comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 11 minutes ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Appreciate you’re having a tough time; can very much empathise
I suspect that there will be some people wanting to push back on the proposed rules or passports as they’re also feeling grumpy and worn out by the situation, an entirely understandable reaction. I’ll just restate what I’ve said from the very start; it’s simple supply and demand.
Lockdown as a measure I think does work, would be interested to understand why you think it does not. What reduces the effectiveness of it is doing it at the wrong time and in the wrong way, which I think everyone here would agree with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Work or don’t work is far too binary.
How well do they work? Do they reduce ICU / hospital covid admissions by 1%? 5%?25%?50%? We don’t have the first clue if we’re honest about it.
People will jump to the correlation of lockdowns and reduction in cases but ignore the summer months from last year? If lockdowns are so effective that they’re worth the undeniable and horrendous cost, then why did we have such low numbers from May-September with no lockdown? Why have there been similar results in areas with completely different approaches? There are no answers to these questions which satisfactorily explain why we were so easily and quickly accepting of such a course of action.
The point is that none of this was properly discussed, many who tried to question this lockdown narrative of support were slimed and ridiculed and now people want to make what is essentially the same point: that restrictive measures (passports) aren’t worth it for the cost. Yet they were happy to accept lockdown with no evidence and worse yet without even asking for or demanding evidence.
This isn’t a controversial set of questions or observations, the same thing happened with the Iraq War and Brexit to a lesser extent but at least there was a genuine opposition with Brexit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was a reasonable amount of analysis into the extent of the effectiveness of lockdown measures no? Admittedly I may be more data engaged than others but saw a great deal on the impact lockdowns had on the extent of social interaction and thus droplet transmission.
So information is never going to be perfect; even with global data pools you’re still going to have quirks or limitations in it. I know we discussed some of the underlying reasons for potential “quirks” in outcomes as a result of behavioural changes (so for example self enforcing lockdown measures) so don’t necessarily want to go over that again.
Personally my issue with certain lockdown sceptics was that they were employing bad science and even a little digging showed clear biases present in many of them which undermined their position. I am intrigued; do you perceive that the scientists at SAGE are lockdown fanatics, or that their proposals, and indeed those from other bodies such as the actuarial response group, are ideologically as opposed to scientifically driven?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not sure that there was, no. Correlation I saw a lot of but definitive evidence as to the level of effectiveness of lockdowns I’m yet to see it. Perhaps you could share it but if it means a fair bit of your time digging it up then don’t worry.
No I don’t see the SAGE panel as fanatics of any kind not that I know them all that intimately. But there is definitely a tendency for leaning towards a worst case scenario which when it concerns human life I don’t necessarily disagree with.
I don’t think it’s fair to label the exceptions as just quirks. They are strong contradictions that clearly show that many forces are at play and that perhaps locking down doesn’t have the effect that we were told, especially given the huge cost to the country.
We’re now heading into the same old debate that we’ve had for a year now which is probably a waste of time unless either of us have anything new to share of course.
My main point was and still is that the level of debate, discourse and opposition to lockdowns was entirely different to what we’re seeing now wrt to measures such as passports which pale by comparison to national lockdowns. People were slimed left, right and centre and there was no legitimate ‘party’ if you will in organised opposition. It was a handful of individuals who were all slimed and labelled as nutters.
comment by rosso - he hands you a nickel, and he hands you a dime, and he asks you with a grin if you're havin' a good time (U17054)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
The new VAT rules and customs and checks are a royal pig’s ear. Here’s how it’s working for us.
(To set the scene, we’re an SME based in Portugal that manufactures and then retails online to customers worldwide.)
- We are still shipping to UK customers. Absolutely no problems for our customers getting our products in, because there aren’t any checks or controls on VAT or apparently anything else at the UK border. All of our packages are flying straight through, and all of our UK customers still seem very happy. This is currently a nice win for EU business.
- Portugal, like all other EU nations, has in place customs procedures for everything that comes into the EU from outside, including, of course, the UK. Most UK SMEs (including all of our remaining UK suppliers) don’t seem to understand how to label their packages to expedite customs clearance. Everything stopped by customs automatically gets whacked with a minimum EUR12 charge, and then import VAT is applied (at 23% here rather than the UK’s 20%) on top. As we buy small quantities of supplies, frequently, from many different suppliers on a JIT basis, this has made it almost impossible financially and practically to continue to work with UK suppliers. This is obviously already a big problem for UK B2B sellers, and, as such, a big win for EU B2B business.
- Same applies to retail as it does wholesale purchases. It has become much more expensive and difficult for end-consumers to buy from UK retailers. Everything is being stopped at the border and whacked with charges. We used to buy stuff like giant sacks of tea bags online to get posted out here, as well as gift shopping, purchases from Depop sellers, and the rest. No more. Again, this is obviously a problem for UK B2C sellers of all scales who sold in any significant way to the EU market, and, as such, a very nice win for EU B2C sellers of all scales.
- VAT registration. UK govt, in its wisdom, has decided that the UK should become the only country in the world (as far as I am aware) with a single-sale VAT registration requirement. The threshold for selling into the UK is £0. I cannot imagine what kind of bureaucratic nightmare this has created for HMRC, but we applied for our VAT regn in December and are yet to receive anything from HMRC. Well done; you’ve created a massive, crippling admin burden the UK taxpayer has to foot the bill for and simultaneously made the UK the most bureaucratically difficult country for online sellers to access, no doubt to the detriment of the UK consumer.
They’ve shot themselves in both feet, and now appear to be systematically working their way around the rest of the figurative body, emptying the rest of the magazine into any remaining unwounded flesh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Study shows AOC to be one of the least effective members of Congress, quelle fking surprise!
AOC introduced a total of 21 bills which the center defined as “substantive” — but that is where the story ends. Her legislation received no action in committees, no floor votes, and none ever became law, according to the center, which takes its data from Congress.gov.
All Twitter mouth, no substance just slogans. Called it a long time ago.
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 0 seconds ago
Study shows AOC to be one of the least effective members of Congress, quelle fking surprise!
AOC introduced a total of 21 bills which the center defined as “substantive” — but that is where the story ends. Her legislation received no action in committees, no floor votes, and none ever became law, according to the center, which takes its data from Congress.gov.
All Twitter mouth, no substance just slogans. Called it a long time ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
230 out of 240 Dems.
Let's see how your right wing heroine makes out. Y'know the Jewish Space Laser lady.
For balance.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 5 minutes ago
Let's see how your right wing heroine makes out. Y'know the Jewish Space Laser lady.
For balance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ahahaha she’s another special one.
Tbf I don’t think I know anyone that has ever voiced any support for her, the lunatic.
comment by ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 12 minutes ago
Study shows AOC to be one of the least effective members of Congress, quelle fking surprise!
AOC introduced a total of 21 bills which the center defined as “substantive” — but that is where the story ends. Her legislation received no action in committees, no floor votes, and none ever became law, according to the center, which takes its data from Congress.gov.
All Twitter mouth, no substance just slogans. Called it a long time ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Basically the OnlyFans hoe of the politics world. This is who the under thirties of America look up to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is what’s most worrying. Even people on here like her. Totally bizarre
Onlyfans hoe lmao
AOCs ideas are ahead of their time. You have to stay true to the platform that got you elected.
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 5 minutes ago
Let's see how your right wing heroine makes out. Y'know the Jewish Space Laser lady.
For balance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ahahaha she’s another special one.
Tbf I don’t think I know anyone that has ever voiced any support for her, the lunatic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You may not know them but I'm sure you know of them.
Oh and all these celebrities who jumped on #metoo. I'd like to see how many if them supported Polanski's return to the US when he was a finalist for an Oscar.
comment by BB⁷ (U13430)
posted 2 hours, 2 minutes ago
comment by 4zA (U22472)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
whut they rioting about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The DUP encouraged them to mask their sheer incompetence, which brought about the NI protocol they are so unhappy about. When the DUP told their followers to vote for Brexit they had hoped for a fantasy. Reality hurts, it hurts their followers. They were warned but wouldn't listen. It was all self harm. They should own it. But no "look over there, something something ra" and the sheep follow 🐑
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
NEW: MPs will be given a vote on vaccine passports before they are introduced, risking a government defeat - Labour are still undecided on whether to back or not
————
Honestly man if Labour abstain or back this they should just fold as a party. Get more opposition from Tory MP’s at their own party Than Labour offer
NEW: The Covid-19 vaccine passport app could require people to give their location to a central database - meaning people could be tracked
Via
@thetimes
NEW: David Davis says domestic vaccine passports should not be used as the NHS is too “incompetent” to handle the data
Via
@thetimes
NEW: 60% of adults in the UK have now been vaccinated against Coronavirus - these groups (1-9) account for 99% of Covid deaths
JUST IN: New York has created a vaccine passport system
NEW: Scotland generated £308 less in tax revenue per person than the UK average in 2020 - but it received £1,633 per person more in public spending
Via
@FT
Coronavirus deaths per million - Europe:
Flag of Czech Republic Czechia: 2,513
Flag of Hungary Hungary: 2,252
Flag of Belgium Belgium: 1,989
Flag of Slovenia Slovenia: 1,960
Flag of Bulgaria Bulgaria: 1,955
Flag of United Kingdom UK: 1,861
Flag of Italy Italy: 1,838
Flag of Slovakia Slovakia: 1,836
Flag of Portugal Portugal: 1,659
BREAKING NEWS: The SNP is under investigation for financial fraud - Police Scotland have confirmed
I hope Starmer locates a pair for the passport vote
comment by Blarmy (U14547)
posted 1 minute ago
I hope Starmer locates a pair for the passport vote
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Highly unlikely, guy is just too weak
Dumb move as well as him voting against it and voting it down would be the biggest political move he’s done and could help him actually win an election or close the gap because let’s face it as it stands sitting on the fence all the time he’s not doing anything and isn’t going to win an election
Be quite ironic that the roles would be reversed and Labour would be the party for freedom lol
Would be absolutely massive for Starmer to get a win over a 80 seat majority government.
But he just won’t do it
We’ll see what his ambition is really like to be PM, he’s got a chance to put Labour back on the map, potentially win a parliamentary vote that defines our country for the future and to morally do the right thing.
It’s a win win situation to vote for it because even if it loses the vote he can rebrand the Labour Party as the party for freedom etc
Whereas if he abstains or backs it he just continues to look weak and basically admits he’s of no real opposition to this government. He can’t even give himself a chance of winning a future election if he doesn’t vote against it, he must know that
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 35 minutes ago
comment by ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 12 minutes ago
Study shows AOC to be one of the least effective members of Congress, quelle fking surprise!
AOC introduced a total of 21 bills which the center defined as “substantive” — but that is where the story ends. Her legislation received no action in committees, no floor votes, and none ever became law, according to the center, which takes its data from Congress.gov.
All Twitter mouth, no substance just slogans. Called it a long time ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Basically the OnlyFans hoe of the politics world. This is who the under thirties of America look up to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is what’s most worrying. Even people on here like her. Totally bizarre
Onlyfans hoe lmao
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought better of you pal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No you didn’t 😂
Labour’s history is more of protest than power. Only 3 leaders have won majorities at a general election, and only 1 of those was born in the past 100 years
-The Times
Sign in if you want to comment
Arguing w/strangers cause I'm lonely thread
Page 560 of 4833
561 | 562 | 563 | 564 | 565
posted on 4/4/21
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 11 minutes ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Appreciate you’re having a tough time; can very much empathise
I suspect that there will be some people wanting to push back on the proposed rules or passports as they’re also feeling grumpy and worn out by the situation, an entirely understandable reaction. I’ll just restate what I’ve said from the very start; it’s simple supply and demand.
Lockdown as a measure I think does work, would be interested to understand why you think it does not. What reduces the effectiveness of it is doing it at the wrong time and in the wrong way, which I think everyone here would agree with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Work or don’t work is far too binary.
How well do they work? Do they reduce ICU / hospital covid admissions by 1%? 5%?25%?50%? We don’t have the first clue if we’re honest about it.
People will jump to the correlation of lockdowns and reduction in cases but ignore the summer months from last year? If lockdowns are so effective that they’re worth the undeniable and horrendous cost, then why did we have such low numbers from May-September with no lockdown? Why have there been similar results in areas with completely different approaches? There are no answers to these questions which satisfactorily explain why we were so easily and quickly accepting of such a course of action.
The point is that none of this was properly discussed, many who tried to question this lockdown narrative of support were slimed and ridiculed and now people want to make what is essentially the same point: that restrictive measures (passports) aren’t worth it for the cost. Yet they were happy to accept lockdown with no evidence and worse yet without even asking for or demanding evidence.
This isn’t a controversial set of questions or observations, the same thing happened with the Iraq War and Brexit to a lesser extent but at least there was a genuine opposition with Brexit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was a reasonable amount of analysis into the extent of the effectiveness of lockdown measures no? Admittedly I may be more data engaged than others but saw a great deal on the impact lockdowns had on the extent of social interaction and thus droplet transmission.
So information is never going to be perfect; even with global data pools you’re still going to have quirks or limitations in it. I know we discussed some of the underlying reasons for potential “quirks” in outcomes as a result of behavioural changes (so for example self enforcing lockdown measures) so don’t necessarily want to go over that again.
Personally my issue with certain lockdown sceptics was that they were employing bad science and even a little digging showed clear biases present in many of them which undermined their position. I am intrigued; do you perceive that the scientists at SAGE are lockdown fanatics, or that their proposals, and indeed those from other bodies such as the actuarial response group, are ideologically as opposed to scientifically driven?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not sure that there was, no. Correlation I saw a lot of but definitive evidence as to the level of effectiveness of lockdowns I’m yet to see it. Perhaps you could share it but if it means a fair bit of your time digging it up then don’t worry.
No I don’t see the SAGE panel as fanatics of any kind not that I know them all that intimately. But there is definitely a tendency for leaning towards a worst case scenario which when it concerns human life I don’t necessarily disagree with.
I don’t think it’s fair to label the exceptions as just quirks. They are strong contradictions that clearly show that many forces are at play and that perhaps locking down doesn’t have the effect that we were told, especially given the huge cost to the country.
We’re now heading into the same old debate that we’ve had for a year now which is probably a waste of time unless either of us have anything new to share of course.
My main point was and still is that the level of debate, discourse and opposition to lockdowns was entirely different to what we’re seeing now wrt to measures such as passports which pale by comparison to national lockdowns. People were slimed left, right and centre and there was no legitimate ‘party’ if you will in organised opposition. It was a handful of individuals who were all slimed and labelled as nutters.
posted on 4/4/21
comment by rosso - he hands you a nickel, and he hands you a dime, and he asks you with a grin if you're havin' a good time (U17054)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
The new VAT rules and customs and checks are a royal pig’s ear. Here’s how it’s working for us.
(To set the scene, we’re an SME based in Portugal that manufactures and then retails online to customers worldwide.)
- We are still shipping to UK customers. Absolutely no problems for our customers getting our products in, because there aren’t any checks or controls on VAT or apparently anything else at the UK border. All of our packages are flying straight through, and all of our UK customers still seem very happy. This is currently a nice win for EU business.
- Portugal, like all other EU nations, has in place customs procedures for everything that comes into the EU from outside, including, of course, the UK. Most UK SMEs (including all of our remaining UK suppliers) don’t seem to understand how to label their packages to expedite customs clearance. Everything stopped by customs automatically gets whacked with a minimum EUR12 charge, and then import VAT is applied (at 23% here rather than the UK’s 20%) on top. As we buy small quantities of supplies, frequently, from many different suppliers on a JIT basis, this has made it almost impossible financially and practically to continue to work with UK suppliers. This is obviously already a big problem for UK B2B sellers, and, as such, a big win for EU B2B business.
- Same applies to retail as it does wholesale purchases. It has become much more expensive and difficult for end-consumers to buy from UK retailers. Everything is being stopped at the border and whacked with charges. We used to buy stuff like giant sacks of tea bags online to get posted out here, as well as gift shopping, purchases from Depop sellers, and the rest. No more. Again, this is obviously a problem for UK B2C sellers of all scales who sold in any significant way to the EU market, and, as such, a very nice win for EU B2C sellers of all scales.
- VAT registration. UK govt, in its wisdom, has decided that the UK should become the only country in the world (as far as I am aware) with a single-sale VAT registration requirement. The threshold for selling into the UK is £0. I cannot imagine what kind of bureaucratic nightmare this has created for HMRC, but we applied for our VAT regn in December and are yet to receive anything from HMRC. Well done; you’ve created a massive, crippling admin burden the UK taxpayer has to foot the bill for and simultaneously made the UK the most bureaucratically difficult country for online sellers to access, no doubt to the detriment of the UK consumer.
They’ve shot themselves in both feet, and now appear to be systematically working their way around the rest of the figurative body, emptying the rest of the magazine into any remaining unwounded flesh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting.
posted on 4/4/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 4/4/21
Study shows AOC to be one of the least effective members of Congress, quelle fking surprise!
AOC introduced a total of 21 bills which the center defined as “substantive” — but that is where the story ends. Her legislation received no action in committees, no floor votes, and none ever became law, according to the center, which takes its data from Congress.gov.
All Twitter mouth, no substance just slogans. Called it a long time ago.
posted on 4/4/21
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 0 seconds ago
Study shows AOC to be one of the least effective members of Congress, quelle fking surprise!
AOC introduced a total of 21 bills which the center defined as “substantive” — but that is where the story ends. Her legislation received no action in committees, no floor votes, and none ever became law, according to the center, which takes its data from Congress.gov.
All Twitter mouth, no substance just slogans. Called it a long time ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
230 out of 240 Dems.
posted on 4/4/21
Let's see how your right wing heroine makes out. Y'know the Jewish Space Laser lady.
For balance.
posted on 4/4/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 4/4/21
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 5 minutes ago
Let's see how your right wing heroine makes out. Y'know the Jewish Space Laser lady.
For balance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ahahaha she’s another special one.
Tbf I don’t think I know anyone that has ever voiced any support for her, the lunatic.
posted on 4/4/21
comment by ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 12 minutes ago
Study shows AOC to be one of the least effective members of Congress, quelle fking surprise!
AOC introduced a total of 21 bills which the center defined as “substantive” — but that is where the story ends. Her legislation received no action in committees, no floor votes, and none ever became law, according to the center, which takes its data from Congress.gov.
All Twitter mouth, no substance just slogans. Called it a long time ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Basically the OnlyFans hoe of the politics world. This is who the under thirties of America look up to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is what’s most worrying. Even people on here like her. Totally bizarre
Onlyfans hoe lmao
posted on 4/4/21
AOCs ideas are ahead of their time. You have to stay true to the platform that got you elected.
posted on 4/4/21
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 5 minutes ago
Let's see how your right wing heroine makes out. Y'know the Jewish Space Laser lady.
For balance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ahahaha she’s another special one.
Tbf I don’t think I know anyone that has ever voiced any support for her, the lunatic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You may not know them but I'm sure you know of them.
posted on 4/4/21
Oh and all these celebrities who jumped on #metoo. I'd like to see how many if them supported Polanski's return to the US when he was a finalist for an Oscar.
posted on 4/4/21
comment by BB⁷ (U13430)
posted 2 hours, 2 minutes ago
comment by 4zA (U22472)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
whut they rioting about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The DUP encouraged them to mask their sheer incompetence, which brought about the NI protocol they are so unhappy about. When the DUP told their followers to vote for Brexit they had hoped for a fantasy. Reality hurts, it hurts their followers. They were warned but wouldn't listen. It was all self harm. They should own it. But no "look over there, something something ra" and the sheep follow 🐑
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 4/4/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 4/4/21
NEW: MPs will be given a vote on vaccine passports before they are introduced, risking a government defeat - Labour are still undecided on whether to back or not
————
Honestly man if Labour abstain or back this they should just fold as a party. Get more opposition from Tory MP’s at their own party Than Labour offer
posted on 4/4/21
NEW: The Covid-19 vaccine passport app could require people to give their location to a central database - meaning people could be tracked
Via
@thetimes
posted on 4/4/21
NEW: David Davis says domestic vaccine passports should not be used as the NHS is too “incompetent” to handle the data
Via
@thetimes
NEW: 60% of adults in the UK have now been vaccinated against Coronavirus - these groups (1-9) account for 99% of Covid deaths
JUST IN: New York has created a vaccine passport system
NEW: Scotland generated £308 less in tax revenue per person than the UK average in 2020 - but it received £1,633 per person more in public spending
Via
@FT
Coronavirus deaths per million - Europe:
Flag of Czech Republic Czechia: 2,513
Flag of Hungary Hungary: 2,252
Flag of Belgium Belgium: 1,989
Flag of Slovenia Slovenia: 1,960
Flag of Bulgaria Bulgaria: 1,955
Flag of United Kingdom UK: 1,861
Flag of Italy Italy: 1,838
Flag of Slovakia Slovakia: 1,836
Flag of Portugal Portugal: 1,659
posted on 4/4/21
BREAKING NEWS: The SNP is under investigation for financial fraud - Police Scotland have confirmed
posted on 4/4/21
I hope Starmer locates a pair for the passport vote
posted on 4/4/21
comment by Blarmy (U14547)
posted 1 minute ago
I hope Starmer locates a pair for the passport vote
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Highly unlikely, guy is just too weak
Dumb move as well as him voting against it and voting it down would be the biggest political move he’s done and could help him actually win an election or close the gap because let’s face it as it stands sitting on the fence all the time he’s not doing anything and isn’t going to win an election
posted on 4/4/21
Be quite ironic that the roles would be reversed and Labour would be the party for freedom lol
posted on 4/4/21
Would be absolutely massive for Starmer to get a win over a 80 seat majority government.
But he just won’t do it
posted on 4/4/21
We’ll see what his ambition is really like to be PM, he’s got a chance to put Labour back on the map, potentially win a parliamentary vote that defines our country for the future and to morally do the right thing.
It’s a win win situation to vote for it because even if it loses the vote he can rebrand the Labour Party as the party for freedom etc
Whereas if he abstains or backs it he just continues to look weak and basically admits he’s of no real opposition to this government. He can’t even give himself a chance of winning a future election if he doesn’t vote against it, he must know that
posted on 4/4/21
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 35 minutes ago
comment by ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 12 minutes ago
Study shows AOC to be one of the least effective members of Congress, quelle fking surprise!
AOC introduced a total of 21 bills which the center defined as “substantive” — but that is where the story ends. Her legislation received no action in committees, no floor votes, and none ever became law, according to the center, which takes its data from Congress.gov.
All Twitter mouth, no substance just slogans. Called it a long time ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Basically the OnlyFans hoe of the politics world. This is who the under thirties of America look up to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is what’s most worrying. Even people on here like her. Totally bizarre
Onlyfans hoe lmao
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought better of you pal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No you didn’t 😂
posted on 4/4/21
Labour’s history is more of protest than power. Only 3 leaders have won majorities at a general election, and only 1 of those was born in the past 100 years
-The Times
Page 560 of 4833
561 | 562 | 563 | 564 | 565