Irony really is lost on you!
===
pfft!
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 4 minutes ago
Did you sign yer share purchasing cheque in blood? or was that just blue biro?
==
just ink cant remember the colour
TRFC
Keep hanging around the champions board and giving us a laugh mate.,
Pfft!
............
Original response.
Was that an admittance there,tim...?
125 years of unbroken history was not one word was said about Rangers,get a grip of yersells.
------
FFS take a look at yourself.
When has another club ever talked about "unbroken history"?
I can't think of one.
If you think that celtic didn't mean anything by that in regards to Rangers troubles then you're a fckin idiot or a brainwashed moron.
You decide.
hows the dossier comin oan DC
think we should be adding the integrity tour of japan in there?
Dukey
Was it a bouncy bouncy cheque?
don't mince yer words eh PB
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 1 second ago
Dukey
Was it a bouncy bouncy cheque?
==
seems to have gone through ok
Brainwashed morons rool ok.
And if you proddy, goat fiddlers disagree yer kneecaps are mine!
Dukey
My £500 worth of useless original shares are in a frame on my office wall...Makes me feel good about myself knowing I own a wee bit.
Don't think I've ever checked their worthlessness.
PB if it was a dig at Rangers then it seems to have worked,as it has certainly got you lot wound up
I thought you lot didn't care what we do?
125 years of unbroken history
I will remember that till the day i die.
Watt a night.
Don't think I've ever checked their worthlessness.
==
seems they are worth 18% more thanks to Rangers running the business at Celtic.
well thats what the OP was saying
FFS take a look at yourself.
When has another club ever talked about "unbroken history"?
-----------------
PB the same way that the Rangers press and media have been at pains to tell us that Rangers then...Rangers now etc etc.
My point before is what if they are little nips?
What of it? They are more in a surreptitious point than some of the blatant comments levelled from Green and co.
Its no more than a comment about the only team in Scotland to have won the European cup...in a kinda GIRUY with a touch of finesse way.
As I say there have been many times when Rangers fans have stood up for the way Charles Green has spoke when many of the rest of us found the comments crass at best....it is a little rich to then feel that Lawwell is "having a go" for a one liner...
Its good to be the Gordon Gecko of the SPL
My point before is what if they are little nips?
------
The only real problem I have with it is (as ive said before) celtic fans who ignore these "wee nips" and day that their club has behaved with dignity.
I also said before that if Celtic were forthright with their digs (like you say green is) then it wouldn't bother me.
It's the sleekit nature of the digs, coupled with the total denial of their meaning from celtic fans which bothers me.
Old Walter Weasel is the past master of talking out of the side of his mouth, aah remember how the Berzz used to deflect away his comments about Celtic, Linesmen, the SFA...
WUR AW AT IT!!!
Hector they dont like it when we get it up them,well tough fecking luck.
125 years Lawwell The Champions Lennon.
COYBIG
They preferred it in the 90's when we were a shambles,well the tables have turned lads,get used to it.
For every £10'r n nat
Green is just havin a hissy fit because that's his get out clause gone. He thought the reconstruction would get him back in the SPL faster so he could flog a top league club for better money.
No fast track, no fast buck.
As for Pete havin a pop, it's all good. Like Green playing up to the supporters to bring in the 'green'backs for The Rangers and get them to a better position to flog em.....He has to make Celtic supporters think in terms of The Rangers being pretty much out of the game for a long period of time.
It's fine to rip them, but they're not our rivals any more. We are a club in our own right. The OF is gone as a spectacle and will be for ages.
Ironically The Rangers need to adopt the same policy as Celtic has in the past. They need to invest heavily in the club and re-invent themselves as a brand that can draw the same levels of merchandise and sponsorship as Celtic. But then, if Celtic keep progressing in obtaining CL football every year or two there should be cash to burn to further improve our standing.
Oldco didn't just liquidate, they also gave Celtic the golden ticket for many years.
Green will get you back to the top league and try his best to flog you. But as far as I an see is your only hope is he flogs you to another David Murray type if you want to get anywhere near Celtic again.
For every £10'r n nat
-----
At least we had the baws to say it, and not skulk around making ambiguous statements.
Ironically The Rangers need to adopt the same policy as Celtic has in the past. They need to invest heavily in the club and re-invent themselves as a brand that can draw the same levels of merchandise and sponsorship as Celtic
==
this i actually agree with
Sign in if you want to comment
keep it up
Page 6 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9
posted on 10/1/13
Irony really is lost on you!
===
pfft!
posted on 10/1/13
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 4 minutes ago
Did you sign yer share purchasing cheque in blood? or was that just blue biro?
==
just ink cant remember the colour
posted on 10/1/13
TRFC
Keep hanging around the champions board and giving us a laugh mate.,
posted on 10/1/13
Pfft!
............
Original response.
posted on 10/1/13
Was that an admittance there,tim...?
posted on 10/1/13
125 years of unbroken history was not one word was said about Rangers,get a grip of yersells.
------
FFS take a look at yourself.
When has another club ever talked about "unbroken history"?
I can't think of one.
If you think that celtic didn't mean anything by that in regards to Rangers troubles then you're a fckin idiot or a brainwashed moron.
You decide.
posted on 10/1/13
hows the dossier comin oan DC
think we should be adding the integrity tour of japan in there?
posted on 10/1/13
Dukey
Was it a bouncy bouncy cheque?
posted on 10/1/13
don't mince yer words eh PB
posted on 10/1/13
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 1 second ago
Dukey
Was it a bouncy bouncy cheque?
==
seems to have gone through ok
posted on 10/1/13
Brainwashed morons rool ok.
And if you proddy, goat fiddlers disagree yer kneecaps are mine!
posted on 10/1/13
Dukey
My £500 worth of useless original shares are in a frame on my office wall...Makes me feel good about myself knowing I own a wee bit.
Don't think I've ever checked their worthlessness.
posted on 10/1/13
PB is a pure sevcopath.
posted on 10/1/13
PB if it was a dig at Rangers then it seems to have worked,as it has certainly got you lot wound up
I thought you lot didn't care what we do?
125 years of unbroken history
I will remember that till the day i die.
Watt a night.
posted on 10/1/13
Don't think I've ever checked their worthlessness.
==
seems they are worth 18% more thanks to Rangers running the business at Celtic.
well thats what the OP was saying
posted on 10/1/13
FFS take a look at yourself.
When has another club ever talked about "unbroken history"?
-----------------
PB the same way that the Rangers press and media have been at pains to tell us that Rangers then...Rangers now etc etc.
My point before is what if they are little nips?
What of it? They are more in a surreptitious point than some of the blatant comments levelled from Green and co.
Its no more than a comment about the only team in Scotland to have won the European cup...in a kinda GIRUY with a touch of finesse way.
As I say there have been many times when Rangers fans have stood up for the way Charles Green has spoke when many of the rest of us found the comments crass at best....it is a little rich to then feel that Lawwell is "having a go" for a one liner...
posted on 10/1/13
Its good to be the Gordon Gecko of the SPL
posted on 10/1/13
My point before is what if they are little nips?
------
The only real problem I have with it is (as ive said before) celtic fans who ignore these "wee nips" and day that their club has behaved with dignity.
I also said before that if Celtic were forthright with their digs (like you say green is) then it wouldn't bother me.
It's the sleekit nature of the digs, coupled with the total denial of their meaning from celtic fans which bothers me.
posted on 10/1/13
hector
posted on 10/1/13
Old Walter Weasel is the past master of talking out of the side of his mouth, aah remember how the Berzz used to deflect away his comments about Celtic, Linesmen, the SFA...
WUR AW AT IT!!!
posted on 10/1/13
Hector they dont like it when we get it up them,well tough fecking luck.
125 years Lawwell The Champions Lennon.
COYBIG
posted on 10/1/13
They preferred it in the 90's when we were a shambles,well the tables have turned lads,get used to it.
For every £10'r n nat
posted on 10/1/13
Green is just havin a hissy fit because that's his get out clause gone. He thought the reconstruction would get him back in the SPL faster so he could flog a top league club for better money.
No fast track, no fast buck.
As for Pete havin a pop, it's all good. Like Green playing up to the supporters to bring in the 'green'backs for The Rangers and get them to a better position to flog em.....He has to make Celtic supporters think in terms of The Rangers being pretty much out of the game for a long period of time.
It's fine to rip them, but they're not our rivals any more. We are a club in our own right. The OF is gone as a spectacle and will be for ages.
Ironically The Rangers need to adopt the same policy as Celtic has in the past. They need to invest heavily in the club and re-invent themselves as a brand that can draw the same levels of merchandise and sponsorship as Celtic. But then, if Celtic keep progressing in obtaining CL football every year or two there should be cash to burn to further improve our standing.
Oldco didn't just liquidate, they also gave Celtic the golden ticket for many years.
Green will get you back to the top league and try his best to flog you. But as far as I an see is your only hope is he flogs you to another David Murray type if you want to get anywhere near Celtic again.
posted on 10/1/13
For every £10'r n nat
-----
At least we had the baws to say it, and not skulk around making ambiguous statements.
posted on 10/1/13
Ironically The Rangers need to adopt the same policy as Celtic has in the past. They need to invest heavily in the club and re-invent themselves as a brand that can draw the same levels of merchandise and sponsorship as Celtic
==
this i actually agree with
Page 6 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9