or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 1623 comments are related to an article called:

Far Right thugs or patriots

Page 26 of 65

posted on 8/8/24

German Courts that support a Hijab Ban?

A German Muslim woman has been barred from working as a lay judge because she wears a headscarf which was alleged to be in violation of the requirement of neutrality. The matter is now before the constitutional court.

Or

Germany's upper house of parliament approved a controversial piece of legislation on Friday banning public employees from wearing ideological or religious symbols while at work.

"In practice, it will particularly affect Muslim women who wear a headscarf - regardless of their eligibility or qualifications," Germany's Muslim Coordination Council (KRM) said

comment by mx4 (U23184)

posted on 8/8/24

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 37 seconds ago
Or are you saying that you and others should be able to determine what minority groups should or should not be offended about?
--------------------------------------------------------
Do you have reading difficulties, I haven't once mentioned what people should or shouldn't sing and personally I don't have any objections to From the River to The Sea, a fact I've mentioned several times over the last 9 months.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So why are you comparing a US imperialist song which isn't sung in foreign places on protest marches to a highly contentious chant that people have been prosecuted for singing in other countries?

comment by mx4 (U23184)

posted on 8/8/24

comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 1 minute ago
German Courts that support a Hijab Ban?

A German Muslim woman has been barred from working as a lay judge because she wears a headscarf which was alleged to be in violation of the requirement of neutrality. The matter is now before the constitutional court.

Or

Germany's upper house of parliament approved a controversial piece of legislation on Friday banning public employees from wearing ideological or religious symbols while at work.

"In practice, it will particularly affect Muslim women who wear a headscarf - regardless of their eligibility or qualifications," Germany's Muslim Coordination Council (KRM) said
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Germany is an Islamaphobic, pro Zionist state?

posted on 8/8/24

comment by Ras Clar Teta (U22980)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 1 minute ago
Why would a group of people find "The river to the sea" phrase a phrase about wiping them out? How about because Zionists used similar phrase to mean that about the locals who inhabited Palestine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Zionists believe a free Palestine means a destroyed Israel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Zionist also believe that they can rape Palestinians. One of the most disturbing videos have been leaked. You have Zionists queuing prisons demanding to rape the prisoners because it is scripted that they can. Disgusting.

posted on 8/8/24

comment by mx4 (U23184)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, Boris Johnson spouted some stuff that if he said the same about Jewish women, would he have been treated the same?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bojo has gotten away with plenty of antisemitism, including a recent yiddish slur against Starmer

And how is this comparable to what we were talking about which was physical assaults on Jews and destruction of property?

It's quite a simple question, who are these people that are doing that and what's their label? Why do you keep deflecting from this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not deflecting. You keep shifting.
If they are asultes because they are Jews then that is a racist attack. If they are attacked for another reason, that reason is behind their attack.

You brought up Germany and I've shown how the Germans are politically biased, have brought in laws against Muslims and how courts have sided against Muslims. I have also shown that the German Nation have long sided with Israel, so their banning of the chant is biased and based on their support. They've yet to condemn the genocide in Gaza.

And as I said, the chant or it's equivalent was used by Zionists and it means one thing when they say it and they project that onto Palestinians and their supporters.

Do you condemn the genocide happening in Gaza? Do you condemn the Zionist use of the slogan?

posted on 8/8/24

comment by mx4 (U23184)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 37 seconds ago
Or are you saying that you and others should be able to determine what minority groups should or should not be offended about?
--------------------------------------------------------
Do you have reading difficulties, I haven't once mentioned what people should or shouldn't sing and personally I don't have any objections to From the River to The Sea, a fact I've mentioned several times over the last 9 months.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So why are you comparing a US imperialist song which isn't sung in foreign places on protest marches to a highly contentious chant that people have been prosecuted for singing in other countries?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's sung by US Marines in foreign places, it's probably sung during US political rallies.

Maybe some people should read about the origins of the chant.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/From_the_river_to_the_sea

comment by mx4 (U23184)

posted on 8/8/24

comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not deflecting. You keep shifting.
If they are asultes because they are Jews then that is a racist attack. If they are attacked for another reason, that reason is behind their attack.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm talking about the abuse of Jews in this Country. It's taken several messages to even pin down the idea that there are racist attacks going on but you still haven't answered who's making them.

You're clearly give not two hoots about whether people in the UK are attacked or not. The rest of it is just a flimsy attempt for you to not admit that.

comment by mx4 (U23184)

posted on 8/8/24

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by mx4 (U23184)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 37 seconds ago
Or are you saying that you and others should be able to determine what minority groups should or should not be offended about?
--------------------------------------------------------
Do you have reading difficulties, I haven't once mentioned what people should or shouldn't sing and personally I don't have any objections to From the River to The Sea, a fact I've mentioned several times over the last 9 months.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So why are you comparing a US imperialist song which isn't sung in foreign places on protest marches to a highly contentious chant that people have been prosecuted for singing in other countries?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's sung by US Marines in foreign places, it's probably sung during US political rallies.

Maybe some people should read about the origins of the chant.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/From_the_river_to_the_sea
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you have got a bee in your bonnet about Jews being offended by this then.

posted on 8/8/24

comment by mx4 (U23184)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by mx4 (U23184)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 37 seconds ago
Or are you saying that you and others should be able to determine what minority groups should or should not be offended about?
--------------------------------------------------------
Do you have reading difficulties, I haven't once mentioned what people should or shouldn't sing and personally I don't have any objections to From the River to The Sea, a fact I've mentioned several times over the last 9 months.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So why are you comparing a US imperialist song which isn't sung in foreign places on protest marches to a highly contentious chant that people have been prosecuted for singing in other countries?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's sung by US Marines in foreign places, it's probably sung during US political rallies.

Maybe some people should read about the origins of the chant.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/From_the_river_to_the_sea
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you have got a bee in your bonnet about Jews being offended by this then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some people are offended by everything.

comment by mx4 (U23184)

posted on 8/8/24

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by mx4 (U23184)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by mx4 (U23184)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 37 seconds ago
Or are you saying that you and others should be able to determine what minority groups should or should not be offended about?
--------------------------------------------------------
Do you have reading difficulties, I haven't once mentioned what people should or shouldn't sing and personally I don't have any objections to From the River to The Sea, a fact I've mentioned several times over the last 9 months.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So why are you comparing a US imperialist song which isn't sung in foreign places on protest marches to a highly contentious chant that people have been prosecuted for singing in other countries?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's sung by US Marines in foreign places, it's probably sung during US political rallies.

Maybe some people should read about the origins of the chant.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/From_the_river_to_the_sea
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you have got a bee in your bonnet about Jews being offended by this then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some people are offended by everything.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
See first post in this thread

posted on 8/8/24

comment by mx4 (U23184)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by mx4 (U23184)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by mx4 (U23184)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 37 seconds ago
Or are you saying that you and others should be able to determine what minority groups should or should not be offended about?
--------------------------------------------------------
Do you have reading difficulties, I haven't once mentioned what people should or shouldn't sing and personally I don't have any objections to From the River to The Sea, a fact I've mentioned several times over the last 9 months.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So why are you comparing a US imperialist song which isn't sung in foreign places on protest marches to a highly contentious chant that people have been prosecuted for singing in other countries?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's sung by US Marines in foreign places, it's probably sung during US political rallies.

Maybe some people should read about the origins of the chant.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/From_the_river_to_the_sea
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you have got a bee in your bonnet about Jews being offended by this then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some people are offended by everything.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
See first post in this thread
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The people who attacked a mosque despite the original attack not being committed by a Muslim?

Who then tried to justify it by claiming a Muslim immigrant was arrested carrying a knife, but it then turned out he was not an immigrant (but happened to be a person of colour) and was called Jordan Davies?

How could they possibly be racist...?
---------------------------------------------------------

Right, you've completely lost me now.

posted on 8/8/24

comment by mx4 (U23184)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not deflecting. You keep shifting.
If they are asultes because they are Jews then that is a racist attack. If they are attacked for another reason, that reason is behind their attack.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm talking about the abuse of Jews in this Country. It's taken several messages to even pin down the idea that there are racist attacks going on but you still haven't answered who's making them.

You're clearly give not two hoots about whether people in the UK are attacked or not. The rest of it is just a flimsy attempt for you to not admit that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I'm talking about how data by some organisation are skewed as something that's contentious as the slogan "From the river to the sea" because one group uses it to mean their freedom from occupation and another says it's for their destruction, this based on a group within this froup using it meaning the destruction of the first group.

If they find River to the Sea anti-Semitic and this is one of the things that is brought up (something the academic increases, amongst other things, be related to), the data will be skewed.

And you've avoided questions I've asked. Do you agree with the German court? One that clearly has, along with the government, shown biased against Muslims? One that has shown bias for Israel? Do you yourself condemn the genocide in Gaza? Or why are you reluctant to do so?

posted on 8/8/24

Nobody ever once shouted Alu Akhbar in the street prior to ISIS.
Everyone knows the context when it's chanted/shouted in the street, and I'm with Jenrick on this one.

posted on 8/8/24

comment by Insert a lame pun on a Spurs player's nam... (U23088)
posted 7 seconds ago
Nobody ever once shouted Alu Akhbar in the street prior to ISIS.
Everyone knows the context when it's chanted/shouted in the street, and I'm with Jenrick on this one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Halleluyah

comment by mx4 (U23184)

posted on 8/8/24

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by mx4 (U23184)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by mx4 (U23184)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by mx4 (U23184)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 37 seconds ago
Or are you saying that you and others should be able to determine what minority groups should or should not be offended about?
--------------------------------------------------------


Right, you've completely lost me now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that clearer as to what's an article and what is a thread.

posted on 8/8/24

comment by Insert a lame pun on a Spurs player's nam... (U23088)
posted 43 seconds ago
Nobody ever once shouted Alu Akhbar in the street prior to ISIS.
Everyone knows the context when it's chanted/shouted in the street, and I'm with Jenrick on this one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not true, depends where you are and I've seen marches before IS where it was used. Jerrick just made up an excuse after the fact. He won't see any repercussions. Might even make him appeal to the hardcore Tories even more.

posted on 8/8/24

Should say ...*could be related to)...

posted on 8/8/24

I'll get back to this tomorrow. Leaving this as a bookmark.

comment by mx4 (U23184)

posted on 8/8/24

comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)


If they find River to the Sea anti-Semitic and this is one of the things that is brought up (something the academic increases, amongst other things, be related to), the data will be skewed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2023/oct/20/antisemitic-hate-crimes-in-london-rise-1350-since-israel-hamas-war-met-says

How is met office data skewed?

How is the "River to the Sea" chant skewing data when The Met said a chant used by some protesters – “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” – would usually be treated as lawful

How are the assaults on people and attacks on property listed in that article skewed? Again, who is making these attacks? What's their label? Why should I answer any questions of yours when you're not prepared to answer mine.

comment by mx4 (U23184)

posted on 8/8/24

comment by CurrentlyInChina (U11181)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Insert a lame pun on a Spurs player's nam... (U23088)
posted 43 seconds ago
Nobody ever once shouted Alu Akhbar in the street prior to ISIS.
Everyone knows the context when it's chanted/shouted in the street, and I'm with Jenrick on this one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not true, depends where you are and I've seen marches before IS where it was used. Jerrick just made up an excuse after the fact. He won't see any repercussions. Might even make him appeal to the hardcore Tories even more.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which marches were people chanting Alu Akhbar?

posted on 8/8/24

How is met office data skewed?
------------------------------------------
Because we do not know weather it is correct or not.

comment by mx4 (U23184)

posted on 8/8/24

comment by John McGlashan (U1734)
posted 31 seconds ago
How is met office data skewed?
------------------------------------------
Because we do not know weather it is correct or not.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So then that applies to hate crimes against Muslims too?

posted on 8/8/24

comment by John McGlashan (U1734)
posted 6 minutes ago
How is met office data skewed?
------------------------------------------
Because we do not know weather it is correct or not.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nice work there Barry

comment by mx4 (U23184)

posted on 8/8/24

Amazing that CIC is using the same playbook that the far right use when downplaying Islamaphobia to downplay Antisemitism.

comment by mx4 (U23184)

posted on 8/8/24

comment by Insufferable-Piffle (U4388)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by John McGlashan (U1734)
posted 6 minutes ago
How is met office data skewed?
------------------------------------------
Because we do not know weather it is correct or not.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nice work there Barry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
duh, needs to be made clear Weather this is barry or not

Page 26 of 65

Sign in if you want to comment