comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 19 minutes ago
Is it not jumping to conclusions to say Sangita has been removed for her Israel interview given LBC have left that interview up on Youtube?

If they were that against surely they'd have removed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would be too blatant and obvious and wouldn't allow them to maintain plausible deniability.

comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 35 minutes ago
Is it not jumping to conclusions to say Sangita has been removed for her Israel interview given LBC have left that interview up on Youtube?

If they were that against surely they'd have removed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In the absence of any explanation by LBC or Sangita, it’s a plausible explanation. The only other thing I can think is that she has had a breakdown and LBC are trying to protect her privacy. However with that, they would usually announce “stepping away for personal reasons” or something like that. From what I can discern, there’s been none of that, leading back to someone at LBC taking issue with what she has done on the air. The timeline of the interview where she challenged the individual who was dismissing the ethnic cleansing and (plausible) genocide of Palestinians by the IDF, to her removal from the air, does look suspicious.

They have made a statement

https://pressgazette.co.uk/the-wire/media-jobs-uk-news/lbc-sangita-myska-vanessa-feltz/

Her contract has not been renewed

So preaching the bible is illegal in America now as it may be misconstrued as antisemitic. When are people going to wake up to this shiiit

What shiiiit?

Just looked and I can't find any news story saying preaching the bible is illegal?

There would be riots surely?

https://x.com/realstewpeters/status/1785842750979469753?s=46&t=OGfZZhWP7rROftTlMhKPZg

There already are riots, haven’t you heard of all those evil pro-Hamas students putting an end to society as we know it?

comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 11 minutes ago
Just looked and I can't find any news story saying preaching the bible is illegal?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh yes because the Zionist media are going to accurately and honestly portray reality. Like I said, when are people gonna wake up to this shiiit?

comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 20 minutes ago
They have made a statement

https://pressgazette.co.uk/the-wire/media-jobs-uk-news/lbc-sangita-myska-vanessa-feltz/

Her contract has not been renewed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
With no explanation as to why, shortly after she challenged an Israeli spokesperson on the bombing of an embassy. And pull her from the air prior to the end of her contract. 🧐

comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 11 minutes ago
Just looked and I can't find any news story saying preaching the bible is illegal?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh yes because the Zionist media are going to accurately and honestly portray reality. Like I said, when are people gonna wake up to this shiiit?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean there would be at least one right wing American publication that would be going mental right now if preaching the bible was suddenly illegal.

The post you linked basically means at worst they can't say one or two lines of gospel, not the whole bible, and even then I highly doubt that would in any way be enforced.

In fact reading their definition again, it says you can't use those gospels to characterise Israel or Israeli's, it doesn't say you can't say those gospels.

There's a clear difference between reading a gospel and reading a gospel to then say Israel is evil because they killed Jesus.

comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 11 minutes ago
Just looked and I can't find any news story saying preaching the bible is illegal?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh yes because the Zionist media are going to accurately and honestly portray reality. Like I said, when are people gonna wake up to this shiiit?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean there would be at least one right wing American publication that would be going mental right now if preaching the bible was suddenly illegal.

The post you linked basically means at worst they can't say one or two lines of gospel, not the whole bible, and even then I highly doubt that would in any way be enforced.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It still makes preaching the bible illegal. Whether it is enforced or not is irrelevant, the point is a law has passed that prevents a Christian nation from quoting passages of the bible as it may offend a country on the other side of the planet.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cw07wgrwzywo

IDF war criminals

Tom Hunt, MP for Ipswich asked local members to act as his “emergency proxy” after he found that he had no appropriate ID to vote in the local council elections

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tory-mp-voter-id-local-elections-b2538329.html

Hahahahahaha

Who’s voted lads

comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 8 minutes ago
Tom Hunt, MP for Ipswich asked local members to act as his “emergency proxy” after he found that he had no appropriate ID to vote in the local council elections

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tory-mp-voter-id-local-elections-b2538329.html

Hahahahahaha
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How does an MP not have photo ID? Does he not drive? Travel?

Westminster Voting Intention:

LAB: 44% (-1)
CON: 18% (-2)
RFM: 15% (+2)
LDM: 10% (+1)
GRN: 8% (+1)
SNP: 2% (-1)

Via @YouGov, 30 Apr - 1 May.
Changes w/ 23-24 Apr.

Oh my goodness lads

The Conservatives are now behind Labour among 2016 Leave voters

Leave voter voting intention
Reform UK: 32%
Labour: 28%
Conservative: 27%

comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
So preaching the bible is illegal in America now as it may be misconstrued as antisemitic. When are people going to wake up to this shiiit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whut fooktard ‘news’ outlet did u get that from u dumb khunt

comment by Sydney Sweeney (U11781)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 8 minutes ago
Tom Hunt, MP for Ipswich asked local members to act as his “emergency proxy” after he found that he had no appropriate ID to vote in the local council elections

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tory-mp-voter-id-local-elections-b2538329.html

Hahahahahaha
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How does an MP not have photo ID? Does he not drive? Travel?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More to the point how do you become an MP without photo ID?

Do they ask you what school you went to before any official form of identification?

comment by #4zA (U22472)
posted 46 minutes ago
comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
So preaching the bible is illegal in America now as it may be misconstrued as antisemitic. When are people going to wake up to this shiiit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whut fooktard ‘news’ outlet did u get that from u dumb khunt
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 5 hours, 1 minute ago
Is it not jumping to conclusions to say Sangita has been removed for her Israel interview given LBC have left that interview up on Youtube?

If they were that against surely they'd have removed it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has the Belle Donati and Mehdi Hasan interviews been removed?

This is how the Israelis work — the evidence is already out there that exposes them, they just want to intimidate journalists so they don't challenge them. They're complete narcissists.

The question is, if it's a fact that anyone, whoever, dominates media at the highest levels, isn't it logically naive to think they don't use this to try to promote their own interests and shape opinions?