Actually no Liverpool LAsig'd to be honest.
"Spurs offered more money"
Given we talking about Levy here, what an insulting offer the Pooool must have made to the boy.
Something like :
We're Liverpool. You take your Swansea wages and be grateful.
Spurs have offered me an extra quid a week.
In the past 3 yrs,they've been PL top 4 twice, and had CL footie once. You've done neither.
Sold to the Darth one.
No......Brendan said Spurs offered more. I he said Santa wasn't real the RS would believe him
A Spurs without modric has no chance of finishing above Liverpool. None.
Everyone other than kids from Iceland know that. Actually, even they know it but you can't turn down much larger wages offered by Spurs.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
This has really got to the Micky Mousers, i can tell just from this thread
"This has really got to the Micky Mousers, i can tell just from this thread"
Indeed.
If only they had offered the extra quid a week as wages.
Hehehee looks like the spu dettes are getting upset again because we're not fussed about sigg'.
The truth is you're paying over the odds for him.
You're just gonna have to live with it........
Overpaid....who said they overpaid?
That's right....the manager who couldn't talk him into joining the RS
"The truth is you're paying over the odds for him"
Given that :
1. You lot cannot even state WHAT the "odds" are/were
2. Levy
The conclusion is :
/
But to be fair, credit for your board trying to do a Levy for the boy.
That shows a club sorting itself out in the right way.
It all boils down to Spurs wanted him more than we did.
"It all boils down to Spurs wanted him more than we did"
Which of course in no way implies Spurs had to pay "over the odds for him."
Just seems very odd that spurs offered more money given that he would have went for football reasons anyway.
They should have matched Liverpools offer.
If I were a spurs fan i'd be disappointed in my board
A club will pay what they have to, to get the player they want so it follows that Spurs must have wanted him more than Liverpool.
"Just seems very odd that spurs offered more money given that he would have went for football reasons anyway."
What did the Poool and Spurs offer ??
Until you give the figures, mockery is upon you.
"to get the player they want so it follows that Spurs must have wanted him more than Liverpool"
Again :
Which of course in no way implies Spurs had to pay "over the odds for him."
Spurs clearly wanted Gylfi more than Liverpool did.
"Spurs clearly wanted Gylfi more than Liverpool did"
Indeed.
Also pleased that we didn't have to pay an inflated price in a bidding war.
No bidding war, Rodgers wouldn't allow it, as for inflated price who knows - unless you have the proof that you claim Liverpool fans didn't have
"unless you have the proof that you claim Liverpool fans didn't have"
I don't.
But then since neither do you lot, game over.
I come back to - Spurs wanted him more than Liverpool did
"Spurs wanted him more than Liverpool did"
Again :
Indeed.
Hahahahha, are you lot still peddling this line, we obviously didn't think he was worth the money, you obviously did, we've moved on to other targets, the only people that give a carp about sigurrdson is him, his agent and spurs (but not modric, ahahahahahahaha!).
"Hahahahha, are you lot still peddling this line"
Apparently you lot still are. #showmethemoney
hahahaha, so you think twitter is representative of what people really think Gullible, much?
Sign in if you want to comment
Gylfis Demands were met by Spurs Board
Page 13 of 16
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16
posted on 8/7/12
Actually no Liverpool LAsig'd to be honest.
posted on 8/7/12
"Spurs offered more money"
Given we talking about Levy here, what an insulting offer the Pooool must have made to the boy.
Something like :
We're Liverpool. You take your Swansea wages and be grateful.
Spurs have offered me an extra quid a week.
In the past 3 yrs,they've been PL top 4 twice, and had CL footie once. You've done neither.
Sold to the Darth one.
posted on 8/7/12
No......Brendan said Spurs offered more. I he said Santa wasn't real the RS would believe him
posted on 8/7/12
A Spurs without modric has no chance of finishing above Liverpool. None.
Everyone other than kids from Iceland know that. Actually, even they know it but you can't turn down much larger wages offered by Spurs.
posted on 8/7/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/7/12
This has really got to the Micky Mousers, i can tell just from this thread
posted on 8/7/12
"This has really got to the Micky Mousers, i can tell just from this thread"
Indeed.
If only they had offered the extra quid a week as wages.
posted on 8/7/12
Hehehee looks like the spu dettes are getting upset again because we're not fussed about sigg'.
The truth is you're paying over the odds for him.
You're just gonna have to live with it........
posted on 8/7/12
Overpaid....who said they overpaid?
That's right....the manager who couldn't talk him into joining the RS
posted on 8/7/12
"The truth is you're paying over the odds for him"
Given that :
1. You lot cannot even state WHAT the "odds" are/were
2. Levy
The conclusion is :
/
But to be fair, credit for your board trying to do a Levy for the boy.
That shows a club sorting itself out in the right way.
posted on 8/7/12
It all boils down to Spurs wanted him more than we did.
posted on 8/7/12
"It all boils down to Spurs wanted him more than we did"
Which of course in no way implies Spurs had to pay "over the odds for him."
posted on 8/7/12
Just seems very odd that spurs offered more money given that he would have went for football reasons anyway.
They should have matched Liverpools offer.
If I were a spurs fan i'd be disappointed in my board
posted on 8/7/12
A club will pay what they have to, to get the player they want so it follows that Spurs must have wanted him more than Liverpool.
posted on 8/7/12
"Just seems very odd that spurs offered more money given that he would have went for football reasons anyway."
What did the Poool and Spurs offer ??
Until you give the figures, mockery is upon you.
posted on 8/7/12
"to get the player they want so it follows that Spurs must have wanted him more than Liverpool"
Again :
Which of course in no way implies Spurs had to pay "over the odds for him."
posted on 8/7/12
Spurs clearly wanted Gylfi more than Liverpool did.
posted on 8/7/12
"Spurs clearly wanted Gylfi more than Liverpool did"
Indeed.
Also pleased that we didn't have to pay an inflated price in a bidding war.
posted on 8/7/12
No bidding war, Rodgers wouldn't allow it, as for inflated price who knows - unless you have the proof that you claim Liverpool fans didn't have
posted on 8/7/12
"unless you have the proof that you claim Liverpool fans didn't have"
I don't.
But then since neither do you lot, game over.
posted on 8/7/12
I come back to - Spurs wanted him more than Liverpool did
posted on 8/7/12
"Spurs wanted him more than Liverpool did"
Again :
Indeed.
posted on 8/7/12
Hahahahha, are you lot still peddling this line, we obviously didn't think he was worth the money, you obviously did, we've moved on to other targets, the only people that give a carp about sigurrdson is him, his agent and spurs (but not modric, ahahahahahahaha!).
posted on 8/7/12
"Hahahahha, are you lot still peddling this line"
Apparently you lot still are. #showmethemoney
posted on 8/7/12
hahahaha, so you think twitter is representative of what people really think Gullible, much?
Page 13 of 16
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16