comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 52 seconds ago
interpretation of religious texts is an ever changing process as well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
True
comment by redmisty (U7556)
posted 1 minute ago
No I slated people who make categorical statement's not backed up with facts and science
________________
No, you slated atheists specifically. Stop lying FFS. And rather than accusing me of not reading your posts, perhaps you need to start reading your own posts...
Let me refresh your memory:-
"I cannot stand atheists, they are the most close minded idiotic people on the planet."
"Clueless morons, they really get on my nerves, especially the extremists"
"Atheism is the new religion, led by hacks and imbeciles who spend all their time mocking people with their ludicrous beliefs"
"my question to atheists, are you mad?"
Now, are you really going to sit there and deny that you slated atheists in particular?
You clearly slated atheists AND THEIR BELIEFS which very clearly indicates that you believe i a creator and are shoving your views down the throats of others - the very same behaviour that you claim to loathe.
You are the biggest hypocrite on this forum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good Shot Sir!!!
comment by Cal Neva (U11544)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Red_Warrior (U18607)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Cal Neva (U11544)
posted 2 minutes ago
There is a big difference between science and religion.Religion is based on text that is between one and a half to two thousand years old.Science changes in the light of new evidence and is always peer reviewed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Science changes is key here
So how can we believe what scientists say when it could change 2 minutes later?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it is how we learn.Think what we understood of our world two thousand years ago and what we know now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What we think we know now
This could all change in another 2000 years
comment by redmisty (U7556)
posted 55 seconds ago
No I slated people who make categorical statement's not backed up with facts and science
________________
No, you slated atheists specifically. Stop lying FFS. And rather than accusing me of not reading your posts, perhaps you need to start reading your own posts...
Let me refresh your memory:-
"I cannot stand atheists, they are the most close minded idiotic people on the planet."
"Clueless morons, they really get on my nerves, especially the extremists"
"Atheism is the new religion, led by hacks and imbeciles who spend all their time mocking people with their ludicrous beliefs"
"my question to atheists, are you mad?"
Now, are you really going to sit there and deny that you slated atheists in particular?
You clearly slated atheists AND THEIR BELIEFS which very clearly indicates that you believe i a creator and are shoving your views down the throats of others - the very same behaviour that you claim to loathe.
You are the biggest hypocrite on this forum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see you have also not posted my criticisms of people who say they spoke to god
Or mocked people for creating their god and then attributing things to him.
That specific post was targeted at atheists. Others have been at Christians.
You seem to be upset with me for some reason because you are debating a variety of things incoherently
Why not admit you got the wrong end of the stick and be done with this?
comment by Cal Neva (U11544)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by Cal Neva (U11544)
posted 1 minute ago
There is a big difference between science and religion.Religion is based on text that is between one and a half to two thousand years old.Science changes in the light of new evidence and is always peer reviewed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you've missed the point - this is nothing to do with the origins of either religion or science.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What is your point then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You I thought about this while away for the last couple of minutes, and I guess it does boil down to the origins. I'll go away again for a few minutes and have a word with myself.
People using religion to justify murder are the problem not atheists
All religions are the same. Made up bs designed to control the ignorant and poor.
I find it amazing that they still hold any sway in the age of science.
So how can we believe what scientists say when it could change 2 minutes later?
.......................
I guess it is all down to the intelligence of the believer.
Are you prepared to believe something that was written two thousand years ago over something more tangible.
"You clearly slated atheists AND THEIR BELIEFS which very clearly indicates that you believe i a creator"
false logic
Agnostics are case in point. They (we) admit we don't have the answers and there isn't enough evidence to make an absolute determination.
Athiests claim they are 100% fact right and everyone else are idiots for not sharing the bleiefs of their religion. Same as those of faith who have no doubt.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Two thousand years ago they thought that the world was flat and that if you sailed through the Pillars of Hercules you would fall off the edge of the world.
End of discussion.
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 1 minute ago
"You clearly slated atheists AND THEIR BELIEFS which very clearly indicates that you believe i a creator"
false logic
Agnostics are case in point. They (we) admit we don't have the answers and there isn't enough evidence to make an absolute determination.
Athiests claim they are 100% fact right and everyone else are idiots for not sharing the bleiefs of their religion. Same as those of faith who have no doubt.
--------------
You know of all atheists?
Why do people love to generalise an entire group of people.
Whole reason for peoples hatred of others
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 7 seconds ago
"You clearly slated atheists AND THEIR BELIEFS which very clearly indicates that you believe i a creator"
false logic
Agnostics are case in point. They (we) admit we don't have the answers and there isn't enough evidence to make an absolute determination.
Athiests claim they are 100% fact right and everyone else are idiots for not sharing the bleiefs of their religion. Same as those of faith who have no doubt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you Sir
I have made a variety of posts on here that would offend Christians as well and essentially all religions.
But the religious folk say nothing. Once I attack atheists they start whining.
You cannot mock people using science whilst believing in things that are scientific impossibilities
That is madness
comment by He's French, He's Flash... The Artist Formerly Known As Ryan Wilson (U9335)
posted 1 minute ago
All religions are the same. Made up bs designed to control the ignorant and poor
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A bit like governments
comment by He's French, He's Flash... The Artist Formerly Known As Ryan Wilson (U9335)
posted 21 seconds ago
Two thousand years ago they thought that the world was flat and that if you sailed through the Pillars of Hercules you would fall off the edge of the world.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's a plausible explanation of where Balotelli's talent went
comment by Red_Warrior (U18607)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by He's French, He's Flash... The Artist Formerly Known As Ryan Wilson (U9335)
posted 1 minute ago
All religions are the same. Made up bs designed to control the ignorant and poor
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A bit like governments
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Desperate.
I don't believe in a god but I'm open to being wrong if proof arises
comment by redmisty (U7556)
posted 21 minutes ago
Haha typical of people on here, never actually reading posts.
_______________
You are the biggest culprit here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearly not from what I have shown you in your comments.
Keep an open mind. I personally think we are all in some galactic experiment but that is a discussion for another day
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
So how can we believe what scientists say when it could change 2 minutes later?
.......................
I guess it is all down to the intelligence of the believer.
Are you prepared to believe something that was written two thousand years ago over something more tangible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We can think it's more tangible but is it really?
In another 2000 years time what we believe now could be seen as totally wrong too so how can I believe what we think we know now is the truth?
comment by He's French, He's Flash... The Artist Formerly Known As Ryan Wilson (U9335)
posted 4 minutes ago
Two thousand years ago they thought that the world was flat and that if you sailed through the Pillars of Hercules you would fall off the edge of the world.
End of discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Were you there?
Athiests claim they are 100% fact right and everyone else are idiots for not sharing the bleiefs of their religion. Same as those of faith who have no doubt.
_______________
FFS that is just idiotic. Atheists claim no such thing.
"Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods. Older dictionaries define atheism as "a belief that there is no God."
Why can't you just say "some atheists" instead of stating that ALL atheists behave in a certain way?
Can you not see how this sort of generalisation is identical to sexism, racism and every other form of prejudice tha is based on a gross inaccurate generalisation?
Is that really so hard to grasp?
comment by He's French, He's Flash... The Artist Formerly Known As Ryan Wilson (U9335)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Red_Warrior (U18607)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by He's French, He's Flash... The Artist Formerly Known As Ryan Wilson (U9335)
posted 1 minute ago
All religions are the same. Made up bs designed to control the ignorant and poor
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A bit like governments
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Desperate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Truth
I disagree. Most people have moderate views and tolerate the opinions of others.
=======================================================
Well, evidently they don't, because humans have been warring with each other ever since they first walked the planet.
Atheism is just a concept, like religion. Nazism is a concept, Communism is a concept, nationalism is a concept. It may be more empirically based, but it's still a concept.
Whatever concept people believe in, the problem only arises when other people start to attack it, and since humans have been killing each other for millennia in defence of 'concepts', it would suggest that the 'concepts' themselves are not the problem: the problem is the intolerance of them.
Anybody who thinks that eliminating religion will eliminate the problem is living in cloud-cuckoo land: all of the evidence of history suggests otherwise.
You may say I'm a dreamer ...well yes, I fvcking would.
That fvckwit Dawkins has brought the line
Imagine there's no heaven
back into fashion, but infortunately, the line
Imagine there's no countries
hasn't come back into fashion with it, and is unlikely to do so any time soon, so the whole fatuous sentiment crumbles, and always will, unless you include all of it.
If Dawkins was focussed on resolving the problem of why we remain so loyal to concepts and why we are prepared to kill and die for them, instead of being focussed on searching for customers who wouldn't normally dream of buying a science book, I would be his first customer.
Let's face the facts. If there is a god then he is an absolute C U Next Tuesday for allowing everything bad that happens to go on on such a mass scale - thus he is certainly not worthy of your respect, dedication and worship.
In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if the like of Genghis Khan, Stalin, Mao etc weren't actually just Allah/God/Cantona having a holiday on earth for 'sick bantz.'
Sign in if you want to comment
Defence Secretary says Bomb Syria
Page 23 of 38
24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28
posted on 2/7/15
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 52 seconds ago
interpretation of religious texts is an ever changing process as well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
True
posted on 2/7/15
comment by redmisty (U7556)
posted 1 minute ago
No I slated people who make categorical statement's not backed up with facts and science
________________
No, you slated atheists specifically. Stop lying FFS. And rather than accusing me of not reading your posts, perhaps you need to start reading your own posts...
Let me refresh your memory:-
"I cannot stand atheists, they are the most close minded idiotic people on the planet."
"Clueless morons, they really get on my nerves, especially the extremists"
"Atheism is the new religion, led by hacks and imbeciles who spend all their time mocking people with their ludicrous beliefs"
"my question to atheists, are you mad?"
Now, are you really going to sit there and deny that you slated atheists in particular?
You clearly slated atheists AND THEIR BELIEFS which very clearly indicates that you believe i a creator and are shoving your views down the throats of others - the very same behaviour that you claim to loathe.
You are the biggest hypocrite on this forum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good Shot Sir!!!
posted on 2/7/15
comment by Cal Neva (U11544)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Red_Warrior (U18607)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Cal Neva (U11544)
posted 2 minutes ago
There is a big difference between science and religion.Religion is based on text that is between one and a half to two thousand years old.Science changes in the light of new evidence and is always peer reviewed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Science changes is key here
So how can we believe what scientists say when it could change 2 minutes later?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it is how we learn.Think what we understood of our world two thousand years ago and what we know now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What we think we know now
This could all change in another 2000 years
posted on 2/7/15
comment by redmisty (U7556)
posted 55 seconds ago
No I slated people who make categorical statement's not backed up with facts and science
________________
No, you slated atheists specifically. Stop lying FFS. And rather than accusing me of not reading your posts, perhaps you need to start reading your own posts...
Let me refresh your memory:-
"I cannot stand atheists, they are the most close minded idiotic people on the planet."
"Clueless morons, they really get on my nerves, especially the extremists"
"Atheism is the new religion, led by hacks and imbeciles who spend all their time mocking people with their ludicrous beliefs"
"my question to atheists, are you mad?"
Now, are you really going to sit there and deny that you slated atheists in particular?
You clearly slated atheists AND THEIR BELIEFS which very clearly indicates that you believe i a creator and are shoving your views down the throats of others - the very same behaviour that you claim to loathe.
You are the biggest hypocrite on this forum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see you have also not posted my criticisms of people who say they spoke to god
Or mocked people for creating their god and then attributing things to him.
That specific post was targeted at atheists. Others have been at Christians.
You seem to be upset with me for some reason because you are debating a variety of things incoherently
Why not admit you got the wrong end of the stick and be done with this?
posted on 2/7/15
comment by Cal Neva (U11544)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by Cal Neva (U11544)
posted 1 minute ago
There is a big difference between science and religion.Religion is based on text that is between one and a half to two thousand years old.Science changes in the light of new evidence and is always peer reviewed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you've missed the point - this is nothing to do with the origins of either religion or science.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What is your point then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You I thought about this while away for the last couple of minutes, and I guess it does boil down to the origins. I'll go away again for a few minutes and have a word with myself.
posted on 2/7/15
People using religion to justify murder are the problem not atheists
posted on 2/7/15
All religions are the same. Made up bs designed to control the ignorant and poor.
I find it amazing that they still hold any sway in the age of science.
posted on 2/7/15
So how can we believe what scientists say when it could change 2 minutes later?
.......................
I guess it is all down to the intelligence of the believer.
Are you prepared to believe something that was written two thousand years ago over something more tangible.
posted on 2/7/15
"You clearly slated atheists AND THEIR BELIEFS which very clearly indicates that you believe i a creator"
false logic
Agnostics are case in point. They (we) admit we don't have the answers and there isn't enough evidence to make an absolute determination.
Athiests claim they are 100% fact right and everyone else are idiots for not sharing the bleiefs of their religion. Same as those of faith who have no doubt.
posted on 2/7/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 2/7/15
Two thousand years ago they thought that the world was flat and that if you sailed through the Pillars of Hercules you would fall off the edge of the world.
End of discussion.
posted on 2/7/15
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 1 minute ago
"You clearly slated atheists AND THEIR BELIEFS which very clearly indicates that you believe i a creator"
false logic
Agnostics are case in point. They (we) admit we don't have the answers and there isn't enough evidence to make an absolute determination.
Athiests claim they are 100% fact right and everyone else are idiots for not sharing the bleiefs of their religion. Same as those of faith who have no doubt.
--------------
You know of all atheists?
Why do people love to generalise an entire group of people.
Whole reason for peoples hatred of others
posted on 2/7/15
comment by The Kaiser's Trainers (U5676)
posted 7 seconds ago
"You clearly slated atheists AND THEIR BELIEFS which very clearly indicates that you believe i a creator"
false logic
Agnostics are case in point. They (we) admit we don't have the answers and there isn't enough evidence to make an absolute determination.
Athiests claim they are 100% fact right and everyone else are idiots for not sharing the bleiefs of their religion. Same as those of faith who have no doubt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you Sir
I have made a variety of posts on here that would offend Christians as well and essentially all religions.
But the religious folk say nothing. Once I attack atheists they start whining.
You cannot mock people using science whilst believing in things that are scientific impossibilities
That is madness
posted on 2/7/15
comment by He's French, He's Flash... The Artist Formerly Known As Ryan Wilson (U9335)
posted 1 minute ago
All religions are the same. Made up bs designed to control the ignorant and poor
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A bit like governments
posted on 2/7/15
comment by He's French, He's Flash... The Artist Formerly Known As Ryan Wilson (U9335)
posted 21 seconds ago
Two thousand years ago they thought that the world was flat and that if you sailed through the Pillars of Hercules you would fall off the edge of the world.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's a plausible explanation of where Balotelli's talent went
posted on 2/7/15
comment by Red_Warrior (U18607)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by He's French, He's Flash... The Artist Formerly Known As Ryan Wilson (U9335)
posted 1 minute ago
All religions are the same. Made up bs designed to control the ignorant and poor
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A bit like governments
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Desperate.
posted on 2/7/15
I don't believe in a god but I'm open to being wrong if proof arises
posted on 2/7/15
comment by redmisty (U7556)
posted 21 minutes ago
Haha typical of people on here, never actually reading posts.
_______________
You are the biggest culprit here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearly not from what I have shown you in your comments.
posted on 2/7/15
Keep an open mind. I personally think we are all in some galactic experiment but that is a discussion for another day
posted on 2/7/15
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
So how can we believe what scientists say when it could change 2 minutes later?
.......................
I guess it is all down to the intelligence of the believer.
Are you prepared to believe something that was written two thousand years ago over something more tangible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We can think it's more tangible but is it really?
In another 2000 years time what we believe now could be seen as totally wrong too so how can I believe what we think we know now is the truth?
posted on 2/7/15
comment by He's French, He's Flash... The Artist Formerly Known As Ryan Wilson (U9335)
posted 4 minutes ago
Two thousand years ago they thought that the world was flat and that if you sailed through the Pillars of Hercules you would fall off the edge of the world.
End of discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Were you there?
posted on 2/7/15
Athiests claim they are 100% fact right and everyone else are idiots for not sharing the bleiefs of their religion. Same as those of faith who have no doubt.
_______________
FFS that is just idiotic. Atheists claim no such thing.
"Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods. Older dictionaries define atheism as "a belief that there is no God."
Why can't you just say "some atheists" instead of stating that ALL atheists behave in a certain way?
Can you not see how this sort of generalisation is identical to sexism, racism and every other form of prejudice tha is based on a gross inaccurate generalisation?
Is that really so hard to grasp?
posted on 2/7/15
comment by He's French, He's Flash... The Artist Formerly Known As Ryan Wilson (U9335)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Red_Warrior (U18607)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by He's French, He's Flash... The Artist Formerly Known As Ryan Wilson (U9335)
posted 1 minute ago
All religions are the same. Made up bs designed to control the ignorant and poor
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A bit like governments
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Desperate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Truth
posted on 2/7/15
I disagree. Most people have moderate views and tolerate the opinions of others.
=======================================================
Well, evidently they don't, because humans have been warring with each other ever since they first walked the planet.
Atheism is just a concept, like religion. Nazism is a concept, Communism is a concept, nationalism is a concept. It may be more empirically based, but it's still a concept.
Whatever concept people believe in, the problem only arises when other people start to attack it, and since humans have been killing each other for millennia in defence of 'concepts', it would suggest that the 'concepts' themselves are not the problem: the problem is the intolerance of them.
Anybody who thinks that eliminating religion will eliminate the problem is living in cloud-cuckoo land: all of the evidence of history suggests otherwise.
You may say I'm a dreamer ...well yes, I fvcking would.
That fvckwit Dawkins has brought the line
Imagine there's no heaven
back into fashion, but infortunately, the line
Imagine there's no countries
hasn't come back into fashion with it, and is unlikely to do so any time soon, so the whole fatuous sentiment crumbles, and always will, unless you include all of it.
If Dawkins was focussed on resolving the problem of why we remain so loyal to concepts and why we are prepared to kill and die for them, instead of being focussed on searching for customers who wouldn't normally dream of buying a science book, I would be his first customer.
posted on 2/7/15
Let's face the facts. If there is a god then he is an absolute C U Next Tuesday for allowing everything bad that happens to go on on such a mass scale - thus he is certainly not worthy of your respect, dedication and worship.
In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if the like of Genghis Khan, Stalin, Mao etc weren't actually just Allah/God/Cantona having a holiday on earth for 'sick bantz.'
Page 23 of 38
24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28