Is this the real reason Fergie changed his mind about retiring? Surely we can't blow a 346 point lead? Only Keegan's Newcastle could do that! Especially as the world is supposed to end this year, isn't it?
Planet X Niburu...... we are doomed I tells ya
Seriously though Everton have some record of top flight games wow!
We are a bigger club than Man Utd. FACT
Spurs > Oil barron's Chelsea
Are giving points for draws aswell? Because if not your maths is all wrong...
comment by henrykamp - I love Arsene Wenger (U8418)
posted 4 minutes ago
We are a bigger club than Man Utd. FACT
---------------
You average less points a season tho
Interesting article but I'm guessing Liverpool and Everton would happily swap their positions on this table for some of the success City and Chelsea have had recently
comment by Biglaa (U5954)
posted 13 minutes ago
Is this the real reason Fergie changed his mind about retiring? Surely we can't blow a 346 point lead? Only Keegan's Newcastle could do that! Especially as the world is supposed to end this year, isn't it?
---------------------------
I've heard that Rafa is coming back. We could still catch you before the end!
spurs are a powerhouse
where is west ham ?
By the end of the season, oil barron Chelsea will overtake Spurs
I'm guessing this league doesn't take into account United from 1888-1902 when we were Newton Heath. Fair play to Liverpool for being on top but I think that is largely due to the fact United didn't enter the league as Manchester United until 1902, 14 years after the beginning of the league.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
the chaaaavs would be about 25th if it werent for roman the showing up
Statto.com table is different:
http://www.statto.com/football/stats/england/premier-league/all-time-table/full
Top ten:
Liverpool - 5171 points
Arsenal - 5105
Everton - 5006
Manchester United - 4901
Aston Villa - 4579
Chelsea - 3788
Spurs - 3771
Man City - 3686
Newcastle - 3672
Sunderland - 3329
Are giving points for draws aswell? Because if not your maths is all wrong...
=================================
Someone doesn't remember the days of 2 points for a win
yes but teams that have only ever finished 2nd could rank very highly on this table, being considered more successful than teams who have won trophies or actually won the league on few occasions . Honestly we are all turning into baseball fans with our obsession over stats these days
Look Moronic is out of his shell
Look Moronic is out of his shell
-----
no one round here goes by that name
try again
So why are you bothered to reply
looking at statto's table something clearly went wrong in your calculations
I don't want stats on history....if i did i would follow Liverpool.
I want to win the league!
Does it take into account the age of a club? For example a club like Totthenham, founded in 1882 with a 23 year head start over a team like Chelsea would surely expect to be further ahead of a team formed in 1905 considering how much better than us they think they are.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Galvin, it refers only to games and results overtime, keep up son, should be simple enough even for you.
Sign in if you want to comment
English football history (the real deal)
Page 1 of 5
posted on 12/9/12
Is this the real reason Fergie changed his mind about retiring? Surely we can't blow a 346 point lead? Only Keegan's Newcastle could do that! Especially as the world is supposed to end this year, isn't it?
posted on 12/9/12
Planet X Niburu...... we are doomed I tells ya
Seriously though Everton have some record of top flight games wow!
posted on 12/9/12
We are a bigger club than Man Utd. FACT
posted on 12/9/12
Spurs > Oil barron's Chelsea
posted on 12/9/12
Are giving points for draws aswell? Because if not your maths is all wrong...
posted on 12/9/12
comment by henrykamp - I love Arsene Wenger (U8418)
posted 4 minutes ago
We are a bigger club than Man Utd. FACT
---------------
You average less points a season tho
posted on 12/9/12
Interesting article but I'm guessing Liverpool and Everton would happily swap their positions on this table for some of the success City and Chelsea have had recently
posted on 12/9/12
comment by Biglaa (U5954)
posted 13 minutes ago
Is this the real reason Fergie changed his mind about retiring? Surely we can't blow a 346 point lead? Only Keegan's Newcastle could do that! Especially as the world is supposed to end this year, isn't it?
---------------------------
I've heard that Rafa is coming back. We could still catch you before the end!
posted on 12/9/12
spurs are a powerhouse
where is west ham ?
posted on 12/9/12
By the end of the season, oil barron Chelsea will overtake Spurs
posted on 12/9/12
I'm guessing this league doesn't take into account United from 1888-1902 when we were Newton Heath. Fair play to Liverpool for being on top but I think that is largely due to the fact United didn't enter the league as Manchester United until 1902, 14 years after the beginning of the league.
posted on 12/9/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/9/12
the chaaaavs would be about 25th if it werent for roman the showing up
posted on 12/9/12
Useless article 1
posted on 12/9/12
Statto.com table is different:
http://www.statto.com/football/stats/england/premier-league/all-time-table/full
Top ten:
Liverpool - 5171 points
Arsenal - 5105
Everton - 5006
Manchester United - 4901
Aston Villa - 4579
Chelsea - 3788
Spurs - 3771
Man City - 3686
Newcastle - 3672
Sunderland - 3329
posted on 12/9/12
Are giving points for draws aswell? Because if not your maths is all wrong...
=================================
Someone doesn't remember the days of 2 points for a win
posted on 12/9/12
yes but teams that have only ever finished 2nd could rank very highly on this table, being considered more successful than teams who have won trophies or actually won the league on few occasions . Honestly we are all turning into baseball fans with our obsession over stats these days
posted on 12/9/12
Look Moronic is out of his shell
posted on 12/9/12
Look Moronic is out of his shell
-----
no one round here goes by that name
try again
posted on 12/9/12
So why are you bothered to reply
posted on 12/9/12
looking at statto's table something clearly went wrong in your calculations
posted on 12/9/12
I don't want stats on history....if i did i would follow Liverpool.
I want to win the league!
posted on 12/9/12
Does it take into account the age of a club? For example a club like Totthenham, founded in 1882 with a 23 year head start over a team like Chelsea would surely expect to be further ahead of a team formed in 1905 considering how much better than us they think they are.
posted on 12/9/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/9/12
Galvin, it refers only to games and results overtime, keep up son, should be simple enough even for you.
Page 1 of 5