comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
Okay so because you don’t care, the difference is obsolete.
I think we’re done here.
Have a nice evening.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You too...
All I'm saying is, whats the difference between City spending 60m on Mahrez and Liverpool spending 60m on Alisson? OK the clubs get there money from different places, but they're still spending it and it still gives them the same advantage over other teams who can't spend that kind of money on players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who from our rivals for the title/top 4 can’t afford to spend £60m?
Everton spent £50m odd on Sigurdsson.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No they didn’t.
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 38 minutes ago
Why fixate on 60m though. I just chose that number because Mahrez and Alisson both went for around that last summer so I was showing its similar spending.
In general, Fabinho and Keita are another two bought for big money. Oxlade-Chamberlain was a bench player (something a Liverpool fan mentioned in an earlier comment) bought for big money, around 40m I believe. Salah another close to 40m. It's a lot of money being spent and I don't see how you can look at Man City and say "Oh, but we're not like them."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ox cost £35m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Splitting hairs lol
comment by ToffeEFC🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 (U17598)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
Okay so because you don’t care, the difference is obsolete.
I think we’re done here.
Have a nice evening.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You too...
All I'm saying is, whats the difference between City spending 60m on Mahrez and Liverpool spending 60m on Alisson? OK the clubs get there money from different places, but they're still spending it and it still gives them the same advantage over other teams who can't spend that kind of money on players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who from our rivals for the title/top 4 can’t afford to spend £60m?
Everton spent £50m odd on Sigurdsson.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No they didn’t.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, my mistake it was £45m.
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 38 minutes ago
Why fixate on 60m though. I just chose that number because Mahrez and Alisson both went for around that last summer so I was showing its similar spending.
In general, Fabinho and Keita are another two bought for big money. Oxlade-Chamberlain was a bench player (something a Liverpool fan mentioned in an earlier comment) bought for big money, around 40m I believe. Salah another close to 40m. It's a lot of money being spent and I don't see how you can look at Man City and say "Oh, but we're not like them."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ox cost £35m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Splitting hairs lol
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really, if you are going to question a clubs spending then let’s get the figures correct.
I'm not questioning your spending. I have no problem with your spending. I'm questioning what right you have to claim you're underdogs to City and to claim that Klopp has done an amazing job building this squad considering the amount of money you've spent.
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by ToffeEFC🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 (U17598)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
Okay so because you don’t care, the difference is obsolete.
I think we’re done here.
Have a nice evening.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You too...
All I'm saying is, whats the difference between City spending 60m on Mahrez and Liverpool spending 60m on Alisson? OK the clubs get there money from different places, but they're still spending it and it still gives them the same advantage over other teams who can't spend that kind of money on players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who from our rivals for the title/top 4 can’t afford to spend £60m?
Everton spent £50m odd on Sigurdsson.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No they didn’t.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, my mistake it was £45m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still overspent on him though.
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by Benji Veniamin (U19953)
posted 36 minutes ago
if you look at the respective 11's from the other night
Allison 60m > 35m Ederson
Danilo 26m > TAA 0
VVD 75m > Stones 50m
lovren 20m > Kompany 6m
Laporte 57m > Robertson 10m
Fernadinho 30m > henderson 20m
B Silva 40m > milner 0
D Silva 25m = wijnaldum 25m
Sane 37m > Mane 34m
Aguero 35m > firmino 30m
sterling 49m > salah 37m
obviosuly thats just the teams that played, and it ignores the money spent on KDB, Fabino, OX, Keita etc
but its not that big a difference 286m for Pool XI vs 345 for city
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are going to do that let’s get the values right.
Henderson was £15m not £20m.
Robertson was £8m not £10m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/liverpool/8562711/Liverpool-sign-Jordan-Henderson-from-Sunderland-in-20-million-deal.html
Robertson I took the headline of 10 and didn’t realise there was 2 in add ins factored in
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 29 seconds ago
I'm not questioning your spending. I have no problem with your spending. I'm questioning what right you have to claim you're underdogs to City and to claim that Klopp has done an amazing job building this squad considering the amount of money you've spent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What you aren’t understanding is that he had to sell players to buy the players he wanted. City don’t have do that, they just go out and buy what they want when they want.
And this coming from an idiot that used City’s spending to defend mourinho wasting millions on dross.
He sold one player who wanted to go. He didn't sell him because he needed to to have money to sign players. He sold Coutinho because he wanted to leave. Otherwise you wouldn't have spent as much money as you have, far more than the transfer fee you received for Coutinho.
And I don't understand what relevance Mourinho has to this? If Man Utd had won the league over Man City, I wouldn't have claimed that they did it without spending a huge amount of money, which is what you're trying to do now seemingly (If Liverpool do win the league that is)
The bottom line is you've spent a large amount of money and you should accept that instead of claiming it doesn't count because you sold one player.
comment by Ed The King Woodward (U10026)
posted 42 minutes ago
Net spend trophy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Something you've never won
comment by Keep It Greasy Fick mich, du (U1396)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Ed The King Woodward (U10026)
posted 42 minutes ago
Net spend trophy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Something you've never won
----------------------------------------------------------------------
apparently only spurs use more of their own money in the last decade to fund the club at 81%, united next at 80%
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 2 hours, 28 minutes ago
You've started outspending them though. So you can't claim some kind of underdog victory over them if you do win the league this season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well their squad was much better than ours before we started buying big-money players and still is better than ours, so yes we can thank you very much.
Wahl, instead of chugging over your Jose posters on your bedroom wall, you should have spent more time studying basic arithmetic.
Comparing Liverpool's spend with that of City's is moronic, even by your own low standards
city have spent what in the PL era? 1.4bn?
Pool have spent 1.1bn
its a sizeable difference i would agree
although utd have spent less than pool, just not recouped enough in comparison.
Yep we've wasted money on some duds.
It's obviously your turn now, and blimey as a club you're doing fantastic job of doing just that.
The OP said it was from 2014. You know, the year Utd became shiiite.
Why is what I'm saying so hard to understand? I'm not saying you've spent more money than City. I'm saying Liverpool have basically started doing what Man City have done to be successful, so they can't claim like they're doing things right compared to City when they're doing the exact same thing City have done for years which is spend huge amounts of money on ready made players. What is the difference other than the fact that the money comes from different places? You're still spending it! Money is money regardless of where it comes from.
very true
weve spent 569m and youve spent i believe 450m?
FA Cup, League cup and europa is all we have to show for that investment though sadly.
what do you have to show for 450m?
TOOR it's not £90m but £159.42m based on transferleague. Basic maths.
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 10 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 59 seconds ago
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 13 minutes ago
Well Liverpool's net spend last summer was -£129m. I wouldn't call that sell to buy...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Add onto that -£129m, the £70m spent on Van Dijk and £40m each on Salah and Oxlade Chamberlain the previous season too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And what?
Professional football club in spending money on footballers that it generated from football shocker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well someone said your club had to sell to buy and I thought that was a little ridiculous.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because like i said klopps net spend average is 12m per window 24m per year hes been here.... peps spent 400m net since aug 2016 thats 80m net per window 160m per season yet according to you we’ve done a city Because we spent 129m (probably wrong) net according to you in one window? Since then we’ve recouped another 40m from ings and solanke too.
If you think 12m and 24m is going above and beyond cities 80m and 160m or even matching them then idk what else to say its over 6 times less than them. This is a team that already had the bigger better more expensive squad too. Every manager inthe top 6 other than poch probably has a higher netspend than klopp maybe even one or two others in the prem too.
Current net spend managers
Emery - 66m 2 windows
Pep - 400m 5 windows
Mourinho - 280m 4 windows
Sarri - 160m 2 windows
Silva - 60m 2 windows?
Klopp - 72m 6 windows
Poch - 18m 9 windows
comment by Benji Veniamin (U19953)
posted 6 hours, 49 minutes ago
very true
weve spent 569m and youve spent i believe 450m?
FA Cup, League cup and europa is all we have to show for that investment though sadly.
what do you have to show for 450m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A huge amount of progress and the best squad we've had in the PL. We will see in a few months what we have to show for it in terms of trophies.
Sign in if you want to comment
After selling Solanke..
Page 5 of 6
6
posted on 6/1/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
Okay so because you don’t care, the difference is obsolete.
I think we’re done here.
Have a nice evening.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You too...
All I'm saying is, whats the difference between City spending 60m on Mahrez and Liverpool spending 60m on Alisson? OK the clubs get there money from different places, but they're still spending it and it still gives them the same advantage over other teams who can't spend that kind of money on players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who from our rivals for the title/top 4 can’t afford to spend £60m?
Everton spent £50m odd on Sigurdsson.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No they didn’t.
posted on 6/1/19
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 38 minutes ago
Why fixate on 60m though. I just chose that number because Mahrez and Alisson both went for around that last summer so I was showing its similar spending.
In general, Fabinho and Keita are another two bought for big money. Oxlade-Chamberlain was a bench player (something a Liverpool fan mentioned in an earlier comment) bought for big money, around 40m I believe. Salah another close to 40m. It's a lot of money being spent and I don't see how you can look at Man City and say "Oh, but we're not like them."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ox cost £35m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Splitting hairs lol
posted on 6/1/19
comment by ToffeEFC🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 (U17598)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
Okay so because you don’t care, the difference is obsolete.
I think we’re done here.
Have a nice evening.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You too...
All I'm saying is, whats the difference between City spending 60m on Mahrez and Liverpool spending 60m on Alisson? OK the clubs get there money from different places, but they're still spending it and it still gives them the same advantage over other teams who can't spend that kind of money on players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who from our rivals for the title/top 4 can’t afford to spend £60m?
Everton spent £50m odd on Sigurdsson.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No they didn’t.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, my mistake it was £45m.
posted on 6/1/19
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 38 minutes ago
Why fixate on 60m though. I just chose that number because Mahrez and Alisson both went for around that last summer so I was showing its similar spending.
In general, Fabinho and Keita are another two bought for big money. Oxlade-Chamberlain was a bench player (something a Liverpool fan mentioned in an earlier comment) bought for big money, around 40m I believe. Salah another close to 40m. It's a lot of money being spent and I don't see how you can look at Man City and say "Oh, but we're not like them."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ox cost £35m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Splitting hairs lol
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really, if you are going to question a clubs spending then let’s get the figures correct.
posted on 6/1/19
I'm not questioning your spending. I have no problem with your spending. I'm questioning what right you have to claim you're underdogs to City and to claim that Klopp has done an amazing job building this squad considering the amount of money you've spent.
posted on 6/1/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by ToffeEFC🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱 (U17598)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
Okay so because you don’t care, the difference is obsolete.
I think we’re done here.
Have a nice evening.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You too...
All I'm saying is, whats the difference between City spending 60m on Mahrez and Liverpool spending 60m on Alisson? OK the clubs get there money from different places, but they're still spending it and it still gives them the same advantage over other teams who can't spend that kind of money on players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who from our rivals for the title/top 4 can’t afford to spend £60m?
Everton spent £50m odd on Sigurdsson.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No they didn’t.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, my mistake it was £45m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still overspent on him though.
posted on 6/1/19
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by Benji Veniamin (U19953)
posted 36 minutes ago
if you look at the respective 11's from the other night
Allison 60m > 35m Ederson
Danilo 26m > TAA 0
VVD 75m > Stones 50m
lovren 20m > Kompany 6m
Laporte 57m > Robertson 10m
Fernadinho 30m > henderson 20m
B Silva 40m > milner 0
D Silva 25m = wijnaldum 25m
Sane 37m > Mane 34m
Aguero 35m > firmino 30m
sterling 49m > salah 37m
obviosuly thats just the teams that played, and it ignores the money spent on KDB, Fabino, OX, Keita etc
but its not that big a difference 286m for Pool XI vs 345 for city
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are going to do that let’s get the values right.
Henderson was £15m not £20m.
Robertson was £8m not £10m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/liverpool/8562711/Liverpool-sign-Jordan-Henderson-from-Sunderland-in-20-million-deal.html
Robertson I took the headline of 10 and didn’t realise there was 2 in add ins factored in
posted on 6/1/19
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 29 seconds ago
I'm not questioning your spending. I have no problem with your spending. I'm questioning what right you have to claim you're underdogs to City and to claim that Klopp has done an amazing job building this squad considering the amount of money you've spent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What you aren’t understanding is that he had to sell players to buy the players he wanted. City don’t have do that, they just go out and buy what they want when they want.
And this coming from an idiot that used City’s spending to defend mourinho wasting millions on dross.
posted on 6/1/19
He sold one player who wanted to go. He didn't sell him because he needed to to have money to sign players. He sold Coutinho because he wanted to leave. Otherwise you wouldn't have spent as much money as you have, far more than the transfer fee you received for Coutinho.
And I don't understand what relevance Mourinho has to this? If Man Utd had won the league over Man City, I wouldn't have claimed that they did it without spending a huge amount of money, which is what you're trying to do now seemingly (If Liverpool do win the league that is)
The bottom line is you've spent a large amount of money and you should accept that instead of claiming it doesn't count because you sold one player.
posted on 6/1/19
Net spend trophy.
posted on 6/1/19
comment by Ed The King Woodward (U10026)
posted 42 minutes ago
Net spend trophy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Something you've never won
posted on 6/1/19
Aye, I’m devasted.
posted on 6/1/19
*devastated
posted on 6/1/19
comment by Keep It Greasy Fick mich, du (U1396)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Ed The King Woodward (U10026)
posted 42 minutes ago
Net spend trophy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Something you've never won
----------------------------------------------------------------------
apparently only spurs use more of their own money in the last decade to fund the club at 81%, united next at 80%
posted on 6/1/19
Henderson was £16m.
posted on 6/1/19
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 2 hours, 28 minutes ago
You've started outspending them though. So you can't claim some kind of underdog victory over them if you do win the league this season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well their squad was much better than ours before we started buying big-money players and still is better than ours, so yes we can thank you very much.
posted on 6/1/19
Wahl, instead of chugging over your Jose posters on your bedroom wall, you should have spent more time studying basic arithmetic.
Comparing Liverpool's spend with that of City's is moronic, even by your own low standards
posted on 6/1/19
city have spent what in the PL era? 1.4bn?
Pool have spent 1.1bn
its a sizeable difference i would agree
although utd have spent less than pool, just not recouped enough in comparison.
posted on 7/1/19
Yep we've wasted money on some duds.
It's obviously your turn now, and blimey as a club you're doing fantastic job of doing just that.
The OP said it was from 2014. You know, the year Utd became shiiite.
posted on 7/1/19
Why is what I'm saying so hard to understand? I'm not saying you've spent more money than City. I'm saying Liverpool have basically started doing what Man City have done to be successful, so they can't claim like they're doing things right compared to City when they're doing the exact same thing City have done for years which is spend huge amounts of money on ready made players. What is the difference other than the fact that the money comes from different places? You're still spending it! Money is money regardless of where it comes from.
posted on 7/1/19
very true
weve spent 569m and youve spent i believe 450m?
FA Cup, League cup and europa is all we have to show for that investment though sadly.
what do you have to show for 450m?
posted on 7/1/19
TOOR it's not £90m but £159.42m based on transferleague. Basic maths.
posted on 7/1/19
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 10 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 59 seconds ago
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 13 minutes ago
Well Liverpool's net spend last summer was -£129m. I wouldn't call that sell to buy...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Add onto that -£129m, the £70m spent on Van Dijk and £40m each on Salah and Oxlade Chamberlain the previous season too
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And what?
Professional football club in spending money on footballers that it generated from football shocker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well someone said your club had to sell to buy and I thought that was a little ridiculous.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because like i said klopps net spend average is 12m per window 24m per year hes been here.... peps spent 400m net since aug 2016 thats 80m net per window 160m per season yet according to you we’ve done a city Because we spent 129m (probably wrong) net according to you in one window? Since then we’ve recouped another 40m from ings and solanke too.
posted on 7/1/19
If you think 12m and 24m is going above and beyond cities 80m and 160m or even matching them then idk what else to say its over 6 times less than them. This is a team that already had the bigger better more expensive squad too. Every manager inthe top 6 other than poch probably has a higher netspend than klopp maybe even one or two others in the prem too.
Current net spend managers
Emery - 66m 2 windows
Pep - 400m 5 windows
Mourinho - 280m 4 windows
Sarri - 160m 2 windows
Silva - 60m 2 windows?
Klopp - 72m 6 windows
Poch - 18m 9 windows
posted on 7/1/19
comment by Benji Veniamin (U19953)
posted 6 hours, 49 minutes ago
very true
weve spent 569m and youve spent i believe 450m?
FA Cup, League cup and europa is all we have to show for that investment though sadly.
what do you have to show for 450m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A huge amount of progress and the best squad we've had in the PL. We will see in a few months what we have to show for it in terms of trophies.
Page 5 of 6
6