comment by GTWI4T (U22545)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/357044


----------------------------------------------------------------------
PROVE that that’s me. It’s a different user number, you can’t prove that that’s me and not someone just with the same username as me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Blatantly lying now

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by GTWI4T (U22545)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/357044


----------------------------------------------------------------------
PROVE that that’s me. It’s a different user number, you can’t prove that that’s me and not someone just with the same username as me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Blatantly lying now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prove that’s me. I will literally give you money if you can prove it’s me.

But you can’t, so your point isn’t valid

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by GTWI4T (U22545)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/357044


----------------------------------------------------------------------
PROVE that that’s me. It’s a different user number, you can’t prove that that’s me and not someone just with the same username as me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Blatantly lying now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prove that’s me. I will literally give you money if you can prove it’s me.

But you can’t, so your point isn’t valid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Easiest way to prove it’s you

Wahl Icht.(U21057)
member since: 22 June 2016
This user profile is currently under moderation restrictions

Robbing impersonated you and didn’t get banned. His articles and comments also gave away the fact it wasn’t you

Right, so what you're saying Wahl is that someone impersonated you several times (think several articles were found?), in criticising Chelsea and their players for reasons unknown. And those that remember you using childish names for players were mistaken or taken in by this impersonator.

As opposed to the alternative explanation which is you've been caught talking shiiiit.

I wonder which is more likely

comment by Naby8 (U6997)
posted 8 minutes ago
Right, so what you're saying Wahl is that someone impersonated you several times (think several articles were found?), in criticising Chelsea and their players for reasons unknown. And those that remember you using childish names for players were mistaken or taken in by this impersonator.

As opposed to the alternative explanation which is you've been caught talking shiiiit.

I wonder which is more likely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well can you prove the the first explanation is false?

Exactly.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Doesn’t matter, you can’t prove each Wahl account is me. Anyone could make an account and call themselves Wahl icht

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

I’ve had maybe 3 or 4 accounts.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 2 minutes ago
I’ve had maybe 3 or 4 accounts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’ve got through that many in a week

comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Naby8 (U6997)
posted 8 minutes ago
Right, so what you're saying Wahl is that someone impersonated you several times (think several articles were found?), in criticising Chelsea and their players for reasons unknown. And those that remember you using childish names for players were mistaken or taken in by this impersonator.

As opposed to the alternative explanation which is you've been caught talking shiiiit.

I wonder which is more likely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well can you prove the the first explanation is false?

Exactly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

That's why I used the word "likely".

I can't disprove the first explanation but is it likely to be correct? I think we all know the answer to that.

comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/357044


----------------------------------------------------------------------
PROVE that that’s me. It’s a different user number, you can’t prove that that’s me and not someone just with the same username as me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course it's a different user number you facking weirdo. You've been banned so many times I bet even you've forgotten.
Liar, fraud, charlatan.
You've done yourself proud here

Wahl why do you keep going on about proof.

We all know it's you. I mean dece clickbait but you look an ass.

You don't know it's me. You think it's me, but you can't prove its me, so you can't prove I said any of those things, so it's pointless bringing them up.

I win, thanks for playing.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

I win

сunt of the day award, not much else

comment by Wahl Tuchel (U22545)
posted 2 minutes ago
You don't know it's me. You think it's me, but you can't prove its me, so you can't prove I said any of those things, so it's pointless bringing them up.

I win, thanks for playing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------



What did all the weirdos do before the internet was invented?

I know arguing with Liverpool fans is like playing on easy mode but it's still fun making them look like idiots.

I’m sure the Chelsea fans, if asked, will confirm the comments you made about Hazard as well

comment by Naby8 (U6997)
posted 7 hours, 44 minutes ago
At their very best I don't think there's a lot to choose between them. Hazard might even edge it.

But the thing with Hazard is you only get to see that level a couple of times a season. Maybe not even that over the last few years.

With Salah you get that level on a pretty regular basis.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The nonsense I hear on this site really amazes me, hazard got the most motms in the 10s I believe. Outrageously consistent player bar one season which he was injured. Guy carried chelsea. Salah is a great goalscorer

comment by Donny The King van de Beek (U10026)
posted 6 hours, 42 minutes ago
They aren’t always playing in the same areas, though. A lot of Hazard’s best work is in the middle third of the pitch. But as I said, it doesn’t mean you can’t make a judgement. I’m pretty sure most people would agree that David Silva is better than Pedro, despite their differences in their role and areas of the pitch they operate in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spot on.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator