But mud was talking about asylum seekers bud
Asylum seekers are immigrants.
Who was that terror suspect who had millions spent on him because he couldn't go back to Jordan?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Andre?
..................
Dwight?
Just to clarify (as it appears necessary): all asylum seekers are immigrants, not all immigrants are asylum seekers.
So, was mud correct in saying all asylum seekers would be deported should they commit a crime?
comment by (Kash) Coutinho Right Foot Curler - Justice4Gaza (U1108)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by BO$$™ (U6401)
posted 5 minutes ago
Do refugees from Syria or middle east carry passports?
--------
They will be in the next few months once they get there papers, you will then be seeing them in a town centre near you.
Went to the bullring on Boxing days and it looked like the middle east ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's your point? Coloured people not allowed to go shopping for sales?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The point is someone intrudes your home, gropes and rape your wife mother and sister, takes your money and shops on Boxing Day.
Who said Muslims don't drink. You must be living under the rock to make such statements.
FYI I'm not against proper legal immigration. Taking in refugees in hordes and spending your tax money on them is plain nonsense.
FYI I'm not against proper legal immigration. Taking in refugees in hordes and spending your tax money on them is plain nonsense.
...............
And highly dangerous to National Security
comment by DeltaHedge (U8662)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (Kash) Coutinho Right Foot Curler - Justice4Gaza (U1108)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by BO$$™ (U6401)
posted 5 minutes ago
Do refugees from Syria or middle east carry passports?
--------
They will be in the next few months once they get there papers, you will then be seeing them in a town centre near you.
Went to the bullring on Boxing days and it looked like the middle east ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's your point? Coloured people not allowed to go shopping for sales?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The point is someone intrudes your home, gropes and rape your wife mother and sister, takes your money and shops on Boxing Day.
Who said Muslims don't drink. You must be living under the rock to make such statements.
FYI I'm not against proper legal immigration. Taking in refugees in hordes and spending your tax money on them is plain nonsense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So are you telling that this happened in the Bullring or are you just blowing it out of proportion?
When did I claim Muslims never drink?
comment by Reddevilsdouble- il just say it was a joke (U12215)
posted 4 minutes ago
So, was mud correct in saying all asylum seekers would be deported should they commit a crime?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seriously?
"The point is someone intrudes your home, gropes and rape your wife mother and sister, takes your money and shops on Boxing Day. "
That sounds like a nightmare. Thank god it hasn't happened anywhere, to anyone related to this article or any of this thread.
"Who said Muslims don't drink."
No-one.
"FYI I'm not against proper legal immigration. Taking in refugees in hordes and spending your tax money on them is plain nonsense."
Those 'refugees in hordes' are 'proper legal immigration'.
Those 'refugees in hordes' are 'proper legal immigration'.
-----------------
Hard to believe how badly stung some people have become by the sensationalism surrounding this issue.
comment by Reddevilsdouble- il just say it was a joke (U12215)
posted 1 minute ago
Yes seriously
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow. Ok.
"comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble- il just say it was a joke (U12215)
posted 5 minutes ago
So Mud was wrong then agreed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, not really no, in principle immigrants who break the law get deported. If they can't, they get stuffed into a "deportation centre", or prison by any other name."
----
Substitute "asylum seekers" for "immigrants" as indicated in later posts.
Those 'refugees in hordes' are 'proper legal immigration'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh so you are saying all of them have been properly vetted out by immigration officials to make sure none of them are islamic terrorists? Good luck.
comment by DeltaHedge (U8662)
posted 3 minutes ago
Those 'refugees in hordes' are 'proper legal immigration'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh so you are saying all of them have been properly vetted out by immigration officials to make sure none of them are islamic terrorists? Good luck.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm, I'm not saying that at all.
Where in "Those 'refugees in hordes' are 'proper legal immigration'" do I even begin to suggest that? Weird.
comment by DeltaHedge (U8662)
posted 4 minutes ago
Those 'refugees in hordes' are 'proper legal immigration'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh so you are saying all of them have been properly vetted out by immigration officials to make sure none of them are islamic terrorists? Good luck.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems like such an odd conclusion to jump to.
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by DeltaHedge (U8662)
posted 4 minutes ago
Those 'refugees in hordes' are 'proper legal immigration'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh so you are saying all of them have been properly vetted out by immigration officials to make sure none of them are islamic terrorists? Good luck.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems like such an odd conclusion to jump to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not concluding anything. I'm just saying that proper procedures have not been followed to accept those immigrants and make sure none of them have any associations with ISIS or any other organization. In this case most of you guys forgo logic and let heart rule over common sense.
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble- il just say it was a joke (U12215)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble- il just say it was a joke (U12215)
posted 1 minute ago
Try finding a takeaway in Birmingham that isn't Halal. Good luck
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do you want one, out of interest?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because I think people of every religion should be catered for with a choice of halal, kosher and non halal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kosher and Halal are the same. But for some reason Kosher does not get as much hate. Why is that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They're not exactly the same. There are differences e.g.prawns are Halal but aren't Kosher, And where the hell do you get the notion that one gets more hate than the other? There are certainly orders of magnitude fewer Kosher takeaways than Halal but that's as far as it goes.
They should do it like titantic, women and children first
Fair point, that must be why we've had that spate of ISIS attacks in the UK.
Bloody immigrants.
Henry - try a yes or no answer if it is easier.
Are ALL asylum seekers found guilty of a crime deported irrelevant of the risk to them at home as Mud said?
Are ALL asylum seekers found guilty of a crime deported irrelevant of the risk to them at home as Mud said?
............
No they are not, but they should be.
comment by Reddevilsdouble- il just say it was a joke (U12215)
posted 1 minute ago
Henry - try a yes or no answer if it is easier.
Are ALL asylum seekers found guilty of a crime deported irrelevant of the risk to them at home as Mud said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can see how you think changing the question might get you the outcome you desire, along with trying to make me look like the stupid one - I forgive that, it's normal on sites like this.
Like most things in life, it's not a simple yes or no, but if it makes you happy, now that you've changed the question enough - the answer from me is, "No.". If MuDD did in deed say that "ALL asylum seekers found guilty of a crime deported irrelevant of the risk to them at home" - the answer is no, that is not true. But I'm fairly sure he didn't say that at all - stick up a quote if I've missed it.
But, as I've said, all immigrants (that includes all asylum seekers) can, and most likely will, be deported as a first choice when they break the law. If they cannot, like the case referenced in this thread that started this, then they will likely be held indefinitely in a 'deportation centre'.
I can see how you think changing the question might get you the outcome you desire, along with trying to make me look like the stupid one - I forgive that, it's normal on sites like this.
.................
Welcome to the world of Reddevils double.
Lets be honest here. The original post drew attention to the fact yes fact that1000 young males of discernable backgrounds attacked vulnerable women in a major german city. This has not been adequately reported and should been a lead story.
I know why this is not front page news and so do all the excuse makers. It is the dream of the likes of merkel and swedens premier to dispose of any pride in your own country in europe and be accused of racism or bigotry if you point out obvious flaws in the experiment.
Let me know of the syrisn extension to geldof and cumberbatches families as they were so quick to mouth off.
Where i live is signifiantly worse off for all of this open door welcome mat immigration. Sending all foreign criminals back to where they came from is a start and never voting for people like livingstone galloway corbyn and their paid cronies who detest everything great about being truly british,not meaning you are born here but that you embrace the culture that existed before the swarms arrived.
Sign in if you want to comment
WTF
Page 4 of 16
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 5/1/16
But mud was talking about asylum seekers bud
posted on 5/1/16
Asylum seekers are immigrants.
posted on 5/1/16
Who was that terror suspect who had millions spent on him because he couldn't go back to Jordan?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Andre?
..................
Dwight?
posted on 5/1/16
Just to clarify (as it appears necessary): all asylum seekers are immigrants, not all immigrants are asylum seekers.
posted on 5/1/16
So, was mud correct in saying all asylum seekers would be deported should they commit a crime?
posted on 5/1/16
comment by (Kash) Coutinho Right Foot Curler - Justice4Gaza (U1108)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by BO$$™ (U6401)
posted 5 minutes ago
Do refugees from Syria or middle east carry passports?
--------
They will be in the next few months once they get there papers, you will then be seeing them in a town centre near you.
Went to the bullring on Boxing days and it looked like the middle east ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's your point? Coloured people not allowed to go shopping for sales?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The point is someone intrudes your home, gropes and rape your wife mother and sister, takes your money and shops on Boxing Day.
Who said Muslims don't drink. You must be living under the rock to make such statements.
FYI I'm not against proper legal immigration. Taking in refugees in hordes and spending your tax money on them is plain nonsense.
posted on 5/1/16
FYI I'm not against proper legal immigration. Taking in refugees in hordes and spending your tax money on them is plain nonsense.
...............
And highly dangerous to National Security
posted on 5/1/16
comment by DeltaHedge (U8662)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by (Kash) Coutinho Right Foot Curler - Justice4Gaza (U1108)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by BO$$™ (U6401)
posted 5 minutes ago
Do refugees from Syria or middle east carry passports?
--------
They will be in the next few months once they get there papers, you will then be seeing them in a town centre near you.
Went to the bullring on Boxing days and it looked like the middle east ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's your point? Coloured people not allowed to go shopping for sales?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The point is someone intrudes your home, gropes and rape your wife mother and sister, takes your money and shops on Boxing Day.
Who said Muslims don't drink. You must be living under the rock to make such statements.
FYI I'm not against proper legal immigration. Taking in refugees in hordes and spending your tax money on them is plain nonsense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So are you telling that this happened in the Bullring or are you just blowing it out of proportion?
When did I claim Muslims never drink?
posted on 5/1/16
comment by Reddevilsdouble- il just say it was a joke (U12215)
posted 4 minutes ago
So, was mud correct in saying all asylum seekers would be deported should they commit a crime?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seriously?
posted on 5/1/16
Yes seriously
posted on 5/1/16
"The point is someone intrudes your home, gropes and rape your wife mother and sister, takes your money and shops on Boxing Day. "
That sounds like a nightmare. Thank god it hasn't happened anywhere, to anyone related to this article or any of this thread.
"Who said Muslims don't drink."
No-one.
"FYI I'm not against proper legal immigration. Taking in refugees in hordes and spending your tax money on them is plain nonsense."
Those 'refugees in hordes' are 'proper legal immigration'.
posted on 5/1/16
Those 'refugees in hordes' are 'proper legal immigration'.
-----------------
Hard to believe how badly stung some people have become by the sensationalism surrounding this issue.
posted on 5/1/16
comment by Reddevilsdouble- il just say it was a joke (U12215)
posted 1 minute ago
Yes seriously
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow. Ok.
"comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble- il just say it was a joke (U12215)
posted 5 minutes ago
So Mud was wrong then agreed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, not really no, in principle immigrants who break the law get deported. If they can't, they get stuffed into a "deportation centre", or prison by any other name."
----
Substitute "asylum seekers" for "immigrants" as indicated in later posts.
posted on 5/1/16
Those 'refugees in hordes' are 'proper legal immigration'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh so you are saying all of them have been properly vetted out by immigration officials to make sure none of them are islamic terrorists? Good luck.
posted on 5/1/16
comment by DeltaHedge (U8662)
posted 3 minutes ago
Those 'refugees in hordes' are 'proper legal immigration'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh so you are saying all of them have been properly vetted out by immigration officials to make sure none of them are islamic terrorists? Good luck.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm, I'm not saying that at all.
Where in "Those 'refugees in hordes' are 'proper legal immigration'" do I even begin to suggest that? Weird.
posted on 5/1/16
comment by DeltaHedge (U8662)
posted 4 minutes ago
Those 'refugees in hordes' are 'proper legal immigration'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh so you are saying all of them have been properly vetted out by immigration officials to make sure none of them are islamic terrorists? Good luck.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems like such an odd conclusion to jump to.
posted on 5/1/16
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by DeltaHedge (U8662)
posted 4 minutes ago
Those 'refugees in hordes' are 'proper legal immigration'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh so you are saying all of them have been properly vetted out by immigration officials to make sure none of them are islamic terrorists? Good luck.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems like such an odd conclusion to jump to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not concluding anything. I'm just saying that proper procedures have not been followed to accept those immigrants and make sure none of them have any associations with ISIS or any other organization. In this case most of you guys forgo logic and let heart rule over common sense.
posted on 5/1/16
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble- il just say it was a joke (U12215)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble- il just say it was a joke (U12215)
posted 1 minute ago
Try finding a takeaway in Birmingham that isn't Halal. Good luck
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do you want one, out of interest?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because I think people of every religion should be catered for with a choice of halal, kosher and non halal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kosher and Halal are the same. But for some reason Kosher does not get as much hate. Why is that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They're not exactly the same. There are differences e.g.prawns are Halal but aren't Kosher, And where the hell do you get the notion that one gets more hate than the other? There are certainly orders of magnitude fewer Kosher takeaways than Halal but that's as far as it goes.
posted on 5/1/16
They should do it like titantic, women and children first
posted on 5/1/16
Fair point, that must be why we've had that spate of ISIS attacks in the UK.
Bloody immigrants.
posted on 5/1/16
Henry - try a yes or no answer if it is easier.
Are ALL asylum seekers found guilty of a crime deported irrelevant of the risk to them at home as Mud said?
posted on 5/1/16
Are ALL asylum seekers found guilty of a crime deported irrelevant of the risk to them at home as Mud said?
............
No they are not, but they should be.
posted on 5/1/16
comment by Reddevilsdouble- il just say it was a joke (U12215)
posted 1 minute ago
Henry - try a yes or no answer if it is easier.
Are ALL asylum seekers found guilty of a crime deported irrelevant of the risk to them at home as Mud said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can see how you think changing the question might get you the outcome you desire, along with trying to make me look like the stupid one - I forgive that, it's normal on sites like this.
Like most things in life, it's not a simple yes or no, but if it makes you happy, now that you've changed the question enough - the answer from me is, "No.". If MuDD did in deed say that "ALL asylum seekers found guilty of a crime deported irrelevant of the risk to them at home" - the answer is no, that is not true. But I'm fairly sure he didn't say that at all - stick up a quote if I've missed it.
But, as I've said, all immigrants (that includes all asylum seekers) can, and most likely will, be deported as a first choice when they break the law. If they cannot, like the case referenced in this thread that started this, then they will likely be held indefinitely in a 'deportation centre'.
posted on 5/1/16
I can see how you think changing the question might get you the outcome you desire, along with trying to make me look like the stupid one - I forgive that, it's normal on sites like this.
.................
Welcome to the world of Reddevils double.
posted on 5/1/16
Lets be honest here. The original post drew attention to the fact yes fact that1000 young males of discernable backgrounds attacked vulnerable women in a major german city. This has not been adequately reported and should been a lead story.
I know why this is not front page news and so do all the excuse makers. It is the dream of the likes of merkel and swedens premier to dispose of any pride in your own country in europe and be accused of racism or bigotry if you point out obvious flaws in the experiment.
Let me know of the syrisn extension to geldof and cumberbatches families as they were so quick to mouth off.
Where i live is signifiantly worse off for all of this open door welcome mat immigration. Sending all foreign criminals back to where they came from is a start and never voting for people like livingstone galloway corbyn and their paid cronies who detest everything great about being truly british,not meaning you are born here but that you embrace the culture that existed before the swarms arrived.
Page 4 of 16
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10