged, married, their relationship status doesn’t matter. They are looking at what he did or didn’t do. Not where they are now.
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 41 seconds ago
We don’t know she has withdrawn her statement (unless that is the same as withdrawing as a witness)
A conviction would depend on the facts. If he did assault her as alleged, and the evidence supported this, then a conviction wouldn’t be hindered by their current relationship status.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Them getting back together wouldn't effect the chances of a prosecution??? I really have heard it all lol.
I won't keep this thread going, that one statement answers everything for me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
BTW, prosecution and conviction are different things.
Sign in if you want to comment
If
Page 3 of 5
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 of 1 half a dozen of the other, you're only guessing there's other evidence, evidence that amazingly has never been released even though it could clear Greenwoods name.
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 4 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s the additional evidence then?
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Johnny Football (U9335)
posted 3 minutes ago
We’ve just spent £70m on a striker who due to a medical issue is unlikely to be able to play 2 games a week. All being said, bringing Greenwood back wouldn’t be the worst decision the club has made this summer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn't it the same injury Rashford had (Rashford's being a double stress fracture). He doesn't seem to struggle playing
posted on 10/8/23
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 hour, 59 minutes ago
It’s a tricky one.
When this all came out about Greenwood I was of the opinion he should never play for the club again.
However in that time he’s gotten back with the victim and has had a child with her.
What he did was shocking but as long as he has changed his ways I don’t believe he is beyond getting a 2nd chance in life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Getting to play for United again is Far too good to be a ‘second chance in life’
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 of 1 half a dozen of the other, you're only guessing there's other evidence, evidence that amazingly has never been released even though it could clear Greenwoods name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CPS referred to further information that had come to light when explaining their decision not to pursue a trial.
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 4 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s the additional evidence then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don’t know. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 of 1 half a dozen of the other, you're only guessing there's other evidence, evidence that amazingly has never been released even though it could clear Greenwoods name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. Why hasn’t it been released? Which again points it to being the victim reversing her statement. Makes the most sense by far, rather than it suddenly emerging greenwood was actually out doing a talk on domestic violence at a conference at the time of the even…
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 of 1 half a dozen of the other, you're only guessing there's other evidence, evidence that amazingly has never been released even though it could clear Greenwoods name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. Why hasn’t it been released? Which again points it to being the victim reversing her statement. Makes the most sense by far, rather than it suddenly emerging greenwood was actually out doing a talk on domestic violence at a conference at the time of the even…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was a criminal investigation. The evidence is confidential and protected.
Just because Romano hasn’t reported it, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist FFS.
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 of 1 half a dozen of the other, you're only guessing there's other evidence, evidence that amazingly has never been released even though it could clear Greenwoods name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CPS referred to further information that had come to light when explaining their decision not to pursue a trial.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
that's likely to be that they are back together & she was pregnant, which is separate from her dropping the charges.
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 of 1 half a dozen of the other, you're only guessing there's other evidence, evidence that amazingly has never been released even though it could clear Greenwoods name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CPS referred to further information that had come to light when explaining their decision not to pursue a trial.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
that's likely to be that they are back together & she was pregnant, which is separate from her dropping the charges.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What does that have to do with if he assaulted her?
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 of 1 half a dozen of the other, you're only guessing there's other evidence, evidence that amazingly has never been released even though it could clear Greenwoods name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CPS referred to further information that had come to light when explaining their decision not to pursue a trial.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
that's likely to be that they are back together & she was pregnant, which is separate from her dropping the charges.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What does that have to do with if he assaulted her?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely nothing, but it's more information that come to like that would effect the possibility of a conviction, the reason they chose not to prosecute
posted on 10/8/23
*light
posted on 10/8/23
Comment deleted by Article Creator
posted on 10/8/23
I'd invade the pitch, pin him down and tell him to get his legs up. Then come on as a sub second half to applause from the fans
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 4 minutes ago
Oh ffs this is a repetitive, boring, rhetorical, pash,same again post, we all have an opinion on it but for some reason you seem to want to raise it again and again?
I've usually ignored it but this time I've decided you're a dull nonsensical fcker
Each to their own but PLEASE give it a rest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn’t agree more. This is the same nonsense he’s spouted time and time again. If Ted bundy was a Utd player rdd would be telling us it was just a few sxxx games that got out of hand.
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Scott Tiffoney (U1734)
posted 3 minutes ago
I'd invade the pitch, pin him down and tell him to get his legs up. Then come on as a sub second half to applause from the fans
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you do the song? The one to the put your hands up for Detroit music?
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 4 minutes ago
Oh ffs this is a repetitive, boring, rhetorical, pash,same again post, we all have an opinion on it but for some reason you seem to want to raise it again and again?
I've usually ignored it but this time I've decided you're a dull nonsensical fcker
Each to their own but PLEASE give it a rest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn’t agree more. This is the same nonsense he’s spouted time and time again. If Ted bundy was a Utd player rdd would be telling us it was just a few sxxx games that got out of hand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye, Baz I'm about as an easy going poster on here as it's just football banter and chatter but some posters have an agenda that they simply cannot let go?
Of course give an opinion and viewpoint but at some point you just get boring with the same old same old?
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 4 minutes ago
Oh ffs this is a repetitive, boring, rhetorical, pash,same again post, we all have an opinion on it but for some reason you seem to want to raise it again and again?
I've usually ignored it but this time I've decided you're a dull nonsensical fcker
Each to their own but PLEASE give it a rest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn’t agree more. This is the same nonsense he’s spouted time and time again. If Ted bundy was a Utd player rdd would be telling us it was just a few sxxx games that got out of hand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye, Baz I'm about as an easy going poster on here as it's just football banter and chatter but some posters have an agenda that they simply cannot let go?
Of course give an opinion and viewpoint but at some point you just get boring with the same old same old?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’ll abuse her again. Domestic abusers are notorious for reoffending
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 of 1 half a dozen of the other, you're only guessing there's other evidence, evidence that amazingly has never been released even though it could clear Greenwoods name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CPS referred to further information that had come to light when explaining their decision not to pursue a trial.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
that's likely to be that they are back together & she was pregnant, which is separate from her dropping the charges.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What does that have to do with if he assaulted her?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely nothing, but it's more information that come to like that would effect the possibility of a conviction, the reason they chose not to prosecute
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spouses can be prosecuted for assaulting each other. The fact they are back together wouldn’t alter their decision to prosecute if the evidence supported it.
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 4 minutes ago
Oh ffs this is a repetitive, boring, rhetorical, pash,same again post, we all have an opinion on it but for some reason you seem to want to raise it again and again?
I've usually ignored it but this time I've decided you're a dull nonsensical fcker
Each to their own but PLEASE give it a rest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn’t agree more. This is the same nonsense he’s spouted time and time again. If Ted bundy was a Utd player rdd would be telling us it was just a few sxxx games that got out of hand.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye, Baz I'm about as an easy going poster on here as it's just football banter and chatter but some posters have an agenda that they simply cannot let go?
Of course give an opinion and viewpoint but at some point you just get boring with the same old same old?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t let me stop you leaving the thread mate.
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
What is the logic?
Timing - you have no way of knowing when the withdrawal and the further info came to light, or how long after these events, the announcement to withdraw was made.
Common sense - grasping here mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 of 1 half a dozen of the other, you're only guessing there's other evidence, evidence that amazingly has never been released even though it could clear Greenwoods name.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CPS referred to further information that had come to light when explaining their decision not to pursue a trial.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
that's likely to be that they are back together & she was pregnant, which is separate from her dropping the charges.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What does that have to do with if he assaulted her?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely nothing, but it's more information that come to like that would effect the possibility of a conviction, the reason they chose not to prosecute
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spouses can be prosecuted for assaulting each other. The fact they are back together wouldn’t alter their decision to prosecute if the evidence supported it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can't be serious, I never said they couldn't be prosecuted, I said it would harm the chances of getting a conviction, especially when coupled with her withdrawing her statement
Just for clarity, are you saying you don't think them getting back together would effect the chances of getting a conviction?
posted on 10/8/23
We don’t know she has withdrawn her statement (unless that is the same as withdrawing as a witness)
A conviction would depend on the facts. If he did assault her as alleged, and the evidence supported this, then a conviction wouldn’t be hindered by their current relationship status.
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 41 seconds ago
We don’t know she has withdrawn her statement (unless that is the same as withdrawing as a witness)
A conviction would depend on the facts. If he did assault her as alleged, and the evidence supported this, then a conviction wouldn’t be hindered by their current relationship status.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Them getting back together wouldn't effect the chances of a prosecution??? I really have heard it all lol.
I won't keep this thread going, that one statement answers everything for me
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 41 seconds ago
We don’t know she has withdrawn her statement (unless that is the same as withdrawing as a witness)
A conviction would depend on the facts. If he did assault her as alleged, and the evidence supported this, then a conviction wouldn’t be hindered by their current relationship status.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Them getting back together wouldn't effect the chances of a prosecution??? I really have heard it all lol.
I won't keep this thread going, that one statement answers everything for me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s true
Going out, engaged, married, their relationship status doesn’t matter. They are looking at what he did or didn’t do. Not where they are now.
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Arctic Monkey (U14534)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 41 seconds ago
We don’t know she has withdrawn her statement (unless that is the same as withdrawing as a witness)
A conviction would depend on the facts. If he did assault her as alleged, and the evidence supported this, then a conviction wouldn’t be hindered by their current relationship status.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Them getting back together wouldn't effect the chances of a prosecution??? I really have heard it all lol.
I won't keep this thread going, that one statement answers everything for me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
BTW, prosecution and conviction are different things.
Page 3 of 5