posted 2 hours, 14 minutes ago
comment by JFK - Super Nintendo Chalmers (U8919)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JFK - Super Nintendo Chalmers (U8919)
posted 33 seconds ago
seen a different still now, not a pen.
ref blew for foul when it was outside.
cant believe they got arfield, but he lost enough at rangers to give a good insight into what it feels like to be a silver medal sensation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some still that where you can hear the whistle
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well my rational for that is that the penalty wasn't given, so it must have been blown for the foul before going in the box.
what's yours?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Celtic and their big bucks have stole the establishment from us with bungs
posted 2 hours, 14 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 13 minutes ago
A lot of chat here when it’s a simple fact we should have had a penalty. Wasn’t given, we’ll make some noicse, Connor to get the sack, then move on.
Actually thought Neil Lennon was good on the commentary yesterday, based on pre-match was thinking he’d be annoying. But he talked through the game and his thoughts on midfield battle, shape etc very well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why Connor? He was only the assistant VAR. Muir was the VAR ref.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sack him then too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But why would you even mention Connor? Never known anyone to blame the assistant VAR.
They’re wont be any sackings anyway.
posted 2 hours, 14 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign: Remember the 453 (U3627)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign: Remember the 453 (U3627)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Call Sign: Remember the 453 (U3627)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted less than a minute ago
I keep hearing this two fouls argument.....to me they are all the same incident....Scales basically tried to stop Cerny by any means whatsoever, so when the first attempt fails he starts pulling at him
For me it's a complete cop out that argument....and if that's what Willie Collum comes out with I'll be disappointed, because of the first foul didn't stop Cerny, advantage should be played until there is none, and it was the shirt pull that finally stopped Cerny in his tracks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you also think that the ref should have let us attack at pace down the left when one of our players got wiped out at the halfway line? The first fould didn't stop our attack
As I said before keep going, you are only convincing yourself
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I do think the ref should have allowed that
Point being made is...if Collum says the first foul is what was given, and that was the right thing to do from the refs point of view...then I'll be disappointed, because he would be wrong...same way he would be wrong if he said Beaton blowing for your foul was the right thing to do
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Excellent. We would have scored from that attack and therefore your penalty claim wouldn't have happened. Happy to clear that up for you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
VAR doesn't look at fouls on the halfway line do they...they do look at potential penalties....hence the difference
It's really not me that's trying to convince myself of anything here mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There wasn't a potential penalty. There was a foul given. Rangers opted to ignore it and play on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
.....which is what the referee should have done until the attack was actually stopped, the very argument that you are making regards the halfway line foul...so I'll say again, if Collum says the decision to award the first foul is correct, them it'll be a poor show, a very poor show indeed
posted 2 hours, 13 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 hour, 57 minutes ago
comment by Faither (U3393)
posted less than a minute ago
The "penalty" was a case of both "at it" both were pulling jerseys so play on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was a clear foul, only dispute is whether it was a pen or not.
Is it reaching a bit...aye
But the rules are what they are, and they say that if a foul starts outside the box and continues into the box, then a penalty is given....on the line is in the box.
The foul started outside the box.....both players were in the box before it finished....so theres definitely an argument to be made there.
As said last night....interested to hear Collum's take on it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The foul didn't continue in the box though, he was fouled outside of it and fell into it.
If someone is halved outside the box but lands inside it, is it a penalty?
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 13 minutes ago
A lot of chat here when it’s a simple fact we should have had a penalty. Wasn’t given, we’ll make some noicse, Connor to get the sack, then move on.
Actually thought Neil Lennon was good on the commentary yesterday, based on pre-match was thinking he’d be annoying. But he talked through the game and his thoughts on midfield battle, shape etc very well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why Connor? He was only the assistant VAR. Muir was the VAR ref.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sack him then too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But why would you even mention Connor? Never known anyone to blame the assistant VAR.
They’re wont be any sackings anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not weird enough to know the names and roles of all the officials
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
‘if Collum says the decision to award the first foul is correct, them it'll be a poor show, a very poor show indeed’
Why? It’s up to the ref to decide if he wants to play advantage. It’s an instant decision with no ability to see into the future.
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 hour, 57 minutes ago
comment by Faither (U3393)
posted less than a minute ago
The "penalty" was a case of both "at it" both were pulling jerseys so play on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was a clear foul, only dispute is whether it was a pen or not.
Is it reaching a bit...aye
But the rules are what they are, and they say that if a foul starts outside the box and continues into the box, then a penalty is given....on the line is in the box.
The foul started outside the box.....both players were in the box before it finished....so theres definitely an argument to be made there.
As said last night....interested to hear Collum's take on it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The foul didn't continue in the box though, he was fouled outside of it and fell into it.
If someone is halved outside the box but lands inside it, is it a penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mate...there are stills where Cerny's foot is on the line, and Scales has a huge handful of his shirt....so don't sit there and tell me it didn't continue into the box
posted 2 hours, 11 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 13 minutes ago
A lot of chat here when it’s a simple fact we should have had a penalty. Wasn’t given, we’ll make some noicse, Connor to get the sack, then move on.
Actually thought Neil Lennon was good on the commentary yesterday, based on pre-match was thinking he’d be annoying. But he talked through the game and his thoughts on midfield battle, shape etc very well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why Connor? He was only the assistant VAR. Muir was the VAR ref.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sack him then too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But why would you even mention Connor? Never known anyone to blame the assistant VAR.
They’re wont be any sackings anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not weird enough to know the names and roles of all the officials
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You knew a guy called Connor was on VAR.
posted 2 hours, 10 minutes ago
‘Celtic and their big bucks have stole the establishment from us with bungs’
I hope this is serious.
posted 2 hours, 10 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign: Remember the 453 (U3627)
posted 32 minutes ago
Rangers really are a route 1 team. Lost count of how many times they just launched it and hoped to pick up a loose ball.
They were only going to score by our loose passes or a hoof into the box and that proved to be the case.
They are hiding behind penalties that never were and whatever nonsense they believe like the same club etc but if they think Rangers were good then I am delighted. We were passive and safe in the first half and the only threat from Rangers came from a Taylor pass straight to them.
Second half same again resulting in a 4 v 1. Then they got 2 goals from launches into the box. They are not a good footballing side at all. All hustle and bustle but very little quality
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's the only reason they're having a bit of success recently, Igamane is a decent target man for them. He's holding the ball up to bring their midfield in and runs the channels well too.
The tactics don't appear to have changed in the past few weeks, they just have someone upfront who isn't a complete donkey and is making them work.
posted 2 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted less than a minute ago
‘if Collum says the decision to award the first foul is correct, them it'll be a poor show, a very poor show indeed’
Why? It’s up to the ref to decide if he wants to play advantage. It’s an instant decision with no ability to see into the future.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's his job to allow play to continue until there I know advantage
Fck sake mate....you think I'm reaching
You've just sat there and slated Beaton for giving a foul when one of your players was fouled on the halfway line but you were still on the attack....now you are saying it's up to the ref whether he plays that advantage or not, so what exactly is your point about the halfway line foul
If he made the wrong call there....he made the wrong call with regards the potential penalty also
posted 2 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted less than a minute ago
‘if Collum says the decision to award the first foul is correct, them it'll be a poor show, a very poor show indeed’
Why? It’s up to the ref to decide if he wants to play advantage. It’s an instant decision with no ability to see into the future.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's his job to allow play to continue until there I know advantage
Fck sake mate....you think I'm reaching
You've just sat there and slated Beaton for giving a foul when one of your players was fouled on the halfway line but you were still on the attack....now you are saying it's up to the ref whether he plays that advantage or not, so what exactly is your point about the halfway line foul
If he made the wrong call there....he made the wrong call with regards the potential penalty also
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re thinking of the wrong poster.
posted 2 hours, 8 minutes ago
Apologies
Same point though really
posted 2 hours, 6 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted less than a minute ago
Apologies
Same point though really
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. POV is a different poster from me.
Confusing two different entities as they same thing can be difficult for you though
posted 2 hours, 6 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 hour, 57 minutes ago
comment by Faither (U3393)
posted less than a minute ago
The "penalty" was a case of both "at it" both were pulling jerseys so play on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was a clear foul, only dispute is whether it was a pen or not.
Is it reaching a bit...aye
But the rules are what they are, and they say that if a foul starts outside the box and continues into the box, then a penalty is given....on the line is in the box.
The foul started outside the box.....both players were in the box before it finished....so theres definitely an argument to be made there.
As said last night....interested to hear Collum's take on it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The foul didn't continue in the box though, he was fouled outside of it and fell into it.
If someone is halved outside the box but lands inside it, is it a penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mate...there are stills where Cerny's foot is on the line, and Scales has a huge handful of his shirt....so don't sit there and tell me it didn't continue into the box
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The kick didn't happen in the box
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
Btw-it’s his job to decide whether to play advantage or not, or award what he thinks is a foul. I don’t know when he blew his whistle, but he was losing control of the game and probably didn’t think there would be an advantage. I’m not sure what the advantage was in that case if he thinks the foul was stopping Cerny.
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 hour, 57 minutes ago
comment by Faither (U3393)
posted less than a minute ago
The "penalty" was a case of both "at it" both were pulling jerseys so play on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was a clear foul, only dispute is whether it was a pen or not.
Is it reaching a bit...aye
But the rules are what they are, and they say that if a foul starts outside the box and continues into the box, then a penalty is given....on the line is in the box.
The foul started outside the box.....both players were in the box before it finished....so theres definitely an argument to be made there.
As said last night....interested to hear Collum's take on it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The foul didn't continue in the box though, he was fouled outside of it and fell into it.
If someone is halved outside the box but lands inside it, is it a penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mate...there are stills where Cerny's foot is on the line, and Scales has a huge handful of his shirt....so don't sit there and tell me it didn't continue into the box
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The kick didn't happen in the box
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't say the kick didn't happen inside the box....the kick didn't knock Cerny over either....was the shirt pulling that did...and as said.....it's the refs job to allow play to continue until an attackers progress is actually stopped or any advantage is lost due to a foul
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
His idea of game management is booking people, whistling like Fvck and scary faces.
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 13 minutes ago
A lot of chat here when it’s a simple fact we should have had a penalty. Wasn’t given, we’ll make some noicse, Connor to get the sack, then move on.
Actually thought Neil Lennon was good on the commentary yesterday, based on pre-match was thinking he’d be annoying. But he talked through the game and his thoughts on midfield battle, shape etc very well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why Connor? He was only the assistant VAR. Muir was the VAR ref.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sack him then too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But why would you even mention Connor? Never known anyone to blame the assistant VAR.
They’re wont be any sackings anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not weird enough to know the names and roles of all the officials
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You knew a guy called Connor was on VAR.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not that deep, someone else referred to him as the VAR man so took that as gospel.
Can always count on there being gimps that know the names, roles, sexuality and marital status of the officials to keep me right
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided what to change it to yet (U10636)
posted less than a minute ago
Btw-it’s his job to decide whether to play advantage or not, or award what he thinks is a foul. I don’t know when he blew his whistle, but he was losing control of the game and probably didn’t think there would be an advantage. I’m not sure what the advantage was in that case if he thinks the foul was stopping Cerny.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was one in the first half where Johnston (I think it was) was taken out with an elbow to the gut and he wasn't even gonna blow for the foul
Was pur chance we kept the ball and won a corner from it, which the linesman also looked uncertain about giving.. you could see him looking over at Beaton to see what the final decision was gonna be
posted 2 hours, 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 13 minutes ago
A lot of chat here when it’s a simple fact we should have had a penalty. Wasn’t given, we’ll make some noicse, Connor to get the sack, then move on.
Actually thought Neil Lennon was good on the commentary yesterday, based on pre-match was thinking he’d be annoying. But he talked through the game and his thoughts on midfield battle, shape etc very well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why Connor? He was only the assistant VAR. Muir was the VAR ref.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sack him then too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But why would you even mention Connor? Never known anyone to blame the assistant VAR.
They’re wont be any sackings anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not weird enough to know the names and roles of all the officials
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You knew a guy called Connor was on VAR.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not that deep, someone else referred to him as the VAR man so took that as gospel.
Can always count on there being gimps that know the names, roles, sexuality and marital status of the officials to keep me right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What if it’s a sham marriage?
posted 2 hours, 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 hour, 57 minutes ago
comment by Faither (U3393)
posted less than a minute ago
The "penalty" was a case of both "at it" both were pulling jerseys so play on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was a clear foul, only dispute is whether it was a pen or not.
Is it reaching a bit...aye
But the rules are what they are, and they say that if a foul starts outside the box and continues into the box, then a penalty is given....on the line is in the box.
The foul started outside the box.....both players were in the box before it finished....so theres definitely an argument to be made there.
As said last night....interested to hear Collum's take on it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The foul didn't continue in the box though, he was fouled outside of it and fell into it.
If someone is halved outside the box but lands inside it, is it a penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mate...there are stills where Cerny's foot is on the line, and Scales has a huge handful of his shirt....so don't sit there and tell me it didn't continue into the box
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The kick didn't happen in the box
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't say the kick didn't happen inside the box....the kick didn't knock Cerny over either....was the shirt pulling that did...and as said.....it's the refs job to allow play to continue until an attackers progress is actually stopped or any advantage is lost due to a foul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you just making up the rules now?
posted 2 hours, 1 minute ago
This is now proper reaching btw
Just seen a still from the penalty shootout, think it was Engels penalty, and the rules clearly state that only the kicker and the goalkeeper should be in the penalty area, the goalkeeper from the kickers team should be on the goal line, outside the penalty area
Schmeichel is inside the box, walking towards the 6 yard box before Engels has even kicked the ball
The refs yesterday were really fcking poor
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 13 minutes ago
A lot of chat here when it’s a simple fact we should have had a penalty. Wasn’t given, we’ll make some noicse, Connor to get the sack, then move on.
Actually thought Neil Lennon was good on the commentary yesterday, based on pre-match was thinking he’d be annoying. But he talked through the game and his thoughts on midfield battle, shape etc very well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why Connor? He was only the assistant VAR. Muir was the VAR ref.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sack him then too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But why would you even mention Connor? Never known anyone to blame the assistant VAR.
They’re wont be any sackings anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not weird enough to know the names and roles of all the officials
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You knew a guy called Connor was on VAR.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not that deep, someone else referred to him as the VAR man so took that as gospel.
Can always count on there being gimps that know the names, roles, sexuality and marital status of the officials to keep me right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ooft! Someone is going right over top now.
I don’t know much about any of the refs-I know Muir is a rangers fan though. Said before, he stays local to me and is a stone’s throw away from the VAR HQ.
Just odd why you would decide that someone called Connor needs sacked.
They wee all in awe of kasper tbf
Sign in if you want to comment
Scottish League Cup Final
Page 24 of 26
22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26
posted 2 hours, 14 minutes ago
comment by JFK - Super Nintendo Chalmers (U8919)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by JFK - Super Nintendo Chalmers (U8919)
posted 33 seconds ago
seen a different still now, not a pen.
ref blew for foul when it was outside.
cant believe they got arfield, but he lost enough at rangers to give a good insight into what it feels like to be a silver medal sensation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some still that where you can hear the whistle
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well my rational for that is that the penalty wasn't given, so it must have been blown for the foul before going in the box.
what's yours?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Celtic and their big bucks have stole the establishment from us with bungs
posted 2 hours, 14 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 13 minutes ago
A lot of chat here when it’s a simple fact we should have had a penalty. Wasn’t given, we’ll make some noicse, Connor to get the sack, then move on.
Actually thought Neil Lennon was good on the commentary yesterday, based on pre-match was thinking he’d be annoying. But he talked through the game and his thoughts on midfield battle, shape etc very well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why Connor? He was only the assistant VAR. Muir was the VAR ref.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sack him then too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But why would you even mention Connor? Never known anyone to blame the assistant VAR.
They’re wont be any sackings anyway.
posted 2 hours, 14 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign: Remember the 453 (U3627)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign: Remember the 453 (U3627)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Call Sign: Remember the 453 (U3627)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted less than a minute ago
I keep hearing this two fouls argument.....to me they are all the same incident....Scales basically tried to stop Cerny by any means whatsoever, so when the first attempt fails he starts pulling at him
For me it's a complete cop out that argument....and if that's what Willie Collum comes out with I'll be disappointed, because of the first foul didn't stop Cerny, advantage should be played until there is none, and it was the shirt pull that finally stopped Cerny in his tracks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you also think that the ref should have let us attack at pace down the left when one of our players got wiped out at the halfway line? The first fould didn't stop our attack
As I said before keep going, you are only convincing yourself
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I do think the ref should have allowed that
Point being made is...if Collum says the first foul is what was given, and that was the right thing to do from the refs point of view...then I'll be disappointed, because he would be wrong...same way he would be wrong if he said Beaton blowing for your foul was the right thing to do
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Excellent. We would have scored from that attack and therefore your penalty claim wouldn't have happened. Happy to clear that up for you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
VAR doesn't look at fouls on the halfway line do they...they do look at potential penalties....hence the difference
It's really not me that's trying to convince myself of anything here mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There wasn't a potential penalty. There was a foul given. Rangers opted to ignore it and play on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
.....which is what the referee should have done until the attack was actually stopped, the very argument that you are making regards the halfway line foul...so I'll say again, if Collum says the decision to award the first foul is correct, them it'll be a poor show, a very poor show indeed
posted 2 hours, 13 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 hour, 57 minutes ago
comment by Faither (U3393)
posted less than a minute ago
The "penalty" was a case of both "at it" both were pulling jerseys so play on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was a clear foul, only dispute is whether it was a pen or not.
Is it reaching a bit...aye
But the rules are what they are, and they say that if a foul starts outside the box and continues into the box, then a penalty is given....on the line is in the box.
The foul started outside the box.....both players were in the box before it finished....so theres definitely an argument to be made there.
As said last night....interested to hear Collum's take on it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The foul didn't continue in the box though, he was fouled outside of it and fell into it.
If someone is halved outside the box but lands inside it, is it a penalty?
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 13 minutes ago
A lot of chat here when it’s a simple fact we should have had a penalty. Wasn’t given, we’ll make some noicse, Connor to get the sack, then move on.
Actually thought Neil Lennon was good on the commentary yesterday, based on pre-match was thinking he’d be annoying. But he talked through the game and his thoughts on midfield battle, shape etc very well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why Connor? He was only the assistant VAR. Muir was the VAR ref.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sack him then too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But why would you even mention Connor? Never known anyone to blame the assistant VAR.
They’re wont be any sackings anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not weird enough to know the names and roles of all the officials
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
‘if Collum says the decision to award the first foul is correct, them it'll be a poor show, a very poor show indeed’
Why? It’s up to the ref to decide if he wants to play advantage. It’s an instant decision with no ability to see into the future.
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 hour, 57 minutes ago
comment by Faither (U3393)
posted less than a minute ago
The "penalty" was a case of both "at it" both were pulling jerseys so play on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was a clear foul, only dispute is whether it was a pen or not.
Is it reaching a bit...aye
But the rules are what they are, and they say that if a foul starts outside the box and continues into the box, then a penalty is given....on the line is in the box.
The foul started outside the box.....both players were in the box before it finished....so theres definitely an argument to be made there.
As said last night....interested to hear Collum's take on it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The foul didn't continue in the box though, he was fouled outside of it and fell into it.
If someone is halved outside the box but lands inside it, is it a penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mate...there are stills where Cerny's foot is on the line, and Scales has a huge handful of his shirt....so don't sit there and tell me it didn't continue into the box
posted 2 hours, 11 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 13 minutes ago
A lot of chat here when it’s a simple fact we should have had a penalty. Wasn’t given, we’ll make some noicse, Connor to get the sack, then move on.
Actually thought Neil Lennon was good on the commentary yesterday, based on pre-match was thinking he’d be annoying. But he talked through the game and his thoughts on midfield battle, shape etc very well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why Connor? He was only the assistant VAR. Muir was the VAR ref.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sack him then too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But why would you even mention Connor? Never known anyone to blame the assistant VAR.
They’re wont be any sackings anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not weird enough to know the names and roles of all the officials
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You knew a guy called Connor was on VAR.
posted 2 hours, 10 minutes ago
‘Celtic and their big bucks have stole the establishment from us with bungs’
I hope this is serious.
posted 2 hours, 10 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign: Remember the 453 (U3627)
posted 32 minutes ago
Rangers really are a route 1 team. Lost count of how many times they just launched it and hoped to pick up a loose ball.
They were only going to score by our loose passes or a hoof into the box and that proved to be the case.
They are hiding behind penalties that never were and whatever nonsense they believe like the same club etc but if they think Rangers were good then I am delighted. We were passive and safe in the first half and the only threat from Rangers came from a Taylor pass straight to them.
Second half same again resulting in a 4 v 1. Then they got 2 goals from launches into the box. They are not a good footballing side at all. All hustle and bustle but very little quality
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's the only reason they're having a bit of success recently, Igamane is a decent target man for them. He's holding the ball up to bring their midfield in and runs the channels well too.
The tactics don't appear to have changed in the past few weeks, they just have someone upfront who isn't a complete donkey and is making them work.
posted 2 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted less than a minute ago
‘if Collum says the decision to award the first foul is correct, them it'll be a poor show, a very poor show indeed’
Why? It’s up to the ref to decide if he wants to play advantage. It’s an instant decision with no ability to see into the future.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's his job to allow play to continue until there I know advantage
Fck sake mate....you think I'm reaching
You've just sat there and slated Beaton for giving a foul when one of your players was fouled on the halfway line but you were still on the attack....now you are saying it's up to the ref whether he plays that advantage or not, so what exactly is your point about the halfway line foul
If he made the wrong call there....he made the wrong call with regards the potential penalty also
posted 2 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted less than a minute ago
‘if Collum says the decision to award the first foul is correct, them it'll be a poor show, a very poor show indeed’
Why? It’s up to the ref to decide if he wants to play advantage. It’s an instant decision with no ability to see into the future.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's his job to allow play to continue until there I know advantage
Fck sake mate....you think I'm reaching
You've just sat there and slated Beaton for giving a foul when one of your players was fouled on the halfway line but you were still on the attack....now you are saying it's up to the ref whether he plays that advantage or not, so what exactly is your point about the halfway line foul
If he made the wrong call there....he made the wrong call with regards the potential penalty also
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re thinking of the wrong poster.
posted 2 hours, 8 minutes ago
Apologies
Same point though really
posted 2 hours, 6 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted less than a minute ago
Apologies
Same point though really
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. POV is a different poster from me.
Confusing two different entities as they same thing can be difficult for you though
posted 2 hours, 6 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 hour, 57 minutes ago
comment by Faither (U3393)
posted less than a minute ago
The "penalty" was a case of both "at it" both were pulling jerseys so play on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was a clear foul, only dispute is whether it was a pen or not.
Is it reaching a bit...aye
But the rules are what they are, and they say that if a foul starts outside the box and continues into the box, then a penalty is given....on the line is in the box.
The foul started outside the box.....both players were in the box before it finished....so theres definitely an argument to be made there.
As said last night....interested to hear Collum's take on it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The foul didn't continue in the box though, he was fouled outside of it and fell into it.
If someone is halved outside the box but lands inside it, is it a penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mate...there are stills where Cerny's foot is on the line, and Scales has a huge handful of his shirt....so don't sit there and tell me it didn't continue into the box
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The kick didn't happen in the box
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
Btw-it’s his job to decide whether to play advantage or not, or award what he thinks is a foul. I don’t know when he blew his whistle, but he was losing control of the game and probably didn’t think there would be an advantage. I’m not sure what the advantage was in that case if he thinks the foul was stopping Cerny.
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 hour, 57 minutes ago
comment by Faither (U3393)
posted less than a minute ago
The "penalty" was a case of both "at it" both were pulling jerseys so play on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was a clear foul, only dispute is whether it was a pen or not.
Is it reaching a bit...aye
But the rules are what they are, and they say that if a foul starts outside the box and continues into the box, then a penalty is given....on the line is in the box.
The foul started outside the box.....both players were in the box before it finished....so theres definitely an argument to be made there.
As said last night....interested to hear Collum's take on it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The foul didn't continue in the box though, he was fouled outside of it and fell into it.
If someone is halved outside the box but lands inside it, is it a penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mate...there are stills where Cerny's foot is on the line, and Scales has a huge handful of his shirt....so don't sit there and tell me it didn't continue into the box
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The kick didn't happen in the box
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't say the kick didn't happen inside the box....the kick didn't knock Cerny over either....was the shirt pulling that did...and as said.....it's the refs job to allow play to continue until an attackers progress is actually stopped or any advantage is lost due to a foul
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
His idea of game management is booking people, whistling like Fvck and scary faces.
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 13 minutes ago
A lot of chat here when it’s a simple fact we should have had a penalty. Wasn’t given, we’ll make some noicse, Connor to get the sack, then move on.
Actually thought Neil Lennon was good on the commentary yesterday, based on pre-match was thinking he’d be annoying. But he talked through the game and his thoughts on midfield battle, shape etc very well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why Connor? He was only the assistant VAR. Muir was the VAR ref.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sack him then too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But why would you even mention Connor? Never known anyone to blame the assistant VAR.
They’re wont be any sackings anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not weird enough to know the names and roles of all the officials
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You knew a guy called Connor was on VAR.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not that deep, someone else referred to him as the VAR man so took that as gospel.
Can always count on there being gimps that know the names, roles, sexuality and marital status of the officials to keep me right
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided what to change it to yet (U10636)
posted less than a minute ago
Btw-it’s his job to decide whether to play advantage or not, or award what he thinks is a foul. I don’t know when he blew his whistle, but he was losing control of the game and probably didn’t think there would be an advantage. I’m not sure what the advantage was in that case if he thinks the foul was stopping Cerny.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was one in the first half where Johnston (I think it was) was taken out with an elbow to the gut and he wasn't even gonna blow for the foul
Was pur chance we kept the ball and won a corner from it, which the linesman also looked uncertain about giving.. you could see him looking over at Beaton to see what the final decision was gonna be
posted 2 hours, 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 13 minutes ago
A lot of chat here when it’s a simple fact we should have had a penalty. Wasn’t given, we’ll make some noicse, Connor to get the sack, then move on.
Actually thought Neil Lennon was good on the commentary yesterday, based on pre-match was thinking he’d be annoying. But he talked through the game and his thoughts on midfield battle, shape etc very well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why Connor? He was only the assistant VAR. Muir was the VAR ref.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sack him then too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But why would you even mention Connor? Never known anyone to blame the assistant VAR.
They’re wont be any sackings anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not weird enough to know the names and roles of all the officials
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You knew a guy called Connor was on VAR.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not that deep, someone else referred to him as the VAR man so took that as gospel.
Can always count on there being gimps that know the names, roles, sexuality and marital status of the officials to keep me right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What if it’s a sham marriage?
posted 2 hours, 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 hour, 57 minutes ago
comment by Faither (U3393)
posted less than a minute ago
The "penalty" was a case of both "at it" both were pulling jerseys so play on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was a clear foul, only dispute is whether it was a pen or not.
Is it reaching a bit...aye
But the rules are what they are, and they say that if a foul starts outside the box and continues into the box, then a penalty is given....on the line is in the box.
The foul started outside the box.....both players were in the box before it finished....so theres definitely an argument to be made there.
As said last night....interested to hear Collum's take on it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The foul didn't continue in the box though, he was fouled outside of it and fell into it.
If someone is halved outside the box but lands inside it, is it a penalty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mate...there are stills where Cerny's foot is on the line, and Scales has a huge handful of his shirt....so don't sit there and tell me it didn't continue into the box
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The kick didn't happen in the box
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't say the kick didn't happen inside the box....the kick didn't knock Cerny over either....was the shirt pulling that did...and as said.....it's the refs job to allow play to continue until an attackers progress is actually stopped or any advantage is lost due to a foul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you just making up the rules now?
posted 2 hours, 1 minute ago
This is now proper reaching btw
Just seen a still from the penalty shootout, think it was Engels penalty, and the rules clearly state that only the kicker and the goalkeeper should be in the penalty area, the goalkeeper from the kickers team should be on the goal line, outside the penalty area
Schmeichel is inside the box, walking towards the 6 yard box before Engels has even kicked the ball
The refs yesterday were really fcking poor
posted 2 hours ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 13 minutes ago
A lot of chat here when it’s a simple fact we should have had a penalty. Wasn’t given, we’ll make some noicse, Connor to get the sack, then move on.
Actually thought Neil Lennon was good on the commentary yesterday, based on pre-match was thinking he’d be annoying. But he talked through the game and his thoughts on midfield battle, shape etc very well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why Connor? He was only the assistant VAR. Muir was the VAR ref.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sack him then too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But why would you even mention Connor? Never known anyone to blame the assistant VAR.
They’re wont be any sackings anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not weird enough to know the names and roles of all the officials
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You knew a guy called Connor was on VAR.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not that deep, someone else referred to him as the VAR man so took that as gospel.
Can always count on there being gimps that know the names, roles, sexuality and marital status of the officials to keep me right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ooft! Someone is going right over top now.
I don’t know much about any of the refs-I know Muir is a rangers fan though. Said before, he stays local to me and is a stone’s throw away from the VAR HQ.
Just odd why you would decide that someone called Connor needs sacked.
posted 2 hours ago
They wee all in awe of kasper tbf
Page 24 of 26
22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26