comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct is a Manchester thing?
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some really odd comments on this thread.
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
But what are we learning new?
———
That he uses Spitting Image puppets of himself to nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That was funny.
Are you a nonce if the girl is seventeen? It's different to what I have in my head when I hear nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A nonce is a seks offender, especially one who is guilty of sexual offences against children.
So yeah, I'd say that nonce is an apt description.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She wasn't a child, and was over the age of consent. If having sexx with a seventeen year old makes you a nonce, the country must be full of them. O
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She was 17 year who was sextrafficked and claims she was sexually assaulted.
If you had a 17 year old daughter who was a victim of sextrafficking and forced to have relations with powerful people against her will, would you be happy with everyone saying it was nothing illegal?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is everyone saying that? If it was he will be charged. It won't be decided on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No not everyone. Just a select few trying to defend Prince Andrew. You are presenting yourself as one of those.
Thanks for letting me know it won't be decided on here. I was under the impression it would be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some of you have decided. Bravo 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems like you have too, given how vehemently you are arguing the way you are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, I've said at the minimum he's a creep, at the maximum a rapist. But there is a lot of ground between those two points. Perhaps you can tell us exactly where on that line he falls.
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct is a Manchester thing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd she saying advance it was non consensual? Were you there?
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know he paid the previous accuser millions to avoid his filthy business being dragged through a court of law. I also know if I was accused of a heinous crime like that I'd want to clear my name regardless of how much money I had.
You think that being 17 means what he's apparently done is legal. Mate look up the word consent, I'll give you a hint. Its not age specific. Crack on not defending him though.
Andrew said he didnt know the girl yet he paid her 13 mil bit odd that
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know he paid the previous accuser millions to avoid his filthy business being dragged through a court of law. I also know if I was accused of a heinous crime like that I'd want to clear my name regardless of how much money I had.
You think that being 17 means what he's apparently done is legal. Mate look up the word consent, I'll give you a hint. Its not age specific. Crack on not defending him though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did she not consent then? I didn't know, how do you?
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct is a Manchester thing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd she saying advance it was non consensual? Were you there?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She is saying she was sexually assaulted and a victim of sextrafficking. The person who arranged the meet up has been convicted of child sextrafficking. Prince Andrew and the Royal Family paid her off to stop it going to court. Epstein was offering money to get people to testify against her and 'prove her wrong' with claims against Clinton and Hawking (we learned that today).
I would say the weight of evidence leans a particular way on that scale.
For the umpteenth time I'm not defending him. I would like to know how you know more than has been published.
comment by (U23131)
posted 18 seconds ago
Andrew said he didnt know the girl yet he paid her 13 mil bit odd that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His mummy paid it.
My opinion is that it only became non-consensual when she realised she could make Millions out of it.
Of course, in the eyes of a few on here, it's impossible for a streetwise teenager who had a tough upbringing to be anything other than chaste and honest.
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct is a Manchester thing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd she saying advance it was non consensual? Were you there?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She is saying she was sexually assaulted and a victim of sextrafficking. The person who arranged the meet up has been convicted of child sextrafficking. Prince Andrew and the Royal Family paid her off to stop it going to court. Epstein was offering money to get people to testify against her and 'prove her wrong' with claims against Clinton and Hawking (we learned that today).
I would say the weight of evidence leans a particular way on that scale.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has she said it was non consensual?
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct is a Manchester thing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd she saying advance it was non consensual? Were you there?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She is saying she was sexually assaulted and a victim of sextrafficking. The person who arranged the meet up has been convicted of child sextrafficking. Prince Andrew and the Royal Family paid her off to stop it going to court. Epstein was offering money to get people to testify against her and 'prove her wrong' with claims against Clinton and Hawking (we learned that today).
I would say the weight of evidence leans a particular way on that scale.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has she said it was non consensual?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ie rape
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know he paid the previous accuser millions to avoid his filthy business being dragged through a court of law. I also know if I was accused of a heinous crime like that I'd want to clear my name regardless of how much money I had.
You think that being 17 means what he's apparently done is legal. Mate look up the word consent, I'll give you a hint. Its not age specific. Crack on not defending him though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did she not consent then? I didn't know, how do you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because she was coerced by the traffickers?
What a moron is anybody surprised with MU52
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct is a Manchester thing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd she saying advance it was non consensual? Were you there?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She is saying she was sexually assaulted and a victim of sextrafficking. The person who arranged the meet up has been convicted of child sextrafficking. Prince Andrew and the Royal Family paid her off to stop it going to court. Epstein was offering money to get people to testify against her and 'prove her wrong' with claims against Clinton and Hawking (we learned that today).
I would say the weight of evidence leans a particular way on that scale.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has she said it was non consensual?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think a victim of sextrafficking is having consensual sax at a time she is a victim of sextrafficking? Of course she has said it was non-consensual. What do you think sextrafficking is?
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know he paid the previous accuser millions to avoid his filthy business being dragged through a court of law. I also know if I was accused of a heinous crime like that I'd want to clear my name regardless of how much money I had.
You think that being 17 means what he's apparently done is legal. Mate look up the word consent, I'll give you a hint. Its not age specific. Crack on not defending him though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did she not consent then? I didn't know, how do you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact she's accused Andrew of sexualassault means she obviously didn't consent. That's the point of accusing someone of sexualassault orrape.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
My opinion is that it only became non-consensual when she realised she could make Millions out of it.
Of course, in the eyes of a few on here, it's impossible for a streetwise teenager who had a tough upbringing to be anything other than chaste and honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah even Mississippi did away with the need for a woman to be chaste or it wasn't rape provision in the last century.
Even hillbillies and swamp dwellers are more advanced than Boris.
Were you talking about holidaying in Thailand recently?
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
My opinion is that it only became non-consensual when she realised she could make Millions out of it.
Of course, in the eyes of a few on here, it's impossible for a streetwise teenager who had a tough upbringing to be anything other than chaste and honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah even Mississippi did away with the need for a woman to be chaste or it wasn't rape provision in the last century.
Even hillbillies and swamp dwellers are more advanced than Boris.
Were you talking about holidaying in Thailand recently?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Leave Boris Glitter alone
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know he paid the previous accuser millions to avoid his filthy business being dragged through a court of law. I also know if I was accused of a heinous crime like that I'd want to clear my name regardless of how much money I had.
You think that being 17 means what he's apparently done is legal. Mate look up the word consent, I'll give you a hint. Its not age specific. Crack on not defending him though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did she not consent then? I didn't know, how do you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact she's accused Andrew of sexualassault means she obviously didn't consent. That's the point of accusing someone of sexualassault orrape.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She accused him much later. She didn't tell him in advance, or go to the police'
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know he paid the previous accuser millions to avoid his filthy business being dragged through a court of law. I also know if I was accused of a heinous crime like that I'd want to clear my name regardless of how much money I had.
You think that being 17 means what he's apparently done is legal. Mate look up the word consent, I'll give you a hint. Its not age specific. Crack on not defending him though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did she not consent then? I didn't know, how do you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact she's accused Andrew of sexualassault means she obviously didn't consent. That's the point of accusing someone of sexualassault orrape.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, not obvious. She could have expressed pleasure in advance, and accuse him years later. Is that possible?
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know he paid the previous accuser millions to avoid his filthy business being dragged through a court of law. I also know if I was accused of a heinous crime like that I'd want to clear my name regardless of how much money I had.
You think that being 17 means what he's apparently done is legal. Mate look up the word consent, I'll give you a hint. Its not age specific. Crack on not defending him though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did she not consent then? I didn't know, how do you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact she's accused Andrew of sexualassault means she obviously didn't consent. That's the point of accusing someone of sexualassault orrape.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She accused him much later. She didn't tell him in advance, or go to the police'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Meaning what?
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know he paid the previous accuser millions to avoid his filthy business being dragged through a court of law. I also know if I was accused of a heinous crime like that I'd want to clear my name regardless of how much money I had.
You think that being 17 means what he's apparently done is legal. Mate look up the word consent, I'll give you a hint. Its not age specific. Crack on not defending him though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did she not consent then? I didn't know, how do you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact she's accused Andrew of sexualassault means she obviously didn't consent. That's the point of accusing someone of sexualassault orrape.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She accused him much later. She didn't tell him in advance, or go to the police'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So an accuser has to tell someone who they believe sexually assaulted them that they are going to accuse them of it before they can make the accusation now?
Your posts are getting weirder all the time. Just admit that you don't want Prince Andrew to be found guilty and leave it at that.
Epstein was known to be a criminal/pedophile as early as 2005
Anybody on the list is tainted as they willingly had dealings with him.
Sign in if you want to comment
Epstein List to be released
Page 9 of 24
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14
posted on 4/1/24
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct is a Manchester thing?
posted on 4/1/24
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some really odd comments on this thread.
posted on 4/1/24
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
But what are we learning new?
———
That he uses Spitting Image puppets of himself to nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That was funny.
Are you a nonce if the girl is seventeen? It's different to what I have in my head when I hear nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A nonce is a seks offender, especially one who is guilty of sexual offences against children.
So yeah, I'd say that nonce is an apt description.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She wasn't a child, and was over the age of consent. If having sexx with a seventeen year old makes you a nonce, the country must be full of them. O
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She was 17 year who was sextrafficked and claims she was sexually assaulted.
If you had a 17 year old daughter who was a victim of sextrafficking and forced to have relations with powerful people against her will, would you be happy with everyone saying it was nothing illegal?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is everyone saying that? If it was he will be charged. It won't be decided on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No not everyone. Just a select few trying to defend Prince Andrew. You are presenting yourself as one of those.
Thanks for letting me know it won't be decided on here. I was under the impression it would be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some of you have decided. Bravo 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems like you have too, given how vehemently you are arguing the way you are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, I've said at the minimum he's a creep, at the maximum a rapist. But there is a lot of ground between those two points. Perhaps you can tell us exactly where on that line he falls.
posted on 4/1/24
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct is a Manchester thing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd she saying advance it was non consensual? Were you there?
posted on 4/1/24
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know he paid the previous accuser millions to avoid his filthy business being dragged through a court of law. I also know if I was accused of a heinous crime like that I'd want to clear my name regardless of how much money I had.
You think that being 17 means what he's apparently done is legal. Mate look up the word consent, I'll give you a hint. Its not age specific. Crack on not defending him though.
posted on 4/1/24
Andrew said he didnt know the girl yet he paid her 13 mil bit odd that
posted on 4/1/24
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know he paid the previous accuser millions to avoid his filthy business being dragged through a court of law. I also know if I was accused of a heinous crime like that I'd want to clear my name regardless of how much money I had.
You think that being 17 means what he's apparently done is legal. Mate look up the word consent, I'll give you a hint. Its not age specific. Crack on not defending him though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did she not consent then? I didn't know, how do you?
posted on 4/1/24
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct is a Manchester thing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd she saying advance it was non consensual? Were you there?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She is saying she was sexually assaulted and a victim of sextrafficking. The person who arranged the meet up has been convicted of child sextrafficking. Prince Andrew and the Royal Family paid her off to stop it going to court. Epstein was offering money to get people to testify against her and 'prove her wrong' with claims against Clinton and Hawking (we learned that today).
I would say the weight of evidence leans a particular way on that scale.
posted on 4/1/24
I see RDD is back
posted on 4/1/24
For the umpteenth time I'm not defending him. I would like to know how you know more than has been published.
posted on 4/1/24
comment by (U23131)
posted 18 seconds ago
Andrew said he didnt know the girl yet he paid her 13 mil bit odd that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
His mummy paid it.
posted on 4/1/24
My opinion is that it only became non-consensual when she realised she could make Millions out of it.
Of course, in the eyes of a few on here, it's impossible for a streetwise teenager who had a tough upbringing to be anything other than chaste and honest.
posted on 4/1/24
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct is a Manchester thing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd she saying advance it was non consensual? Were you there?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She is saying she was sexually assaulted and a victim of sextrafficking. The person who arranged the meet up has been convicted of child sextrafficking. Prince Andrew and the Royal Family paid her off to stop it going to court. Epstein was offering money to get people to testify against her and 'prove her wrong' with claims against Clinton and Hawking (we learned that today).
I would say the weight of evidence leans a particular way on that scale.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has she said it was non consensual?
posted on 4/1/24
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct is a Manchester thing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd she saying advance it was non consensual? Were you there?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She is saying she was sexually assaulted and a victim of sextrafficking. The person who arranged the meet up has been convicted of child sextrafficking. Prince Andrew and the Royal Family paid her off to stop it going to court. Epstein was offering money to get people to testify against her and 'prove her wrong' with claims against Clinton and Hawking (we learned that today).
I would say the weight of evidence leans a particular way on that scale.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has she said it was non consensual?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ie rape
posted on 4/1/24
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know he paid the previous accuser millions to avoid his filthy business being dragged through a court of law. I also know if I was accused of a heinous crime like that I'd want to clear my name regardless of how much money I had.
You think that being 17 means what he's apparently done is legal. Mate look up the word consent, I'll give you a hint. Its not age specific. Crack on not defending him though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did she not consent then? I didn't know, how do you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because she was coerced by the traffickers?
posted on 4/1/24
What a moron is anybody surprised with MU52
posted on 4/1/24
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct is a Manchester thing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd she saying advance it was non consensual? Were you there?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She is saying she was sexually assaulted and a victim of sextrafficking. The person who arranged the meet up has been convicted of child sextrafficking. Prince Andrew and the Royal Family paid her off to stop it going to court. Epstein was offering money to get people to testify against her and 'prove her wrong' with claims against Clinton and Hawking (we learned that today).
I would say the weight of evidence leans a particular way on that scale.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has she said it was non consensual?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think a victim of sextrafficking is having consensual sax at a time she is a victim of sextrafficking? Of course she has said it was non-consensual. What do you think sextrafficking is?
posted on 4/1/24
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know he paid the previous accuser millions to avoid his filthy business being dragged through a court of law. I also know if I was accused of a heinous crime like that I'd want to clear my name regardless of how much money I had.
You think that being 17 means what he's apparently done is legal. Mate look up the word consent, I'll give you a hint. Its not age specific. Crack on not defending him though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did she not consent then? I didn't know, how do you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact she's accused Andrew of sexualassault means she obviously didn't consent. That's the point of accusing someone of sexualassault orrape.
posted on 4/1/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
My opinion is that it only became non-consensual when she realised she could make Millions out of it.
Of course, in the eyes of a few on here, it's impossible for a streetwise teenager who had a tough upbringing to be anything other than chaste and honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah even Mississippi did away with the need for a woman to be chaste or it wasn't rape provision in the last century.
Even hillbillies and swamp dwellers are more advanced than Boris.
Were you talking about holidaying in Thailand recently?
posted on 4/1/24
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
My opinion is that it only became non-consensual when she realised she could make Millions out of it.
Of course, in the eyes of a few on here, it's impossible for a streetwise teenager who had a tough upbringing to be anything other than chaste and honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah even Mississippi did away with the need for a woman to be chaste or it wasn't rape provision in the last century.
Even hillbillies and swamp dwellers are more advanced than Boris.
Were you talking about holidaying in Thailand recently?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Leave Boris Glitter alone
posted on 4/1/24
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know he paid the previous accuser millions to avoid his filthy business being dragged through a court of law. I also know if I was accused of a heinous crime like that I'd want to clear my name regardless of how much money I had.
You think that being 17 means what he's apparently done is legal. Mate look up the word consent, I'll give you a hint. Its not age specific. Crack on not defending him though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did she not consent then? I didn't know, how do you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact she's accused Andrew of sexualassault means she obviously didn't consent. That's the point of accusing someone of sexualassault orrape.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She accused him much later. She didn't tell him in advance, or go to the police'
posted on 4/1/24
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know he paid the previous accuser millions to avoid his filthy business being dragged through a court of law. I also know if I was accused of a heinous crime like that I'd want to clear my name regardless of how much money I had.
You think that being 17 means what he's apparently done is legal. Mate look up the word consent, I'll give you a hint. Its not age specific. Crack on not defending him though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did she not consent then? I didn't know, how do you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact she's accused Andrew of sexualassault means she obviously didn't consent. That's the point of accusing someone of sexualassault orrape.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, not obvious. She could have expressed pleasure in advance, and accuse him years later. Is that possible?
posted on 4/1/24
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know he paid the previous accuser millions to avoid his filthy business being dragged through a court of law. I also know if I was accused of a heinous crime like that I'd want to clear my name regardless of how much money I had.
You think that being 17 means what he's apparently done is legal. Mate look up the word consent, I'll give you a hint. Its not age specific. Crack on not defending him though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did she not consent then? I didn't know, how do you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact she's accused Andrew of sexualassault means she obviously didn't consent. That's the point of accusing someone of sexualassault orrape.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She accused him much later. She didn't tell him in advance, or go to the police'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Meaning what?
posted on 4/1/24
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
The comments by MU52, Elvis and Boris make me think victim blaming and non consensual sexualconduct must be a Manchester thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you're thinking now. Maybe you will think that it is old news, and we know little of what was truly known by HRH, unless of course, you do know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know he paid the previous accuser millions to avoid his filthy business being dragged through a court of law. I also know if I was accused of a heinous crime like that I'd want to clear my name regardless of how much money I had.
You think that being 17 means what he's apparently done is legal. Mate look up the word consent, I'll give you a hint. Its not age specific. Crack on not defending him though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did she not consent then? I didn't know, how do you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact she's accused Andrew of sexualassault means she obviously didn't consent. That's the point of accusing someone of sexualassault orrape.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She accused him much later. She didn't tell him in advance, or go to the police'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So an accuser has to tell someone who they believe sexually assaulted them that they are going to accuse them of it before they can make the accusation now?
Your posts are getting weirder all the time. Just admit that you don't want Prince Andrew to be found guilty and leave it at that.
posted on 4/1/24
Epstein was known to be a criminal/pedophile as early as 2005
Anybody on the list is tainted as they willingly had dealings with him.
Page 9 of 24
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14