Despite no glory hunting support and an empty trophy cabinet Spurs had the 2nd highest average Prem attendance last season (even though Arsenal, West Ham and City falsify theirs).
----------------------------
So a stadiums capacity defines how big a club is?!
Depends on what metric you are using. History and Trophies won are all in the past & wont mean shlt come the next Saturday. Spurs right now have the biggest stadium in London, are the only team playing in the Champions league and had more players in the Semis of the World cup than any other team in Europe. We have the World Cup Winning Captain in Goal, Englands center forward/ one of the most in demand players in the world and a manager who has managed to outperform his peers with a "nothing" net spend (while stadium built) over the past 3/4 years while being in demand for some of Europe's biggest clubs. .... Perhaps that counts for more than some random cup final win 20 years ago??????
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 48 seconds ago
Depends on what metric you are using. History and Trophies won are all in the past & wont mean shlt come the next Saturday. Spurs right now have the biggest stadium in London, are the only team playing in the Champions league and had more players in the Semis of the World cup than any other team in Europe. We have the World Cup Winning Captain in Goal, Englands center forward/ one of the most in demand players in the world and a manager who has managed to outperform his peers with a "nothing" net spend (while stadium built) over the past 3/4 years while being in demand for some of Europe's biggest clubs. .... Perhaps that counts for more than some random cup final win 20 years ago??????
----------------------------------------------------------------------
again another goodish comment, but anyone can make a case for their own club by moving the parameters. A lot of yours are random criteria
Travelling around Europe a lot as i do,the three clubs spoken about in England are,
Man U,Chelsea and Liverpool,Man city are just beginning to be spoken of.
Arsenal are bigger just.
They've been a bad joke for minimum 10 years and Chelsea are certainly catching them. Remains to be seen if Arsenal give Emery the financial muscle to reverse the trend.
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 7 minutes ago
Depends on what metric you are using. History and Trophies won are all in the past & wont mean shlt come the next Saturday. Spurs right now have the biggest stadium in London, are the only team playing in the Champions league and had more players in the Semis of the World cup than any other team in Europe. We have the World Cup Winning Captain in Goal, Englands center forward/ one of the most in demand players in the world and a manager who has managed to outperform his peers with a "nothing" net spend (while stadium built) over the past 3/4 years while being in demand for some of Europe's biggest clubs. .... Perhaps that counts for more than some random cup final win 20 years ago??????
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Getting a reality check in the champions league aren't you, you'll be joining us and Arsenal in the EL if you can get 3rd
Arsenal are bigger on Youtube with their fan TV which provides weekly entertainment for many fans across the world
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 6 minutes ago
Depends on what metric you are using. History and Trophies won are all in the past & wont mean shlt come the next Saturday. Spurs right now have the biggest stadium in London, are the only team playing in the Champions league and had more players in the Semis of the World cup than any other team in Europe. We have the World Cup Winning Captain in Goal, Englands center forward/ one of the most in demand players in the world and a manager who has managed to outperform his peers with a "nothing" net spend (while stadium built) over the past 3/4 years while being in demand for some of Europe's biggest clubs. .... Perhaps that counts for more than some random cup final win 20 years ago??????
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My local sunday league side has a net spend of zero. Have never won anything (which doesn't matter), own their own pitch next to a hill which has a capacity of over 100,000. The main thing is is that their next game hasn't happened yet, so they could win it, even though they've lost every game in their history. What matters is the now and at the moment my sunday league team is the biggest in the country.
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 48 seconds ago
Depends on what metric you are using. History and Trophies won are all in the past & wont mean shlt come the next Saturday. Spurs right now have the biggest stadium in London, are the only team playing in the Champions league and had more players in the Semis of the World cup than any other team in Europe. We have the World Cup Winning Captain in Goal, Englands center forward/ one of the most in demand players in the world and a manager who has managed to outperform his peers with a "nothing" net spend (while stadium built) over the past 3/4 years while being in demand for some of Europe's biggest clubs. .... Perhaps that counts for more than some random cup final win 20 years ago??????
----------------------------------------------------------------------
again another goodish comment, but anyone can make a case for their own club by moving the parameters. A lot of yours are random criteria
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I know but I just don't think matters TBH. It's
just a "big dlck" contest for some fans who are seriously lacking ...Leicester aren't deemed a "big club" but their achievement is far greater than anything achieved by City, Chelsea or United in the past decade
I don't think there's much in it between Chelsea and Arsenal TBH.
Put it this way: a big player has a choice to join any club in London. Which are they probably going to go for?
It's quite clearly Chelsea.
comment by Tablighi Jamaat (U15973)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 7 minutes ago
Depends on what metric you are using. History and Trophies won are all in the past & wont mean shlt come the next Saturday. Spurs right now have the biggest stadium in London, are the only team playing in the Champions league and had more players in the Semis of the World cup than any other team in Europe. We have the World Cup Winning Captain in Goal, Englands center forward/ one of the most in demand players in the world and a manager who has managed to outperform his peers with a "nothing" net spend (while stadium built) over the past 3/4 years while being in demand for some of Europe's biggest clubs. .... Perhaps that counts for more than some random cup final win 20 years ago??????
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Getting a reality check in the champions league aren't you, you'll be joining us and Arsenal in the EL if you can get 3rd
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep.... Looking like it. Its what happens when u cant spend/strengthen......wouldn't be shocked if Spurs, Arsenal or Chelsea won it this year
comment by HaaK (U11574)
posted 2 minutes ago
Put it this way: a big player has a choice to join any club in London. Which are they probably going to go for?
It's quite clearly Chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably because we'll pay the higher wages and fee
comment by HaaK (U11574)
posted 4 minutes ago
Put it this way: a big player has a choice to join any club in London. Which are they probably going to go for?
It's quite clearly Chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The same as when Sanchez chose United over City. United are the team the players want to play for as we're the bigger club. No one would want to sign for City.
comment by Dominic Shimmin (U1734)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by HaaK (U11574)
posted 4 minutes ago
Put it this way: a big player has a choice to join any club in London. Which are they probably going to go for?
It's quite clearly Chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The same as when Sanchez chose United over City. United are the team the players want to play for as we're the bigger club. No one would want to sign for City.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty sure that clusterf*ck had more to do with 450K+ a week
comment by Serial WUManiser™© - In Unai We Trust (U1410)
posted 22 minutes ago
Despite no glory hunting support and an empty trophy cabinet Spurs had the 2nd highest average Prem attendance last season (even though Arsenal, West Ham and City falsify theirs).
----------------------------
So a stadiums capacity defines how big a club is?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how many people deem you worth watching isn't important then? Monaco could win the CL 5 times in a row but they still wouldn't be a big club.
Arsenal are the biggest Club in London still IMO.
Chelsea and Spurs have vied for the second place over the years, depending on WHEN historically you look at it would decide who is currently in the ascendancy. There have been times when Spurs have clearly been in front and there have been times when Chelsea have clearly been in front.
Spurs with their new big ground have struck a big blow but Chelsea with their big ground plans and regular big trophy winning habits have also struck big blows, so it all comes down to interpretation, bias and who you support.
Whatever your persuasion is, the one thing on here that neither set of supporters should be disputing is that BOTH are big Clubs.
Then comes West Ham.
Then comes all the rest IMO.
comment by Tablighi Jamaat (U15973)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by HaaK (U11574)
posted 2 minutes ago
Put it this way: a big player has a choice to join any club in London. Which are they probably going to go for?
It's quite clearly Chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably because we'll pay the higher wages and fee
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's part of it, sure. But then, on the whole, bigger clubs pay bigger wages, don't they.
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Serial WUManiser™© - In Unai We Trust (U1410)
posted 22 minutes ago
Despite no glory hunting support and an empty trophy cabinet Spurs had the 2nd highest average Prem attendance last season (even though Arsenal, West Ham and City falsify theirs).
----------------------------
So a stadiums capacity defines how big a club is?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how many people deem you worth watching isn't important then? Monaco could win the CL 5 times in a row but they still wouldn't be a big club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By that logic worldwide fans is a completely useless stat then.
And i'd agree what a load of nonsense it is.
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Serial WUManiser™© - In Unai We Trust (U1410)
posted 22 minutes ago
Despite no glory hunting support and an empty trophy cabinet Spurs had the 2nd highest average Prem attendance last season (even though Arsenal, West Ham and City falsify theirs).
----------------------------
So a stadiums capacity defines how big a club is?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how many people deem you worth watching isn't important then? Monaco could win the CL 5 times in a row but they still wouldn't be a big club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea what you're on about. Monaco are a big club with a rich history of success. They're right up there with PSG, Lyon & Marseille as the biggest clubs in France.
Don't care how big your TEMPORARY stadium is, it's right at the bottom of a long list of factors when judging how big a club is. Just because a club seats 60,000 capacity doesn't make it a bigger club than one that holds 50,000. It's nonsense, tbh.
comment by Dominic Shimmin (U1734)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by HaaK (U11574)
posted 4 minutes ago
Put it this way: a big player has a choice to join any club in London. Which are they probably going to go for?
It's quite clearly Chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The same as when Sanchez chose United over City. United are the team the players want to play for as we're the bigger club. No one would want to sign for City.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Having taken the money it would appear that the opposite is actually true..... Pogba, Martial, Sanchez, Lindeloft, Bailey etc all look bl0ddy miserable at United
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Dominic Shimmin (U1734)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by HaaK (U11574)
posted 4 minutes ago
Put it this way: a big player has a choice to join any club in London. Which are they probably going to go for?
It's quite clearly Chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The same as when Sanchez chose United over City. United are the team the players want to play for as we're the bigger club. No one would want to sign for City.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Having taken the money it would appear that the opposite is actually true..... Pogba, Martial, Sanchez, Lindeloft, Bailey etc all look bl0ddy miserable at United
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you're saying they'd rather have joined City?
comment by Serial WUManiser™© - In Unai We Trust (U1410)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Serial WUManiser™© - In Unai We Trust (U1410)
posted 22 minutes ago
Despite no glory hunting support and an empty trophy cabinet Spurs had the 2nd highest average Prem attendance last season (even though Arsenal, West Ham and City falsify theirs).
----------------------------
So a stadiums capacity defines how big a club is?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how many people deem you worth watching isn't important then? Monaco could win the CL 5 times in a row but they still wouldn't be a big club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea what you're on about. Monaco are a big club with a rich history of success. They're right up there with PSG, Lyon & Marseille as the biggest clubs in France.
Don't care how big your TEMPORARY stadium is, it's right at the bottom of a long list of factors when judging how big a club is. Just because a club seats 60,000 capacity doesn't make it a bigger club than one that holds 50,000. It's nonsense, tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Monaco are not a big club. Never have been and never will be.
It's a millionaires plaything that spend most of their time playing in a tiny stadium that's 3/4 empty.
comment by Dominic Shimmin (U1734)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Dominic Shimmin (U1734)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by HaaK (U11574)
posted 4 minutes ago
Put it this way: a big player has a choice to join any club in London. Which are they probably going to go for?
It's quite clearly Chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The same as when Sanchez chose United over City. United are the team the players want to play for as we're the bigger club. No one would want to sign for City.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Having taken the money it would appear that the opposite is actually true..... Pogba, Martial, Sanchez, Lindeloft, Bailey etc all look bl0ddy miserable at United
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you're saying they'd rather have joined City?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think they'd rather be playing the football City do
comment by Tablighi Jamaat (U15973)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by Dominic Shimmin (U1734)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Dominic Shimmin (U1734)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by HaaK (U11574)
posted 4 minutes ago
Put it this way: a big player has a choice to join any club in London. Which are they probably going to go for?
It's quite clearly Chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The same as when Sanchez chose United over City. United are the team the players want to play for as we're the bigger club. No one would want to sign for City.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Having taken the money it would appear that the opposite is actually true..... Pogba, Martial, Sanchez, Lindeloft, Bailey etc all look bl0ddy miserable at United
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you're saying they'd rather have joined City?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think they'd rather be playing the football City do
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So he is saying that City are a bigger club than United?
Sign in if you want to comment
Biggest Club In London
Page 2 of 10
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 10/10/18
Despite no glory hunting support and an empty trophy cabinet Spurs had the 2nd highest average Prem attendance last season (even though Arsenal, West Ham and City falsify theirs).
----------------------------
So a stadiums capacity defines how big a club is?!
posted on 10/10/18
Depends on what metric you are using. History and Trophies won are all in the past & wont mean shlt come the next Saturday. Spurs right now have the biggest stadium in London, are the only team playing in the Champions league and had more players in the Semis of the World cup than any other team in Europe. We have the World Cup Winning Captain in Goal, Englands center forward/ one of the most in demand players in the world and a manager who has managed to outperform his peers with a "nothing" net spend (while stadium built) over the past 3/4 years while being in demand for some of Europe's biggest clubs. .... Perhaps that counts for more than some random cup final win 20 years ago??????
posted on 10/10/18
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 48 seconds ago
Depends on what metric you are using. History and Trophies won are all in the past & wont mean shlt come the next Saturday. Spurs right now have the biggest stadium in London, are the only team playing in the Champions league and had more players in the Semis of the World cup than any other team in Europe. We have the World Cup Winning Captain in Goal, Englands center forward/ one of the most in demand players in the world and a manager who has managed to outperform his peers with a "nothing" net spend (while stadium built) over the past 3/4 years while being in demand for some of Europe's biggest clubs. .... Perhaps that counts for more than some random cup final win 20 years ago??????
----------------------------------------------------------------------
again another goodish comment, but anyone can make a case for their own club by moving the parameters. A lot of yours are random criteria
posted on 10/10/18
Travelling around Europe a lot as i do,the three clubs spoken about in England are,
Man U,Chelsea and Liverpool,Man city are just beginning to be spoken of.
posted on 10/10/18
Arsenal are bigger just.
They've been a bad joke for minimum 10 years and Chelsea are certainly catching them. Remains to be seen if Arsenal give Emery the financial muscle to reverse the trend.
posted on 10/10/18
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 7 minutes ago
Depends on what metric you are using. History and Trophies won are all in the past & wont mean shlt come the next Saturday. Spurs right now have the biggest stadium in London, are the only team playing in the Champions league and had more players in the Semis of the World cup than any other team in Europe. We have the World Cup Winning Captain in Goal, Englands center forward/ one of the most in demand players in the world and a manager who has managed to outperform his peers with a "nothing" net spend (while stadium built) over the past 3/4 years while being in demand for some of Europe's biggest clubs. .... Perhaps that counts for more than some random cup final win 20 years ago??????
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Getting a reality check in the champions league aren't you, you'll be joining us and Arsenal in the EL if you can get 3rd
posted on 10/10/18
Arsenal are bigger on Youtube with their fan TV which provides weekly entertainment for many fans across the world
posted on 10/10/18
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 6 minutes ago
Depends on what metric you are using. History and Trophies won are all in the past & wont mean shlt come the next Saturday. Spurs right now have the biggest stadium in London, are the only team playing in the Champions league and had more players in the Semis of the World cup than any other team in Europe. We have the World Cup Winning Captain in Goal, Englands center forward/ one of the most in demand players in the world and a manager who has managed to outperform his peers with a "nothing" net spend (while stadium built) over the past 3/4 years while being in demand for some of Europe's biggest clubs. .... Perhaps that counts for more than some random cup final win 20 years ago??????
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My local sunday league side has a net spend of zero. Have never won anything (which doesn't matter), own their own pitch next to a hill which has a capacity of over 100,000. The main thing is is that their next game hasn't happened yet, so they could win it, even though they've lost every game in their history. What matters is the now and at the moment my sunday league team is the biggest in the country.
posted on 10/10/18
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 48 seconds ago
Depends on what metric you are using. History and Trophies won are all in the past & wont mean shlt come the next Saturday. Spurs right now have the biggest stadium in London, are the only team playing in the Champions league and had more players in the Semis of the World cup than any other team in Europe. We have the World Cup Winning Captain in Goal, Englands center forward/ one of the most in demand players in the world and a manager who has managed to outperform his peers with a "nothing" net spend (while stadium built) over the past 3/4 years while being in demand for some of Europe's biggest clubs. .... Perhaps that counts for more than some random cup final win 20 years ago??????
----------------------------------------------------------------------
again another goodish comment, but anyone can make a case for their own club by moving the parameters. A lot of yours are random criteria
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I know but I just don't think matters TBH. It's
just a "big dlck" contest for some fans who are seriously lacking ...Leicester aren't deemed a "big club" but their achievement is far greater than anything achieved by City, Chelsea or United in the past decade
posted on 10/10/18
I don't think there's much in it between Chelsea and Arsenal TBH.
posted on 10/10/18
Put it this way: a big player has a choice to join any club in London. Which are they probably going to go for?
It's quite clearly Chelsea.
posted on 10/10/18
comment by Tablighi Jamaat (U15973)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 7 minutes ago
Depends on what metric you are using. History and Trophies won are all in the past & wont mean shlt come the next Saturday. Spurs right now have the biggest stadium in London, are the only team playing in the Champions league and had more players in the Semis of the World cup than any other team in Europe. We have the World Cup Winning Captain in Goal, Englands center forward/ one of the most in demand players in the world and a manager who has managed to outperform his peers with a "nothing" net spend (while stadium built) over the past 3/4 years while being in demand for some of Europe's biggest clubs. .... Perhaps that counts for more than some random cup final win 20 years ago??????
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Getting a reality check in the champions league aren't you, you'll be joining us and Arsenal in the EL if you can get 3rd
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep.... Looking like it. Its what happens when u cant spend/strengthen......wouldn't be shocked if Spurs, Arsenal or Chelsea won it this year
posted on 10/10/18
comment by HaaK (U11574)
posted 2 minutes ago
Put it this way: a big player has a choice to join any club in London. Which are they probably going to go for?
It's quite clearly Chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably because we'll pay the higher wages and fee
posted on 10/10/18
comment by HaaK (U11574)
posted 4 minutes ago
Put it this way: a big player has a choice to join any club in London. Which are they probably going to go for?
It's quite clearly Chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The same as when Sanchez chose United over City. United are the team the players want to play for as we're the bigger club. No one would want to sign for City.
posted on 10/10/18
comment by Dominic Shimmin (U1734)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by HaaK (U11574)
posted 4 minutes ago
Put it this way: a big player has a choice to join any club in London. Which are they probably going to go for?
It's quite clearly Chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The same as when Sanchez chose United over City. United are the team the players want to play for as we're the bigger club. No one would want to sign for City.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty sure that clusterf*ck had more to do with 450K+ a week
posted on 10/10/18
comment by Serial WUManiser™© - In Unai We Trust (U1410)
posted 22 minutes ago
Despite no glory hunting support and an empty trophy cabinet Spurs had the 2nd highest average Prem attendance last season (even though Arsenal, West Ham and City falsify theirs).
----------------------------
So a stadiums capacity defines how big a club is?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how many people deem you worth watching isn't important then? Monaco could win the CL 5 times in a row but they still wouldn't be a big club.
posted on 10/10/18
Arsenal are the biggest Club in London still IMO.
Chelsea and Spurs have vied for the second place over the years, depending on WHEN historically you look at it would decide who is currently in the ascendancy. There have been times when Spurs have clearly been in front and there have been times when Chelsea have clearly been in front.
Spurs with their new big ground have struck a big blow but Chelsea with their big ground plans and regular big trophy winning habits have also struck big blows, so it all comes down to interpretation, bias and who you support.
Whatever your persuasion is, the one thing on here that neither set of supporters should be disputing is that BOTH are big Clubs.
Then comes West Ham.
Then comes all the rest IMO.
posted on 10/10/18
comment by Tablighi Jamaat (U15973)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by HaaK (U11574)
posted 2 minutes ago
Put it this way: a big player has a choice to join any club in London. Which are they probably going to go for?
It's quite clearly Chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably because we'll pay the higher wages and fee
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's part of it, sure. But then, on the whole, bigger clubs pay bigger wages, don't they.
posted on 10/10/18
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Serial WUManiser™© - In Unai We Trust (U1410)
posted 22 minutes ago
Despite no glory hunting support and an empty trophy cabinet Spurs had the 2nd highest average Prem attendance last season (even though Arsenal, West Ham and City falsify theirs).
----------------------------
So a stadiums capacity defines how big a club is?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how many people deem you worth watching isn't important then? Monaco could win the CL 5 times in a row but they still wouldn't be a big club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By that logic worldwide fans is a completely useless stat then.
And i'd agree what a load of nonsense it is.
posted on 10/10/18
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Serial WUManiser™© - In Unai We Trust (U1410)
posted 22 minutes ago
Despite no glory hunting support and an empty trophy cabinet Spurs had the 2nd highest average Prem attendance last season (even though Arsenal, West Ham and City falsify theirs).
----------------------------
So a stadiums capacity defines how big a club is?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how many people deem you worth watching isn't important then? Monaco could win the CL 5 times in a row but they still wouldn't be a big club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea what you're on about. Monaco are a big club with a rich history of success. They're right up there with PSG, Lyon & Marseille as the biggest clubs in France.
Don't care how big your TEMPORARY stadium is, it's right at the bottom of a long list of factors when judging how big a club is. Just because a club seats 60,000 capacity doesn't make it a bigger club than one that holds 50,000. It's nonsense, tbh.
posted on 10/10/18
comment by Dominic Shimmin (U1734)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by HaaK (U11574)
posted 4 minutes ago
Put it this way: a big player has a choice to join any club in London. Which are they probably going to go for?
It's quite clearly Chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The same as when Sanchez chose United over City. United are the team the players want to play for as we're the bigger club. No one would want to sign for City.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Having taken the money it would appear that the opposite is actually true..... Pogba, Martial, Sanchez, Lindeloft, Bailey etc all look bl0ddy miserable at United
posted on 10/10/18
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Dominic Shimmin (U1734)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by HaaK (U11574)
posted 4 minutes ago
Put it this way: a big player has a choice to join any club in London. Which are they probably going to go for?
It's quite clearly Chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The same as when Sanchez chose United over City. United are the team the players want to play for as we're the bigger club. No one would want to sign for City.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Having taken the money it would appear that the opposite is actually true..... Pogba, Martial, Sanchez, Lindeloft, Bailey etc all look bl0ddy miserable at United
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you're saying they'd rather have joined City?
posted on 10/10/18
comment by Serial WUManiser™© - In Unai We Trust (U1410)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Serial WUManiser™© - In Unai We Trust (U1410)
posted 22 minutes ago
Despite no glory hunting support and an empty trophy cabinet Spurs had the 2nd highest average Prem attendance last season (even though Arsenal, West Ham and City falsify theirs).
----------------------------
So a stadiums capacity defines how big a club is?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how many people deem you worth watching isn't important then? Monaco could win the CL 5 times in a row but they still wouldn't be a big club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea what you're on about. Monaco are a big club with a rich history of success. They're right up there with PSG, Lyon & Marseille as the biggest clubs in France.
Don't care how big your TEMPORARY stadium is, it's right at the bottom of a long list of factors when judging how big a club is. Just because a club seats 60,000 capacity doesn't make it a bigger club than one that holds 50,000. It's nonsense, tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Monaco are not a big club. Never have been and never will be.
It's a millionaires plaything that spend most of their time playing in a tiny stadium that's 3/4 empty.
posted on 10/10/18
comment by Dominic Shimmin (U1734)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Dominic Shimmin (U1734)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by HaaK (U11574)
posted 4 minutes ago
Put it this way: a big player has a choice to join any club in London. Which are they probably going to go for?
It's quite clearly Chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The same as when Sanchez chose United over City. United are the team the players want to play for as we're the bigger club. No one would want to sign for City.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Having taken the money it would appear that the opposite is actually true..... Pogba, Martial, Sanchez, Lindeloft, Bailey etc all look bl0ddy miserable at United
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you're saying they'd rather have joined City?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think they'd rather be playing the football City do
posted on 10/10/18
comment by Tablighi Jamaat (U15973)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by Dominic Shimmin (U1734)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Dominic Shimmin (U1734)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by HaaK (U11574)
posted 4 minutes ago
Put it this way: a big player has a choice to join any club in London. Which are they probably going to go for?
It's quite clearly Chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The same as when Sanchez chose United over City. United are the team the players want to play for as we're the bigger club. No one would want to sign for City.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Having taken the money it would appear that the opposite is actually true..... Pogba, Martial, Sanchez, Lindeloft, Bailey etc all look bl0ddy miserable at United
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you're saying they'd rather have joined City?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think they'd rather be playing the football City do
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So he is saying that City are a bigger club than United?
Page 2 of 10
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10