Are the loserpudliuns still banging on about this deary me.
"he didn't want to offer what Sigurdsson wanted"
What was the stuff that he "wanted" ??
He wantwed a million-billion-trillion a week. Only Spurs were daft enough to double taht offer from Liverpool.....so Brendan says
IMHO :
1. Rogers offered him the same kind of deal that he would have done if he was buying him for Swansea.
2. +/- this is Liverpool and you should be grateful for such an offer etc
Fellaini's
I'm sad to hear that we're spending so much on him. I'm not entirely sure he's worth it. But if Brendan says so, it's definitely true.
Its all still lads....unless.someone can put a figure down.for the.RS offer and the Spurs deal.
Until then comments about spurs offering more are just bitter felled
Doesn't matter what the figure is. Let's say Rodgers offered x. Sightseeing wanted y. Rodgers didn't budge on x. Spurs agreed to y. It's all very simple even for those who don't understand algebra.
If y = x + 1, then Liverpl.
No, no, no.
You need to assign a figure, I could make X and Y equal if I wanted....
So what are the numbers
Or are you just going to swallow Brenda corporate line
Hhahaah The loserpudlians are trying to get anyone they can to take Andy Carrol on loan, just so they can afford to bring in boroni Queen Kenny has really fecked you lot upno wonder they tried to underpay gilfi.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Its illegal for a club to release the financial transactions of other clubs (player wages etc). If someone from liverpool really knew how much sigs was offered and announced it to the press then liverpool fc and the person who announced it would be in a lot of trouble with the fa.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
It doesn't matter it just seemed a fair few liverpool wums stated that it was the only reason sigs came to spurs. Normally I wouldn't mind as all the wums are confined in this one place and not ruining articles on the main board, however I was bored of this coming up in my news feed so wanted to put an end to any speculation. Maybe sigs is or isn't on at spurs but the only people who know that are probably him, his agent and the club.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Nobody has announced anything. It was merely pointed out that Sig was offered more at Spurs than he was with us.
==
Does anyone have a set of figures they can put to the Spurs and Liverpool offers?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Massively naïve is the wrong word as there isn't sufficient evidence. Also rodgers didn't state sigs was on more wages at spurs, he speculated.
comment by Greatteamswinit4times(redrobtheredforDon) (U6008)
posted 1 minute ago
Nobody has announced anything. It was merely pointed out that Sig was offered more at Spurs than he was with us.
==
Does anyone have a set of figures they can put to the Spurs and Liverpool offers?
---------------
Obviously not. I just said that was what was pointed out.
====
Well until someone can back it up, its just nuts isn't it?
You cant claim he gets more without knowing what Liverpool offered and what Spurs gave him!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sign in if you want to comment
Gylfis Demands were met by Spurs Board
Page 15 of 16
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16
posted on 10/7/12
Are the loserpudliuns still banging on about this deary me.
posted on 10/7/12
"he didn't want to offer what Sigurdsson wanted"
What was the stuff that he "wanted" ??
posted on 10/7/12
He wantwed a million-billion-trillion a week. Only Spurs were daft enough to double taht offer from Liverpool.....so Brendan says
posted on 10/7/12
IMHO :
1. Rogers offered him the same kind of deal that he would have done if he was buying him for Swansea.
2. +/- this is Liverpool and you should be grateful for such an offer etc
posted on 10/7/12
Fellaini's
I'm sad to hear that we're spending so much on him. I'm not entirely sure he's worth it. But if Brendan says so, it's definitely true.
posted on 10/7/12
Its all still lads....unless.someone can put a figure down.for the.RS offer and the Spurs deal.
Until then comments about spurs offering more are just bitter felled
posted on 10/7/12
Doesn't matter what the figure is. Let's say Rodgers offered x. Sightseeing wanted y. Rodgers didn't budge on x. Spurs agreed to y. It's all very simple even for those who don't understand algebra.
posted on 10/7/12
Sigurdsson *
posted on 10/7/12
If y = x + 1, then Liverpl.
posted on 10/7/12
No, no, no.
You need to assign a figure, I could make X and Y equal if I wanted....
So what are the numbers
Or are you just going to swallow Brenda corporate line
posted on 11/7/12
Hhahaah The loserpudlians are trying to get anyone they can to take Andy Carrol on loan, just so they can afford to bring in boroni Queen Kenny has really fecked you lot upno wonder they tried to underpay gilfi.
posted on 11/7/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/7/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/7/12
Its illegal for a club to release the financial transactions of other clubs (player wages etc). If someone from liverpool really knew how much sigs was offered and announced it to the press then liverpool fc and the person who announced it would be in a lot of trouble with the fa.
posted on 12/7/12
Edin's ITK
posted on 12/7/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/7/12
It doesn't matter it just seemed a fair few liverpool wums stated that it was the only reason sigs came to spurs. Normally I wouldn't mind as all the wums are confined in this one place and not ruining articles on the main board, however I was bored of this coming up in my news feed so wanted to put an end to any speculation. Maybe sigs is or isn't on at spurs but the only people who know that are probably him, his agent and the club.
posted on 12/7/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/7/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/7/12
Nobody has announced anything. It was merely pointed out that Sig was offered more at Spurs than he was with us.
==
Does anyone have a set of figures they can put to the Spurs and Liverpool offers?
posted on 12/7/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/7/12
Massively naïve is the wrong word as there isn't sufficient evidence. Also rodgers didn't state sigs was on more wages at spurs, he speculated.
posted on 12/7/12
comment by Greatteamswinit4times(redrobtheredforDon) (U6008)
posted 1 minute ago
Nobody has announced anything. It was merely pointed out that Sig was offered more at Spurs than he was with us.
==
Does anyone have a set of figures they can put to the Spurs and Liverpool offers?
---------------
Obviously not. I just said that was what was pointed out.
====
Well until someone can back it up, its just nuts isn't it?
You cant claim he gets more without knowing what Liverpool offered and what Spurs gave him!
posted on 12/7/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/7/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 15 of 16
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16