Luis Suarez was found guilty of racism and biting two footballers on the pitch which is basically GBH in the street for the common man. He wasn't sacked either.
Greenwood's contract could be terminated mutually for sure but I don't think there's a cat in hells chance they will sack him now the charges are dropped.
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
Can’t see how he’d win on appeal if you do decide to terminate m, you’ve got a years worth of proof already about reputational damage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. The fact that his sponsors have cancelled deals with him is solid evidence. Plus the numerous club sponsors that have said they are monitoring the situation.
I wouldn’t have a problem with the club terminating his contract *even if they knew they’d likely lose out financially on appeal* tbh.
In fact, I’d applaud them for it.
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 54 seconds ago
i think it's safe to assume that se85 knows absolutely nothing about either uk employment law or the finer details of greenwood's contract.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What does Paul think?
oh, and could people please stop replying to rdd, it makes my filtering of him redundant when i have to see his comments anyway.
thanks.
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 1 minute ago
Is he responsible for its creation or release?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That doesn't matter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is of you are blaming him for it.
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 1 minute ago
oh, and could people please stop replying to rdd, it makes my filtering of him redundant when i have to see his comments anyway.
thanks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seconded.
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 2 minutes ago
The 'witnesses' arent interested in pursuing the case.
The evidence isnt grounds to proceed to trial.
The kid has never admitted to any of the charges.
I find it bizarre that so many United fans are getting so upset at the suggestion that 1 of our young players, found guilty of nothing, be given a second chance.
The motivation can only be to avoid considering that they were wrong on this subject.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think that it is possible to be wrong about not liking men who abuse women. Only way Mason gets a pass off most right thinking people is if it is confirmed that this was some kind of setup or role play.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But we arent going to get that confirmation, so you have to go on what we know.
The witness isn't pursuing it.
The evidence isn't enough to convict on any charge.
Can you take this and concede he MIGHT not be guilty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have always conceded that. If you hadn't been banned you'd be aware of that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So why, given the biggest indication yet he is innocent, are you still so insistent he can't continue at United?
stadiums should play the audio clip of him every game
comment by isembowel the libeals, an ink the bloo of thei chilen (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
I wouldn’t have a problem with the club terminating his contract *even if they knew they’d likely lose out financially on appeal* tbh.
In fact, I’d applaud them for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’d be disappointed if it’s not their first course of action.
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 1 minute ago
oh, and could people please stop replying to rdd, it makes my filtering of him redundant when i have to see his comments anyway.
thanks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Grow up FFS
comment by Taki Minamino (U20650)
posted 23 seconds ago
stadiums should play the audio clip of him every game
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine.
comment by Taki Minamino (U20650)
posted 15 seconds ago
stadiums should play the audio clip of him every game
----------------------------------------------------------------------
as theyre walking out of the tunnel
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
Luis Suarez was found guilty of racism and biting two footballers on the pitch which is basically GBH in the street for the common man. He wasn't sacked either.
Greenwood's contract could be terminated mutually for sure but I don't think there's a cat in hells chance they will sack him now the charges are dropped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Publicly, it’ll be a mutual termination if they do decide to sack him. Most of the time it isn’t really that though!
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
Luis Suarez was found guilty of racism and biting two footballers on the pitch which is basically GBH in the street for the common man. He wasn't sacked either.
Greenwood's contract could be terminated mutually for sure but I don't think there's a cat in hells chance they will sack him now the charges are dropped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Publicly, it’ll be a mutual termination if they do decide to sack him. Most of the time it isn’t really that though!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would the club terminate his contract now, and not 12 months ago?
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
Luis Suarez was found guilty of racism and biting two footballers on the pitch which is basically GBH in the street for the common man. He wasn't sacked either.
Greenwood's contract could be terminated mutually for sure but I don't think there's a cat in hells chance they will sack him now the charges are dropped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Publicly, it’ll be a mutual termination if they do decide to sack him. Most of the time it isn’t really that though!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A bit like with players handing in transfer requests.
The club would’ve sacked him already if they were going to sack him.
Sell him - If the stigma is as bad as some suggest, who would buy him, and would he go for the move?
Terminate his contract - Why now, when this is the biggest indication he isnt guilty?
comment by Christ We Won (TENƎꓕ) (U17162)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Taki Minamino (U20650)
posted 15 seconds ago
stadiums should play the audio clip of him every game
----------------------------------------------------------------------
as theyre walking out of the tunnel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully they don’t when it’s the woman’s team playing…
Looks like my return to attending games could be short-lived depending on how the club handle this.
comment by Greta Thunberg, the Communist mouthpiece 👅 (U9335)
posted 17 seconds ago
The club would’ve sacked him already if they were going to sack him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. If anything, this outcome makes it easier to keep him.
comment by Greta Thunberg, the Communist mouthpiece 👅 (U9335)
posted 25 seconds ago
The club would’ve sacked him already if they were going to sack him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think that’s necessarily true.
They might have received legal advice advising against doing so, for more than one reason.
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
Luis Suarez was found guilty of racism and biting two footballers on the pitch which is basically GBH in the street for the common man. He wasn't sacked either.
Greenwood's contract could be terminated mutually for sure but I don't think there's a cat in hells chance they will sack him now the charges are dropped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Publicly, it’ll be a mutual termination if they do decide to sack him. Most of the time it isn’t really that though!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would the club terminate his contract now, and not 12 months ago?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The same reason we haven’t with Mendy either.
maybe opposing teams can make banners of this
https://twitter.com/12emannn/status/1621155945446535171/photo/1
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Greta Thunberg, the Communist mouthpiece 👅 (U9335)
posted 17 seconds ago
The club would’ve sacked him already if they were going to sack him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. If anything, this outcome makes it easier to keep him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The sensible thing would be to bin him. There’s obviously going to be a backlash. It will look pretty bad if we keep him, but I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if they try.
Sign in if you want to comment
General Greenwood Consensus?
Page 6 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9
posted on 2/2/23
Luis Suarez was found guilty of racism and biting two footballers on the pitch which is basically GBH in the street for the common man. He wasn't sacked either.
Greenwood's contract could be terminated mutually for sure but I don't think there's a cat in hells chance they will sack him now the charges are dropped.
posted on 2/2/23
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
Can’t see how he’d win on appeal if you do decide to terminate m, you’ve got a years worth of proof already about reputational damage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. The fact that his sponsors have cancelled deals with him is solid evidence. Plus the numerous club sponsors that have said they are monitoring the situation.
posted on 2/2/23
I wouldn’t have a problem with the club terminating his contract *even if they knew they’d likely lose out financially on appeal* tbh.
In fact, I’d applaud them for it.
posted on 2/2/23
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 54 seconds ago
i think it's safe to assume that se85 knows absolutely nothing about either uk employment law or the finer details of greenwood's contract.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What does Paul think?
posted on 2/2/23
oh, and could people please stop replying to rdd, it makes my filtering of him redundant when i have to see his comments anyway.
thanks.
posted on 2/2/23
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 1 minute ago
Is he responsible for its creation or release?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That doesn't matter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is of you are blaming him for it.
posted on 2/2/23
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 1 minute ago
oh, and could people please stop replying to rdd, it makes my filtering of him redundant when i have to see his comments anyway.
thanks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seconded.
posted on 2/2/23
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 2 minutes ago
The 'witnesses' arent interested in pursuing the case.
The evidence isnt grounds to proceed to trial.
The kid has never admitted to any of the charges.
I find it bizarre that so many United fans are getting so upset at the suggestion that 1 of our young players, found guilty of nothing, be given a second chance.
The motivation can only be to avoid considering that they were wrong on this subject.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think that it is possible to be wrong about not liking men who abuse women. Only way Mason gets a pass off most right thinking people is if it is confirmed that this was some kind of setup or role play.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But we arent going to get that confirmation, so you have to go on what we know.
The witness isn't pursuing it.
The evidence isn't enough to convict on any charge.
Can you take this and concede he MIGHT not be guilty?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have always conceded that. If you hadn't been banned you'd be aware of that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So why, given the biggest indication yet he is innocent, are you still so insistent he can't continue at United?
posted on 2/2/23
stadiums should play the audio clip of him every game
posted on 2/2/23
comment by isembowel the libeals, an ink the bloo of thei chilen (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
I wouldn’t have a problem with the club terminating his contract *even if they knew they’d likely lose out financially on appeal* tbh.
In fact, I’d applaud them for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’d be disappointed if it’s not their first course of action.
posted on 2/2/23
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 1 minute ago
oh, and could people please stop replying to rdd, it makes my filtering of him redundant when i have to see his comments anyway.
thanks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Grow up FFS
posted on 2/2/23
comment by Taki Minamino (U20650)
posted 23 seconds ago
stadiums should play the audio clip of him every game
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine.
posted on 2/2/23
comment by Taki Minamino (U20650)
posted 15 seconds ago
stadiums should play the audio clip of him every game
----------------------------------------------------------------------
as theyre walking out of the tunnel
posted on 2/2/23
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
Luis Suarez was found guilty of racism and biting two footballers on the pitch which is basically GBH in the street for the common man. He wasn't sacked either.
Greenwood's contract could be terminated mutually for sure but I don't think there's a cat in hells chance they will sack him now the charges are dropped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Publicly, it’ll be a mutual termination if they do decide to sack him. Most of the time it isn’t really that though!
posted on 2/2/23
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
Luis Suarez was found guilty of racism and biting two footballers on the pitch which is basically GBH in the street for the common man. He wasn't sacked either.
Greenwood's contract could be terminated mutually for sure but I don't think there's a cat in hells chance they will sack him now the charges are dropped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Publicly, it’ll be a mutual termination if they do decide to sack him. Most of the time it isn’t really that though!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would the club terminate his contract now, and not 12 months ago?
posted on 2/2/23
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
Luis Suarez was found guilty of racism and biting two footballers on the pitch which is basically GBH in the street for the common man. He wasn't sacked either.
Greenwood's contract could be terminated mutually for sure but I don't think there's a cat in hells chance they will sack him now the charges are dropped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Publicly, it’ll be a mutual termination if they do decide to sack him. Most of the time it isn’t really that though!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A bit like with players handing in transfer requests.
posted on 2/2/23
The club would’ve sacked him already if they were going to sack him.
posted on 2/2/23
Sell him - If the stigma is as bad as some suggest, who would buy him, and would he go for the move?
Terminate his contract - Why now, when this is the biggest indication he isnt guilty?
posted on 2/2/23
comment by Christ We Won (TENƎꓕ) (U17162)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Taki Minamino (U20650)
posted 15 seconds ago
stadiums should play the audio clip of him every game
----------------------------------------------------------------------
as theyre walking out of the tunnel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully they don’t when it’s the woman’s team playing…
posted on 2/2/23
Looks like my return to attending games could be short-lived depending on how the club handle this.
posted on 2/2/23
comment by Greta Thunberg, the Communist mouthpiece 👅 (U9335)
posted 17 seconds ago
The club would’ve sacked him already if they were going to sack him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. If anything, this outcome makes it easier to keep him.
posted on 2/2/23
comment by Greta Thunberg, the Communist mouthpiece 👅 (U9335)
posted 25 seconds ago
The club would’ve sacked him already if they were going to sack him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think that’s necessarily true.
They might have received legal advice advising against doing so, for more than one reason.
posted on 2/2/23
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
Luis Suarez was found guilty of racism and biting two footballers on the pitch which is basically GBH in the street for the common man. He wasn't sacked either.
Greenwood's contract could be terminated mutually for sure but I don't think there's a cat in hells chance they will sack him now the charges are dropped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Publicly, it’ll be a mutual termination if they do decide to sack him. Most of the time it isn’t really that though!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would the club terminate his contract now, and not 12 months ago?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The same reason we haven’t with Mendy either.
posted on 2/2/23
maybe opposing teams can make banners of this
https://twitter.com/12emannn/status/1621155945446535171/photo/1
posted on 2/2/23
comment by Rdd is back (U22942)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Greta Thunberg, the Communist mouthpiece 👅 (U9335)
posted 17 seconds ago
The club would’ve sacked him already if they were going to sack him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. If anything, this outcome makes it easier to keep him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The sensible thing would be to bin him. There’s obviously going to be a backlash. It will look pretty bad if we keep him, but I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if they try.
Page 6 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9