The sub committee couldn't agree a minimum number. But it would be hilarious if they said at least 1. It's ridiculous they couldn't even offer that
comment by Mummy's Hairy Growler (U10045)
posted 1 minute ago
The sub committee couldn't agree a minimum number. But it would be hilarious if they said at least 1. It's ridiculous they couldn't even offer that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
tbf its the usual SPFL idiots... why create a rule stating that there needs to be a reasonable amount of away fans allocated tickets but then not create a rule dictating what a reasonable amount is !
We have been told by the SPFL that the amount we are offering is reasonable.
Celtic said after a game in Ibrox their fans got hit by missiles. They don't want to accept the 800 allocation so have said their are safety concerns. It wouldn't take a genius to come up with a list of concerns for an old firm game and provide evidence where either sets of fans have done something in previous games.
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Mummy's Hairy Growler (U10045)
posted 1 minute ago
The sub committee couldn't agree a minimum number. But it would be hilarious if they said at least 1. It's ridiculous they couldn't even offer that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
tbf its the usual SPFL idiots... why create a rule stating that there needs to be a reasonable amount of away fans allocated tickets but then not create a rule dictating what a reasonable amount is !
We have been told by the SPFL that the amount we are offering is reasonable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If Celtic can't protect 800 then a number like a dozen should have at least been offered because it otherwise disputes the original concerns
Celtic obviously can't safety dance
comment by Mummy's Hairy Growler (U10045)
posted 1 minute ago
Celtic said after a game in Ibrox their fans got hit by missiles. They don't want to accept the 800 allocation so have said their are safety concerns. It wouldn't take a genius to come up with a list of concerns for an old firm game and provide evidence where either sets of fans have done something in previous games.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yup I kinda knew that was the reason, but not actually confirmed.
Since that complaint we have installed nets to protect the away fans in that corner to stop this from happening. thats why the they wont confirm it as the reason , thats why they are not emphasising its the "safety" issue any more.
we covered the corner making it safe and then suddenly the narrative became its not enough we want more.
the 800 fans in that corner covered by the nets is far safer than having 8000 fans not covered by nets ......
its all bull$hit. Celtic are refusing to agree with our demands that are perfectly legitimate, they adhere to the rules, been approved by the SPFL.
Celtic dont want to be seen as "agreeing" with us after we initially took the huff. Both teams are acting like weans... us initially and now celtic are doing so currently.
We are trying to resolve it now.
Have Rangers simply tried apologizing for their initial vvankery?
That might work wonders.
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 57 seconds ago
Have Rangers simply tried apologizing for their initial vvankery?
That might work wonders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What the did worked though. After Gerrard won the league it should have been put back to the way it was
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Mummy's Hairy Growler (U10045)
posted 1 minute ago
Celtic said after a game in Ibrox their fans got hit by missiles. They don't want to accept the 800 allocation so have said their are safety concerns. It wouldn't take a genius to come up with a list of concerns for an old firm game and provide evidence where either sets of fans have done something in previous games.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yup I kinda knew that was the reason, but not actually confirmed.
Since that complaint we have installed nets to protect the away fans in that corner to stop this from happening. thats why the they wont confirm it as the reason , thats why they are not emphasising its the "safety" issue any more.
we covered the corner making it safe and then suddenly the narrative became its not enough we want more.
the 800 fans in that corner covered by the nets is far safer than having 8000 fans not covered by nets ......
its all bull$hit. Celtic are refusing to agree with our demands that are perfectly legitimate, they adhere to the rules, been approved by the SPFL.
Celtic dont want to be seen as "agreeing" with us after we initially took the huff. Both teams are acting like weans... us initially and now celtic are doing so currently.
We are trying to resolve it now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As I said, there are a number of reasons you could say and evidence it. Rightly or not. A real flex of strength would have been increasing the allocation to show the club was back. Celtic will be feeling like their pants have been pulled down because of this and are now demonstrating they have the power to now allow no away fans at Parkhead.
There's nothing better than beating Celtic at Ibrox with 8000 of their fans there and I'm sure it's the same for them.
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 10 minutes ago
Have Rangers simply tried apologizing for their initial vvankery?
That might work wonders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how does an apology make it safer?
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 10 minutes ago
Have Rangers simply tried apologizing for their initial vvankery?
That might work wonders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how does an apology make it safer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The same way you apologise to the misses for something. It keeps the peace and means you get to plough them
comment by Mummy's Hairy Growler (U10045)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 10 minutes ago
Have Rangers simply tried apologizing for their initial vvankery?
That might work wonders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how does an apology make it safer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The same way you apologise to the misses for something. It keeps the peace and means you get to plough them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well if Celtic agree to let us pump them at the weekend I will give the any apology they want !!
I don't want us to let them pump them. Just the opportunity to.
The graft makes it enjoyable
comment by Mummy's Hairy Growler (U10045)
posted 3 minutes ago
I don't want us to let them pump them. Just the opportunity to.
The graft makes it enjoyable
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The last time I did something to her without asking first she threatened to chop it off
If Rangers refuse to offer Celtic an allocation for Ibrox for the next old firm, I won't be happy with the club at all
If they offer the same 800, I'll understand it
Would be delighted if they offer more
About time one of them put Thier big girls pants on and brought an end to this $hite....hence why I'm giving Celtic pelters on this occasion for being petty bastirts
I'm not buying this security concerns $hite for one second...it's t!t for tat bull$hit and it needs to stop
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
If Rangers refuse to offer Celtic an allocation for Ibrox for the next old firm, I won't be happy with the club at all
If they offer the same 800, I'll understand it
Would be delighted if they offer more
About time one of them put Thier big girls pants on and brought an end to this $hite....hence why I'm giving Celtic pelters on this occasion for being petty bastirts
I'm not buying this security concerns $hite for one second...it's t!t for tat bull$hit and it needs to stop
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just ignoring the fact penning Celtic fans into a corner surrounded from both sides and above getting pelted by anything and everything
Fingers in ears la la la la la la la la la
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
If Rangers refuse to offer Celtic an allocation for Ibrox for the next old firm, I won't be happy with the club at all
If they offer the same 800, I'll understand it
Would be delighted if they offer more
About time one of them put Thier big girls pants on and brought an end to this $hite....hence why I'm giving Celtic pelters on this occasion for being petty bastirts
I'm not buying this security concerns $hite for one second...it's t!t for tat bull$hit and it needs to stop
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just ignoring the fact penning Celtic fans into a corner surrounded from both sides and above getting pelted by anything and everything
Fingers in ears la la la la la la la la la
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ignoring that we already addressed that and have installed nets to stop this.
why is this never an issue at other grounds, fans throwing stuff isnt exclusive to the old firm.
fingers in ears lalalalalalalalalalala
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
If Rangers refuse to offer Celtic an allocation for Ibrox for the next old firm, I won't be happy with the club at all
If they offer the same 800, I'll understand it
Would be delighted if they offer more
About time one of them put Thier big girls pants on and brought an end to this $hite....hence why I'm giving Celtic pelters on this occasion for being petty bastirts
I'm not buying this security concerns $hite for one second...it's t!t for tat bull$hit and it needs to stop
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just ignoring the fact penning Celtic fans into a corner surrounded from both sides and above getting pelted by anything and everything
Fingers in ears la la la la la la la la la
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rangers fans also faced the same at parkhead. It doesn't make it OK though. Perhaps the police should actually police the fans.
https://youtu.be/vbz8tWSDT9U?si=-JolLXJ1g0K3DxZU
Throwing stuff, flares, offensive singing can be found at every old firm game. It would be better if both clubs agreed that safety in numbers actually protects the fans.
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
If Rangers refuse to offer Celtic an allocation for Ibrox for the next old firm, I won't be happy with the club at all
If they offer the same 800, I'll understand it
Would be delighted if they offer more
About time one of them put Thier big girls pants on and brought an end to this $hite....hence why I'm giving Celtic pelters on this occasion for being petty bastirts
I'm not buying this security concerns $hite for one second...it's t!t for tat bull$hit and it needs to stop
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just ignoring the fact penning Celtic fans into a corner surrounded from both sides and above getting pelted by anything and everything
Fingers in ears la la la la la la la la la
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ignoring that we already addressed that and have installed nets to stop this.
why is this never an issue at other grounds, fans throwing stuff isnt exclusive to the old firm.
fingers in ears lalalalalalalalalalala
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nets installed to prevent broken glass being thrown into the 18 yard area?
Has Rangers' position from the start changed? All seem to agree they were d!cks to start this. Think you will find their position is still the same, ergo still d!cks.
I've made my position clear from the start, both clubs behaving like school kids. If I remember correctly, Celtic asked Rangers in the close season for an increased allocation and Rangers rejected it.
Now we have the situation that if one club relents, the Neanderthals in their support will go ape sh!t. Think it was Ginger who said, they need to sit down and talk behind closed doors, resolve this.
Then make a joint statement.
Fat chance, probably, but ridiculous that adults in their position are behaving like this
comment by Mummy's Hairy Growler (U10045)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
If Rangers refuse to offer Celtic an allocation for Ibrox for the next old firm, I won't be happy with the club at all
If they offer the same 800, I'll understand it
Would be delighted if they offer more
About time one of them put Thier big girls pants on and brought an end to this $hite....hence why I'm giving Celtic pelters on this occasion for being petty bastirts
I'm not buying this security concerns $hite for one second...it's t!t for tat bull$hit and it needs to stop
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just ignoring the fact penning Celtic fans into a corner surrounded from both sides and above getting pelted by anything and everything
Fingers in ears la la la la la la la la la
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rangers fans also faced the same at parkhead. It doesn't make it OK though. Perhaps the police should actually police the fans.
https://youtu.be/vbz8tWSDT9U?si=-JolLXJ1g0K3DxZU
----------------------------------------------------------------------
think this just proves that Celtic fans are p00fy wee $hitebags.
"we dont feel safe"
The reality is we are the only club in the country that has went out their way to alleviate Celtics "safety concerns".
there is a reason they aint peddling the safety issue anymore.
comment by Mummy's Hairy Growler (U10045)
Perhaps the police should actually police the fans.
Good one mate 🤣. If only
Pay us please and let us go home
comment by Why the pallaver, aka Count Binface (a little more apathetic) (U10168)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
If Rangers refuse to offer Celtic an allocation for Ibrox for the next old firm, I won't be happy with the club at all
If they offer the same 800, I'll understand it
Would be delighted if they offer more
About time one of them put Thier big girls pants on and brought an end to this $hite....hence why I'm giving Celtic pelters on this occasion for being petty bastirts
I'm not buying this security concerns $hite for one second...it's t!t for tat bull$hit and it needs to stop
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just ignoring the fact penning Celtic fans into a corner surrounded from both sides and above getting pelted by anything and everything
Fingers in ears la la la la la la la la la
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ignoring that we already addressed that and have installed nets to stop this.
why is this never an issue at other grounds, fans throwing stuff isnt exclusive to the old firm.
fingers in ears lalalalalalalalalalala
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nets installed to prevent broken glass being thrown into the 18 yard area?
Has Rangers' position from the start changed? All seem to agree they were d!cks to start this. Think you will find their position is still the same, ergo still d!cks.
I've made my position clear from the start, both clubs behaving like school kids. If I remember correctly, Celtic asked Rangers in the close season for an increased allocation and Rangers rejected it.
Now we have the situation that if one club relents, the Neanderthals in their support will go ape sh!t. Think it was Ginger who said, they need to sit down and talk behind closed doors, resolve this.
Then make a joint statement.
Fat chance, probably, but ridiculous that adults in their position are behaving like this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then dont go to any away game as this is the kind of thing that has been seen at all grounds in the top flight.
yes we changed our position to offer you seats in the corner just like every other team in the country gets and installed nets that will catch objects thrown ... iv never seen anyone smash a bottle or glass first then throw it.
your changing your argument its not about the pitch its about the fans hence why the argument is about how many fans????!!!!
also how is it safer to have 8000 fans with no nets and well within throwing distance than to have 800 fans covered by nets and also within throwing distance??
end of the day we are offering what you are entitled to, the rules are there, the SPFL have confirmed we are being reasonable in our allocation and celtic are not.
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by Why the pallaver, aka Count Binface (a little more apathetic) (U10168)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
If Rangers refuse to offer Celtic an allocation for Ibrox for the next old firm, I won't be happy with the club at all
If they offer the same 800, I'll understand it
Would be delighted if they offer more
About time one of them put Thier big girls pants on and brought an end to this $hite....hence why I'm giving Celtic pelters on this occasion for being petty bastirts
I'm not buying this security concerns $hite for one second...it's t!t for tat bull$hit and it needs to stop
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just ignoring the fact penning Celtic fans into a corner surrounded from both sides and above getting pelted by anything and everything
Fingers in ears la la la la la la la la la
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ignoring that we already addressed that and have installed nets to stop this.
why is this never an issue at other grounds, fans throwing stuff isnt exclusive to the old firm.
fingers in ears lalalalalalalalalalala
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nets installed to prevent broken glass being thrown into the 18 yard area?
Has Rangers' position from the start changed? All seem to agree they were d!cks to start this. Think you will find their position is still the same, ergo still d!cks.
I've made my position clear from the start, both clubs behaving like school kids. If I remember correctly, Celtic asked Rangers in the close season for an increased allocation and Rangers rejected it.
Now we have the situation that if one club relents, the Neanderthals in their support will go ape sh!t. Think it was Ginger who said, they need to sit down and talk behind closed doors, resolve this.
Then make a joint statement.
Fat chance, probably, but ridiculous that adults in their position are behaving like this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then dont go to any away game as this is the kind of thing that has been seen at all grounds in the top flight.
yes we changed our position to offer you seats in the corner just like every other team in the country gets and installed nets that will catch objects thrown ... iv never seen anyone smash a bottle or glass first then throw it.
your changing your argument its not about the pitch its about the fans hence why the argument is about how many fans????!!!!
also how is it safer to have 8000 fans with no nets and well within throwing distance than to have 800 fans covered by nets and also within throwing distance??
end of the day we are offering what you are entitled to, the rules are there, the SPFL have confirmed we are being reasonable in our allocation and celtic are not.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it keeps you happy.
Home games would be an away game for me
Sign in if you want to comment
Auld Firm Build Up
Page 5 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9
posted on 28/12/23
The sub committee couldn't agree a minimum number. But it would be hilarious if they said at least 1. It's ridiculous they couldn't even offer that
posted on 28/12/23
comment by Mummy's Hairy Growler (U10045)
posted 1 minute ago
The sub committee couldn't agree a minimum number. But it would be hilarious if they said at least 1. It's ridiculous they couldn't even offer that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
tbf its the usual SPFL idiots... why create a rule stating that there needs to be a reasonable amount of away fans allocated tickets but then not create a rule dictating what a reasonable amount is !
We have been told by the SPFL that the amount we are offering is reasonable.
posted on 28/12/23
Celtic said after a game in Ibrox their fans got hit by missiles. They don't want to accept the 800 allocation so have said their are safety concerns. It wouldn't take a genius to come up with a list of concerns for an old firm game and provide evidence where either sets of fans have done something in previous games.
posted on 28/12/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Mummy's Hairy Growler (U10045)
posted 1 minute ago
The sub committee couldn't agree a minimum number. But it would be hilarious if they said at least 1. It's ridiculous they couldn't even offer that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
tbf its the usual SPFL idiots... why create a rule stating that there needs to be a reasonable amount of away fans allocated tickets but then not create a rule dictating what a reasonable amount is !
We have been told by the SPFL that the amount we are offering is reasonable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If Celtic can't protect 800 then a number like a dozen should have at least been offered because it otherwise disputes the original concerns
posted on 28/12/23
Celtic obviously can't safety dance
posted on 28/12/23
comment by Mummy's Hairy Growler (U10045)
posted 1 minute ago
Celtic said after a game in Ibrox their fans got hit by missiles. They don't want to accept the 800 allocation so have said their are safety concerns. It wouldn't take a genius to come up with a list of concerns for an old firm game and provide evidence where either sets of fans have done something in previous games.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yup I kinda knew that was the reason, but not actually confirmed.
Since that complaint we have installed nets to protect the away fans in that corner to stop this from happening. thats why the they wont confirm it as the reason , thats why they are not emphasising its the "safety" issue any more.
we covered the corner making it safe and then suddenly the narrative became its not enough we want more.
the 800 fans in that corner covered by the nets is far safer than having 8000 fans not covered by nets ......
its all bull$hit. Celtic are refusing to agree with our demands that are perfectly legitimate, they adhere to the rules, been approved by the SPFL.
Celtic dont want to be seen as "agreeing" with us after we initially took the huff. Both teams are acting like weans... us initially and now celtic are doing so currently.
We are trying to resolve it now.
posted on 28/12/23
Have Rangers simply tried apologizing for their initial vvankery?
That might work wonders.
posted on 28/12/23
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 57 seconds ago
Have Rangers simply tried apologizing for their initial vvankery?
That might work wonders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What the did worked though. After Gerrard won the league it should have been put back to the way it was
posted on 28/12/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Mummy's Hairy Growler (U10045)
posted 1 minute ago
Celtic said after a game in Ibrox their fans got hit by missiles. They don't want to accept the 800 allocation so have said their are safety concerns. It wouldn't take a genius to come up with a list of concerns for an old firm game and provide evidence where either sets of fans have done something in previous games.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yup I kinda knew that was the reason, but not actually confirmed.
Since that complaint we have installed nets to protect the away fans in that corner to stop this from happening. thats why the they wont confirm it as the reason , thats why they are not emphasising its the "safety" issue any more.
we covered the corner making it safe and then suddenly the narrative became its not enough we want more.
the 800 fans in that corner covered by the nets is far safer than having 8000 fans not covered by nets ......
its all bull$hit. Celtic are refusing to agree with our demands that are perfectly legitimate, they adhere to the rules, been approved by the SPFL.
Celtic dont want to be seen as "agreeing" with us after we initially took the huff. Both teams are acting like weans... us initially and now celtic are doing so currently.
We are trying to resolve it now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As I said, there are a number of reasons you could say and evidence it. Rightly or not. A real flex of strength would have been increasing the allocation to show the club was back. Celtic will be feeling like their pants have been pulled down because of this and are now demonstrating they have the power to now allow no away fans at Parkhead.
posted on 28/12/23
There's nothing better than beating Celtic at Ibrox with 8000 of their fans there and I'm sure it's the same for them.
posted on 28/12/23
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 10 minutes ago
Have Rangers simply tried apologizing for their initial vvankery?
That might work wonders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how does an apology make it safer?
posted on 28/12/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 10 minutes ago
Have Rangers simply tried apologizing for their initial vvankery?
That might work wonders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how does an apology make it safer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The same way you apologise to the misses for something. It keeps the peace and means you get to plough them
posted on 28/12/23
comment by Mummy's Hairy Growler (U10045)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 10 minutes ago
Have Rangers simply tried apologizing for their initial vvankery?
That might work wonders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how does an apology make it safer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The same way you apologise to the misses for something. It keeps the peace and means you get to plough them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well if Celtic agree to let us pump them at the weekend I will give the any apology they want !!
posted on 28/12/23
I don't want us to let them pump them. Just the opportunity to.
The graft makes it enjoyable
posted on 28/12/23
comment by Mummy's Hairy Growler (U10045)
posted 3 minutes ago
I don't want us to let them pump them. Just the opportunity to.
The graft makes it enjoyable
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The last time I did something to her without asking first she threatened to chop it off
posted on 28/12/23
If Rangers refuse to offer Celtic an allocation for Ibrox for the next old firm, I won't be happy with the club at all
If they offer the same 800, I'll understand it
Would be delighted if they offer more
About time one of them put Thier big girls pants on and brought an end to this $hite....hence why I'm giving Celtic pelters on this occasion for being petty bastirts
I'm not buying this security concerns $hite for one second...it's t!t for tat bull$hit and it needs to stop
posted on 28/12/23
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
If Rangers refuse to offer Celtic an allocation for Ibrox for the next old firm, I won't be happy with the club at all
If they offer the same 800, I'll understand it
Would be delighted if they offer more
About time one of them put Thier big girls pants on and brought an end to this $hite....hence why I'm giving Celtic pelters on this occasion for being petty bastirts
I'm not buying this security concerns $hite for one second...it's t!t for tat bull$hit and it needs to stop
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just ignoring the fact penning Celtic fans into a corner surrounded from both sides and above getting pelted by anything and everything
Fingers in ears la la la la la la la la la
posted on 28/12/23
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
If Rangers refuse to offer Celtic an allocation for Ibrox for the next old firm, I won't be happy with the club at all
If they offer the same 800, I'll understand it
Would be delighted if they offer more
About time one of them put Thier big girls pants on and brought an end to this $hite....hence why I'm giving Celtic pelters on this occasion for being petty bastirts
I'm not buying this security concerns $hite for one second...it's t!t for tat bull$hit and it needs to stop
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just ignoring the fact penning Celtic fans into a corner surrounded from both sides and above getting pelted by anything and everything
Fingers in ears la la la la la la la la la
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ignoring that we already addressed that and have installed nets to stop this.
why is this never an issue at other grounds, fans throwing stuff isnt exclusive to the old firm.
fingers in ears lalalalalalalalalalala
posted on 28/12/23
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
If Rangers refuse to offer Celtic an allocation for Ibrox for the next old firm, I won't be happy with the club at all
If they offer the same 800, I'll understand it
Would be delighted if they offer more
About time one of them put Thier big girls pants on and brought an end to this $hite....hence why I'm giving Celtic pelters on this occasion for being petty bastirts
I'm not buying this security concerns $hite for one second...it's t!t for tat bull$hit and it needs to stop
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just ignoring the fact penning Celtic fans into a corner surrounded from both sides and above getting pelted by anything and everything
Fingers in ears la la la la la la la la la
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rangers fans also faced the same at parkhead. It doesn't make it OK though. Perhaps the police should actually police the fans.
https://youtu.be/vbz8tWSDT9U?si=-JolLXJ1g0K3DxZU
posted on 28/12/23
Throwing stuff, flares, offensive singing can be found at every old firm game. It would be better if both clubs agreed that safety in numbers actually protects the fans.
posted on 28/12/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
If Rangers refuse to offer Celtic an allocation for Ibrox for the next old firm, I won't be happy with the club at all
If they offer the same 800, I'll understand it
Would be delighted if they offer more
About time one of them put Thier big girls pants on and brought an end to this $hite....hence why I'm giving Celtic pelters on this occasion for being petty bastirts
I'm not buying this security concerns $hite for one second...it's t!t for tat bull$hit and it needs to stop
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just ignoring the fact penning Celtic fans into a corner surrounded from both sides and above getting pelted by anything and everything
Fingers in ears la la la la la la la la la
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ignoring that we already addressed that and have installed nets to stop this.
why is this never an issue at other grounds, fans throwing stuff isnt exclusive to the old firm.
fingers in ears lalalalalalalalalalala
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nets installed to prevent broken glass being thrown into the 18 yard area?
Has Rangers' position from the start changed? All seem to agree they were d!cks to start this. Think you will find their position is still the same, ergo still d!cks.
I've made my position clear from the start, both clubs behaving like school kids. If I remember correctly, Celtic asked Rangers in the close season for an increased allocation and Rangers rejected it.
Now we have the situation that if one club relents, the Neanderthals in their support will go ape sh!t. Think it was Ginger who said, they need to sit down and talk behind closed doors, resolve this.
Then make a joint statement.
Fat chance, probably, but ridiculous that adults in their position are behaving like this
posted on 28/12/23
comment by Mummy's Hairy Growler (U10045)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
If Rangers refuse to offer Celtic an allocation for Ibrox for the next old firm, I won't be happy with the club at all
If they offer the same 800, I'll understand it
Would be delighted if they offer more
About time one of them put Thier big girls pants on and brought an end to this $hite....hence why I'm giving Celtic pelters on this occasion for being petty bastirts
I'm not buying this security concerns $hite for one second...it's t!t for tat bull$hit and it needs to stop
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just ignoring the fact penning Celtic fans into a corner surrounded from both sides and above getting pelted by anything and everything
Fingers in ears la la la la la la la la la
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rangers fans also faced the same at parkhead. It doesn't make it OK though. Perhaps the police should actually police the fans.
https://youtu.be/vbz8tWSDT9U?si=-JolLXJ1g0K3DxZU
----------------------------------------------------------------------
think this just proves that Celtic fans are p00fy wee $hitebags.
"we dont feel safe"
The reality is we are the only club in the country that has went out their way to alleviate Celtics "safety concerns".
there is a reason they aint peddling the safety issue anymore.
posted on 28/12/23
comment by Mummy's Hairy Growler (U10045)
Perhaps the police should actually police the fans.
Good one mate 🤣. If only
Pay us please and let us go home
posted on 28/12/23
comment by Why the pallaver, aka Count Binface (a little more apathetic) (U10168)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
If Rangers refuse to offer Celtic an allocation for Ibrox for the next old firm, I won't be happy with the club at all
If they offer the same 800, I'll understand it
Would be delighted if they offer more
About time one of them put Thier big girls pants on and brought an end to this $hite....hence why I'm giving Celtic pelters on this occasion for being petty bastirts
I'm not buying this security concerns $hite for one second...it's t!t for tat bull$hit and it needs to stop
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just ignoring the fact penning Celtic fans into a corner surrounded from both sides and above getting pelted by anything and everything
Fingers in ears la la la la la la la la la
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ignoring that we already addressed that and have installed nets to stop this.
why is this never an issue at other grounds, fans throwing stuff isnt exclusive to the old firm.
fingers in ears lalalalalalalalalalala
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nets installed to prevent broken glass being thrown into the 18 yard area?
Has Rangers' position from the start changed? All seem to agree they were d!cks to start this. Think you will find their position is still the same, ergo still d!cks.
I've made my position clear from the start, both clubs behaving like school kids. If I remember correctly, Celtic asked Rangers in the close season for an increased allocation and Rangers rejected it.
Now we have the situation that if one club relents, the Neanderthals in their support will go ape sh!t. Think it was Ginger who said, they need to sit down and talk behind closed doors, resolve this.
Then make a joint statement.
Fat chance, probably, but ridiculous that adults in their position are behaving like this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then dont go to any away game as this is the kind of thing that has been seen at all grounds in the top flight.
yes we changed our position to offer you seats in the corner just like every other team in the country gets and installed nets that will catch objects thrown ... iv never seen anyone smash a bottle or glass first then throw it.
your changing your argument its not about the pitch its about the fans hence why the argument is about how many fans????!!!!
also how is it safer to have 8000 fans with no nets and well within throwing distance than to have 800 fans covered by nets and also within throwing distance??
end of the day we are offering what you are entitled to, the rules are there, the SPFL have confirmed we are being reasonable in our allocation and celtic are not.
posted on 28/12/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by Why the pallaver, aka Count Binface (a little more apathetic) (U10168)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
If Rangers refuse to offer Celtic an allocation for Ibrox for the next old firm, I won't be happy with the club at all
If they offer the same 800, I'll understand it
Would be delighted if they offer more
About time one of them put Thier big girls pants on and brought an end to this $hite....hence why I'm giving Celtic pelters on this occasion for being petty bastirts
I'm not buying this security concerns $hite for one second...it's t!t for tat bull$hit and it needs to stop
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just ignoring the fact penning Celtic fans into a corner surrounded from both sides and above getting pelted by anything and everything
Fingers in ears la la la la la la la la la
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ignoring that we already addressed that and have installed nets to stop this.
why is this never an issue at other grounds, fans throwing stuff isnt exclusive to the old firm.
fingers in ears lalalalalalalalalalala
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nets installed to prevent broken glass being thrown into the 18 yard area?
Has Rangers' position from the start changed? All seem to agree they were d!cks to start this. Think you will find their position is still the same, ergo still d!cks.
I've made my position clear from the start, both clubs behaving like school kids. If I remember correctly, Celtic asked Rangers in the close season for an increased allocation and Rangers rejected it.
Now we have the situation that if one club relents, the Neanderthals in their support will go ape sh!t. Think it was Ginger who said, they need to sit down and talk behind closed doors, resolve this.
Then make a joint statement.
Fat chance, probably, but ridiculous that adults in their position are behaving like this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then dont go to any away game as this is the kind of thing that has been seen at all grounds in the top flight.
yes we changed our position to offer you seats in the corner just like every other team in the country gets and installed nets that will catch objects thrown ... iv never seen anyone smash a bottle or glass first then throw it.
your changing your argument its not about the pitch its about the fans hence why the argument is about how many fans????!!!!
also how is it safer to have 8000 fans with no nets and well within throwing distance than to have 800 fans covered by nets and also within throwing distance??
end of the day we are offering what you are entitled to, the rules are there, the SPFL have confirmed we are being reasonable in our allocation and celtic are not.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it keeps you happy.
Home games would be an away game for me
Page 5 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9