Personally I'd bring on Saka. Rashford would have started the game and probably already scored a brace.

comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted 51 seconds ago
Personally I'd bring on Saka. Rashford would have started the game and probably already left the stadium in a leg brace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted 51 seconds ago
Personally I'd bring on Saka. Rashford would have started the game and probably already left the stadium in a leg brace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Makes sense why he couldn't complete the hat-trick

Rashford some games is the better, Saka is better in the other games.

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 2 minutes ago
Rashford some games is the better, Saka is better in the other games.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn’t know you loved splinters so much

Depends who the opposition is.

Both decent players.

Liverpool fans trying to troll, given their position, is an epic level of banter.

Rashford and Saka don't play in the same position. I'd bring Rashford on the left if that side needed improving and Saka if it was the right hand side looking weaker.

I think both players are a little overhyped tbh, in that typical English way.

Saka probably needs to deliver a little more if he’s to elevate himself to a truly top player. Every chance that can happen if Arsenal keep improving and strengthen their team over the summer.

Rashford can be unplayable but he does have quite long periods of poor form. He needs to show he can deliver this year’s form again and again imo.

Having thought about it, I would probably choose Rashford over Saka for impact off the bench.

As for who starts, it depends on the opposition.

Would barely take Saka over Dan James the few weeks, annoyingly since I put him in my FF side.

Rashford, Sakas a better player though for sure and in a few more years experience might be more reliable.

Saka on the left is better.

Rashford on the right is better.

Daft article.

Fack me I'm tired, mixed up my left and right 😄

Saka has a lot more to his game than Rashford (which isn't saying much) + he has 4 extra years.

But I'd never take an AFC player over a united one - AFC players are more likely to be, or become, a cheater.

I'd leave them both on the bench for as long as was possible. Both are average, journeyman and accordingly over-hyped

I'm happy to see that the majority of posters agree that rashford is a superior player.
If saka was playing with the likes of Weghorst on a weekly basis, he would have precisely 0 assists.

Rashford creates his own luck. Saka on the other hand expects others to bury the chances.

comment by Pâî§Lë¥'š _P䆆ê®ÑëÐ_ÐrÊåm§ (U1541)
posted 21 minutes ago
Fack me I'm tired, mixed up my left and right 😄
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I let you get away with that. Fair play for fessing up.

Saka is 21 years old, rashford is 25. Have some shame.

comment by IAmMe (U18491)
posted 1 hour, 46 minutes ago
Saka has a lot more to his game than Rashford (which isn't saying much) + he has 4 extra years.

But I'd never take an AFC player over a united one - AFC players are more likely to be, or become, a cheater.

I'd leave them both on the bench for as long as was possible. Both are average, journeyman and accordingly over-hyped
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You don't know what journeymen means you plonker

IAmMe is a bit of a simpleton.