comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 minutes ago
Oh and ‘welcome back’?
Some us have lives and don’t use this site day in day out. I bet you were here spouting crap on Christmas Day weren’t you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah the old some of us have lives.
Yes I commited the ghastly sin of typing stuff on a website on the 25th of December. Oh the shame of it all.
comment by der kloppites (U13373)
posted 2 minutes ago
Billy’s got a black book on us 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it is of course covered in bias. Of all the decisions he claimed were in our favour, and there was one that decided nearly every game, only two of them were actually incorrect decisions. One when Spurs should have had a penalty. One offside in a 4-0 win or something. Of course none of the ones against us. I didn't hear too many people complaining when last season they were going against us.
People say they even out over a season. For me that's nonsense. You can have a good season in terms of decisions and the following season have a poor one.
The state of this: https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/mohamed-salah-been-lucky-boy-15601636?fbclid=IwAR1hv42j-SdO92t8Ktr1HowtpCtTCVKnhtv8gAnyL7HEZQGHo3EVTJ3GoXA
Niasse literally threw himself to the ground with no contact. How anyone can compare them is beyond me.
It was a blatant dive by Salah but we have had Alli do it.
In short, all teams have players who go down easily.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 minutes ago
Oh and ‘welcome back’?
Some us have lives and don’t use this site day in day out. I bet you were here spouting crap on Christmas Day weren’t you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah the old some of us have lives.
Yes I commited the ghastly sin of typing stuff on a website on the 25th of December. Oh the shame of it all
========
How did he know about that?
He has a life, just enough to come here to read what you post on Christmas day.
comment by Billy The Yidd (U3924)
posted 7 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by KloppsMop (U13071)
posted 4 hours, 34 minutes ago
comment by Father Pranksmas (U6283)
posted 12 minutes ago
What was it Kane said after diving to win a pen at Anfield, if I feel contact I go down.
Salah obviously took note
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Salah in a game where it was largely irrelevant to the outcome.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The game was finely poised at 1-0 when Salah dived, Newcastle were still in the game at that point, but that gifted penalty killed the game.
The same thing happened at Palace with the game at 0-0, a gifted penalty for a Mo Salah dive.
Then there are countless times referees bottle giving penalties against Pool, usually at a key point in a game, for example v Spurs, Hudds, Watford, Wolves and Bournemouth etc etc
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m amazed you ever get time to watch your own team play, considering you much watch every game of ours at least 5 times
Honestly Mousers getting themselves wound up because Salah dived, and they are in denial. 150 posts trying to defend the cheat. I really think they don't have a life.
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 6 hours, 19 minutes ago
It was a blatant dive by Salah but we have had Alli do it.
In short, all teams have players who go down easily.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was a recent game, can’t remember which one, where Salah had a blatant penalty turned down because he stayed on his feet. Even the commentators stated it was an obvious penalty. It shows the refs can be influenced by what the players reaction is to the foul, which doesn’t shine a positive light on refs. I believe that may have caused Salah to go down the way he did....
He dived but he was also fouled. The penalty was for the foul not the dive.
It seems to me the rules don't punish a dive just because it's a dive. If a player is fouled and goes down dramatically like a fish, he can't be punished.
If a player isn't fouled and goes down dramatically like a fish, he will be punished.
I don't see what more they can do because you can't punish a player for going down dramatically if a foul has occurred. That would be ridiculous.
TOOR, it is a fictional problem. You’ve been sucked into believing what some two bob pundit tells you because you’re not very bright.
Challenges that don’t cause you to go over are often not strong enough to be deemed a foul. That’s why they’re not given.
Just because you watch it and think otherwise doesn’t mean the ref is wrong.
Players like Owen have led you to believe there’s this valid reason for throwing yourself on the floor and it’s all a load of nonsense to justify cheating.
You claimed that players are not punished in these cases. You made that up. There’s no policy to that effect but it made sense in your head so you did what you always do and invented the criteria to apply.
Yet again you’re wrong.
And for the love of god, please learn what a strawman argument is, you simpleton.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 8 hours, 47 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 minutes ago
Oh and ‘welcome back’?
Some us have lives and don’t use this site day in day out. I bet you were here spouting crap on Christmas Day weren’t you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah the old some of us have lives.
Yes I commited the ghastly sin of typing stuff on a website on the 25th of December. Oh the shame of it all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its true though. Why are you welcoming me back? I just don’t use a web site like this most days of my life like you do.
It does suggest you’ve been keeping an eye out for me though. How odd.
And I didn’t criticise you for posting on Christmas Day. I said I bet you were here spouting crap that day. There’s a distinct difference.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 minutes ago
TOOR, it is a fictional problem. You’ve been sucked into believing what some two bob pundit tells you because you’re not very bright.
Challenges that don’t cause you to go over are often not strong enough to be deemed a foul. That’s why they’re not given.
Just because you watch it and think otherwise doesn’t mean the ref is wrong.
Players like Owen have led you to believe there’s this valid reason for throwing yourself on the floor and it’s all a load of nonsense to justify cheating.
You claimed that players are not punished in these cases. You made that up. There’s no policy to that effect but it made sense in your head so you did what you always do and invented the criteria to apply.
Yet again you’re wrong.
And for the love of god, please learn what a strawman argument is, you simpleton.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Challenges that don’t cause you to go over are often not strong enough to be deemed a foul. That’s why they’re not given.
======
Which article in the rule book provides for this?
Players like Owen have led you to believe there’s this valid reason for throwing yourself on the floor and it’s all a load of nonsense to justify cheating.
=========
Wrong again.
These players have clearly stated that you go down to force the decision, not to dupe the ref.
Diving after a foul is not the same as diving with no foul. The idea is that a foul has occurred but the refs don't give them unless you go down. Therefore, players go down to force it.
The idea isn't to go down having not been fouled, which is cheating and different from the first scenario.
Both scenarios are frowned upon but get it right.
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 3 hours, 34 minutes ago
Honestly Mousers getting themselves wound up because Salah dived, and they are in denial. 150 posts trying to defend the cheat. I really think they don't have a life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mousers are always in denial.
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 3 hours, 34 minutes ago
Honestly Mousers getting themselves wound up because Salah dived, and they are in denial. 150 posts trying to defend the cheat. I really think they don't have a life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mousers are always in denial.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cockneys
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 hours, 18 minutes ago
TOOR, it is a fictional problem. You’ve been sucked into believing what some two bob pundit tells you because you’re not very bright.
Challenges that don’t cause you to go over are often not strong enough to be deemed a foul. That’s why they’re not given.
Just because you watch it and think otherwise doesn’t mean the ref is wrong.
Players like Owen have led you to believe there’s this valid reason for throwing yourself on the floor and it’s all a load of nonsense to justify cheating.
You claimed that players are not punished in these cases. You made that up. There’s no policy to that effect but it made sense in your head so you did what you always do and invented the criteria to apply.
Yet again you’re wrong.
And for the love of god, please learn what a strawman argument is, you simpleton.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I haven't be sucked into anything thank you. I have my own mind and have played the game and watched it for decades. You do not get penalties if you do not go down. Everybody knows this. I'm not surprised you're arguing against it though, you'd argue black was white.
Nobody is going to stay on their feet in the box, when fouled, even Liverpool players.
I know what a strawman argument is. Your famous for it. You're always trying to argue against people for something they didn't say. You're not content with arguing what they did say, you have to add in arguments you've made up also.
I'd suggest looking in the mirror before accusing somebody of being stupid. You may seem yourself intelligent but you're certainly the only one on here. Arguing against something everybody knows to be true, whether it's in the rules or not demonstrates this.
Wise up.
Also if this isn't the case, and everybody but you knows that it is, why wasn't Salah punished retrospectively?
I suggest taking another break.
What's a strawman argument
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 14 hours, 25 minutes ago
Just seen this;
“Tottenham’s attendance at Wembley vs Bournemouth in the Premier League: 45,154 today
Sunderland’s attendance at the Stadium of Light vs Bradford in League One: 46,039 today”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the mousers always move to irrelevant comments when they are getting a good shoeing
Except it's not us that's getting the shoeing.
Sign in if you want to comment
Reeks of cover up and helping the old boys!
Page 7 of 15
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12
posted on 27/12/18
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 minutes ago
Oh and ‘welcome back’?
Some us have lives and don’t use this site day in day out. I bet you were here spouting crap on Christmas Day weren’t you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah the old some of us have lives.
Yes I commited the ghastly sin of typing stuff on a website on the 25th of December. Oh the shame of it all.
posted on 27/12/18
comment by der kloppites (U13373)
posted 2 minutes ago
Billy’s got a black book on us 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it is of course covered in bias. Of all the decisions he claimed were in our favour, and there was one that decided nearly every game, only two of them were actually incorrect decisions. One when Spurs should have had a penalty. One offside in a 4-0 win or something. Of course none of the ones against us. I didn't hear too many people complaining when last season they were going against us.
People say they even out over a season. For me that's nonsense. You can have a good season in terms of decisions and the following season have a poor one.
posted on 27/12/18
The state of this: https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/mohamed-salah-been-lucky-boy-15601636?fbclid=IwAR1hv42j-SdO92t8Ktr1HowtpCtTCVKnhtv8gAnyL7HEZQGHo3EVTJ3GoXA
Niasse literally threw himself to the ground with no contact. How anyone can compare them is beyond me.
posted on 27/12/18
It was a blatant dive by Salah but we have had Alli do it.
In short, all teams have players who go down easily.
posted on 27/12/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/12/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 minutes ago
Oh and ‘welcome back’?
Some us have lives and don’t use this site day in day out. I bet you were here spouting crap on Christmas Day weren’t you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah the old some of us have lives.
Yes I commited the ghastly sin of typing stuff on a website on the 25th of December. Oh the shame of it all
========
How did he know about that?
He has a life, just enough to come here to read what you post on Christmas day.
posted on 28/12/18
comment by Billy The Yidd (U3924)
posted 7 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by KloppsMop (U13071)
posted 4 hours, 34 minutes ago
comment by Father Pranksmas (U6283)
posted 12 minutes ago
What was it Kane said after diving to win a pen at Anfield, if I feel contact I go down.
Salah obviously took note
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Salah in a game where it was largely irrelevant to the outcome.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The game was finely poised at 1-0 when Salah dived, Newcastle were still in the game at that point, but that gifted penalty killed the game.
The same thing happened at Palace with the game at 0-0, a gifted penalty for a Mo Salah dive.
Then there are countless times referees bottle giving penalties against Pool, usually at a key point in a game, for example v Spurs, Hudds, Watford, Wolves and Bournemouth etc etc
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m amazed you ever get time to watch your own team play, considering you much watch every game of ours at least 5 times
posted on 28/12/18
Honestly Mousers getting themselves wound up because Salah dived, and they are in denial. 150 posts trying to defend the cheat. I really think they don't have a life.
posted on 28/12/18
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 6 hours, 19 minutes ago
It was a blatant dive by Salah but we have had Alli do it.
In short, all teams have players who go down easily.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was a recent game, can’t remember which one, where Salah had a blatant penalty turned down because he stayed on his feet. Even the commentators stated it was an obvious penalty. It shows the refs can be influenced by what the players reaction is to the foul, which doesn’t shine a positive light on refs. I believe that may have caused Salah to go down the way he did....
posted on 28/12/18
He dived but he was also fouled. The penalty was for the foul not the dive.
It seems to me the rules don't punish a dive just because it's a dive. If a player is fouled and goes down dramatically like a fish, he can't be punished.
If a player isn't fouled and goes down dramatically like a fish, he will be punished.
I don't see what more they can do because you can't punish a player for going down dramatically if a foul has occurred. That would be ridiculous.
posted on 28/12/18
TOOR, it is a fictional problem. You’ve been sucked into believing what some two bob pundit tells you because you’re not very bright.
Challenges that don’t cause you to go over are often not strong enough to be deemed a foul. That’s why they’re not given.
Just because you watch it and think otherwise doesn’t mean the ref is wrong.
Players like Owen have led you to believe there’s this valid reason for throwing yourself on the floor and it’s all a load of nonsense to justify cheating.
You claimed that players are not punished in these cases. You made that up. There’s no policy to that effect but it made sense in your head so you did what you always do and invented the criteria to apply.
Yet again you’re wrong.
And for the love of god, please learn what a strawman argument is, you simpleton.
posted on 28/12/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 8 hours, 47 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 minutes ago
Oh and ‘welcome back’?
Some us have lives and don’t use this site day in day out. I bet you were here spouting crap on Christmas Day weren’t you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah the old some of us have lives.
Yes I commited the ghastly sin of typing stuff on a website on the 25th of December. Oh the shame of it all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its true though. Why are you welcoming me back? I just don’t use a web site like this most days of my life like you do.
It does suggest you’ve been keeping an eye out for me though. How odd.
And I didn’t criticise you for posting on Christmas Day. I said I bet you were here spouting crap that day. There’s a distinct difference.
posted on 28/12/18
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 minutes ago
TOOR, it is a fictional problem. You’ve been sucked into believing what some two bob pundit tells you because you’re not very bright.
Challenges that don’t cause you to go over are often not strong enough to be deemed a foul. That’s why they’re not given.
Just because you watch it and think otherwise doesn’t mean the ref is wrong.
Players like Owen have led you to believe there’s this valid reason for throwing yourself on the floor and it’s all a load of nonsense to justify cheating.
You claimed that players are not punished in these cases. You made that up. There’s no policy to that effect but it made sense in your head so you did what you always do and invented the criteria to apply.
Yet again you’re wrong.
And for the love of god, please learn what a strawman argument is, you simpleton.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 28/12/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/12/18
Challenges that don’t cause you to go over are often not strong enough to be deemed a foul. That’s why they’re not given.
======
Which article in the rule book provides for this?
posted on 28/12/18
Players like Owen have led you to believe there’s this valid reason for throwing yourself on the floor and it’s all a load of nonsense to justify cheating.
=========
Wrong again.
These players have clearly stated that you go down to force the decision, not to dupe the ref.
Diving after a foul is not the same as diving with no foul. The idea is that a foul has occurred but the refs don't give them unless you go down. Therefore, players go down to force it.
The idea isn't to go down having not been fouled, which is cheating and different from the first scenario.
Both scenarios are frowned upon but get it right.
posted on 28/12/18
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 3 hours, 34 minutes ago
Honestly Mousers getting themselves wound up because Salah dived, and they are in denial. 150 posts trying to defend the cheat. I really think they don't have a life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mousers are always in denial.
posted on 28/12/18
posted on 28/12/18
comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 3 hours, 34 minutes ago
Honestly Mousers getting themselves wound up because Salah dived, and they are in denial. 150 posts trying to defend the cheat. I really think they don't have a life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mousers are always in denial.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cockneys
posted on 28/12/18
Its ccnknys
posted on 28/12/18
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 hours, 18 minutes ago
TOOR, it is a fictional problem. You’ve been sucked into believing what some two bob pundit tells you because you’re not very bright.
Challenges that don’t cause you to go over are often not strong enough to be deemed a foul. That’s why they’re not given.
Just because you watch it and think otherwise doesn’t mean the ref is wrong.
Players like Owen have led you to believe there’s this valid reason for throwing yourself on the floor and it’s all a load of nonsense to justify cheating.
You claimed that players are not punished in these cases. You made that up. There’s no policy to that effect but it made sense in your head so you did what you always do and invented the criteria to apply.
Yet again you’re wrong.
And for the love of god, please learn what a strawman argument is, you simpleton.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I haven't be sucked into anything thank you. I have my own mind and have played the game and watched it for decades. You do not get penalties if you do not go down. Everybody knows this. I'm not surprised you're arguing against it though, you'd argue black was white.
Nobody is going to stay on their feet in the box, when fouled, even Liverpool players.
I know what a strawman argument is. Your famous for it. You're always trying to argue against people for something they didn't say. You're not content with arguing what they did say, you have to add in arguments you've made up also.
I'd suggest looking in the mirror before accusing somebody of being stupid. You may seem yourself intelligent but you're certainly the only one on here. Arguing against something everybody knows to be true, whether it's in the rules or not demonstrates this.
Wise up.
posted on 28/12/18
Also if this isn't the case, and everybody but you knows that it is, why wasn't Salah punished retrospectively?
I suggest taking another break.
posted on 28/12/18
What's a strawman argument
posted on 28/12/18
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 14 hours, 25 minutes ago
Just seen this;
“Tottenham’s attendance at Wembley vs Bournemouth in the Premier League: 45,154 today
Sunderland’s attendance at the Stadium of Light vs Bradford in League One: 46,039 today”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the mousers always move to irrelevant comments when they are getting a good shoeing
posted on 28/12/18
Except it's not us that's getting the shoeing.
Page 7 of 15
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12