https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/alfie-holdsworth-hussain-attack-video-30194673
1 year for attacking a child.. atleast he didnt say anything mean
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 46 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 8 hours, 31 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
He's had a bounce
Partly because the Dems have gone for a "not trump" campaigning policy which just indirectly campaigns for the Reps
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I think Harris has been speaking quite a lot, interviewing quite a bit and she’s far from impressive,
It’s gonna be really tight again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Got to challenge the idea that in this same period where Harris has not impressed that Trump has
Senile old fack spent 20 minutes shuffling from side to side this week
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can challenge it mate but I didn’t say that he had impressed. I just said that she’s been in the public a lot recently, a lot more than usual, a fk lot more and she’s not that impressive and then we see her lead reduce or odds get longer. My comment was purely about Harris, not Trump.
Wait was the McDonalds thing fake? Is someone kidding me? That country’s leadership is done for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual you can't help but lie. Trump's bump in the polls is the reason she came out, her coming out did not lead to Trump's bump in the polls. You've got these events the wrong way around, with a conveniently selected view if events.
Harris was happy to stay quiet but as the election draws nearer the Dems have accepted that whatever gains they have made have not been enough, and as Trump's long predicted bump in the polls came to fruition they decided to send her out.
Thanks
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 2 hours ago
The police should get absolute pelters for shooting anyone unarmed. This guy might have been a violent man, he might have driven his car in a violent manner, he didn't deserve to die because of those things, situations like the police found themselves in are not new, they had him hemmed in, they have been in situations like this before, there was no actual need to execute him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This should never have gone to court.
Sounds like the CPS are just as useless as they were when Starmer was running the show.
I bet the Tw@t is praying Trump doesn't win the US election. If so the special relationship is down the toilet.
You think that the state shooting dead an unarmed man shouldn’t even go to court?
Jesus fvcking Christ.
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted about an hour ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 41 minutes ago
The police should get absolute pelters for shooting anyone unarmed. This guy might have been a violent man, he might have driven his car in a violent manner, he didn't deserve to die because of those things, situations like the police found themselves in are not new, they had him hemmed in, they have been in situations like this before, there was no actual need to execute him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolute nonsense. A vehicle being driven in a certain way is no less dangerous than any conventional weapon. Were they supposed to wait until he’d plowed down two or three officers before deciding he was a threat to life?
The officer has been found not guilty by a jury, so clearly all the evidence backs up his actions. Unless you’re one of those that think everything’s a cover up?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps he could have not killed the guy as he was trapped, but considering the nature of the job and the actual charges against him, there's no way he should be found guilty in my book. That threshold has not been reached in my conscience if I'm being honest.
Still, this incident can be used to perhaps improve training and advice given to cops to ensure it doesn't happen again.
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
You think that the state shooting dead an unarmed man shouldn’t even go to court?
Jesus fvcking Christ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, have you seen his criminal record?
Jesus,fvcking Christ!!?
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
You think that the state shooting dead an unarmed man shouldn’t even go to court?
Jesus fvcking Christ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, have you seen his criminal record?
Jesus,fvcking Christ!!?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s your point? That we can ad hoc have capital punishment meted out by mid ranked Police Officers due to time served offences?
Go and take your head for a sh!t Pawl.
This is what Keir Starmer calls “Israel’s right to defend itself”:
Senior Israeli cabinet ministers addressing (and apparently dancing for joy at) a conference entitled “Settle Gaza”, established, quite literally, to discuss what Israeli settlements in Gaza should look like.
“Taking territory” from Arabs is what “hurts them most” - Social Equality () Minister May Golan
The Gaza Strip is “part of the Land of Israel” and “without settlements, there is no security” - Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich
https://www.timesofisrael.com/government-ministers-call-for-new-settlements-in-gaza-at-ultranationalist-conference/amp/
This is what this Labour government is directly and unashamedly supporting.
comment by Mamba - You hit us, We hit you. (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 46 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 8 hours, 31 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
He's had a bounce
Partly because the Dems have gone for a "not trump" campaigning policy which just indirectly campaigns for the Reps
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I think Harris has been speaking quite a lot, interviewing quite a bit and she’s far from impressive,
It’s gonna be really tight again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Got to challenge the idea that in this same period where Harris has not impressed that Trump has
Senile old fack spent 20 minutes shuffling from side to side this week
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can challenge it mate but I didn’t say that he had impressed. I just said that she’s been in the public a lot recently, a lot more than usual, a fk lot more and she’s not that impressive and then we see her lead reduce or odds get longer. My comment was purely about Harris, not Trump.
Wait was the McDonalds thing fake? Is someone kidding me? That country’s leadership is done for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual you can't help but lie. Trump's bump in the polls is the reason she came out, her coming out did not lead to Trump's bump in the polls. You've got these events the wrong way around, with a conveniently selected view if events.
Harris was happy to stay quiet but as the election draws nearer the Dems have accepted that whatever gains they have made have not been enough, and as Trump's long predicted bump in the polls came to fruition they decided to send her out.
Thanks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual you cannot read.
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Mamba - You hit us, We hit you. (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 46 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 8 hours, 31 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
He's had a bounce
Partly because the Dems have gone for a "not trump" campaigning policy which just indirectly campaigns for the Reps
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I think Harris has been speaking quite a lot, interviewing quite a bit and she’s far from impressive,
It’s gonna be really tight again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Got to challenge the idea that in this same period where Harris has not impressed that Trump has
Senile old fack spent 20 minutes shuffling from side to side this week
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can challenge it mate but I didn’t say that he had impressed. I just said that she’s been in the public a lot recently, a lot more than usual, a fk lot more and she’s not that impressive and then we see her lead reduce or odds get longer. My comment was purely about Harris, not Trump.
Wait was the McDonalds thing fake? Is someone kidding me? That country’s leadership is done for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual you can't help but lie. Trump's bump in the polls is the reason she came out, her coming out did not lead to Trump's bump in the polls. You've got these events the wrong way around, with a conveniently selected view if events.
Harris was happy to stay quiet but as the election draws nearer the Dems have accepted that whatever gains they have made have not been enough, and as Trump's long predicted bump in the polls came to fruition they decided to send her out.
Thanks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual you cannot read.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/national/
Have a look there. Seeing as you struggle with reading, there’s a colourful and interactive image for you to look at. With dates everything.
Too complicated, don’t understand: the gap has shrunk since she has been speaking publicly more this past month. She got a ‘new manager bounce’ which eventually came to an end and the gap is returning to its normal, very tight levels. If she were anything close to decent, she would be destroying Trump and in US terms that means more or less 5%
Wind your neck in you bellnd
comment by Mamba - You hit us, We hit you. (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, you are laughable
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
You think that the state shooting dead an unarmed man shouldn’t even go to court?
Jesus fvcking Christ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, have you seen his criminal record?
Jesus,fvcking Christ!!?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s your point? That we can ad hoc have capital punishment meted out by mid ranked Police Officers due to time served offences?
Go and take your head for a sh!t Pawl.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As per usual somebody doesn't agree with you so out come the insults.
Many folk don't think it should have gone to trial and it's a perfectly reasonable opinion to hold.
Get over it!!
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
You think that the state shooting dead an unarmed man shouldn’t even go to court?
Jesus fvcking Christ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, have you seen his criminal record?
Jesus,fvcking Christ!!?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s your point? That we can ad hoc have capital punishment meted out by mid ranked Police Officers due to time served offences?
Go and take your head for a sh!t Pawl.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As per usual somebody doesn't agree with you so out come the insults.
Many folk don't think it should have gone to trial and it's a perfectly reasonable opinion to hold.
Get over it!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It shouldn’t have gone to court for murder, but it’s a questionable action in my opinion. Looked like the car was full boxed in.
Disgusting human being that he was, I won’t be shedding a tear. But I don’t think it was a lawful shooting.
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Mamba - You hit us, We hit you. (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 46 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 8 hours, 31 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
He's had a bounce
Partly because the Dems have gone for a "not trump" campaigning policy which just indirectly campaigns for the Reps
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I think Harris has been speaking quite a lot, interviewing quite a bit and she’s far from impressive,
It’s gonna be really tight again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Got to challenge the idea that in this same period where Harris has not impressed that Trump has
Senile old fack spent 20 minutes shuffling from side to side this week
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can challenge it mate but I didn’t say that he had impressed. I just said that she’s been in the public a lot recently, a lot more than usual, a fk lot more and she’s not that impressive and then we see her lead reduce or odds get longer. My comment was purely about Harris, not Trump.
Wait was the McDonalds thing fake? Is someone kidding me? That country’s leadership is done for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual you can't help but lie. Trump's bump in the polls is the reason she came out, her coming out did not lead to Trump's bump in the polls. You've got these events the wrong way around, with a conveniently selected view if events.
Harris was happy to stay quiet but as the election draws nearer the Dems have accepted that whatever gains they have made have not been enough, and as Trump's long predicted bump in the polls came to fruition they decided to send her out.
Thanks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual you cannot read.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/national/
Have a look there. Seeing as you struggle with reading, there’s a colourful and interactive image for you to look at. With dates everything.
Too complicated, don’t understand: the gap has shrunk since she has been speaking publicly more this past month. She got a ‘new manager bounce’ which eventually came to an end and the gap is returning to its normal, very tight levels. If she were anything close to decent, she would be destroying Trump and in US terms that means more or less 5%
Wind your neck in you bellnd
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The gap was already shrinking before she started talking you fecking genius. It has continued to do so after she started talking, and that's all your colourful nursery school diagrams prove. Thanks for taking the time to post irrelevant undisputed info in support of your fairy tale of events.
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
You think that the state shooting dead an unarmed man shouldn’t even go to court?
Jesus fvcking Christ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, have you seen his criminal record?
Jesus,fvcking Christ!!?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s your point? That we can ad hoc have capital punishment meted out by mid ranked Police Officers due to time served offences?
Go and take your head for a sh!t Pawl.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As per usual somebody doesn't agree with you so out come the insults.
Many folk don't think it should have gone to trial and it's a perfectly reasonable opinion to hold.
Get over it!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It shouldn’t have gone to court for murder, but it’s a questionable action in my opinion. Looked like the car was full boxed in.
Disgusting human being that he was, I won’t be shedding a tear. But I don’t think it was a lawful shooting.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree with this, but is there really justification for a guilty verdict and putting this cop away for years? I have my doubts tbh.
They should have included lesser charges perhaps?
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
You think that the state shooting dead an unarmed man shouldn’t even go to court?
Jesus fvcking Christ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, have you seen his criminal record?
Jesus,fvcking Christ!!?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s your point? That we can ad hoc have capital punishment meted out by mid ranked Police Officers due to time served offences?
Go and take your head for a sh!t Pawl.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As per usual somebody doesn't agree with you so out come the insults.
Many folk don't think it should have gone to trial and it's a perfectly reasonable opinion to hold.
Get over it!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There’s not a single insult in there and if your point is that we can have the Police ad hoc mete out capital punishment on our streets for time served offences and not even be questioned about it, fair enough.
I mean that’s just incredibly fvcking stupid by any measure, but you’re entitled to your opinion.
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
You think that the state shooting dead an unarmed man shouldn’t even go to court?
Jesus fvcking Christ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, have you seen his criminal record?
Jesus,fvcking Christ!!?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s your point? That we can ad hoc have capital punishment meted out by mid ranked Police Officers due to time served offences?
Go and take your head for a sh!t Pawl.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As per usual somebody doesn't agree with you so out come the insults.
Many folk don't think it should have gone to trial and it's a perfectly reasonable opinion to hold.
Get over it!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There’s not a single insult in there and if your point is that we can have the Police ad hoc mete out capital punishment on our streets for time served offences and not even be questioned about it, fair enough.
I mean that’s just incredibly fvcking stupid by any measure, but you’re entitled to your opinion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Barry strikes again
comment by Mamba - You hit us, We hit you. (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
You think that the state shooting dead an unarmed man shouldn’t even go to court?
Jesus fvcking Christ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, have you seen his criminal record?
Jesus,fvcking Christ!!?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s your point? That we can ad hoc have capital punishment meted out by mid ranked Police Officers due to time served offences?
Go and take your head for a sh!t Pawl.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As per usual somebody doesn't agree with you so out come the insults.
Many folk don't think it should have gone to trial and it's a perfectly reasonable opinion to hold.
Get over it!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It shouldn’t have gone to court for murder, but it’s a questionable action in my opinion. Looked like the car was full boxed in.
Disgusting human being that he was, I won’t be shedding a tear. But I don’t think it was a lawful shooting.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree with this, but is there really justification for a guilty verdict and putting this cop away for years? I have my doubts tbh.
They should have included lesser charges perhaps?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe not for years and it’s easy to say sat at a desk but the car was going nowhere. I’d want to know what their thoughts were on whether he was armed or not. I think that’s the main thing that changed the state of mind with armed police.
Tbf to the officer, he has to live with it. Whether or not the guy was a PoS he has now killed a man, an unarmed man; that will affect him.
It can’t be Barry surely?
If he is then he’s mugged me right off.
Fwiw, I don’t think he should have been found guilty. They’ve such a hard job, under extreme pressure, making very quick decisions.
But to suggest killing an unarmed man on our streets should have even been questioned in court is insane and facist.
comment by Mamba - You hit us, We hit you. (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Mamba - You hit us, We hit you. (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 46 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 8 hours, 31 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
He's had a bounce
Partly because the Dems have gone for a "not trump" campaigning policy which just indirectly campaigns for the Reps
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I think Harris has been speaking quite a lot, interviewing quite a bit and she’s far from impressive,
It’s gonna be really tight again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Got to challenge the idea that in this same period where Harris has not impressed that Trump has
Senile old fack spent 20 minutes shuffling from side to side this week
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can challenge it mate but I didn’t say that he had impressed. I just said that she’s been in the public a lot recently, a lot more than usual, a fk lot more and she’s not that impressive and then we see her lead reduce or odds get longer. My comment was purely about Harris, not Trump.
Wait was the McDonalds thing fake? Is someone kidding me? That country’s leadership is done for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual you can't help but lie. Trump's bump in the polls is the reason she came out, her coming out did not lead to Trump's bump in the polls. You've got these events the wrong way around, with a conveniently selected view if events.
Harris was happy to stay quiet but as the election draws nearer the Dems have accepted that whatever gains they have made have not been enough, and as Trump's long predicted bump in the polls came to fruition they decided to send her out.
Thanks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual you cannot read.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/national/
Have a look there. Seeing as you struggle with reading, there’s a colourful and interactive image for you to look at. With dates everything.
Too complicated, don’t understand: the gap has shrunk since she has been speaking publicly more this past month. She got a ‘new manager bounce’ which eventually came to an end and the gap is returning to its normal, very tight levels. If she were anything close to decent, she would be destroying Trump and in US terms that means more or less 5%
Wind your neck in you bellnd
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The gap was already shrinking before she started talking you fecking genius. It has continued to do so after she started talking, and that's all your colourful nursery school diagrams prove. Thanks for taking the time to post irrelevant undisputed info in support of your fairy tale of events.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It ‘shrank’ from what? 3.4% to 2.7% over months And then from 2.7% to 1.7% in weeks?
You fkign genius 🤣🤣🤣
Maybe your teleprompter is broken also 🤣🤣🤣
“Why did you shoot that guy in the head? You didn’t even know who he was!”
“Yeah but we found out afterwards he had a previous criminal record that he’d already been punished for so bygones… nothing to see here. Don’t worry about it.”
The fact it went to trial meant all the facts were put in the public domain, no trial and we would probably be having vigils and protests for weeks
Sign in if you want to comment
Arguing w/strangers cause I'm lonely thread
Page 4717 of 4737
4718 | 4719 | 4720 | 4721 | 4722
posted 1 week ago
https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/alfie-holdsworth-hussain-attack-video-30194673
1 year for attacking a child.. atleast he didnt say anything mean
posted 1 week ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 46 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 8 hours, 31 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
He's had a bounce
Partly because the Dems have gone for a "not trump" campaigning policy which just indirectly campaigns for the Reps
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I think Harris has been speaking quite a lot, interviewing quite a bit and she’s far from impressive,
It’s gonna be really tight again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Got to challenge the idea that in this same period where Harris has not impressed that Trump has
Senile old fack spent 20 minutes shuffling from side to side this week
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can challenge it mate but I didn’t say that he had impressed. I just said that she’s been in the public a lot recently, a lot more than usual, a fk lot more and she’s not that impressive and then we see her lead reduce or odds get longer. My comment was purely about Harris, not Trump.
Wait was the McDonalds thing fake? Is someone kidding me? That country’s leadership is done for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual you can't help but lie. Trump's bump in the polls is the reason she came out, her coming out did not lead to Trump's bump in the polls. You've got these events the wrong way around, with a conveniently selected view if events.
Harris was happy to stay quiet but as the election draws nearer the Dems have accepted that whatever gains they have made have not been enough, and as Trump's long predicted bump in the polls came to fruition they decided to send her out.
Thanks
posted 1 week ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 2 hours ago
The police should get absolute pelters for shooting anyone unarmed. This guy might have been a violent man, he might have driven his car in a violent manner, he didn't deserve to die because of those things, situations like the police found themselves in are not new, they had him hemmed in, they have been in situations like this before, there was no actual need to execute him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This should never have gone to court.
Sounds like the CPS are just as useless as they were when Starmer was running the show.
I bet the Tw@t is praying Trump doesn't win the US election. If so the special relationship is down the toilet.
posted 1 week ago
You think that the state shooting dead an unarmed man shouldn’t even go to court?
Jesus fvcking Christ.
posted 1 week ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted about an hour ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 41 minutes ago
The police should get absolute pelters for shooting anyone unarmed. This guy might have been a violent man, he might have driven his car in a violent manner, he didn't deserve to die because of those things, situations like the police found themselves in are not new, they had him hemmed in, they have been in situations like this before, there was no actual need to execute him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolute nonsense. A vehicle being driven in a certain way is no less dangerous than any conventional weapon. Were they supposed to wait until he’d plowed down two or three officers before deciding he was a threat to life?
The officer has been found not guilty by a jury, so clearly all the evidence backs up his actions. Unless you’re one of those that think everything’s a cover up?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps he could have not killed the guy as he was trapped, but considering the nature of the job and the actual charges against him, there's no way he should be found guilty in my book. That threshold has not been reached in my conscience if I'm being honest.
Still, this incident can be used to perhaps improve training and advice given to cops to ensure it doesn't happen again.
posted 1 week ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
You think that the state shooting dead an unarmed man shouldn’t even go to court?
Jesus fvcking Christ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, have you seen his criminal record?
Jesus,fvcking Christ!!?
posted 1 week ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
You think that the state shooting dead an unarmed man shouldn’t even go to court?
Jesus fvcking Christ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, have you seen his criminal record?
Jesus,fvcking Christ!!?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s your point? That we can ad hoc have capital punishment meted out by mid ranked Police Officers due to time served offences?
Go and take your head for a sh!t Pawl.
posted 1 week ago
This is what Keir Starmer calls “Israel’s right to defend itself”:
Senior Israeli cabinet ministers addressing (and apparently dancing for joy at) a conference entitled “Settle Gaza”, established, quite literally, to discuss what Israeli settlements in Gaza should look like.
“Taking territory” from Arabs is what “hurts them most” - Social Equality () Minister May Golan
The Gaza Strip is “part of the Land of Israel” and “without settlements, there is no security” - Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich
https://www.timesofisrael.com/government-ministers-call-for-new-settlements-in-gaza-at-ultranationalist-conference/amp/
This is what this Labour government is directly and unashamedly supporting.
posted 1 week ago
comment by Mamba - You hit us, We hit you. (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 46 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 8 hours, 31 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
He's had a bounce
Partly because the Dems have gone for a "not trump" campaigning policy which just indirectly campaigns for the Reps
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I think Harris has been speaking quite a lot, interviewing quite a bit and she’s far from impressive,
It’s gonna be really tight again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Got to challenge the idea that in this same period where Harris has not impressed that Trump has
Senile old fack spent 20 minutes shuffling from side to side this week
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can challenge it mate but I didn’t say that he had impressed. I just said that she’s been in the public a lot recently, a lot more than usual, a fk lot more and she’s not that impressive and then we see her lead reduce or odds get longer. My comment was purely about Harris, not Trump.
Wait was the McDonalds thing fake? Is someone kidding me? That country’s leadership is done for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual you can't help but lie. Trump's bump in the polls is the reason she came out, her coming out did not lead to Trump's bump in the polls. You've got these events the wrong way around, with a conveniently selected view if events.
Harris was happy to stay quiet but as the election draws nearer the Dems have accepted that whatever gains they have made have not been enough, and as Trump's long predicted bump in the polls came to fruition they decided to send her out.
Thanks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual you cannot read.
posted 1 week ago
posted 1 week ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Mamba - You hit us, We hit you. (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 46 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 8 hours, 31 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
He's had a bounce
Partly because the Dems have gone for a "not trump" campaigning policy which just indirectly campaigns for the Reps
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I think Harris has been speaking quite a lot, interviewing quite a bit and she’s far from impressive,
It’s gonna be really tight again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Got to challenge the idea that in this same period where Harris has not impressed that Trump has
Senile old fack spent 20 minutes shuffling from side to side this week
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can challenge it mate but I didn’t say that he had impressed. I just said that she’s been in the public a lot recently, a lot more than usual, a fk lot more and she’s not that impressive and then we see her lead reduce or odds get longer. My comment was purely about Harris, not Trump.
Wait was the McDonalds thing fake? Is someone kidding me? That country’s leadership is done for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual you can't help but lie. Trump's bump in the polls is the reason she came out, her coming out did not lead to Trump's bump in the polls. You've got these events the wrong way around, with a conveniently selected view if events.
Harris was happy to stay quiet but as the election draws nearer the Dems have accepted that whatever gains they have made have not been enough, and as Trump's long predicted bump in the polls came to fruition they decided to send her out.
Thanks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual you cannot read.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/national/
Have a look there. Seeing as you struggle with reading, there’s a colourful and interactive image for you to look at. With dates everything.
Too complicated, don’t understand: the gap has shrunk since she has been speaking publicly more this past month. She got a ‘new manager bounce’ which eventually came to an end and the gap is returning to its normal, very tight levels. If she were anything close to decent, she would be destroying Trump and in US terms that means more or less 5%
Wind your neck in you bellnd
posted 1 week ago
comment by Mamba - You hit us, We hit you. (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, you are laughable
posted 1 week ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
You think that the state shooting dead an unarmed man shouldn’t even go to court?
Jesus fvcking Christ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, have you seen his criminal record?
Jesus,fvcking Christ!!?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s your point? That we can ad hoc have capital punishment meted out by mid ranked Police Officers due to time served offences?
Go and take your head for a sh!t Pawl.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As per usual somebody doesn't agree with you so out come the insults.
Many folk don't think it should have gone to trial and it's a perfectly reasonable opinion to hold.
Get over it!!
posted 1 week ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
You think that the state shooting dead an unarmed man shouldn’t even go to court?
Jesus fvcking Christ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, have you seen his criminal record?
Jesus,fvcking Christ!!?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s your point? That we can ad hoc have capital punishment meted out by mid ranked Police Officers due to time served offences?
Go and take your head for a sh!t Pawl.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As per usual somebody doesn't agree with you so out come the insults.
Many folk don't think it should have gone to trial and it's a perfectly reasonable opinion to hold.
Get over it!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It shouldn’t have gone to court for murder, but it’s a questionable action in my opinion. Looked like the car was full boxed in.
Disgusting human being that he was, I won’t be shedding a tear. But I don’t think it was a lawful shooting.
posted 1 week ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Mamba - You hit us, We hit you. (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 46 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 8 hours, 31 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
He's had a bounce
Partly because the Dems have gone for a "not trump" campaigning policy which just indirectly campaigns for the Reps
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I think Harris has been speaking quite a lot, interviewing quite a bit and she’s far from impressive,
It’s gonna be really tight again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Got to challenge the idea that in this same period where Harris has not impressed that Trump has
Senile old fack spent 20 minutes shuffling from side to side this week
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can challenge it mate but I didn’t say that he had impressed. I just said that she’s been in the public a lot recently, a lot more than usual, a fk lot more and she’s not that impressive and then we see her lead reduce or odds get longer. My comment was purely about Harris, not Trump.
Wait was the McDonalds thing fake? Is someone kidding me? That country’s leadership is done for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual you can't help but lie. Trump's bump in the polls is the reason she came out, her coming out did not lead to Trump's bump in the polls. You've got these events the wrong way around, with a conveniently selected view if events.
Harris was happy to stay quiet but as the election draws nearer the Dems have accepted that whatever gains they have made have not been enough, and as Trump's long predicted bump in the polls came to fruition they decided to send her out.
Thanks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual you cannot read.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/national/
Have a look there. Seeing as you struggle with reading, there’s a colourful and interactive image for you to look at. With dates everything.
Too complicated, don’t understand: the gap has shrunk since she has been speaking publicly more this past month. She got a ‘new manager bounce’ which eventually came to an end and the gap is returning to its normal, very tight levels. If she were anything close to decent, she would be destroying Trump and in US terms that means more or less 5%
Wind your neck in you bellnd
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The gap was already shrinking before she started talking you fecking genius. It has continued to do so after she started talking, and that's all your colourful nursery school diagrams prove. Thanks for taking the time to post irrelevant undisputed info in support of your fairy tale of events.
posted 1 week ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
You think that the state shooting dead an unarmed man shouldn’t even go to court?
Jesus fvcking Christ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, have you seen his criminal record?
Jesus,fvcking Christ!!?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s your point? That we can ad hoc have capital punishment meted out by mid ranked Police Officers due to time served offences?
Go and take your head for a sh!t Pawl.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As per usual somebody doesn't agree with you so out come the insults.
Many folk don't think it should have gone to trial and it's a perfectly reasonable opinion to hold.
Get over it!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It shouldn’t have gone to court for murder, but it’s a questionable action in my opinion. Looked like the car was full boxed in.
Disgusting human being that he was, I won’t be shedding a tear. But I don’t think it was a lawful shooting.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree with this, but is there really justification for a guilty verdict and putting this cop away for years? I have my doubts tbh.
They should have included lesser charges perhaps?
posted 1 week ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
You think that the state shooting dead an unarmed man shouldn’t even go to court?
Jesus fvcking Christ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, have you seen his criminal record?
Jesus,fvcking Christ!!?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s your point? That we can ad hoc have capital punishment meted out by mid ranked Police Officers due to time served offences?
Go and take your head for a sh!t Pawl.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As per usual somebody doesn't agree with you so out come the insults.
Many folk don't think it should have gone to trial and it's a perfectly reasonable opinion to hold.
Get over it!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There’s not a single insult in there and if your point is that we can have the Police ad hoc mete out capital punishment on our streets for time served offences and not even be questioned about it, fair enough.
I mean that’s just incredibly fvcking stupid by any measure, but you’re entitled to your opinion.
posted 1 week ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
You think that the state shooting dead an unarmed man shouldn’t even go to court?
Jesus fvcking Christ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, have you seen his criminal record?
Jesus,fvcking Christ!!?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s your point? That we can ad hoc have capital punishment meted out by mid ranked Police Officers due to time served offences?
Go and take your head for a sh!t Pawl.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As per usual somebody doesn't agree with you so out come the insults.
Many folk don't think it should have gone to trial and it's a perfectly reasonable opinion to hold.
Get over it!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There’s not a single insult in there and if your point is that we can have the Police ad hoc mete out capital punishment on our streets for time served offences and not even be questioned about it, fair enough.
I mean that’s just incredibly fvcking stupid by any measure, but you’re entitled to your opinion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Barry strikes again
posted 1 week ago
comment by Mamba - You hit us, We hit you. (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t talk to me unless you can do ten (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
You think that the state shooting dead an unarmed man shouldn’t even go to court?
Jesus fvcking Christ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, have you seen his criminal record?
Jesus,fvcking Christ!!?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s your point? That we can ad hoc have capital punishment meted out by mid ranked Police Officers due to time served offences?
Go and take your head for a sh!t Pawl.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As per usual somebody doesn't agree with you so out come the insults.
Many folk don't think it should have gone to trial and it's a perfectly reasonable opinion to hold.
Get over it!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It shouldn’t have gone to court for murder, but it’s a questionable action in my opinion. Looked like the car was full boxed in.
Disgusting human being that he was, I won’t be shedding a tear. But I don’t think it was a lawful shooting.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree with this, but is there really justification for a guilty verdict and putting this cop away for years? I have my doubts tbh.
They should have included lesser charges perhaps?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe not for years and it’s easy to say sat at a desk but the car was going nowhere. I’d want to know what their thoughts were on whether he was armed or not. I think that’s the main thing that changed the state of mind with armed police.
Tbf to the officer, he has to live with it. Whether or not the guy was a PoS he has now killed a man, an unarmed man; that will affect him.
posted 1 week ago
It can’t be Barry surely?
If he is then he’s mugged me right off.
posted 1 week ago
Fwiw, I don’t think he should have been found guilty. They’ve such a hard job, under extreme pressure, making very quick decisions.
But to suggest killing an unarmed man on our streets should have even been questioned in court is insane and facist.
posted 1 week ago
Shouldn’t!*
posted 1 week ago
comment by Mamba - You hit us, We hit you. (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Mamba - You hit us, We hit you. (U1282)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 46 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 8 hours, 31 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
He's had a bounce
Partly because the Dems have gone for a "not trump" campaigning policy which just indirectly campaigns for the Reps
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I think Harris has been speaking quite a lot, interviewing quite a bit and she’s far from impressive,
It’s gonna be really tight again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Got to challenge the idea that in this same period where Harris has not impressed that Trump has
Senile old fack spent 20 minutes shuffling from side to side this week
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can challenge it mate but I didn’t say that he had impressed. I just said that she’s been in the public a lot recently, a lot more than usual, a fk lot more and she’s not that impressive and then we see her lead reduce or odds get longer. My comment was purely about Harris, not Trump.
Wait was the McDonalds thing fake? Is someone kidding me? That country’s leadership is done for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual you can't help but lie. Trump's bump in the polls is the reason she came out, her coming out did not lead to Trump's bump in the polls. You've got these events the wrong way around, with a conveniently selected view if events.
Harris was happy to stay quiet but as the election draws nearer the Dems have accepted that whatever gains they have made have not been enough, and as Trump's long predicted bump in the polls came to fruition they decided to send her out.
Thanks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As usual you cannot read.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/national/
Have a look there. Seeing as you struggle with reading, there’s a colourful and interactive image for you to look at. With dates everything.
Too complicated, don’t understand: the gap has shrunk since she has been speaking publicly more this past month. She got a ‘new manager bounce’ which eventually came to an end and the gap is returning to its normal, very tight levels. If she were anything close to decent, she would be destroying Trump and in US terms that means more or less 5%
Wind your neck in you bellnd
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The gap was already shrinking before she started talking you fecking genius. It has continued to do so after she started talking, and that's all your colourful nursery school diagrams prove. Thanks for taking the time to post irrelevant undisputed info in support of your fairy tale of events.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It ‘shrank’ from what? 3.4% to 2.7% over months And then from 2.7% to 1.7% in weeks?
You fkign genius 🤣🤣🤣
Maybe your teleprompter is broken also 🤣🤣🤣
posted 1 week ago
“Why did you shoot that guy in the head? You didn’t even know who he was!”
“Yeah but we found out afterwards he had a previous criminal record that he’d already been punished for so bygones… nothing to see here. Don’t worry about it.”
posted 1 week ago
The fact it went to trial meant all the facts were put in the public domain, no trial and we would probably be having vigils and protests for weeks
Page 4717 of 4737
4718 | 4719 | 4720 | 4721 | 4722