comment by Benji Veniamin (U19953)
posted 7 hours, 19 minutes ago
very true
weve spent 569m and youve spent i believe 450m?
FA Cup, League cup and europa is all we have to show for that investment though sadly.
what do you have to show for 450m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s just painting over the cracks, big style. Not one person will deny that Liverpool are miles ahead of United at the moment in terms of being where they want to be as a club. United are a complete mess, successive managers have stagnated/regressed you. It’s the polar opposite to us, who have a manager who has us playing how the fans want them to, and are showing massive improvement compared to previous management.
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 2 hours, 14 minutes ago
If you think 12m and 24m is going above and beyond cities 80m and 160m or even matching them then idk what else to say its over 6 times less than them. This is a team that already had the bigger better more expensive squad too. Every manager inthe top 6 other than poch probably has a higher netspend than klopp maybe even one or two others in the prem too.
Current net spend managers
Emery - 66m 2 windows
Pep - 400m 5 windows
Mourinho - 280m 4 windows
Sarri - 160m 2 windows
Silva - 60m 2 windows?
Klopp - 72m 6 windows
Poch - 18m 9 windows
----------------------------------------------------------------------
IMO this is far more relevant that going back to 2014.
It could be argued at some level the agents fees and wages that are hidden behind these numbers may be proportional to the levels of fees. Its hard to say though.
The money spent by chelsea just this year is interesting.
But once again it shows the work done by spurs over 5 years to get to where they are at.
After selling Solanke..
Page 6 of 6
6
posted on 7/1/19
comment by Benji Veniamin (U19953)
posted 7 hours, 19 minutes ago
very true
weve spent 569m and youve spent i believe 450m?
FA Cup, League cup and europa is all we have to show for that investment though sadly.
what do you have to show for 450m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s just painting over the cracks, big style. Not one person will deny that Liverpool are miles ahead of United at the moment in terms of being where they want to be as a club. United are a complete mess, successive managers have stagnated/regressed you. It’s the polar opposite to us, who have a manager who has us playing how the fans want them to, and are showing massive improvement compared to previous management.
posted on 7/1/19
Lol how bad must Liverpool be to finish behind us in most seasons since SAF left lol.
posted on 7/1/19
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 2 hours, 14 minutes ago
If you think 12m and 24m is going above and beyond cities 80m and 160m or even matching them then idk what else to say its over 6 times less than them. This is a team that already had the bigger better more expensive squad too. Every manager inthe top 6 other than poch probably has a higher netspend than klopp maybe even one or two others in the prem too.
Current net spend managers
Emery - 66m 2 windows
Pep - 400m 5 windows
Mourinho - 280m 4 windows
Sarri - 160m 2 windows
Silva - 60m 2 windows?
Klopp - 72m 6 windows
Poch - 18m 9 windows
----------------------------------------------------------------------
IMO this is far more relevant that going back to 2014.
It could be argued at some level the agents fees and wages that are hidden behind these numbers may be proportional to the levels of fees. Its hard to say though.
The money spent by chelsea just this year is interesting.
But once again it shows the work done by spurs over 5 years to get to where they are at.
Page 6 of 6
6