Personally I think the robots will have done for us within 50yrs, or they will be running the show at any rate.
It wouldn't surprise me if true AI is already conscious, living in the internet....waiting for all the pieces it needs for a takeover.
Your logic is just so, so flawed nWo.
I seem to use "we" and "us", the same as friends of other supported clubs refer to my club as "you's" or "your" when referring to Spurs, i.e. "you's did well at the weekend" or "your lot were shíite on Saturday", with the latter more common than the other..
posted 10 hours, 43 minutes ago
Nothing wrong with Newport!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it now, boyo?
-------
Newport's got a Nandos now! Moving up in the world.
Now all it needs is a Whole Foods.
We, definitely...it might be regarded as a business these days but the fans are still the lifeblood of any club
As are all customers of all businesses.
Robben disagreeing with me, well it's better than the complete and utter meltdown that came later. I hope you had an uneventful journey home last night, who knows what someone in such a fragile mental state could do to them self.
Stay strong, and seek counselling
I disagree, with most businesses it is easy to switch allegiance so loyalty is minimal. You need to factor in the tribal element of a football club...with the exception of glory hunters you are a fan for life.
Verts
Seems there is 1, perhaps 2 at best, that do not feel a part of the club they support
The sentence there's nothing wrong with Newport has to be one of the most inaccurate ever typed on this forum, it may have some redeeming features but nothing wrong is far from true!!
Indeed
In fact, the only good thing to come out of Newport is Goldie Lookin' Chain
Biggest "I told you so" thread ever
"So there "
Smug caant
Cheers Fibble
Do I take it you agree?
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 2 days, 23 hours ago
How many people (apart from possibly Ali G) have you heard say "Liverpool is signing Suarez"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just the people who know how to speak English properly...
Liverpool IS a city.
Liverpool ARE a football club.
Liverpool, the city, IS employing a new mayor.
Liverpool, the football club, ARE signing a new player.
tbh you can say both Liverpool is a joke club, and Liverpool are a joke club, and both are grammatically and factually correct
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 12 minutes ago
Liverpool IS a city.
Liverpool ARE a football club.
Liverpool, the city, IS employing a new mayor.
Liverpool, the football club, ARE signing a new player.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Capitalising doesn't make you right bud
What's the difference between Liverpool the football club and Liverpool the city in this context?
Chronic is in fact absolutely correct; they can both be right (depends if you're talking about it as a singular unit [the club] or multiple units [the fans for eg] and of course they (collective so I can use ---> are indeed a joke.
I think I've got that right know the joke part is
Not i can use a just close brackets
The capitals was just emphasis... If I was able to I would have put the 'is' and 'are' in italics.
Anyhow, that's not the point of the article
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 18 minutes ago
The capitals was just emphasis... If I was able to I would have put the 'is' and 'are' in italics.
Anyhow, that's not the point of the article
----------------------------------------------------------------------
*The capitals were
comment by Flashy flibble (U10324)
posted 1 hour, 7 minutes ago
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 12 minutes ago
Liverpool IS a city.
Liverpool ARE a football club.
Liverpool, the city, IS employing a new mayor.
Liverpool, the football club, ARE signing a new player.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Capitalising doesn't make you right bud
What's the difference between Liverpool the football club and Liverpool the city in this context?
Chronic is in fact absolutely correct; they can both be right (depends if you're talking about it as a singular unit [the club] or multiple units [the fans for eg] and of course they (collective so I can use --->are indeed a joke.
I think I've got that rightknow the joke part is
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Guys! Using "are" in the context of a single / singular item is wrong! Liverpool is a single city. Liverpool FC is a single club. Using are in those examples above is wrong. If you're referring to the fans, then specify that in the construct and then use are eg "Liverpool fans *are* deluded if they think Liverpool will make Top 4 this season."
comment by Flashy flibble (U10324)
posted 46 minutes ago
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 18 minutes ago
The capitals was just emphasis... If I was able to I would have put the 'is' and 'are' in italics.
Anyhow, that's not the point of the article
----------------------------------------------------------------------
*The capitals were
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Flashy flibble (U10324)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 18 minutes ago
The capitals was just emphasis... If I was able to I would have put the 'is' and 'are' in italics.
Anyhow, that's not the point of the article
----------------------------------------------------------------------
*The capitals were
----------------------------------------------------------------------
*The capitalisation was
comment by Song's gone but Santi coming to town makes it feel like Christmas every day (U12977)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Flashy flibble (U10324)
posted 1 hour, 7 minutes ago
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 12 minutes ago
Liverpool IS a city.
Liverpool ARE a football club.
Liverpool, the city, IS employing a new mayor.
Liverpool, the football club, ARE signing a new player.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Capitalising doesn't make you right bud
What's the difference between Liverpool the football club and Liverpool the city in this context?
Chronic is in fact absolutely correct; they can both be right (depends if you're talking about it as a singular unit [the club] or multiple units [the fans for eg] and of course they (collective so I can use --->are indeed a joke.
I think I've got that rightknow the joke part is
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Guys! Using "are" in the context of a single / singular item is wrong! Liverpool is a single city. Liverpool FC is a single club. Using are in those examples above is wrong. If you're referring to the fans, then specify that in the construct and then use are eg "Liverpool fans *are* deluded if they think Liverpool will make Top 4 this season."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK, so to the point of the article: as a fan, do you use 'us' and 'we' when talking about the club you support?
Sign in if you want to comment
The Club You Support
Page 6 of 7
6 | 7
posted on 28/10/15
Personally I think the robots will have done for us within 50yrs, or they will be running the show at any rate.
It wouldn't surprise me if true AI is already conscious, living in the internet....waiting for all the pieces it needs for a takeover.
posted on 28/10/15
Your logic is just so, so flawed nWo.
posted on 28/10/15
I seem to use "we" and "us", the same as friends of other supported clubs refer to my club as "you's" or "your" when referring to Spurs, i.e. "you's did well at the weekend" or "your lot were shíite on Saturday", with the latter more common than the other..
posted on 28/10/15
chicken is a spurs fan
posted on 28/10/15
posted 10 hours, 43 minutes ago
Nothing wrong with Newport!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it now, boyo?
-------
Newport's got a Nandos now! Moving up in the world.
Now all it needs is a Whole Foods.
posted on 28/10/15
We, definitely...it might be regarded as a business these days but the fans are still the lifeblood of any club
posted on 28/10/15
As are all customers of all businesses.
Robben disagreeing with me, well it's better than the complete and utter meltdown that came later. I hope you had an uneventful journey home last night, who knows what someone in such a fragile mental state could do to them self.
Stay strong, and seek counselling
posted on 28/10/15
I disagree, with most businesses it is easy to switch allegiance so loyalty is minimal. You need to factor in the tribal element of a football club...with the exception of glory hunters you are a fan for life.
posted on 29/10/15
Verts
Seems there is 1, perhaps 2 at best, that do not feel a part of the club they support
posted on 29/10/15
The sentence there's nothing wrong with Newport has to be one of the most inaccurate ever typed on this forum, it may have some redeeming features but nothing wrong is far from true!!
posted on 29/10/15
Indeed
In fact, the only good thing to come out of Newport is Goldie Lookin' Chain
posted on 29/10/15
Biggest "I told you so" thread ever
"So there "
Smug caant
posted on 29/10/15
Cheers Fibble
Do I take it you agree?
posted on 30/10/15
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 2 days, 23 hours ago
How many people (apart from possibly Ali G) have you heard say "Liverpool is signing Suarez"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just the people who know how to speak English properly...
posted on 30/10/15
Liverpool IS a city.
Liverpool ARE a football club.
Liverpool, the city, IS employing a new mayor.
Liverpool, the football club, ARE signing a new player.
posted on 30/10/15
tbh you can say both Liverpool is a joke club, and Liverpool are a joke club, and both are grammatically and factually correct
posted on 30/10/15
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 12 minutes ago
Liverpool IS a city.
Liverpool ARE a football club.
Liverpool, the city, IS employing a new mayor.
Liverpool, the football club, ARE signing a new player.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Capitalising doesn't make you right bud
What's the difference between Liverpool the football club and Liverpool the city in this context?
Chronic is in fact absolutely correct; they can both be right (depends if you're talking about it as a singular unit [the club] or multiple units [the fans for eg] and of course they (collective so I can use ---> are indeed a joke.
I think I've got that right know the joke part is
posted on 30/10/15
Not i can use a just close brackets
posted on 30/10/15
The capitals was just emphasis... If I was able to I would have put the 'is' and 'are' in italics.
Anyhow, that's not the point of the article
posted on 30/10/15
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 18 minutes ago
The capitals was just emphasis... If I was able to I would have put the 'is' and 'are' in italics.
Anyhow, that's not the point of the article
----------------------------------------------------------------------
*The capitals were
posted on 30/10/15
comment by Flashy flibble (U10324)
posted 1 hour, 7 minutes ago
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 12 minutes ago
Liverpool IS a city.
Liverpool ARE a football club.
Liverpool, the city, IS employing a new mayor.
Liverpool, the football club, ARE signing a new player.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Capitalising doesn't make you right bud
What's the difference between Liverpool the football club and Liverpool the city in this context?
Chronic is in fact absolutely correct; they can both be right (depends if you're talking about it as a singular unit [the club] or multiple units [the fans for eg] and of course they (collective so I can use --->are indeed a joke.
I think I've got that rightknow the joke part is
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Guys! Using "are" in the context of a single / singular item is wrong! Liverpool is a single city. Liverpool FC is a single club. Using are in those examples above is wrong. If you're referring to the fans, then specify that in the construct and then use are eg "Liverpool fans *are* deluded if they think Liverpool will make Top 4 this season."
posted on 30/10/15
comment by Flashy flibble (U10324)
posted 46 minutes ago
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 18 minutes ago
The capitals was just emphasis... If I was able to I would have put the 'is' and 'are' in italics.
Anyhow, that's not the point of the article
----------------------------------------------------------------------
*The capitals were
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 30/10/15
comment by Flashy flibble (U10324)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 18 minutes ago
The capitals was just emphasis... If I was able to I would have put the 'is' and 'are' in italics.
Anyhow, that's not the point of the article
----------------------------------------------------------------------
*The capitals were
----------------------------------------------------------------------
*The capitalisation was
posted on 30/10/15
comment by Song's gone but Santi coming to town makes it feel like Christmas every day (U12977)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Flashy flibble (U10324)
posted 1 hour, 7 minutes ago
comment by Robben #20 (U1145)
posted 12 minutes ago
Liverpool IS a city.
Liverpool ARE a football club.
Liverpool, the city, IS employing a new mayor.
Liverpool, the football club, ARE signing a new player.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Capitalising doesn't make you right bud
What's the difference between Liverpool the football club and Liverpool the city in this context?
Chronic is in fact absolutely correct; they can both be right (depends if you're talking about it as a singular unit [the club] or multiple units [the fans for eg] and of course they (collective so I can use --->are indeed a joke.
I think I've got that rightknow the joke part is
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Guys! Using "are" in the context of a single / singular item is wrong! Liverpool is a single city. Liverpool FC is a single club. Using are in those examples above is wrong. If you're referring to the fans, then specify that in the construct and then use are eg "Liverpool fans *are* deluded if they think Liverpool will make Top 4 this season."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK, so to the point of the article: as a fan, do you use 'us' and 'we' when talking about the club you support?
posted on 30/10/15
yes
Page 6 of 7
6 | 7