I’m not wrong.

This is what happens when people p!ss about with protest votes

F*cking idiots.

comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 6 minutes ago
Yep it most likely will, hopefully you are wrong. Doesn’t change the fact that the Dems got well deserved karma
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does it count as karma if the ones who benefit are far worse?

comment by T-BAD (U11806)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 6 minutes ago
Yep it most likely will, hopefully you are wrong. Doesn’t change the fact that the Dems got well deserved karma
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does it count as karma if the ones who benefit are far worse?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly.

Isn’t there good karma and bad karma?

It’s not democrats policy to support and fund Isreal, it’s America’s policy full stop.

comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 2 minutes ago
https://newrepublic.com/post/188048/michigan-dearborn-arab-americans-election-harris-trump-stein

The only good thing to come out of this is the Dems getting hit with well deserved karma for the Gaza genocide
----------------------------------------------------------------------
FFS so bored of hearing this.

The Gaza genocide will be far worse under Trump, may as well say it was Isreal who really won this election.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It really is the most backward thinking ever. The reps don't give a single flying feck about Palestine ffs.

comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 1 minute ago
Isn’t there good karma and bad karma?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah but what is are the Republicans getting good karma for when they're worse on all issues of morality or even basic humanity?

I never said anything about the Republicans wtf are you talking about.

But they're the ones who are benefitting from the bad karma, which is why I don't think the karma argument as a whole makes sense.

Genocide Joe and Kamala were given countless endorsements by Hollywood virtue signallers telling us all how he was going to change how America are looked at by the rest of the world for the better and then proceeded to indirectly drop the equivalent of 3 Hiroshima bombs on a defenceless dot on the map so losing an election over that is very much karma.

The fact people are having a karma debate is bad enough ffs, no such feckin thing, get a grip.

Lets talk about Jesus while we are making shat up eh.

Well I'm just pointing out that in it's theory it's a nonsensical argument because of who is gaining from the supposed bad karma.

Obviously it's an irrelevant discussion but when someone is being stupid I like to try and figure out how they got there.

comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 1 minute ago
The fact people are having a karma debate is bad enough ffs, no such feckin thing, get a grip.

Lets talk about Jesus while we are making shat up eh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wonder what karma racist rapists have coming their way?

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 1 minute ago
The fact people are having a karma debate is bad enough ffs, no such feckin thing, get a grip.

Lets talk about Jesus while we are making shat up eh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wonder what karma racist rapists have coming their way?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

To be fair the average Trump supporter has already lost in life, have you seen the sad no neck feckers

Inbreds.

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 1 minute ago
The fact people are having a karma debate is bad enough ffs, no such feckin thing, get a grip.

Lets talk about Jesus while we are making shat up eh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wonder what karma racist rapists have coming their way?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
An assassin will be successful eventually

comment by T-BAD (U11806)
posted 11 minutes ago
Well I'm just pointing out that in it's theory it's a nonsensical argument because of who is gaining from the supposed bad karma.

Obviously it's an irrelevant discussion but when someone is being stupid I like to try and figure out how they got there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn’t say I agree with these people and that they shouldn’t have voted for Kamala so it’s not my logic that you are arguing with. All I said is the Dems got deserved karma for there complicity in this genocide.

comment by Luka Bosh Brasi (U22178)
posted 9 hours, 34 minutes ago
America dodged a bullet by not selecting Harris.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yeh really dodged a bullet by electing a convicted se@ offender.

comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Luka Bosh Brasi (U22178)
posted 9 hours, 34 minutes ago
America dodged a bullet by not selecting Harris.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yeh really dodged a bullet by electing a convicted se@ offender.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I guess time will tell. Last time Trump was in it was an utter disaster so lets see what magic he works this time.

comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 7 hours, 51 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 23 seconds ago
I'll answer the original question.... as a moderate, liberal thinking republican who voted.... The democrats gave people no choice. It was the worst run campaign in the history of politics. It started with Biden's joke campaign, the rushed promotion of Kamala (who was in no way qualified) and not supported by her own party. The arrogance & moral superiority of the Dems drove people to Trump. You may not like his politics (thats OK, Its a free world) but gas prices, groceries, Jobs, Inflation, immigration & crime are things that matter to people. Trump was clear about how he wants to deal with it (who knows whether he will or not) but the outcome has been obvious since the summer (Despite the sugar rush bounce Kamala got when she announced she was running). I can assure you it has nothing to with s8x or race... the numbers and voting trends prove it.

If you don't like it, that's cool, you don't live here. Given last week's Budget you guys have enough to worry about over there.

Onwards & upwards
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You voted for a N@zi, so your explanations and excuses are f*cking worthless.

You’ll never comment on any of my articles again.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say who I voted for. Personally, I'm not a fan of Trump.... I was just trying to explain why she lost. I live in a Blue state (always will be). People like me are not the reason why he won. You need to understand the infrastructure & dynamics of the US political system to see why the outcome was like this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
False promises of jam tomorrow and racist gaslighting is the reason Trump gets elected. His proposed tariffs won't make the average working Joe richer.

The other candidate isn't a racist, misogynist, sexoffender with a litany of lies that have become normalised to the point of being shrugged off. Sorry of you see this as 'moral superiority' (it is) or 'arrogance' (it isn't).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just trying to explain why she lost...
----------------------------------------------------------------------

She lost because the average American is as thick as mince. Harris and the Democrats may not have ran a perfect campaign, but come on Trump has so much baggage, he should have been wiped out by any half intelligent electorate.

I don’t think she was as accessible to the public, Trump did podcasts, interviews, had sound bites and his policies were pretty clear.

I don’t feel I got that from Kamala, she mumbled her way through many questions without giving any clarity to the questions she was asked. She didn’t do many public interviews (SNL, think I may have seen her in Oprah?).

I don’t her being a woman had anything to do with it, early indications are that the Hispanic and, funnily enough, female voters were what swung it for trump.

I don’t think it spells good news for the UK, Starmer needs to get in line now and apologise for the team sent to the US in support of the Democrats, not sure what he was thinking.

comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 44 seconds ago
I don’t think she was as accessible to the public, Trump did podcasts, interviews, had sound bites and his policies were pretty clear.

I don’t feel I got that from Kamala, she mumbled her way through many questions without giving any clarity to the questions she was asked. She didn’t do many public interviews (SNL, think I may have seen her in Oprah?).

I don’t her being a woman had anything to do with it, early indications are that the Hispanic and, funnily enough, female voters were what swung it for trump.

I don’t think it spells good news for the UK, Starmer needs to get in line now and apologise for the team sent to the US in support of the Democrats, not sure what he was thinking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What was he thinking?

He was thinking there is no way a complete cant would get elected again after the complete disaster of his last run.

comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 44 seconds ago
I don’t think she was as accessible to the public, Trump did podcasts, interviews, had sound bites and his policies were pretty clear.

I don’t feel I got that from Kamala, she mumbled her way through many questions without giving any clarity to the questions she was asked. She didn’t do many public interviews (SNL, think I may have seen her in Oprah?).

I don’t her being a woman had anything to do with it, early indications are that the Hispanic and, funnily enough, female voters were what swung it for trump.

I don’t think it spells good news for the UK, Starmer needs to get in line now and apologise for the team sent to the US in support of the Democrats, not sure what he was thinking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What was he thinking?

He was thinking there is no way a complete cant would get elected again after the complete disaster of his last run.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s been a pretty disastrous office for the democrats don’t forget. Inflation and interest rate spiralled, inability to control geopolitical tensions, immigration off the charts, many people left far left states to traditional republican states.

The fact is, like the UK, people probably didn’t vote for the eventual winner, they voted for change because they are sick of diminishing living conditions.

I still see pockets of women seeing each other as the problem rather than trying to support each other in my day to day life, so I think being a woman in itself could have been enough to lose the vote of certain women. Women of which I imagine there are plenty in a country like the US.