We don’t even know the context of the cartoon but it apparently wasn’t anything offensive
Maybe we should just get the book of Islam amended and changed to include the allowance of humour, jokes and cartoons
Modernisation to religions isn’t really a bad idea as it goes as pretty much all of them are 100’s of years out of date so if people do still want to believe these fables which is fair enough we could at least help out by modernising them all for the 21st century purposes
Might save us non religious people all this BS constantly
Feel sorry for the teacher, he didn't commit any offence
comment by Oscar. #TeamFury (U12980)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 9 minutes ago
The teacher should be sacked, what he did was stupid. Personally i think the parents are in thier right to protest for his sacking. Hopefully it wont go further than that with any violence
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You genuinely think someone should be sacked for showing a cartoon? Are you for real or joking?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No.
I think he should be sack for insulting a religion as an RS teacher
comment by Oscar. #TeamFury (U12980)
posted 11 minutes ago
We don’t even know the context of the cartoon but it apparently wasn’t anything offensive
Maybe we should just get the book of Islam amended and changed to include the allowance of humour, jokes and cartoons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From what I can gather the image of Allah/Muhammad is forbidden to be drawn by human hand.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depictions_of_Muhammad
As usual looks like extremists have hijacked the issue.
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Percy Pig aficionado (U3126)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Oscar. #TeamFury (U12980)
posted 11 minutes ago
We don’t even know the context of the cartoon but it apparently wasn’t anything offensive
Maybe we should just get the book of Islam amended and changed to include the allowance of humour, jokes and cartoons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From what I can gather the image of Allah/Muhammad is forbidden to be drawn by human hand.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depictions_of_Muhammad
As usual looks like extremists have hijacked the issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep he didn’t even draw it he just showed an image of a cartoon Muhammad
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Oscar. #TeamFury (U12980)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 9 minutes ago
The teacher should be sacked, what he did was stupid. Personally i think the parents are in thier right to protest for his sacking. Hopefully it wont go further than that with any violence
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You genuinely think someone should be sacked for showing a cartoon? Are you for real or joking?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No.
I think he should be sack for insulting a religion as an RS teacher
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is showing a cartoon insulting a religion? Mohammed would probably have found cartoons of him funny
Agreed and also blasphemy isnt a crime in this country
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted about a minute ago
If you are having a discussion on blasphemy on censorship in an educational context I think you should show the images. Especially when to not do so would seem cowardly after what happened yo Samuel Paty last year.
I refuse to live by other oeopke’s blasphemy rules in this country.
Most the people protesting arent parents, they are young men who heard about the incident and seek to intimidate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah i do agree with this too, a lot will depend on the context but it wont be seen that way and the school has to do something or the problems will just escalate
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Im sure it wasnt to the level of crowders bob ross
"We don’t even know the context of the cartoon but it apparently wasn’t anything offensive"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiyxzuQrYTc
comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Percy Pig aficionado (U3126)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Oscar. #TeamFury (U12980)
posted 11 minutes ago
We don’t even know the context of the cartoon but it apparently wasn’t anything offensive
Maybe we should just get the book of Islam amended and changed to include the allowance of humour, jokes and cartoons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From what I can gather the image of Allah/Muhammad is forbidden to be drawn by human hand.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depictions_of_Muhammad
As usual looks like extremists have hijacked the issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not necessarily true, as posted earlier there are multiple examples of artwork and paintings of Mohammed - the Sunni concept of forbidding drawings is relatively recent.
I posted links earlier today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not something I'm particularly knowledgeable on tbh .
Just found the information on wiki which seems to suggest it's a fairly contentious issue.
2 and a half weeks until restaurants re open thank fack
Hope in future pandemics they’ve learned to just keep it secret and let us get on with life and whatever will be will be
Hospitalisation Update: Mar 25
Total hospitalisations (25 Mar): 4613. England: 3763
Yesterday (24 Mar): 4855. Eng: 4005
Last Week (18 Mar): 6133. England: 5083
Spring Peak: 21687 (12 Apr)
Winter Peak: 39249 (18 Jan)
Eng Spring: 18974 (12 Apr)
Eng Winter: 34336 (18 Jan)
——-
Whoever asked for the latest hospital figs yesterday see above
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Oscar. #TeamFury (U12980)
posted 16 minutes ago
Hope in future pandemics they’ve learned to just keep it secret and let us get on with life and whatever will be will be
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Thanos approach!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Percy Pig aficionado (U3126)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Percy Pig aficionado (U3126)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Oscar. #TeamFury (U12980)
posted 11 minutes ago
We don’t even know the context of the cartoon but it apparently wasn’t anything offensive
Maybe we should just get the book of Islam amended and changed to include the allowance of humour, jokes and cartoons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From what I can gather the image of Allah/Muhammad is forbidden to be drawn by human hand.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depictions_of_Muhammad
As usual looks like extremists have hijacked the issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not necessarily true, as posted earlier there are multiple examples of artwork and paintings of Mohammed - the Sunni concept of forbidding drawings is relatively recent.
I posted links earlier today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not something I'm particularly knowledgeable on tbh.
Just found the information on wiki which seems to suggest it's a fairly contentious issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I believe from a documentary I watched many years ago on religious art, that Mohammed had criticisms of art and chastised one of his wives for buying a painting, proclaiming art to be a rather futile endeavour. Which consequently led to art being expressed through textiles, in particular Persian rugs.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Percy Pig aficionado (U3126)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Percy Pig aficionado (U3126)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Oscar. #TeamFury (U12980)
posted 11 minutes ago
We don’t even know the context of the cartoon but it apparently wasn’t anything offensive
Maybe we should just get the book of Islam amended and changed to include the allowance of humour, jokes and cartoons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From what I can gather the image of Allah/Muhammad is forbidden to be drawn by human hand.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depictions_of_Muhammad
As usual looks like extremists have hijacked the issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not necessarily true, as posted earlier there are multiple examples of artwork and paintings of Mohammed - the Sunni concept of forbidding drawings is relatively recent.
I posted links earlier today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not something I'm particularly knowledgeable on tbh.
Just found the information on wiki which seems to suggest it's a fairly contentious issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I believe from a documentary I watched many years ago on religious art, that Mohammed had criticisms of art and chastised one of his wives for buying a painting, proclaiming art to be a rather futile endeavour. Which consequently led to art being expressed through textiles, in particular Persian rugs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not an Andy Warhol fan then!
Sign in if you want to comment
Arguing w/strangers cause I'm lonely thread
Page 460 of 4764
461 | 462 | 463 | 464 | 465
posted on 26/3/21
We don’t even know the context of the cartoon but it apparently wasn’t anything offensive
Maybe we should just get the book of Islam amended and changed to include the allowance of humour, jokes and cartoons
posted on 26/3/21
Modernisation to religions isn’t really a bad idea as it goes as pretty much all of them are 100’s of years out of date so if people do still want to believe these fables which is fair enough we could at least help out by modernising them all for the 21st century purposes
Might save us non religious people all this BS constantly
posted on 26/3/21
Feel sorry for the teacher, he didn't commit any offence
posted on 26/3/21
comment by Oscar. #TeamFury (U12980)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 9 minutes ago
The teacher should be sacked, what he did was stupid. Personally i think the parents are in thier right to protest for his sacking. Hopefully it wont go further than that with any violence
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You genuinely think someone should be sacked for showing a cartoon? Are you for real or joking?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No.
I think he should be sack for insulting a religion as an RS teacher
posted on 26/3/21
comment by Oscar. #TeamFury (U12980)
posted 11 minutes ago
We don’t even know the context of the cartoon but it apparently wasn’t anything offensive
Maybe we should just get the book of Islam amended and changed to include the allowance of humour, jokes and cartoons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From what I can gather the image of Allah/Muhammad is forbidden to be drawn by human hand.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depictions_of_Muhammad
As usual looks like extremists have hijacked the issue.
posted on 26/3/21
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Percy Pig aficionado (U3126)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Oscar. #TeamFury (U12980)
posted 11 minutes ago
We don’t even know the context of the cartoon but it apparently wasn’t anything offensive
Maybe we should just get the book of Islam amended and changed to include the allowance of humour, jokes and cartoons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From what I can gather the image of Allah/Muhammad is forbidden to be drawn by human hand.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depictions_of_Muhammad
As usual looks like extremists have hijacked the issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep he didn’t even draw it he just showed an image of a cartoon Muhammad
posted on 26/3/21
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Oscar. #TeamFury (U12980)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 9 minutes ago
The teacher should be sacked, what he did was stupid. Personally i think the parents are in thier right to protest for his sacking. Hopefully it wont go further than that with any violence
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You genuinely think someone should be sacked for showing a cartoon? Are you for real or joking?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No.
I think he should be sack for insulting a religion as an RS teacher
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is showing a cartoon insulting a religion? Mohammed would probably have found cartoons of him funny
posted on 26/3/21
Agreed and also blasphemy isnt a crime in this country
posted on 26/3/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/3/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/3/21
comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted about a minute ago
If you are having a discussion on blasphemy on censorship in an educational context I think you should show the images. Especially when to not do so would seem cowardly after what happened yo Samuel Paty last year.
I refuse to live by other oeopke’s blasphemy rules in this country.
Most the people protesting arent parents, they are young men who heard about the incident and seek to intimidate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah i do agree with this too, a lot will depend on the context but it wont be seen that way and the school has to do something or the problems will just escalate
posted on 26/3/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/3/21
Im sure it wasnt to the level of crowders bob ross
posted on 26/3/21
"We don’t even know the context of the cartoon but it apparently wasn’t anything offensive"
posted on 26/3/21
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiyxzuQrYTc
posted on 26/3/21
comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Percy Pig aficionado (U3126)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Oscar. #TeamFury (U12980)
posted 11 minutes ago
We don’t even know the context of the cartoon but it apparently wasn’t anything offensive
Maybe we should just get the book of Islam amended and changed to include the allowance of humour, jokes and cartoons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From what I can gather the image of Allah/Muhammad is forbidden to be drawn by human hand.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depictions_of_Muhammad
As usual looks like extremists have hijacked the issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not necessarily true, as posted earlier there are multiple examples of artwork and paintings of Mohammed - the Sunni concept of forbidding drawings is relatively recent.
I posted links earlier today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not something I'm particularly knowledgeable on tbh .
Just found the information on wiki which seems to suggest it's a fairly contentious issue.
posted on 26/3/21
2 and a half weeks until restaurants re open thank fack
posted on 26/3/21
Hope in future pandemics they’ve learned to just keep it secret and let us get on with life and whatever will be will be
posted on 26/3/21
Hospitalisation Update: Mar 25
Total hospitalisations (25 Mar): 4613. England: 3763
Yesterday (24 Mar): 4855. Eng: 4005
Last Week (18 Mar): 6133. England: 5083
Spring Peak: 21687 (12 Apr)
Winter Peak: 39249 (18 Jan)
Eng Spring: 18974 (12 Apr)
Eng Winter: 34336 (18 Jan)
——-
Whoever asked for the latest hospital figs yesterday see above
posted on 26/3/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/3/21
comment by Oscar. #TeamFury (U12980)
posted 16 minutes ago
Hope in future pandemics they’ve learned to just keep it secret and let us get on with life and whatever will be will be
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Thanos approach!
posted on 26/3/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/3/21
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Percy Pig aficionado (U3126)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Percy Pig aficionado (U3126)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Oscar. #TeamFury (U12980)
posted 11 minutes ago
We don’t even know the context of the cartoon but it apparently wasn’t anything offensive
Maybe we should just get the book of Islam amended and changed to include the allowance of humour, jokes and cartoons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From what I can gather the image of Allah/Muhammad is forbidden to be drawn by human hand.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depictions_of_Muhammad
As usual looks like extremists have hijacked the issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not necessarily true, as posted earlier there are multiple examples of artwork and paintings of Mohammed - the Sunni concept of forbidding drawings is relatively recent.
I posted links earlier today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not something I'm particularly knowledgeable on tbh.
Just found the information on wiki which seems to suggest it's a fairly contentious issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I believe from a documentary I watched many years ago on religious art, that Mohammed had criticisms of art and chastised one of his wives for buying a painting, proclaiming art to be a rather futile endeavour. Which consequently led to art being expressed through textiles, in particular Persian rugs.
posted on 26/3/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/3/21
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Percy Pig aficionado (U3126)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Percy Pig aficionado (U3126)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Oscar. #TeamFury (U12980)
posted 11 minutes ago
We don’t even know the context of the cartoon but it apparently wasn’t anything offensive
Maybe we should just get the book of Islam amended and changed to include the allowance of humour, jokes and cartoons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From what I can gather the image of Allah/Muhammad is forbidden to be drawn by human hand.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depictions_of_Muhammad
As usual looks like extremists have hijacked the issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not necessarily true, as posted earlier there are multiple examples of artwork and paintings of Mohammed - the Sunni concept of forbidding drawings is relatively recent.
I posted links earlier today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not something I'm particularly knowledgeable on tbh.
Just found the information on wiki which seems to suggest it's a fairly contentious issue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I believe from a documentary I watched many years ago on religious art, that Mohammed had criticisms of art and chastised one of his wives for buying a painting, proclaiming art to be a rather futile endeavour. Which consequently led to art being expressed through textiles, in particular Persian rugs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not an Andy Warhol fan then!
Page 460 of 4764
461 | 462 | 463 | 464 | 465