Well the equivalent would be my female boss doing that, and honestly I don't think if the circumstances were similar, IE something similar to the world cup I would mind and If I did mind I'm sure I'd get over it in 6.7 seconds because I'm an adult and understand that in the grand scheme of things, it's not a big deal.
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 8 hours, 14 minutes ago
He's also under investigation on a couple of corruption charges: one regarding the use of FA funds to pay for an ordgy with prozzies for him and his team of advisors, and the other over the payment of commissions related to the sale of the rights to the Spanish Supercup to KSA. He is also alleged to have recorded conversations with members of the government and rivals in the world of football, and his behaviour during the World Cup final isn't the first time he's landed himself in hot water over his treatment of women. It was on his orders that the letters of complaint from the 15 players in the women's NT were leaked to the press. Earlier this year he refused to hand the players their medals after the women's Supercup game, having them set out on a table instead for the players to collect them themselves. Less than three years ago he also advised against the creation of a professional women's league.
He's an ugly piece of work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A very useful post. Context is everything, and a kiss can mean very different things in different contexts. Blanc kissing Barthez on his bald head was fine because they were friends and equals and it was a ritual they had for years.
The situation around the Spanish women's team is that (apparently a bit of a recurring theme that football administrators are useless dinosaurs) for some years they felt aggrieved by the lack of respect and professionalism with which the Spanish FA treated them. Itsonlyagame mentioned the corruption case involving use of prostitutes and forcing female players to go and collect their medals from a table rather than having a standard presentation (remember, this in a country where women's football is actually attracting large crowds, filling the Nou Camp for certain matches). In addition, they appointed a useless manager through nepotism to lead the women's national side. Basically the equivalent of our FA appointing Phil Neville. The women complained about the substandard coaching and training. Several of them withdrew from the national side in protest. The Spanish FA did sweet FA: they stood by their mediocre dude. That situation continued to simmer throughout the World Cup, and from what I've read, the players won the competition despite rather than thanks to him - a situation made possible by the fact that the majority of the players are also together at Barcelona, the best club side in the world. You might have noticed in photos that when the final whistle blew, the players and coaches celebrated separately, in different halves of the pitch.
So that seems to me the context in which we should view the kiss. A man who has consistently disrespected the women who had reached the pinnacle of sporting achievement, who had been part of a leadership which in fact actively held them back from this achievement while using money that is supposed to be invested in the country's footballing activities to fиck hookers, and now basking in the glory of a World Cup victory. In that context, I don't see it as an act of violence (as someone apparently described it) but I don't think it's like Blanc and Barthez, a consensual act of respect and affection between two friends and equals. I think it's a rather aggressive expression of power.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely this.
Anyone thinking he was just caught up in the moment, or that it was an act of affection, is being very naive.
A man does that and what some people are more alarmed about is the reaction to it. Not the man behaving like a nonce.
Apparently for the grievous sin of calling it sexual violence. I mean, perhaps it's a misdemeanour to mislabel it sexual violence, and the internet is full of children and stoopid people, but how can that even come close to comparing to the felony of what this nonce did? It's a topic for psychological analysts why people use a reaction to a wrongful act to deflect from the actual wrongful act and even worse what motivates an uninvolved observer to do that.
I don't think there was anything sinister in the kiss.
The bloke was overcome with joy having just seen his nation lift the World Cup, it's not not like he cornered her in a gloomy corridor in an office block.
I can understand her not particularly liking the incident, especially having being kicked, shoved, kneed and possibly punched during the previous 90 minutes but the reaction has been way over the top.
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 58 seconds ago
A man does that and what some people are more alarmed about is the reaction to it. Not the man behaving like a nonce.
Apparently for the grievous sin of calling it sexual violence. I mean, perhaps it's a misdemeanour to mislabel it sexual violence, and the internet is full of children and stoopid people, but how can that even come close to comparing to the felony of what this nonce did? It's a topic for psychological analysts why people use a reaction to a wrongful act to deflect from the actual wrongful act and even worse what motivates an uninvolved observer to do that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I beg you shut up.
comment by Lexington 125.2 (U8879)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 8 hours, 14 minutes ago
He's also under investigation on a couple of corruption charges: one regarding the use of FA funds to pay for an ordgy with prozzies for him and his team of advisors, and the other over the payment of commissions related to the sale of the rights to the Spanish Supercup to KSA. He is also alleged to have recorded conversations with members of the government and rivals in the world of football, and his behaviour during the World Cup final isn't the first time he's landed himself in hot water over his treatment of women. It was on his orders that the letters of complaint from the 15 players in the women's NT were leaked to the press. Earlier this year he refused to hand the players their medals after the women's Supercup game, having them set out on a table instead for the players to collect them themselves. Less than three years ago he also advised against the creation of a professional women's league.
He's an ugly piece of work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A very useful post. Context is everything, and a kiss can mean very different things in different contexts. Blanc kissing Barthez on his bald head was fine because they were friends and equals and it was a ritual they had for years.
The situation around the Spanish women's team is that (apparently a bit of a recurring theme that football administrators are useless dinosaurs) for some years they felt aggrieved by the lack of respect and professionalism with which the Spanish FA treated them. Itsonlyagame mentioned the corruption case involving use of prostitutes and forcing female players to go and collect their medals from a table rather than having a standard presentation (remember, this in a country where women's football is actually attracting large crowds, filling the Nou Camp for certain matches). In addition, they appointed a useless manager through nepotism to lead the women's national side. Basically the equivalent of our FA appointing Phil Neville. The women complained about the substandard coaching and training. Several of them withdrew from the national side in protest. The Spanish FA did sweet FA: they stood by their mediocre dude. That situation continued to simmer throughout the World Cup, and from what I've read, the players won the competition despite rather than thanks to him - a situation made possible by the fact that the majority of the players are also together at Barcelona, the best club side in the world. You might have noticed in photos that when the final whistle blew, the players and coaches celebrated separately, in different halves of the pitch.
So that seems to me the context in which we should view the kiss. A man who has consistently disrespected the women who had reached the pinnacle of sporting achievement, who had been part of a leadership which in fact actively held them back from this achievement while using money that is supposed to be invested in the country's footballing activities to fиck hookers, and now basking in the glory of a World Cup victory. In that context, I don't see it as an act of violence (as someone apparently described it) but I don't think it's like Blanc and Barthez, a consensual act of respect and affection between two friends and equals. I think it's a rather aggressive expression of power.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely this.
Anyone thinking he was just caught up in the moment, or that it was an act of affection, is being very naive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They're not naive they're plain stoopid. Always on that side of debates. Have a look around and it's mostly just the stoopid ones. It would still be wrong anyway even if it was an innocent act.
comment by user number one (U23061)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 58 seconds ago
A man does that and what some people are more alarmed about is the reaction to it. Not the man behaving like a nonce.
Apparently for the grievous sin of calling it sexual violence. I mean, perhaps it's a misdemeanour to mislabel it sexual violence, and the internet is full of children and stoopid people, but how can that even come close to comparing to the felony of what this nonce did? It's a topic for psychological analysts why people use a reaction to a wrongful act to deflect from the actual wrongful act and even worse what motivates an uninvolved observer to do that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I beg you shut up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Go to hell.
comment by user number one (U23061)
posted 16 minutes ago
No it wouldn't
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it would.
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by user number one (U23061)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 58 seconds ago
A man does that and what some people are more alarmed about is the reaction to it. Not the man behaving like a nonce.
Apparently for the grievous sin of calling it sexual violence. I mean, perhaps it's a misdemeanour to mislabel it sexual violence, and the internet is full of children and stoopid people, but how can that even come close to comparing to the felony of what this nonce did? It's a topic for psychological analysts why people use a reaction to a wrongful act to deflect from the actual wrongful act and even worse what motivates an uninvolved observer to do that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I beg you shut up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Go to hell.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop talking utter rot.
a topic for psychological analysts why people use a reaction to a wrongful act to deflect from the actual wrongful act and even worse what motivates an uninvolved observer to do that.
_______
Oh and to answer this because we think its so infinitesimall it's ridiculous to make an issue of it and the people doing so are idiots.
it does tend to be the clearly more stupid people who call out the clearly more cleverer people for being either 'woke' or 'snowflake' or 'looney left' or 'political correctness gone mad' when all they do is calmly identify the bleedin obvious. The same type of people who tend to say about educated people that 'they may have a University Degree but have no common sense at all'. Think we all know that person.
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 35 seconds ago
it does tend to be the clearly more stupid people who call out the clearly more cleverer people for being either 'woke' or 'snowflake' or 'looney left' or 'political correctness gone mad' when all they do is calmly identify the bleedin obvious. The same type of people who tend to say about educated people that 'they may have a University Degree but have no common sense at all'. Think we all know that person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rachel Riley, like yourself, is an idiot.
Further more to your point, woke people are the complete opposite of intelligent and generally that's why they are roundly mocked by, well, just about everyone.
comment by user number one (U23061)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 35 seconds ago
it does tend to be the clearly more stupid people who call out the clearly more cleverer people for being either 'woke' or 'snowflake' or 'looney left' or 'political correctness gone mad' when all they do is calmly identify the bleedin obvious. The same type of people who tend to say about educated people that 'they may have a University Degree but have no common sense at all'. Think we all know that person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rachel Riley, like yourself, is an idiot.
Further more to your point, woke people are the complete opposite of intelligent and generally that's why they are roundly mocked by, well, just about everyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
QED.
Calling Rachel Riley an idiot. You could call her lots of things (I am sure you probably do with your mates) but she is clearly not an idiot. She is a very successful and intelligent woman. Which is probably what triggers you.
I didn't know any of his history when posting it. I saw the photo of it at the time, then yesterday in the Guardians satirical football column all the people wanting him to go.
So I thought I'd do a little post mentioning tongues, just to make you smile.
Personal opinion, if it's ok with her he should have a friendly warning.
If it's ok with her he should be made to 'resign'
This isn't about being 'woke' though.
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 8 minutes ago
it does tend to be the clearly more stupid people who call out the clearly more cleverer people
----------------------------------------------------------------------
i love the smell of irony in the morning
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 8 minutes ago
it does tend to be the clearly more stupid people who call out the clearly more cleverer people
----------------------------------------------------------------------
i love the smell of irony in the morning
----------------------------------------------------------------------
should that be ironing, in this case?
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by user number one (U23061)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 35 seconds ago
it does tend to be the clearly more stupid people who call out the clearly more cleverer people for being either 'woke' or 'snowflake' or 'looney left' or 'political correctness gone mad' when all they do is calmly identify the bleedin obvious. The same type of people who tend to say about educated people that 'they may have a University Degree but have no common sense at all'. Think we all know that person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rachel Riley, like yourself, is an idiot.
Further more to your point, woke people are the complete opposite of intelligent and generally that's why they are roundly mocked by, well, just about everyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
QED.
Calling Rachel Riley an idiot. You could call her lots of things (I am sure you probably do with your mates) but she is clearly not an idiot. She is a very successful and intelligent woman. Which is probably what triggers you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She is a presenter on countdown and has a decking maths degree 😂😂. If that's your bar for success then LOL. She is an idiot regardless.
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 21 seconds ago
I didn't know any of his history when posting it. I saw the photo of it at the time, then yesterday in the Guardians satirical football column all the people wanting him to go.
So I thought I'd do a little post mentioning tongues, just to make you smile.
Personal opinion, if it's ok with her he should have a friendly warning.
If it's ok with her he should be made to 'resign'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not*
comment by Lexington 125.2 (U8879)
posted 2 minutes ago
This isn't about being 'woke' though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Au contraire Mon frere, it most certainly is.
comment by user number one (U23061)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by user number one (U23061)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 35 seconds ago
it does tend to be the clearly more stupid people who call out the clearly more cleverer people for being either 'woke' or 'snowflake' or 'looney left' or 'political correctness gone mad' when all they do is calmly identify the bleedin obvious. The same type of people who tend to say about educated people that 'they may have a University Degree but have no common sense at all'. Think we all know that person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rachel Riley, like yourself, is an idiot.
Further more to your point, woke people are the complete opposite of intelligent and generally that's why they are roundly mocked by, well, just about everyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
QED.
Calling Rachel Riley an idiot. You could call her lots of things (I am sure you probably do with your mates) but she is clearly not an idiot. She is a very successful and intelligent woman. Which is probably what triggers you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She is a presenter on countdown and has a decking maths degree 😂😂. If that's your bar for success then LOL. She is an idiot regardless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would say it's exactly what you regard as success. Shes has fame, wealth, and influence. Which is why you are specifically talking about her.
So, thinking someone shouldn't assume another person (whatever gender) should be comfortable having them impose themselves on them in a physical manner is being woke?
Hmm... that says more about you than anything tbh.
Mon frère.
She's not wealthy, wealth is different to being well off.
Fame - countdown lol.
And her influence got her rightfully abused when she decided to open her trap at the last general election. Woman's a buffoon.
pc gone mad my kid is 7 and has a teacher that kisses her on the lips every day at the school gates when he says bye to her every day he does it with all the other kids as well not the boys because he isnt a pooof but its just the way he shows he cares about the kids this is all a load of pc nonce sense
Sign in if you want to comment
That kiss
Page 3 of 11
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 25/8/23
Well the equivalent would be my female boss doing that, and honestly I don't think if the circumstances were similar, IE something similar to the world cup I would mind and If I did mind I'm sure I'd get over it in 6.7 seconds because I'm an adult and understand that in the grand scheme of things, it's not a big deal.
posted on 25/8/23
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 8 hours, 14 minutes ago
He's also under investigation on a couple of corruption charges: one regarding the use of FA funds to pay for an ordgy with prozzies for him and his team of advisors, and the other over the payment of commissions related to the sale of the rights to the Spanish Supercup to KSA. He is also alleged to have recorded conversations with members of the government and rivals in the world of football, and his behaviour during the World Cup final isn't the first time he's landed himself in hot water over his treatment of women. It was on his orders that the letters of complaint from the 15 players in the women's NT were leaked to the press. Earlier this year he refused to hand the players their medals after the women's Supercup game, having them set out on a table instead for the players to collect them themselves. Less than three years ago he also advised against the creation of a professional women's league.
He's an ugly piece of work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A very useful post. Context is everything, and a kiss can mean very different things in different contexts. Blanc kissing Barthez on his bald head was fine because they were friends and equals and it was a ritual they had for years.
The situation around the Spanish women's team is that (apparently a bit of a recurring theme that football administrators are useless dinosaurs) for some years they felt aggrieved by the lack of respect and professionalism with which the Spanish FA treated them. Itsonlyagame mentioned the corruption case involving use of prostitutes and forcing female players to go and collect their medals from a table rather than having a standard presentation (remember, this in a country where women's football is actually attracting large crowds, filling the Nou Camp for certain matches). In addition, they appointed a useless manager through nepotism to lead the women's national side. Basically the equivalent of our FA appointing Phil Neville. The women complained about the substandard coaching and training. Several of them withdrew from the national side in protest. The Spanish FA did sweet FA: they stood by their mediocre dude. That situation continued to simmer throughout the World Cup, and from what I've read, the players won the competition despite rather than thanks to him - a situation made possible by the fact that the majority of the players are also together at Barcelona, the best club side in the world. You might have noticed in photos that when the final whistle blew, the players and coaches celebrated separately, in different halves of the pitch.
So that seems to me the context in which we should view the kiss. A man who has consistently disrespected the women who had reached the pinnacle of sporting achievement, who had been part of a leadership which in fact actively held them back from this achievement while using money that is supposed to be invested in the country's footballing activities to fиck hookers, and now basking in the glory of a World Cup victory. In that context, I don't see it as an act of violence (as someone apparently described it) but I don't think it's like Blanc and Barthez, a consensual act of respect and affection between two friends and equals. I think it's a rather aggressive expression of power.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely this.
Anyone thinking he was just caught up in the moment, or that it was an act of affection, is being very naive.
posted on 25/8/23
A man does that and what some people are more alarmed about is the reaction to it. Not the man behaving like a nonce.
Apparently for the grievous sin of calling it sexual violence. I mean, perhaps it's a misdemeanour to mislabel it sexual violence, and the internet is full of children and stoopid people, but how can that even come close to comparing to the felony of what this nonce did? It's a topic for psychological analysts why people use a reaction to a wrongful act to deflect from the actual wrongful act and even worse what motivates an uninvolved observer to do that.
posted on 25/8/23
I don't think there was anything sinister in the kiss.
The bloke was overcome with joy having just seen his nation lift the World Cup, it's not not like he cornered her in a gloomy corridor in an office block.
I can understand her not particularly liking the incident, especially having being kicked, shoved, kneed and possibly punched during the previous 90 minutes but the reaction has been way over the top.
posted on 25/8/23
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 58 seconds ago
A man does that and what some people are more alarmed about is the reaction to it. Not the man behaving like a nonce.
Apparently for the grievous sin of calling it sexual violence. I mean, perhaps it's a misdemeanour to mislabel it sexual violence, and the internet is full of children and stoopid people, but how can that even come close to comparing to the felony of what this nonce did? It's a topic for psychological analysts why people use a reaction to a wrongful act to deflect from the actual wrongful act and even worse what motivates an uninvolved observer to do that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I beg you shut up.
posted on 25/8/23
comment by Lexington 125.2 (U8879)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 8 hours, 14 minutes ago
He's also under investigation on a couple of corruption charges: one regarding the use of FA funds to pay for an ordgy with prozzies for him and his team of advisors, and the other over the payment of commissions related to the sale of the rights to the Spanish Supercup to KSA. He is also alleged to have recorded conversations with members of the government and rivals in the world of football, and his behaviour during the World Cup final isn't the first time he's landed himself in hot water over his treatment of women. It was on his orders that the letters of complaint from the 15 players in the women's NT were leaked to the press. Earlier this year he refused to hand the players their medals after the women's Supercup game, having them set out on a table instead for the players to collect them themselves. Less than three years ago he also advised against the creation of a professional women's league.
He's an ugly piece of work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A very useful post. Context is everything, and a kiss can mean very different things in different contexts. Blanc kissing Barthez on his bald head was fine because they were friends and equals and it was a ritual they had for years.
The situation around the Spanish women's team is that (apparently a bit of a recurring theme that football administrators are useless dinosaurs) for some years they felt aggrieved by the lack of respect and professionalism with which the Spanish FA treated them. Itsonlyagame mentioned the corruption case involving use of prostitutes and forcing female players to go and collect their medals from a table rather than having a standard presentation (remember, this in a country where women's football is actually attracting large crowds, filling the Nou Camp for certain matches). In addition, they appointed a useless manager through nepotism to lead the women's national side. Basically the equivalent of our FA appointing Phil Neville. The women complained about the substandard coaching and training. Several of them withdrew from the national side in protest. The Spanish FA did sweet FA: they stood by their mediocre dude. That situation continued to simmer throughout the World Cup, and from what I've read, the players won the competition despite rather than thanks to him - a situation made possible by the fact that the majority of the players are also together at Barcelona, the best club side in the world. You might have noticed in photos that when the final whistle blew, the players and coaches celebrated separately, in different halves of the pitch.
So that seems to me the context in which we should view the kiss. A man who has consistently disrespected the women who had reached the pinnacle of sporting achievement, who had been part of a leadership which in fact actively held them back from this achievement while using money that is supposed to be invested in the country's footballing activities to fиck hookers, and now basking in the glory of a World Cup victory. In that context, I don't see it as an act of violence (as someone apparently described it) but I don't think it's like Blanc and Barthez, a consensual act of respect and affection between two friends and equals. I think it's a rather aggressive expression of power.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely this.
Anyone thinking he was just caught up in the moment, or that it was an act of affection, is being very naive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They're not naive they're plain stoopid. Always on that side of debates. Have a look around and it's mostly just the stoopid ones. It would still be wrong anyway even if it was an innocent act.
posted on 25/8/23
No it wouldn't
posted on 25/8/23
comment by user number one (U23061)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 58 seconds ago
A man does that and what some people are more alarmed about is the reaction to it. Not the man behaving like a nonce.
Apparently for the grievous sin of calling it sexual violence. I mean, perhaps it's a misdemeanour to mislabel it sexual violence, and the internet is full of children and stoopid people, but how can that even come close to comparing to the felony of what this nonce did? It's a topic for psychological analysts why people use a reaction to a wrongful act to deflect from the actual wrongful act and even worse what motivates an uninvolved observer to do that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I beg you shut up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Go to hell.
posted on 25/8/23
comment by user number one (U23061)
posted 16 minutes ago
No it wouldn't
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it would.
posted on 25/8/23
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by user number one (U23061)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 58 seconds ago
A man does that and what some people are more alarmed about is the reaction to it. Not the man behaving like a nonce.
Apparently for the grievous sin of calling it sexual violence. I mean, perhaps it's a misdemeanour to mislabel it sexual violence, and the internet is full of children and stoopid people, but how can that even come close to comparing to the felony of what this nonce did? It's a topic for psychological analysts why people use a reaction to a wrongful act to deflect from the actual wrongful act and even worse what motivates an uninvolved observer to do that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I beg you shut up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Go to hell.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop talking utter rot.
posted on 25/8/23
a topic for psychological analysts why people use a reaction to a wrongful act to deflect from the actual wrongful act and even worse what motivates an uninvolved observer to do that.
_______
Oh and to answer this because we think its so infinitesimall it's ridiculous to make an issue of it and the people doing so are idiots.
posted on 25/8/23
it does tend to be the clearly more stupid people who call out the clearly more cleverer people for being either 'woke' or 'snowflake' or 'looney left' or 'political correctness gone mad' when all they do is calmly identify the bleedin obvious. The same type of people who tend to say about educated people that 'they may have a University Degree but have no common sense at all'. Think we all know that person.
posted on 25/8/23
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 35 seconds ago
it does tend to be the clearly more stupid people who call out the clearly more cleverer people for being either 'woke' or 'snowflake' or 'looney left' or 'political correctness gone mad' when all they do is calmly identify the bleedin obvious. The same type of people who tend to say about educated people that 'they may have a University Degree but have no common sense at all'. Think we all know that person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rachel Riley, like yourself, is an idiot.
Further more to your point, woke people are the complete opposite of intelligent and generally that's why they are roundly mocked by, well, just about everyone.
posted on 25/8/23
comment by user number one (U23061)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 35 seconds ago
it does tend to be the clearly more stupid people who call out the clearly more cleverer people for being either 'woke' or 'snowflake' or 'looney left' or 'political correctness gone mad' when all they do is calmly identify the bleedin obvious. The same type of people who tend to say about educated people that 'they may have a University Degree but have no common sense at all'. Think we all know that person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rachel Riley, like yourself, is an idiot.
Further more to your point, woke people are the complete opposite of intelligent and generally that's why they are roundly mocked by, well, just about everyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
QED.
Calling Rachel Riley an idiot. You could call her lots of things (I am sure you probably do with your mates) but she is clearly not an idiot. She is a very successful and intelligent woman. Which is probably what triggers you.
posted on 25/8/23
I didn't know any of his history when posting it. I saw the photo of it at the time, then yesterday in the Guardians satirical football column all the people wanting him to go.
So I thought I'd do a little post mentioning tongues, just to make you smile.
Personal opinion, if it's ok with her he should have a friendly warning.
If it's ok with her he should be made to 'resign'
posted on 25/8/23
This isn't about being 'woke' though.
posted on 25/8/23
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 8 minutes ago
it does tend to be the clearly more stupid people who call out the clearly more cleverer people
----------------------------------------------------------------------
i love the smell of irony in the morning
posted on 25/8/23
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 8 minutes ago
it does tend to be the clearly more stupid people who call out the clearly more cleverer people
----------------------------------------------------------------------
i love the smell of irony in the morning
----------------------------------------------------------------------
should that be ironing, in this case?
posted on 25/8/23
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by user number one (U23061)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 35 seconds ago
it does tend to be the clearly more stupid people who call out the clearly more cleverer people for being either 'woke' or 'snowflake' or 'looney left' or 'political correctness gone mad' when all they do is calmly identify the bleedin obvious. The same type of people who tend to say about educated people that 'they may have a University Degree but have no common sense at all'. Think we all know that person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rachel Riley, like yourself, is an idiot.
Further more to your point, woke people are the complete opposite of intelligent and generally that's why they are roundly mocked by, well, just about everyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
QED.
Calling Rachel Riley an idiot. You could call her lots of things (I am sure you probably do with your mates) but she is clearly not an idiot. She is a very successful and intelligent woman. Which is probably what triggers you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She is a presenter on countdown and has a decking maths degree 😂😂. If that's your bar for success then LOL. She is an idiot regardless.
posted on 25/8/23
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 21 seconds ago
I didn't know any of his history when posting it. I saw the photo of it at the time, then yesterday in the Guardians satirical football column all the people wanting him to go.
So I thought I'd do a little post mentioning tongues, just to make you smile.
Personal opinion, if it's ok with her he should have a friendly warning.
If it's ok with her he should be made to 'resign'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not*
posted on 25/8/23
comment by Lexington 125.2 (U8879)
posted 2 minutes ago
This isn't about being 'woke' though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Au contraire Mon frere, it most certainly is.
posted on 25/8/23
comment by user number one (U23061)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by user number one (U23061)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 35 seconds ago
it does tend to be the clearly more stupid people who call out the clearly more cleverer people for being either 'woke' or 'snowflake' or 'looney left' or 'political correctness gone mad' when all they do is calmly identify the bleedin obvious. The same type of people who tend to say about educated people that 'they may have a University Degree but have no common sense at all'. Think we all know that person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rachel Riley, like yourself, is an idiot.
Further more to your point, woke people are the complete opposite of intelligent and generally that's why they are roundly mocked by, well, just about everyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
QED.
Calling Rachel Riley an idiot. You could call her lots of things (I am sure you probably do with your mates) but she is clearly not an idiot. She is a very successful and intelligent woman. Which is probably what triggers you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She is a presenter on countdown and has a decking maths degree 😂😂. If that's your bar for success then LOL. She is an idiot regardless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would say it's exactly what you regard as success. Shes has fame, wealth, and influence. Which is why you are specifically talking about her.
posted on 25/8/23
So, thinking someone shouldn't assume another person (whatever gender) should be comfortable having them impose themselves on them in a physical manner is being woke?
Hmm... that says more about you than anything tbh.
Mon frère.
posted on 25/8/23
She's not wealthy, wealth is different to being well off.
Fame - countdown lol.
And her influence got her rightfully abused when she decided to open her trap at the last general election. Woman's a buffoon.
posted on 25/8/23
pc gone mad my kid is 7 and has a teacher that kisses her on the lips every day at the school gates when he says bye to her every day he does it with all the other kids as well not the boys because he isnt a pooof but its just the way he shows he cares about the kids this is all a load of pc nonce sense
Page 3 of 11
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10