This article is really missing Nohlman.

Can everyone use the forum the way TopForm would like, please?

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 hours, 57 minutes ago
comment by Keep It Greasy - Music is the BEST (U1396)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 10 minutes ago
Sat Nav- you keep saying that some accusations were proven to have been completely fabricating claims but you have provided any evidence of this. Can you share your proof?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can’t use google?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're the one making the claim, so the burden of proof lies with you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On a football forum? Don’t make me laugh. If someone is interested as to the veracity of the claim, they can research it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I did Google it. Found no such evidence, which leads me to believe that you haven't got any either. Your inability to provide such evidence despite being specifically asked just adds to that conclusion.

So again, can you share this proof? Or have you decided that these people are guilty of an offence without the courts proving it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re not very good at googling then, it took me less than a minute. The two girls’ names in question are Emma & Aliona. Their WhatsApp messages were obtained and it’s a very interesting read.

Now, as mentioned, that alone does nothing like proving these guys’ innocence but it casts enough doubt to give them the ‘benefit of the doubt’ to use RR’s words or my words or choice: innocent until proven guilty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Still not providing this evidence that you keep claiming. Strange.

Never fails to amaze.

Any article like is guaranteed to bring out Rapelay, N2 and TopForm.
Glad

Admin, you have their IP addresses. Report the fackers. They are facking dangerous! Absolute looney bins!

comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas please' of the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 3 minutes ago
Never fails to amaze.

Any article like is guaranteed to bring out Rapelay, N2 and TopForm.
Glad

Admin, you have their IP addresses. Report the fackers. They are facking dangerous! Absolute looney bins!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shut the hell up!!!

comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas please'of the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 3 minutes ago
Never fails to amaze.

Any article like is guaranteed to bring out Rapelay, N2 and TopForm.
Glad

Admin, you have their IP addresses. Report the fackers. They are facking dangerous! Absolute looney bins!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shut the hell up!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Poor N2 gettin cancelled just 4 having ‘different’ opinion on r@pey coersion n influence of idiotic incels

comment by #4zA Napul3 (U22472)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas please'of the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 3 minutes ago
Never fails to amaze.

Any article like is guaranteed to bring out Rapelay, N2 and TopForm.
Glad

Admin, you have their IP addresses. Report the fackers. They are facking dangerous! Absolute looney bins!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shut the hell up!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Poor N2 gettin cancelled just 4 having ‘different’ opinion on r@pey coersion n influence of idiotic incels
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Incels don't have influence.

comment by TopForm (U15726)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by TopForm (U15726)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 57 minutes ago
Part of me thinks the liberals get so upset with him because their own movement has no personalities, just robots.

With the millions of libs out there, you'd think you could produce at least one charismatic character, but no, just zombies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bloody hell, as someone that doesn't get upset with Tate but rather the underlying exploitation system behind him, this comment makes me want to turn liberal and get upset by him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But then you'd be proving N2's point.

Please stay rapey.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Obviously by using that odious word so liberally you're triggered by him for reasons other than morality.

There's a definite case that some people get upset because they're desperately trying to prove they don't have any Tate in them.

Whereas those that don't have any Tate tendencies just see the overall picture of exploitation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ZZZZZZZZZ

comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas please'of the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 3 minutes ago
Never fails to amaze.

Any article like is guaranteed to bring out Rapelay, N2 and TopForm.
Glad

Admin, you have their IP addresses. Report the fackers. They are facking dangerous! Absolute looney bins!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shut the hell up!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You just threw your phone on the ground, didn't you?

comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by #4zA Napul3 (U22472)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas please'of the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 3 minutes ago
Never fails to amaze.

Any article like is guaranteed to bring out Rapelay, N2 and TopForm.
Glad

Admin, you have their IP addresses. Report the fackers. They are facking dangerous! Absolute looney bins!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shut the hell up!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Poor N2 gettin cancelled just 4 having ‘different’ opinion on r@pey coersion n influence of idiotic incels
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Incels don't have influence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems that makes u

comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 hours, 57 minutes ago
comment by Keep It Greasy - Music is the BEST (U1396)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 10 minutes ago
Sat Nav- you keep saying that some accusations were proven to have been completely fabricating claims but you have provided any evidence of this. Can you share your proof?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can’t use google?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're the one making the claim, so the burden of proof lies with you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On a football forum? Don’t make me laugh. If someone is interested as to the veracity of the claim, they can research it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I did Google it. Found no such evidence, which leads me to believe that you haven't got any either. Your inability to provide such evidence despite being specifically asked just adds to that conclusion.

So again, can you share this proof? Or have you decided that these people are guilty of an offence without the courts proving it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re not very good at googling then, it took me less than a minute. The two girls’ names in question are Emma & Aliona. Their WhatsApp messages were obtained and it’s a very interesting read.

Now, as mentioned, that alone does nothing like proving these guys’ innocence but it casts enough doubt to give them the ‘benefit of the doubt’ to use RR’s words or my words or choice: innocent until proven guilty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Still not providing this evidence that you keep claiming. Strange.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think what you like Welshpoolfan, it doesn’t affect my life that you cannot google well.

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 hours, 57 minutes ago
comment by Keep It Greasy - Music is the BEST (U1396)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 10 minutes ago
Sat Nav- you keep saying that some accusations were proven to have been completely fabricating claims but you have provided any evidence of this. Can you share your proof?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can’t use google?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're the one making the claim, so the burden of proof lies with you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On a football forum? Don’t make me laugh. If someone is interested as to the veracity of the claim, they can research it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I did Google it. Found no such evidence, which leads me to believe that you haven't got any either. Your inability to provide such evidence despite being specifically asked just adds to that conclusion.

So again, can you share this proof? Or have you decided that these people are guilty of an offence without the courts proving it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re not very good at googling then, it took me less than a minute. The two girls’ names in question are Emma & Aliona. Their WhatsApp messages were obtained and it’s a very interesting read.

Now, as mentioned, that alone does nothing like proving these guys’ innocence but it casts enough doubt to give them the ‘benefit of the doubt’ to use RR’s words or my words or choice: innocent until proven guilty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Still not providing this evidence that you keep claiming. Strange.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think what you like Welshpoolfan, it doesn’t affect my life that you cannot google well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aliona: “You are a good actress”

Emma: “I practiced”

Aliona: “Play Dumb”

Emma: “I’m going to pull some tears out”

Emma: “We are writing a movie ASAP”

Aliona: “Lets email Netflix ASAP”

Emma: “Hulu, Amazon Prime

comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas please'of the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 3 minutes ago
Never fails to amaze.

Any article like is guaranteed to bring out Rapelay, N2 and TopForm.
Glad

Admin, you have their IP addresses. Report the fackers. They are facking dangerous! Absolute looney bins!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shut the hell up!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He just showed his female side. Tate will be fuming with him

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 hours, 57 minutes ago
comment by Keep It Greasy - Music is the BEST (U1396)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 10 minutes ago
Sat Nav- you keep saying that some accusations were proven to have been completely fabricating claims but you have provided any evidence of this. Can you share your proof?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can’t use google?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're the one making the claim, so the burden of proof lies with you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On a football forum? Don’t make me laugh. If someone is interested as to the veracity of the claim, they can research it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I did Google it. Found no such evidence, which leads me to believe that you haven't got any either. Your inability to provide such evidence despite being specifically asked just adds to that conclusion.

So again, can you share this proof? Or have you decided that these people are guilty of an offence without the courts proving it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re not very good at googling then, it took me less than a minute. The two girls’ names in question are Emma & Aliona. Their WhatsApp messages were obtained and it’s a very interesting read.

Now, as mentioned, that alone does nothing like proving these guys’ innocence but it casts enough doubt to give them the ‘benefit of the doubt’ to use RR’s words or my words or choice: innocent until proven guilty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Still not providing this evidence that you keep claiming. Strange.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think what you like Welshpoolfan, it doesn’t affect my life that you cannot google well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aliona: “You are a good actress”

Emma: “I practiced”

Aliona: “Play Dumb”

Emma: “I’m going to pull some tears out”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is not incriminating

comment by #4zA Napul3 (U22472)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 hours, 57 minutes ago
comment by Keep It Greasy - Music is the BEST (U1396)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 10 minutes ago
Sat Nav- you keep saying that some accusations were proven to have been completely fabricating claims but you have provided any evidence of this. Can you share your proof?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can’t use google?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're the one making the claim, so the burden of proof lies with you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On a football forum? Don’t make me laugh. If someone is interested as to the veracity of the claim, they can research it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I did Google it. Found no such evidence, which leads me to believe that you haven't got any either. Your inability to provide such evidence despite being specifically asked just adds to that conclusion.

So again, can you share this proof? Or have you decided that these people are guilty of an offence without the courts proving it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re not very good at googling then, it took me less than a minute. The two girls’ names in question are Emma & Aliona. Their WhatsApp messages were obtained and it’s a very interesting read.

Now, as mentioned, that alone does nothing like proving these guys’ innocence but it casts enough doubt to give them the ‘benefit of the doubt’ to use RR’s words or my words or choice: innocent until proven guilty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Still not providing this evidence that you keep claiming. Strange.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think what you like Welshpoolfan, it doesn’t affect my life that you cannot google well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aliona: “You are a good actress”

Emma: “I practiced”

Aliona: “Play Dumb”

Emma: “I’m going to pull some tears out”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is not incriminating
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like roleplay to me

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 hours, 57 minutes ago
comment by Keep It Greasy - Music is the BEST (U1396)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 10 minutes ago
Sat Nav- you keep saying that some accusations were proven to have been completely fabricating claims but you have provided any evidence of this. Can you share your proof?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can’t use google?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're the one making the claim, so the burden of proof lies with you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On a football forum? Don’t make me laugh. If someone is interested as to the veracity of the claim, they can research it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I did Google it. Found no such evidence, which leads me to believe that you haven't got any either. Your inability to provide such evidence despite being specifically asked just adds to that conclusion.

So again, can you share this proof? Or have you decided that these people are guilty of an offence without the courts proving it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re not very good at googling then, it took me less than a minute. The two girls’ names in question are Emma & Aliona. Their WhatsApp messages were obtained and it’s a very interesting read.

Now, as mentioned, that alone does nothing like proving these guys’ innocence but it casts enough doubt to give them the ‘benefit of the doubt’ to use RR’s words or my words or choice: innocent until proven guilty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Still not providing this evidence that you keep claiming. Strange.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think what you like Welshpoolfan, it doesn’t affect my life that you cannot google well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aliona: “You are a good actress”

Emma: “I practiced”

Aliona: “Play Dumb”

Emma: “I’m going to pull some tears out”
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So you ate defending Tate based on an accusation he has made (that these girls are lying - funny how your innocence until proven guilty doesn't extend to them) yet you cannot actually link to this evidence you have found?

It's also interesting you are attacking my Google skills yet you seemingly can't Google well enough to provide links to something you claim to have already found.

Then your retort is to post stuff that has absolutely nothing incriminating about it.

Good job...

N2 trying to cancel me from being gay

comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 2 hours, 56 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 hours, 57 minutes ago
comment by Keep It Greasy - Music is the BEST (U1396)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 10 minutes ago
Sat Nav- you keep saying that some accusations were proven to have been completely fabricating claims but you have provided any evidence of this. Can you share your proof?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can’t use google?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're the one making the claim, so the burden of proof lies with you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On a football forum? Don’t make me laugh. If someone is interested as to the veracity of the claim, they can research it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I did Google it. Found no such evidence, which leads me to believe that you haven't got any either. Your inability to provide such evidence despite being specifically asked just adds to that conclusion.

So again, can you share this proof? Or have you decided that these people are guilty of an offence without the courts proving it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re not very good at googling then, it took me less than a minute. The two girls’ names in question are Emma & Aliona. Their WhatsApp messages were obtained and it’s a very interesting read.

Now, as mentioned, that alone does nothing like proving these guys’ innocence but it casts enough doubt to give them the ‘benefit of the doubt’ to use RR’s words or my words or choice: innocent until proven guilty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Still not providing this evidence that you keep claiming. Strange.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think what you like Welshpoolfan, it doesn’t affect my life that you cannot google well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aliona: “You are a good actress”

Emma: “I practiced”

Aliona: “Play Dumb”

Emma: “I’m going to pull some tears out”
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So you ate defending Tate based on an accusation he has made (that these girls are lying - funny how your innocence until proven guilty doesn't extend to them) yet you cannot actually link to this evidence you have found?

It's also interesting you are attacking my Google skills yet you seemingly can't Google well enough to provide links to something you claim to have already found.

Then your retort is to post stuff that has absolutely nothing incriminating about it.

Good job...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hahaha you fkign moron. Where do you think I was copying and pasting this from?

Defending him? Grow the fk up you child.

Forget to learn to code, learn to google you minnow plebiscite

Minnow referendum is quite the insult.

comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 12 minutes ago
Minnow referendum is quite the insult.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like when your wife is deciding whether to shaag you or not

Wonderful stuff from N2

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 2 hours, 56 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 hours, 57 minutes ago
comment by Keep It Greasy - Music is the BEST (U1396)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 10 minutes ago
Sat Nav- you keep saying that some accusations were proven to have been completely fabricating claims but you have provided any evidence of this. Can you share your proof?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can’t use google?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're the one making the claim, so the burden of proof lies with you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On a football forum? Don’t make me laugh. If someone is interested as to the veracity of the claim, they can research it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I did Google it. Found no such evidence, which leads me to believe that you haven't got any either. Your inability to provide such evidence despite being specifically asked just adds to that conclusion.

So again, can you share this proof? Or have you decided that these people are guilty of an offence without the courts proving it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re not very good at googling then, it took me less than a minute. The two girls’ names in question are Emma & Aliona. Their WhatsApp messages were obtained and it’s a very interesting read.

Now, as mentioned, that alone does nothing like proving these guys’ innocence but it casts enough doubt to give them the ‘benefit of the doubt’ to use RR’s words or my words or choice: innocent until proven guilty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Still not providing this evidence that you keep claiming. Strange.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think what you like Welshpoolfan, it doesn’t affect my life that you cannot google well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aliona: “You are a good actress”

Emma: “I practiced”

Aliona: “Play Dumb”

Emma: “I’m going to pull some tears out”
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So you ate defending Tate based on an accusation he has made (that these girls are lying - funny how your innocence until proven guilty doesn't extend to them) yet you cannot actually link to this evidence you have found?

It's also interesting you are attacking my Google skills yet you seemingly can't Google well enough to provide links to something you claim to have already found.

Then your retort is to post stuff that has absolutely nothing incriminating about it.

Good job...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hahaha you fkign moron. Where do you think I was copying and pasting this from?

Defending him? Grow the fk up you child.

Forget to learn to code, learn to google you minnow plebiscite
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok so apparently you can Google but lack the basic capabilities of copying a link. How embarrassing for you.

I also would be careful about calling other people a "fkign moron" when you can't even abbreviate "fking" properly. It makes you look particularly stupid and that's before we even get to the nonsensical "minnow plebiscite".

I wouldn't expect anything more from someone defending Andrew Tate.

…or even Shat Nav

sterculinum publicum