comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 43 minutes ago
As a football historian sandy, I am surprised you are only focusing on the prem era.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not just concentrating on the Prem era. The article covers the whole of football history from the time Preston won the league. Or didn`t you actually read the article properly? Sometimes that helps.
It then descended into a City v Spurs history lesson, but whatever way you look at it. Be it in the Prem era or before, then Spurs lord it over City.
More wins overall, many, many more wins in the Prem era. Case closed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lauding it over spurs by winning one more match across the history? I think you need to buy a dictionary. You pick and choose how important history is depending on your own opinion. If anyone had done an article specifically about the prem era you’d be the first talking about football not being invented in 1992.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Football wasn`t invented in 1992, so that`s another fact. Not sure why you are waffling on about 1992 anyway. The article doesn`t even mention the Prem era.
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 43 minutes ago
As a football historian sandy, I am surprised you are only focusing on the prem era.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not just concentrating on the Prem era. The article covers the whole of football history from the time Preston won the league. Or didn`t you actually read the article properly? Sometimes that helps.
It then descended into a City v Spurs history lesson, but whatever way you look at it. Be it in the Prem era or before, then Spurs lord it over City.
More wins overall, many, many more wins in the Prem era. Case closed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lauding it over spurs by winning one more match across the history? I think you need to buy a dictionary. You pick and choose how important history is depending on your own opinion. If anyone had done an article specifically about the prem era you’d be the first talking about football not being invented in 1992.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 3 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 43 minutes ago
As a football historian sandy, I am surprised you are only focusing on the prem era.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not just concentrating on the Prem era. The article covers the whole of football history from the time Preston won the league. Or didn`t you actually read the article properly? Sometimes that helps.
It then descended into a City v Spurs history lesson, but whatever way you look at it. Be it in the Prem era or before, then Spurs lord it over City.
More wins overall, many, many more wins in the Prem era. Case closed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lauding it over spurs by winning one more match across the history? I think you need to buy a dictionary. You pick and choose how important history is depending on your own opinion. If anyone had done an article specifically about the prem era you’d be the first talking about football not being invented in 1992.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not lauding it just giving you the facts. Spurs over the whole of football history have the upper hand over City, however you want to spin it. I am just giving the facts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City have beaten Spurs more times than Spurs have beaten City since the first meeting in 1909 and that's a fact.
Why are you persisting with the notion you have always had the upper hand?
comment by SirCastic (U8772)
posted 1 day, 2 hours ago
Do you think Tottenham will make it to 100?
___________________________________________
Pochettino will comeback when hes 88 years old to win the league with spurs,before he dies
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 3 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 43 minutes ago
As a football historian sandy, I am surprised you are only focusing on the prem era.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not just concentrating on the Prem era. The article covers the whole of football history from the time Preston won the league. Or didn`t you actually read the article properly? Sometimes that helps.
It then descended into a City v Spurs history lesson, but whatever way you look at it. Be it in the Prem era or before, then Spurs lord it over City.
More wins overall, many, many more wins in the Prem era. Case closed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lauding it over spurs by winning one more match across the history? I think you need to buy a dictionary. You pick and choose how important history is depending on your own opinion. If anyone had done an article specifically about the prem era you’d be the first talking about football not being invented in 1992.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not lauding it just giving you the facts. Spurs over the whole of football history have the upper hand over City, however you want to spin it. I am just giving the facts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City have beaten Spurs more times than Spurs have beaten City since the first meeting in 1909 and that's a fact.
Why are you persisting with the notion you have always had the upper hand?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Latest result Spurs v Man City 2-0, the last result is always the best.
Although knocking moneybags out of the CL was pretty good. City never been to a CL final, and now banned, and all their players probably about to jump ship.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
So you've swung from claiming a Century of domination to just highlighting the last game where you beat a team reduced to 10 men at your own ground.
That win was a fluke as well.
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 6 minutes ago
That win was a fluke as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could argue that. Could also argue Sterling should have been given a straight red for the challenge on Alli, or a second yellow for diving.
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 54 minutes ago
That win was a fluke as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well 2-0 says otherwise. Dry your tears mate.
It doesn’t. What tears? I’m a United fan. I thought it was funny.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 12 minutes ago
So you've swung from claiming a Century of domination to just highlighting the last game where you beat a team reduced to 10 men at your own ground.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs also have won three times as many European completions as City.
Oh and never played in the 3rd division.
Oh and never been banned for cheating.
City have spent 91 seasons in the top flight compared to your paltry 85.
We've also won 3 times as many league titles as you
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 hours, 31 minutes ago
City have spent 91 seasons in the top flight compared to your paltry 85.
We've also won 3 times as many league titles as you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, most of them were bought with dodgy Arab money.
Sign in if you want to comment
Spurs are often derided for when
Page 8 of 8
6 | 7 | 8
posted on 8/5/20
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 43 minutes ago
As a football historian sandy, I am surprised you are only focusing on the prem era.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not just concentrating on the Prem era. The article covers the whole of football history from the time Preston won the league. Or didn`t you actually read the article properly? Sometimes that helps.
It then descended into a City v Spurs history lesson, but whatever way you look at it. Be it in the Prem era or before, then Spurs lord it over City.
More wins overall, many, many more wins in the Prem era. Case closed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lauding it over spurs by winning one more match across the history? I think you need to buy a dictionary. You pick and choose how important history is depending on your own opinion. If anyone had done an article specifically about the prem era you’d be the first talking about football not being invented in 1992.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Football wasn`t invented in 1992, so that`s another fact. Not sure why you are waffling on about 1992 anyway. The article doesn`t even mention the Prem era.
posted on 8/5/20
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 43 minutes ago
As a football historian sandy, I am surprised you are only focusing on the prem era.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not just concentrating on the Prem era. The article covers the whole of football history from the time Preston won the league. Or didn`t you actually read the article properly? Sometimes that helps.
It then descended into a City v Spurs history lesson, but whatever way you look at it. Be it in the Prem era or before, then Spurs lord it over City.
More wins overall, many, many more wins in the Prem era. Case closed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lauding it over spurs by winning one more match across the history? I think you need to buy a dictionary. You pick and choose how important history is depending on your own opinion. If anyone had done an article specifically about the prem era you’d be the first talking about football not being invented in 1992.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 8/5/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/5/20
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 3 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 43 minutes ago
As a football historian sandy, I am surprised you are only focusing on the prem era.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not just concentrating on the Prem era. The article covers the whole of football history from the time Preston won the league. Or didn`t you actually read the article properly? Sometimes that helps.
It then descended into a City v Spurs history lesson, but whatever way you look at it. Be it in the Prem era or before, then Spurs lord it over City.
More wins overall, many, many more wins in the Prem era. Case closed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lauding it over spurs by winning one more match across the history? I think you need to buy a dictionary. You pick and choose how important history is depending on your own opinion. If anyone had done an article specifically about the prem era you’d be the first talking about football not being invented in 1992.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not lauding it just giving you the facts. Spurs over the whole of football history have the upper hand over City, however you want to spin it. I am just giving the facts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City have beaten Spurs more times than Spurs have beaten City since the first meeting in 1909 and that's a fact.
Why are you persisting with the notion you have always had the upper hand?
posted on 8/5/20
comment by SirCastic (U8772)
posted 1 day, 2 hours ago
Do you think Tottenham will make it to 100?
___________________________________________
Pochettino will comeback when hes 88 years old to win the league with spurs,before he dies
posted on 8/5/20
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 3 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 43 minutes ago
As a football historian sandy, I am surprised you are only focusing on the prem era.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not just concentrating on the Prem era. The article covers the whole of football history from the time Preston won the league. Or didn`t you actually read the article properly? Sometimes that helps.
It then descended into a City v Spurs history lesson, but whatever way you look at it. Be it in the Prem era or before, then Spurs lord it over City.
More wins overall, many, many more wins in the Prem era. Case closed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lauding it over spurs by winning one more match across the history? I think you need to buy a dictionary. You pick and choose how important history is depending on your own opinion. If anyone had done an article specifically about the prem era you’d be the first talking about football not being invented in 1992.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not lauding it just giving you the facts. Spurs over the whole of football history have the upper hand over City, however you want to spin it. I am just giving the facts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City have beaten Spurs more times than Spurs have beaten City since the first meeting in 1909 and that's a fact.
Why are you persisting with the notion you have always had the upper hand?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Latest result Spurs v Man City 2-0, the last result is always the best.
Although knocking moneybags out of the CL was pretty good. City never been to a CL final, and now banned, and all their players probably about to jump ship.
posted on 8/5/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/5/20
So you've swung from claiming a Century of domination to just highlighting the last game where you beat a team reduced to 10 men at your own ground.
posted on 8/5/20
That win was a fluke as well.
posted on 8/5/20
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 6 minutes ago
That win was a fluke as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could argue that. Could also argue Sterling should have been given a straight red for the challenge on Alli, or a second yellow for diving.
posted on 8/5/20
comment by Joe The King Exotic (U10026)
posted 54 minutes ago
That win was a fluke as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well 2-0 says otherwise. Dry your tears mate.
posted on 8/5/20
It doesn’t. What tears? I’m a United fan. I thought it was funny.
posted on 8/5/20
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 12 minutes ago
So you've swung from claiming a Century of domination to just highlighting the last game where you beat a team reduced to 10 men at your own ground.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs also have won three times as many European completions as City.
Oh and never played in the 3rd division.
Oh and never been banned for cheating.
posted on 8/5/20
posted on 8/5/20
City have spent 91 seasons in the top flight compared to your paltry 85.
We've also won 3 times as many league titles as you
posted on 8/5/20
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 hours, 31 minutes ago
City have spent 91 seasons in the top flight compared to your paltry 85.
We've also won 3 times as many league titles as you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, most of them were bought with dodgy Arab money.
Page 8 of 8
6 | 7 | 8