comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 29 seconds ago
This is often where debates get to with TOOR, he does not understand this simple point.

Two people can watch the same incident (supposed foul) and disagree. Neither need necessarily be wrong.

TOOR, until you understand that, you’ll forever be labelled an idiot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never said people can't disagree. I said it was a foul. The referee agreed and gave the penalty. They reviewed it and agreed. Simple.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You said that if Salah has stayed on his feet and the referee had concluded that it wasn’t a foul he’d be wrong.

So now you’ve contradicted yourself.

Lovely stuff.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
‘A player knows he has been fouled’

What if the referee disagrees?

Does TOOR have the deciding vote?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then he doesn't get the foul. Obviously. In this case he did, they reviewed it and judged it was a foul and therefore no punishment for Salah. And yet here you are arguing it. Typical Winston.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

That’s not how the retrospective panel works actually.

So if the referee disagrees then how can Salah ‘know’ he has been fouled?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A foul is a foul whether the referee gets it right or not. Wow.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 minutes ago
‘Of course he knows he’s been fouled otherwise he wouldn’t go down’



TOOR taking stupid to a new level.

Ever heard of cheating, TOOR? You know some players feel contact and go down because they’re cheats, right?

Also, he cannot ‘know’ he’s been fouled. Because it’s a matter of opinion and the referee may not have seen that as a foul. That pull was not a foul in my view. It’s subjective. Therefore how can he know?

You really are stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you can't pull a player back its against the rules

so he was fouled and had the right to go down, u just admitted he was pulled above.

job done see ya laters

Right Winston, you're gonna be here for a few days so I'll come back sporadically and pick apart your nonsense. Enjoy.

Winston

Whilst you’re pontificating what constitutes a good or bad day out. Haven’t you got anything better to do than argue on here all day about a foul that didn’t affect your team and had no bearing on where United are in the league?

comment by Father Pranksmas (U6283)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 minutes ago
‘Of course he knows he’s been fouled otherwise he wouldn’t go down’



TOOR taking stupid to a new level.

Ever heard of cheating, TOOR? You know some players feel contact and go down because they’re cheats, right?

Also, he cannot ‘know’ he’s been fouled. Because it’s a matter of opinion and the referee may not have seen that as a foul. That pull was not a foul in my view. It’s subjective. Therefore how can he know?

You really are stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you can't pull a player back its against the rules

so he was fouled and had the right to go down, u just admitted he was pulled above.

job done see ya laters


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually, it is possible for a player to pull another and for it not to be deemed a foul.

Job done, you’ve proven you’ve no idea what you’re talking about.

Enjoy your fun night out.

comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 38 seconds ago
Right Winston, you're gonna be here for a few days so I'll come back sporadically and pick apart your nonsense. Enjoy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Just as you have contradicted yourself you run away.

Love it.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Father Pranksmas (U6283)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 minutes ago
‘Of course he knows he’s been fouled otherwise he wouldn’t go down’



TOOR taking stupid to a new level.

Ever heard of cheating, TOOR? You know some players feel contact and go down because they’re cheats, right?

Also, he cannot ‘know’ he’s been fouled. Because it’s a matter of opinion and the referee may not have seen that as a foul. That pull was not a foul in my view. It’s subjective. Therefore how can he know?

You really are stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you can't pull a player back its against the rules

so he was fouled and had the right to go down, u just admitted he was pulled above.

job done see ya laters


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually, it is possible for a player to pull another and for it not to be deemed a foul.

Job done, you’ve proven you’ve no idea what you’re talking about.

Enjoy your fun night out.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
nope pulling your opponent is against the rules

Can you tell me which law says that?

comment by Winston (U16525)
‘Of course he knows he’s been fouled otherwise he wouldn’t go down’



TOOR taking stupid to a new level.
========


Is this guy for real?

He thinks players don't know when they're fouled and laughs at others for being stupid.

Comedy gold.

the foul is that he pulled him back slightly after salah had went past him, sure it wouldnt make you flop to the floor but it impeded his progress (even if only a small amount he still impeded him), so thats the foul, not him falling to the floor

Sure there are plenty of times when they arent given, but they should be

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 minutes ago
Can you tell me which law says that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct

Pulling an opponent would fall under this wouldn’t it?

“impedes an opponent with contact”

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 44 minutes ago
Can you tell me which law says that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it would come under whatever rules talks about impeding a players progress

comment by Adam 'The interview' Lallana (U20650)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 44 minutes ago
Can you tell me which law says that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it would come under whatever rules talks about impeding a players progress
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think you’ll find that such a law refers to the extent / effect of contact.

If I ever so gently pulled your shirt, so slightly that you don’t even notice, it’s not a foul is it?

Extreme example, but proves it’s possible to ‘pull’ someone and not foul them.

It’s for this reason that subjectivity is important.

I don’t believe the pull on Salah impeded him. But it’s hard to tell because he dived to the floor.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Adam 'The interview' Lallana (U20650)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 44 minutes ago
Can you tell me which law says that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it would come under whatever rules talks about impeding a players progress
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think you’ll find that such a law refers to the extent / effect of contact.

If I ever so gently pulled your shirt, so slightly that you don’t even notice, it’s not a foul is it?

Extreme example, but proves it’s possible to ‘pull’ someone and not foul them.

It’s for this reason that subjectivity is important.

I don’t believe the pull on Salah impeded him. But it’s hard to tell because he dived to the floor.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but he didnt notice it, ever so slightly, you can see him shake his arm to try get away from him

Adam 'The interview' Lallana (U20650)

The point I’m getting at is that just because there was contact by the way of a pull, does not mean that the referee is obliged to decide that it constituted a foul.

Its up to him, he judged it to have impeded salah, even if only a small bit, seen things like that given in the middle of a pitch a fair bit

comment by Adam 'The interview' Lallana (U20650)
posted 2 minutes ago
Its up to him, he judged it to have impeded salah, even if only a small bit, seen things like that given in the middle of a pitch a fair bit
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It is up to him.

Which is why diving to the floor to make out that the contact was more severe than it actually was is cheating.

How can the referee make a fair decision when the contact appears to be stronger than it actually was?

I think you’ll find that such a law refers to the extent / effect of contact.
======
No it doesn't.

How much bullsheet can this guy spout in one day?

Which is why diving to the floor to make out that the contact was more severe than it actually was is cheating.

How can the referee make a fair decision when the contact appears to be stronger than it actually was?
=======
Severity is irrelevant.

Read the rules. There is no rule that introduces severity of contact.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 28 minutes ago
Can you tell me which law says that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
its a foul, you know it is

comment by Father Pranksmas (U6283)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 28 minutes ago
Can you tell me which law says that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
its a foul, you know it is
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Great argument.

So answer then. What a shock.

Whether it’s a foul depends on the incident. My opinion is that the idea Salah was fouled is laughable.

Laugh all you want but its a foul according to the rules.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Father Pranksmas (U6283)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 28 minutes ago
Can you tell me which law says that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
its a foul, you know it is
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Great argument.

So answer then. What a shock.

Whether it’s a foul depends on the incident. My opinion is that the idea Salah was fouled is laughable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because you love to be contrary. You get a thrill out of it. You're weird.

No TOOR, I don’t think it was a foul.

And judging by much of what I’ve read online, nor do many people outside the deluded Liverpool fraternity.

Most people are laughing at the decision from what I can tell.