comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
But what are we learning new?
———
That he uses Spitting Image puppets of himself to nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That was funny.
Are you a nonce if the girl is seventeen? It's different to what I have in my head when I hear nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A nonce is a seks offender, especially one who is guilty of sexual offences against children.

So yeah, I'd say that nonce is an apt description.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She wasn't a child, and was over the age of consent. If having sexx with a seventeen year old makes you a nonce, the country must be full of them. O
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He didn't just have seks with a 17 year old though. As has been pointed out to you, it's also to do with consent and coercion. Are you not reading the thread?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did she not consent? It was rape then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted.about an hour ago on here by Eagle fang

"Perhaps even more important to her role in Epstein’s sexual abuse ring, Maxwell had direct connections to other powerful individuals with whom she could connect Epstein.

For instance, one such powerful individual Epstein forced Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with was a member of the British Royal Family, Prince Andrew (a/k/a Duke of York).

Jane Doe #3 was forced to have sexual relations with this Prince when she was a minor in three separate geographical locations: in London (at Ghislaine Maxwell’s apartment), in New York, and on Epstein’s private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands (in an ŏrgy with numerous other under-aged girls).

Epstein instructed Jane Doe #3 that she was to give the Prince whatever he demanded and required Jane Doe #3 to report back to him on the details of the sexual abuse.

Maxwell facilitated Prince Andrew’s acts of sexual abuse by acting as a “madame” for Epstein, thereby assisting in internationally trafficking Jane Doe #3 (and numerous other young girls) for sexual purposes."

But she was 17 so it's all good. Jesus Christ

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
But what are we learning new?
———
That he uses Spitting Image puppets of himself to nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That was funny.
Are you a nonce if the girl is seventeen? It's different to what I have in my head when I hear nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A nonce is a seks offender, especially one who is guilty of sexual offences against children.

So yeah, I'd say that nonce is an apt description.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She wasn't a child, and was over the age of consent. If having sexx with a seventeen year old makes you a nonce, the country must be full of them. O
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He didn't just have seks with a 17 year old though. As has been pointed out to you, it's also to do with consent and coercion. Are you not reading the thread?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did she not consent? It was rape then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted.about an hour ago on here by Eagle fang

"Perhaps even more important to her role in Epstein’s sexual abuse ring, Maxwell had direct connections to other powerful individuals with whom she could connect Epstein.

For instance, one such powerful individual Epstein forced Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with was a member of the British Royal Family, Prince Andrew (a/k/a Duke of York).

Jane Doe #3 was forced to have sexual relations with this Prince when she was a minor in three separate geographical locations: in London (at Ghislaine Maxwell’s apartment), in New York, and on Epstein’s private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands (in an ŏrgy with numerous other under-aged girls).

Epstein instructed Jane Doe #3 that she was to give the Prince whatever he demanded and required Jane Doe #3 to report back to him on the details of the sexual abuse.

Maxwell facilitated Prince Andrew’s acts of sexual abuse by acting as a “madame” for Epstein, thereby assisting in internationally trafficking Jane Doe #3 (and numerous other young girls) for sexual purposes."

But she was 17 so it's all good. Jesus Christ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If only you could read Fields, the words all good were never said or implied.

comment by Diafol Coch 77 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 (U2462)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 36 seconds ago
I want to know more about the logistics of an orgyyy with Stephen Hawking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here you go...

https://twitter.com/Boss__Tha/status/1742849608529715486?t=sNsMiEiKgKUlbjaQ8BvBdg&s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Meal time for me, so I'm done, but carry on.

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
But what are we learning new?
———
That he uses Spitting Image puppets of himself to nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That was funny.
Are you a nonce if the girl is seventeen? It's different to what I have in my head when I hear nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A nonce is a seks offender, especially one who is guilty of sexual offences against children.

So yeah, I'd say that nonce is an apt description.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She wasn't a child, and was over the age of consent. If having sexx with a seventeen year old makes you a nonce, the country must be full of them. O
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He didn't just have seks with a 17 year old though. As has been pointed out to you, it's also to do with consent and coercion. Are you not reading the thread?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did she not consent? It was rape then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted.about an hour ago on here by Eagle fang

"Perhaps even more important to her role in Epstein’s sexual abuse ring, Maxwell had direct connections to other powerful individuals with whom she could connect Epstein.

For instance, one such powerful individual Epstein forced Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with was a member of the British Royal Family, Prince Andrew (a/k/a Duke of York).

Jane Doe #3 was forced to have sexual relations with this Prince when she was a minor in three separate geographical locations: in London (at Ghislaine Maxwell’s apartment), in New York, and on Epstein’s private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands (in an ŏrgy with numerous other under-aged girls).

Epstein instructed Jane Doe #3 that she was to give the Prince whatever he demanded and required Jane Doe #3 to report back to him on the details of the sexual abuse.

Maxwell facilitated Prince Andrew’s acts of sexual abuse by acting as a “madame” for Epstein, thereby assisting in internationally trafficking Jane Doe #3 (and numerous other young girls) for sexual purposes."

But she was 17 so it's all good. Jesus Christ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If only you could read Fields, the words all good were never said or implied.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If only you could read and understand the word consent. 'Its all good' comes from you arguing semantics about the use of the term 'nonce' & saying she was 17 so it wasn't illegal, whilst claiming to not be defending him. You're also niave if you think he's ever seeing the inside of a court room.

Even the Guardian says it's news given a fresh airing.

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 7 minutes ago
I'm certainly not defending Prince Andrew. I presumed we all thought he was guilty when he paid the money.
Whether it was illegal I don't know as she was seventeen, so not illegal here. At best he's a creep, and in the states guilty of what I don't know.
But what are we learning new?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its not a question of age but one of consent, grooming and coercion by people with power and money. This was shown in the trial of Maxwell.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This.
There is also the matter of transporting under 18's (not age of consent) people across state lines for pimping or fvking. And laws against shex tourism.

We didn't have such a thing as consent back in are day and guess what no rapes

comment by Frank van Eijs (U1734)
posted 32 seconds ago
We didn't have such a thing as consent back in are day and guess what no rapes
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The old "He says. He says.

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
But what are we learning new?
———
That he uses Spitting Image puppets of himself to nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That was funny.
Are you a nonce if the girl is seventeen? It's different to what I have in my head when I hear nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A nonce is a seks offender, especially one who is guilty of sexual offences against children.

So yeah, I'd say that nonce is an apt description.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She wasn't a child, and was over the age of consent. If having sexx with a seventeen year old makes you a nonce, the country must be full of them. O
----------------------------------------------------------------------

She was 17 year who was sextrafficked and claims she was sexually assaulted.

If you had a 17 year old daughter who was a victim of sextrafficking and forced to have relations with powerful people against her will, would you be happy with everyone saying it was nothing illegal?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is everyone saying that? If it was he will be charged. It won't be decided on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No not everyone. Just a select few trying to defend Prince Andrew. You are presenting yourself as one of those.

Thanks for letting me know it won't be decided on here. I was under the impression it would be.

comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
But what are we learning new?
———
That he uses Spitting Image puppets of himself to nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That was funny.
Are you a nonce if the girl is seventeen? It's different to what I have in my head when I hear nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A nonce is a seks offender, especially one who is guilty of sexual offences against children.

So yeah, I'd say that nonce is an apt description.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She wasn't a child, and was over the age of consent. If having sexx with a seventeen year old makes you a nonce, the country must be full of them. O
----------------------------------------------------------------------

She was 17 year who was sextrafficked and claims she was sexually assaulted.

If you had a 17 year old daughter who was a victim of sextrafficking and forced to have relations with powerful people against her will, would you be happy with everyone saying it was nothing illegal?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is everyone saying that? If it was he will be charged. It won't be decided on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No not everyone. Just a select few trying to defend Prince Andrew. You are presenting yourself as one of those.

Thanks for letting me know it won't be decided on here. I was under the impression it would be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As are all the important issues of the day.

What's the legal age to be murdered in the US?

Virginia Giuffre didn't need much coercing if you read her life story.

comment by Frank van Eijs (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
What's the legal age to be murdered in the US?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well they're at least stopping all the ante-natal murders in a lot of states. So I guess 1 hour or thereabouts?

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
Virginia Giuffre didn't need much coercing if you read her life story.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The bit where she was sexually abused at age 7?

comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
Virginia Giuffre didn't need much coercing if you read her life story.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The bit where she was sexually abused at age 7?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So she claims.

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
Virginia Giuffre didn't need much coercing if you read her life story.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The bit where she was sexually abused at age 7?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So she claims.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a new low Boris FFS lad

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
Virginia Giuffre didn't need much coercing if you read her life story.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The bit where she was sexually abused at age 7?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So she claims.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, then could you point out where, how and what would lead you to believe she wouldn't need much coercing?
She was 17 FFS.
I suppose you believe Woody Allen didn't groom his now wife.

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
Virginia Giuffre didn't need much coercing if you read her life story.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The bit where she was sexually abused at age 7?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So she claims.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
Virginia Giuffre didn't need much coercing if you read her life story.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The bit where she was sexually abused at age 7?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So she claims.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, then could you point out where, how and what would lead you to believe she wouldn't need much coercing?
She was 17 FFS.
I suppose you believe Woody Allen didn't groom his now wife.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
17 is the new 25 unless you've spent the first 3 decades of your life in a monastic institution.

The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
Virginia Giuffre didn't need much coercing if you read her life story.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The bit where she was sexually abused at age 7?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So she claims.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, then could you point out where, how and what would lead you to believe she wouldn't need much coercing?
She was 17 FFS.
I suppose you believe Woody Allen didn't groom his now wife.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
17 is the new 25 unless you've spent the first 3 decades of your life in a monastic institution.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Near enough 3 decades since they coerced her. And Don't talk schite. 17 is not 25 anyfvkinwhere.

comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
But what are we learning new?
———
That he uses Spitting Image puppets of himself to nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That was funny.
Are you a nonce if the girl is seventeen? It's different to what I have in my head when I hear nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A nonce is a seks offender, especially one who is guilty of sexual offences against children.

So yeah, I'd say that nonce is an apt description.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She wasn't a child, and was over the age of consent. If having sexx with a seventeen year old makes you a nonce, the country must be full of them. O
----------------------------------------------------------------------

She was 17 year who was sextrafficked and claims she was sexually assaulted.

If you had a 17 year old daughter who was a victim of sextrafficking and forced to have relations with powerful people against her will, would you be happy with everyone saying it was nothing illegal?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is everyone saying that? If it was he will be charged. It won't be decided on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No not everyone. Just a select few trying to defend Prince Andrew. You are presenting yourself as one of those.

Thanks for letting me know it won't be decided on here. I was under the impression it would be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some of you have decided. Bravo 👍

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
But what are we learning new?
———
That he uses Spitting Image puppets of himself to nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That was funny.
Are you a nonce if the girl is seventeen? It's different to what I have in my head when I hear nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A nonce is a seks offender, especially one who is guilty of sexual offences against children.

So yeah, I'd say that nonce is an apt description.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She wasn't a child, and was over the age of consent. If having sexx with a seventeen year old makes you a nonce, the country must be full of them. O
----------------------------------------------------------------------

She was 17 year who was sextrafficked and claims she was sexually assaulted.

If you had a 17 year old daughter who was a victim of sextrafficking and forced to have relations with powerful people against her will, would you be happy with everyone saying it was nothing illegal?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is everyone saying that? If it was he will be charged. It won't be decided on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No not everyone. Just a select few trying to defend Prince Andrew. You are presenting yourself as one of those.

Thanks for letting me know it won't be decided on here. I was under the impression it would be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some of you have decided. Bravo 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Seems like you have too, given how vehemently you are arguing the way you are.