Iniesta doesn't have a set position, you complete tosspot.
You just answered your own question though. Yes. He plays the same position he does for Barca when with Spain.
Both positions? What as an attacking mid too?
So just because he plays in a free role makes him better? Xavi is a better passer, has better vision, is more incisive and contributes more in either position.
I never said that. I think Xavi's the best midfielder in the world.
And I agree with you on the trait comparison.
Was just contesting your points about the positions. Xavi is not better than Iniesta in the attacking mid position. Plain and simple.
And no, I can't explain how he was player of the tournament at the Euro's. There were 3/4 players that were better than him in the Euro's
Fabregas should have won POTT to be honest
Iniesta isn't a bad player, he's world class but Xavi is better in both positions, he's played in attacking midfield plenty for Spain and sometimes for Barca and been very effective.
Fabregas, Pirlo and Ronaldo were easily better than Iniesta at the Euro's.
well he was, get over it.
Great article.
Wait...I feel like I said this before
hardly he could play for you lot even if he was blindfolded
He probably could. He would still be diabolical though, in fact with a blindfold he would probably be worse.
Sign in if you want to comment
Iniesta lol
Page 11 of 11
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
posted on 26/8/12
Iniesta doesn't have a set position, you complete tosspot.
You just answered your own question though. Yes. He plays the same position he does for Barca when with Spain.
Both positions? What as an attacking mid too?
posted on 26/8/12
So just because he plays in a free role makes him better? Xavi is a better passer, has better vision, is more incisive and contributes more in either position.
posted on 26/8/12
I never said that. I think Xavi's the best midfielder in the world.
And I agree with you on the trait comparison.
Was just contesting your points about the positions. Xavi is not better than Iniesta in the attacking mid position. Plain and simple.
posted on 26/8/12
And no, I can't explain how he was player of the tournament at the Euro's. There were 3/4 players that were better than him in the Euro's
posted on 26/8/12
Obviously not.
posted on 26/8/12
Fabregas should have won POTT to be honest
posted on 26/8/12
Iniesta isn't a bad player, he's world class but Xavi is better in both positions, he's played in attacking midfield plenty for Spain and sometimes for Barca and been very effective.
Fabregas, Pirlo and Ronaldo were easily better than Iniesta at the Euro's.
posted on 26/8/12
well he was, get over it.
posted on 28/3/13
Iniesta is diabolical.
posted on 28/3/13
Great article.
Wait...I feel like I said this before
posted on 28/3/13
hardly he could play for you lot even if he was blindfolded
posted on 28/3/13
He probably could. He would still be diabolical though, in fact with a blindfold he would probably be worse.
Page 11 of 11
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11