comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 7 minutes ago
Will compare their PL numbers:
Saka 12 goals and 10 assists
rashford 15 goals and 4 assist.
Saka edging it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are their overall numbers? As it wouldn’t be limited to the Premiership in this context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but its prob the fairest way to judge... in the same competition level against the same teams. If your gonna compare them that has to be the fairest comparison surely.
comment by Christ We Won (U17162)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Christ We Won (U17162)
posted 3 seconds ago
These comparison articles are rubbish.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
this one is actually decent, two reasonably similar level players, play in similar positions doing similar things.
they do it differently but there is defo comparison to be had.
Saka having the better season as stats will show.
the other telling factor is that Saka is 21 , Rashford 25
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I donno I think these articles on this forum never really go anywhere and just descend into rival fans calling each others team and players rubbish, usually. But as of right now I haven't checked out the comments, so maybe I'm wrong on this one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeah usually you need to filter through the usual crap, however, there is some genuine stuff to take note from.
Both are great players there is no shame in Rashford perhaps being a little less effective than Saka its hardly a slight on either player.
Saka is a big time bottle merchant, cost his country the Euros and his team the Premier League.
Rashford wins on the count that matters. Medals.
If it's an open, end to end game, then rashford.
If it's against a low block, then saka, as he is more creative.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 7 minutes ago
Will compare their PL numbers:
Saka 12 goals and 10 assists
rashford 15 goals and 4 assist.
Saka edging it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are their overall numbers? As it wouldn’t be limited to the Premiership in this context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't compare really as people play different number of games etc .Best metric is to compare the same competition where players play the same amount of games, its the fairest way to do it.
England are lucky to have both, and the fact that they and Kane can work together really well as a front three. I love Rashford, but as of now suspect Saka might have gone further by the time their careers are over. He's a superb player, and we'll be lucky if Antony ends up being 75% as good as him.
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 7 minutes ago
Will compare their PL numbers:
Saka 12 goals and 10 assists
rashford 15 goals and 4 assist.
Saka edging it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are their overall numbers? As it wouldn’t be limited to the Premiership in this context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but its prob the fairest way to judge... in the same competition level against the same teams. If your gonna compare them that has to be the fairest comparison surely.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is if you want to manipulate stats to an agenda. They have both played in the cup competitions as well.
The premise here is who would you like to bring on to win you a game. It was not premier league specific.
I would be quite happy to bring on either player, myself.
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 22 minutes ago
Will compare their PL numbers:
Saka 12 goals and 10 assists
rashford 15 goals and 4 assist.
Saka edging it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
saka - 0.69 G+A per 90 (excluding penalties)
rashfodd - 0.72 G+A per 90 (excluding penalties)
comment by King TUt (U3732)
posted 7 minutes ago
If it's an open, end to end game, then rashford.
If it's against a low block, then saka, as he is more creative.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I'd say that's fair
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 7 minutes ago
Will compare their PL numbers:
Saka 12 goals and 10 assists
rashford 15 goals and 4 assist.
Saka edging it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are their overall numbers? As it wouldn’t be limited to the Premiership in this context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but its prob the fairest way to judge... in the same competition level against the same teams. If your gonna compare them that has to be the fairest comparison surely.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is if you want to manipulate stats to an agenda. They have both played in the cup competitions as well.
The premise here is who would you like to bring on to win you a game. It was not premier league specific.
I would be quite happy to bring on either player, myself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no but if you wanna suggest one is better than the other statistically, then it has to be the fairest comparison which has to be the stats against the same level of opposition and teams.
If you are gonna start comparing stats from different levels of competition that both are in then its pointless, cos you could just pluck any name out any random league who is producing the numbers and argue they are better which is pointless.
Has Saka even written a novel?
I wouldn't be bringing either on as they'd both be starting.
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 15 seconds ago
Has Saka even written a novel?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, under the pseudonym Bookayo Sacker.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 7 minutes ago
Will compare their PL numbers:
Saka 12 goals and 10 assists
rashford 15 goals and 4 assist.
Saka edging it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are their overall numbers? As it wouldn’t be limited to the Premiership in this context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but its prob the fairest way to judge... in the same competition level against the same teams. If your gonna compare them that has to be the fairest comparison surely.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is if you want to manipulate stats to an agenda. They have both played in the cup competitions as well.
The premise here is who would you like to bring on to win you a game. It was not premier league specific.
I would be quite happy to bring on either player, myself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it is the fairest way of doing it, if anything you are trying to manipulate stats.
Someone could play fa cup first round v man city (like chelsea did) or play oldham. It's not a fair comparison.
Also someone could play double the games the other player. The PL both players play the same team, if not injured, play the same amount of games etc.
So once we have the best way to compare the two, then we can judge who we'd want to bring on no matter what competition they are in.
If we don't compare from the same league then you might as well say you'll take andy cook from bradford over rashford or saka. it's silly.
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 7 minutes ago
Will compare their PL numbers:
Saka 12 goals and 10 assists
rashford 15 goals and 4 assist.
Saka edging it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are their overall numbers? As it wouldn’t be limited to the Premiership in this context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but its prob the fairest way to judge... in the same competition level against the same teams. If your gonna compare them that has to be the fairest comparison surely.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is if you want to manipulate stats to an agenda. They have both played in the cup competitions as well.
The premise here is who would you like to bring on to win you a game. It was not premier league specific.
I would be quite happy to bring on either player, myself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it is the fairest way of doing it, if anything you are trying to manipulate stats.
Someone could play fa cup first round v man city (like chelsea did) or play oldham. It's not a fair comparison.
Also someone could play double the games the other player. The PL both players play the same team, if not injured, play the same amount of games etc.
So once we have the best way to compare the two, then we can judge who we'd want to bring on no matter what competition they are in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
im not manipulating anything nothing is changed the stats are the stats. the level of competition its against has to be considered and since both players have a level playing field to compare them statistically (that also happens to be biggest in terms of sample size. Its clearly the fairest way to compare them.
I get it your a Man Utd fan and dont wanna seem like your admitting he is a lesser player. you want to include lower level League matches and europa cup matches to champions league matches, i totally understand why you do.
Id rather keep it fair and balanced and compare them in their biggest sample size against the same opposition in the same competition.
sorry Nick that was meant for Vidic if you didnt gather that already
Rashford. Saka is a better all round player, but Rashford’s got a better history of winning his team games late in the day. Think he holds the record for most goals scored in injury time in the premier league.
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 13 seconds ago
sorry Nick that was meant for Vidic if you didnt gather that already
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably Rashford. But Saka is a cracking player and still only 21.
include lower level League *cup matches and
Saka couldn't finish his dinner.
Rashford, meanwhile, could provide Saka's dinner and then finish it for him.
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 4 minutes ago
Rashford. Saka is a better all round player, but Rashford’s got a better history of winning his team games late in the day. Think he holds the record for most goals scored in injury time in the premier league.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See this is a much better way to debate the stats that I give.
This is quite interesting actually, do you have the actual stats for this or some reference. Cos that would defo be something to consider.
Sign in if you want to comment
Saka vs Rashford
Page 2 of 5
posted on 17/4/23
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 7 minutes ago
Will compare their PL numbers:
Saka 12 goals and 10 assists
rashford 15 goals and 4 assist.
Saka edging it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are their overall numbers? As it wouldn’t be limited to the Premiership in this context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but its prob the fairest way to judge... in the same competition level against the same teams. If your gonna compare them that has to be the fairest comparison surely.
posted on 17/4/23
comment by Christ We Won (U17162)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Christ We Won (U17162)
posted 3 seconds ago
These comparison articles are rubbish.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
this one is actually decent, two reasonably similar level players, play in similar positions doing similar things.
they do it differently but there is defo comparison to be had.
Saka having the better season as stats will show.
the other telling factor is that Saka is 21 , Rashford 25
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I donno I think these articles on this forum never really go anywhere and just descend into rival fans calling each others team and players rubbish, usually. But as of right now I haven't checked out the comments, so maybe I'm wrong on this one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeah usually you need to filter through the usual crap, however, there is some genuine stuff to take note from.
Both are great players there is no shame in Rashford perhaps being a little less effective than Saka its hardly a slight on either player.
posted on 17/4/23
Greg you rascal
posted on 17/4/23
Saka is a big time bottle merchant, cost his country the Euros and his team the Premier League.
Rashford wins on the count that matters. Medals.
posted on 17/4/23
If it's an open, end to end game, then rashford.
If it's against a low block, then saka, as he is more creative.
posted on 17/4/23
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 7 minutes ago
Will compare their PL numbers:
Saka 12 goals and 10 assists
rashford 15 goals and 4 assist.
Saka edging it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are their overall numbers? As it wouldn’t be limited to the Premiership in this context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't compare really as people play different number of games etc .Best metric is to compare the same competition where players play the same amount of games, its the fairest way to do it.
posted on 17/4/23
England are lucky to have both, and the fact that they and Kane can work together really well as a front three. I love Rashford, but as of now suspect Saka might have gone further by the time their careers are over. He's a superb player, and we'll be lucky if Antony ends up being 75% as good as him.
posted on 17/4/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 7 minutes ago
Will compare their PL numbers:
Saka 12 goals and 10 assists
rashford 15 goals and 4 assist.
Saka edging it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are their overall numbers? As it wouldn’t be limited to the Premiership in this context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but its prob the fairest way to judge... in the same competition level against the same teams. If your gonna compare them that has to be the fairest comparison surely.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is if you want to manipulate stats to an agenda. They have both played in the cup competitions as well.
The premise here is who would you like to bring on to win you a game. It was not premier league specific.
I would be quite happy to bring on either player, myself.
posted on 17/4/23
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 22 minutes ago
Will compare their PL numbers:
Saka 12 goals and 10 assists
rashford 15 goals and 4 assist.
Saka edging it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
saka - 0.69 G+A per 90 (excluding penalties)
rashfodd - 0.72 G+A per 90 (excluding penalties)
posted on 17/4/23
rashfodd
posted on 17/4/23
comment by King TUt (U3732)
posted 7 minutes ago
If it's an open, end to end game, then rashford.
If it's against a low block, then saka, as he is more creative.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I'd say that's fair
posted on 17/4/23
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 7 minutes ago
Will compare their PL numbers:
Saka 12 goals and 10 assists
rashford 15 goals and 4 assist.
Saka edging it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are their overall numbers? As it wouldn’t be limited to the Premiership in this context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but its prob the fairest way to judge... in the same competition level against the same teams. If your gonna compare them that has to be the fairest comparison surely.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is if you want to manipulate stats to an agenda. They have both played in the cup competitions as well.
The premise here is who would you like to bring on to win you a game. It was not premier league specific.
I would be quite happy to bring on either player, myself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no but if you wanna suggest one is better than the other statistically, then it has to be the fairest comparison which has to be the stats against the same level of opposition and teams.
If you are gonna start comparing stats from different levels of competition that both are in then its pointless, cos you could just pluck any name out any random league who is producing the numbers and argue they are better which is pointless.
posted on 17/4/23
Has Saka even written a novel?
posted on 17/4/23
I wouldn't be bringing either on as they'd both be starting.
posted on 17/4/23
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 15 seconds ago
Has Saka even written a novel?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, under the pseudonym Bookayo Sacker.
posted on 17/4/23
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 7 minutes ago
Will compare their PL numbers:
Saka 12 goals and 10 assists
rashford 15 goals and 4 assist.
Saka edging it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are their overall numbers? As it wouldn’t be limited to the Premiership in this context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but its prob the fairest way to judge... in the same competition level against the same teams. If your gonna compare them that has to be the fairest comparison surely.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is if you want to manipulate stats to an agenda. They have both played in the cup competitions as well.
The premise here is who would you like to bring on to win you a game. It was not premier league specific.
I would be quite happy to bring on either player, myself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it is the fairest way of doing it, if anything you are trying to manipulate stats.
Someone could play fa cup first round v man city (like chelsea did) or play oldham. It's not a fair comparison.
Also someone could play double the games the other player. The PL both players play the same team, if not injured, play the same amount of games etc.
So once we have the best way to compare the two, then we can judge who we'd want to bring on no matter what competition they are in.
posted on 17/4/23
If we don't compare from the same league then you might as well say you'll take andy cook from bradford over rashford or saka. it's silly.
posted on 17/4/23
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 7 minutes ago
Will compare their PL numbers:
Saka 12 goals and 10 assists
rashford 15 goals and 4 assist.
Saka edging it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are their overall numbers? As it wouldn’t be limited to the Premiership in this context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but its prob the fairest way to judge... in the same competition level against the same teams. If your gonna compare them that has to be the fairest comparison surely.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is if you want to manipulate stats to an agenda. They have both played in the cup competitions as well.
The premise here is who would you like to bring on to win you a game. It was not premier league specific.
I would be quite happy to bring on either player, myself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it is the fairest way of doing it, if anything you are trying to manipulate stats.
Someone could play fa cup first round v man city (like chelsea did) or play oldham. It's not a fair comparison.
Also someone could play double the games the other player. The PL both players play the same team, if not injured, play the same amount of games etc.
So once we have the best way to compare the two, then we can judge who we'd want to bring on no matter what competition they are in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
im not manipulating anything nothing is changed the stats are the stats. the level of competition its against has to be considered and since both players have a level playing field to compare them statistically (that also happens to be biggest in terms of sample size. Its clearly the fairest way to compare them.
I get it your a Man Utd fan and dont wanna seem like your admitting he is a lesser player. you want to include lower level League matches and europa cup matches to champions league matches, i totally understand why you do.
Id rather keep it fair and balanced and compare them in their biggest sample size against the same opposition in the same competition.
posted on 17/4/23
sorry Nick that was meant for Vidic if you didnt gather that already
posted on 17/4/23
Rashford. Saka is a better all round player, but Rashford’s got a better history of winning his team games late in the day. Think he holds the record for most goals scored in injury time in the premier league.
posted on 17/4/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 13 seconds ago
sorry Nick that was meant for Vidic if you didnt gather that already
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 17/4/23
Probably Rashford. But Saka is a cracking player and still only 21.
posted on 17/4/23
include lower level League *cup matches and
posted on 17/4/23
Saka couldn't finish his dinner.
Rashford, meanwhile, could provide Saka's dinner and then finish it for him.
posted on 17/4/23
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 4 minutes ago
Rashford. Saka is a better all round player, but Rashford’s got a better history of winning his team games late in the day. Think he holds the record for most goals scored in injury time in the premier league.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See this is a much better way to debate the stats that I give.
This is quite interesting actually, do you have the actual stats for this or some reference. Cos that would defo be something to consider.
Page 2 of 5