or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 172 comments are related to an article called:

Not a true reflection

Page 3 of 7

posted on 3/2/22

Celtic were blowing out their ar$e just before they got their 2nd.
------------------------

posted on 3/2/22

comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 9 seconds ago
Not sure Celtic will tire. They have Kyogo, Meade, Forrest, Rogic, Bitton all to come back in and I’m sure they’ll rotate.

Issue was a simple lack of shape. Defensively going forward. Celtic’s rotations had up pressing empty spaces while they got in behind.

Having a keeper that would command his area and not just stay on his line, two actual centre backs and Jack in midfield would have kept score down, but we’d have still lost. Personnel were poor, but at least under Gerrard we had clear shape and structure to our play.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The only “tactic” I saw from Rangers last night was try and play the ball out from McGregor to one of two at the back. It didn’t work and there was nothing else.

Just bereft of a plan and if that’s GVB at work, then keep up the good work I say.

posted on 3/2/22

comment by Kyo-Joe Furusmashi (U15888)
posted 56 seconds ago
Celtic were blowing out their ar$e just before they got their 2nd.
------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
have to agree what a fcking weird comment , and also wonder if he actually believes it

posted on 3/2/22

comment by Kyo-Joe Furusmashi (U15888)
posted 1 minute ago
Celtic were blowing out their ar$e just before they got their 2nd.
------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
no my fault you cant read the game, the pace in your press and movement of the ball had dropped right off, we had the ball a good 6/7 min period cause of that and gaps were starting to open up. I know you like to pick and choose and ignored the part that i said it shouldnt have mattered cos you should have already been about 3/4 up by that point

comment by Cesar (U22237)

posted on 3/2/22

comment by Kyo-Joe Furusmashi (U15888)
posted 2 minutes ago
Celtic were blowing out their ar$e just before they got their 2nd.
------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
But could've and should have had 4😂

posted on 3/2/22

we had the ball a good 6/7 min period cause of that and gaps were starting to open up
============
you had ONE opportunity and the pass was too heavy - apart from that Hart had nothing to do all game

comment by St3vie (U11028)

posted on 3/2/22

What's that old saying......leagues aren't won in February, that's the one!!

We welcome the cha......aw fck cannie even say that noo

Get it up ye's ya bastirts, here's hoping we see a reaction at the weekend, and you turn up at Fir Park thinking the joabs done noo

All to play for

posted on 3/2/22

comment by Cesar (U22237)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Kyo-Joe Furusmashi (U15888)
posted 2 minutes ago
Celtic were blowing out their ar$e just before they got their 2nd.
------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
But could've and should have had 4😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no the brightest are you? yes after about 5 mins of celtic completely dominating us nd playing at a pace we couldnt handle they started to tire and we cam back into the game. during that first 35 mins you should have scored about 4/5 goals. you coulnt figure that out? really?

posted on 3/2/22

*35mins not 5

comment by St3vie (U11028)

posted on 3/2/22

comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 2 seconds ago
we had the ball a good 6/7 min period cause of that and gaps were starting to open up
============
you had ONE opportunity and the pass was too heavy - apart from that Hart had nothing to do all game
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spot on mate......but the amount of room Arfield had in that instance was unbelievable, your defence was horrendously split wide open with one good pass....hence my belief that with players in our midfield that are more equipped to see and exploit those kind of gaps, we wil fare far better next time

posted on 3/2/22

comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 1 minute ago
we had the ball a good 6/7 min period cause of that and gaps were starting to open up
============
you had ONE opportunity and the pass was too heavy - apart from that Hart had nothing to do all game


----------------------------------------------------------------------
did I say we created loads . no i said you started to tire and the press and movement of the ball were not the same.

posted on 3/2/22

Get it up ye's ya bastirts
==========
I think you'll find its us thats doing the giving this time !!

now be a good boy....

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 3/2/22

comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 8 minutes ago
Not sure Celtic will tire. They have Kyogo, Meade, Forrest, Rogic, Bitton all to come back in and I’m sure they’ll rotate.

Issue was a simple lack of shape. Defensively going forward. Celtic’s rotations had up pressing empty spaces while they got in behind.

Having a keeper that would command his area and not just stay on his line, two actual centre backs and Jack in midfield would have kept score down, but we’d have still lost. Personnel were poor, but at least under Gerrard we had clear shape and structure to our play.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put a wig on Meade and he’d be a right honey

posted on 3/2/22

Old firm games are won through people performing on the day and Celtic had the best performers

hatate , Juranovic , Abada and Oriley

no-one got near their levels

posted on 3/2/22

comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 14 seconds ago
Old firm games are won through people performing on the day and Celtic had the best performers

hatate , Juranovic , Abada and Oriley

no-one got near their levels

----------------------------------------------------------------------
so this is how you break down a game? well that explains the argument your putting up then at least.

Celtic won cos they had a far better game plan, Ange set out how they will play and has clearly been working on it over and over in training. That coupled with hunger is why you dominated the match not cos a handful of players "turned " up.

posted on 3/2/22

"You played well for one half"

So we were guff in the other and conceded goals?

Some amount of piish being spouted by you this morning Stevie in a vain hope at giving yourself a compfort blanket.

posted on 3/2/22

comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 20 seconds ago
"You played well for one half"

So we were guff in the other and conceded goals?

Some amount of piish being spouted by you this morning Stevie in a vain hope at giving yourself a compfort blanket.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
both teams were guff, celtics energy levels had dropped right off, and we still couldnt do anything against ye's

posted on 3/2/22

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 59 minutes ago
Better ball played into Arfield first half when he had acres of room, we score, that puts us back in the game big time

Story of our night though, quality not there when needed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get you back in a game that (playing these daft 'what if' scenarios out) you would've been 4 or 5 down in has we taken earlier chances.

Do you not see how futile these hypothetical situations are?

comment by Cesar (U22237)

posted on 3/2/22

comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 14 seconds ago
Old firm games are won through people performing on the day and Celtic had the best performers

hatate , Juranovic , Abada and Oriley

no-one got near their levels

----------------------------------------------------------------------
so this is how you break down a game? well that explains the argument your putting up then at least.

Celtic won cos they had a far better game plan, Ange set out how they will play and has clearly been working on it over and over in training. That coupled with hunger is why you dominated the match not cos a handful of players "turned " up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just admit celtic bent Rangers over and it's been coming,beautiful.We can all then get on with our day ripping the p!sh out of youse👍

posted on 3/2/22

comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 14 seconds ago
Old firm games are won through people performing on the day and Celtic had the best performers

hatate , Juranovic , Abada and Oriley

no-one got near their levels

----------------------------------------------------------------------
so this is how you break down a game? well that explains the argument your putting up then at least.

Celtic won cos they had a far better game plan, Ange set out how they will play and has clearly been working on it over and over in training. That coupled with hunger is why you dominated the match not cos a handful of players "turned " up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what are you chatting about ? , youre like a nagging wife looking for an arguement when none is there

Yes we had so many other factors that went into winning but you need people performing and in the 4 i mentioned nobody else got close to that level

posted on 3/2/22

comment by Cesar (U22237)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 14 seconds ago
Old firm games are won through people performing on the day and Celtic had the best performers

hatate , Juranovic , Abada and Oriley

no-one got near their levels

----------------------------------------------------------------------
so this is how you break down a game? well that explains the argument your putting up then at least.

Celtic won cos they had a far better game plan, Ange set out how they will play and has clearly been working on it over and over in training. That coupled with hunger is why you dominated the match not cos a handful of players "turned " up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just admit celtic bent Rangers over and it's been coming,beautiful.We can all then get on with our day ripping the p!sh out of youse👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what part of celtic should have been 4/5 up dont you get ?

posted on 3/2/22

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 50 minutes ago
I am accepting we were soundly beaten last night...but I'm not buying this argument that you took your foot of the gas second half....you simply can't play at that level for 90mins, it was never going to happen
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When you're 3-0 aheas and cruising, our keeper without a single save to make second half, then is it an issue that we can't play with a mad tempo for 90 mins?

comment by St3vie (U11028)

posted on 3/2/22

comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 minute ago
"You played well for one half"

So we were guff in the other and conceded goals?

Some amount of piish being spouted by you this morning Stevie in a vain hope at giving yourself a compfort blanket.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Celtic done next to nothing in an attacking sense in the second half... unfortunately, neither did we

Was not as though we were playing great football and Celtic were defending brilliantly.....we created next to nothing and resorted to long shots and aimless balls fling into the box

The amount of times you gave the ball away in your own half in the second half was huge...we just did not exploit that in anyway shape or form coz we were utter dug$hite

posted on 3/2/22


----------------------------------------------------------------------
so this is how you break down a game? well that explains the argument your putting up then at least.

Celtic won cos they had a far better game plan, Ange set out how they will play and has clearly been working on it over and over in training. That coupled with hunger is why you dominated the match not cos a handful of players "turned " up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what are you chatting about ? , youre like a nagging wife looking for an arguement when none is there

Yes we had so many other factors that went into winning but you need people performing and in the 4 i mentioned nobody else got close to that level
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you do realise that it was you that started with me?

posted on 3/2/22

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by JukeboxJunkie (U10162)
posted 1 minute ago
"You played well for one half"

So we were guff in the other and conceded goals?

Some amount of piish being spouted by you this morning Stevie in a vain hope at giving yourself a compfort blanket.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Celtic done next to nothing in an attacking sense in the second half... unfortunately, neither did we

Was not as though we were playing great football and Celtic were defending brilliantly.....we created next to nothing and resorted to long shots and aimless balls fling into the box

The amount of times you gave the ball away in your own half in the second half was huge...we just did not exploit that in anyway shape or form coz we were utter dug$hite
----------------------------------------------------------------------
give it up stevie, we were terrible, 1st half celtic smashed us

Page 3 of 7

Sign in if you want to comment