IOAG , you're the one who is twisting historical events for your own agenda, not me
I'm just saying what happened in a matter of fact impartial way, you're not
I also do have a genuine interest in Australian aborigines and a genuine feeling of remorse for what's happened to them since Europeans settled Australia
You know nothing about these people & only "care" about them as it plays in to your woke agenda
i see the biggest khunt on the site is at it again, just in time for the year-end vote
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTcDeeHPyeE
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 11 seconds ago
i see the biggest khunt on the site is at it again, just in time for the year-end vote
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Edin's not that tbh
he's a good lad most of the time
comment by Peks - El Cid Campeador (U6618)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by ai'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Peks - El Cid Campeador (U6618)
posted 2 hours, 58 minutes ago
I was aware of that actually
I have watched the brilliant Oz film, Rabbit Proof Fence a number of times
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jM49rUQjkd4
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you think that makes your opening claims any better?
You seemed to wave away the legitimacy of claims to Aboriginal ancestry, despite knowing that their not being 'pure blooded' would owe to the forced raape of their ancestors.
You then argued that 'pure-blooded' indigenous Australians are (quote) 'special needs' by Western standards.
What seems to follow in your train of logic is that by mass raaping their women, white settlers were actually doing them a favour by providing them with the right genes to survive in 'Western' society.
On a related note, contrasting 'hunter-gatherers' and 'Western societies' also has a strong whiff to it. Why would someone so clued-up on human anthropology choose such a clumsy opposition of terms?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's nonsense
You're interpreting what I said for you own agenda
You also make some strange claims, such as:
"You seemed to wave away the legitimacy of claims to Aboriginal ancestry, despite knowing that their not being 'pure blooded' would owe to the forced raape of their ancestors."
Undoubtedly some of these Aboriginal woman became pregnant with the kids of white men by rape.
However, the majority wouldn't have been by rape
Women are attracted by men from incoming dominant cultures., that's a biological fact.
Female hypergamy is hardwired
Most of these aboriginal women would have voluntarily got into sexual relationships with white men
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The abduction and rape of indigenous girls and women is known to have occurred on a very wide scale. That is by no means a strange claim, but a well-known fact and one you intentionally and disingenuously ignored.
Now, you're brushing it aside as negligible in the grand scheme.
Well done for finding a straw to clutch amidst your claims of indigenous Australians being 'special needs' people and the favour white invaders did by copulating either consensually or non-consensually with them. Carry on. Each passing post makes you look better and better.
(Still no explanation for your weird hunter-gatherer vs 'Western society' opposition either.)
comment by ai'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Peks - El Cid Campeador (U6618)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by ai'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Peks - El Cid Campeador (U6618)
posted 2 hours, 58 minutes ago
I was aware of that actually
I have watched the brilliant Oz film, Rabbit Proof Fence a number of times
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jM49rUQjkd4
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you think that makes your opening claims any better?
You seemed to wave away the legitimacy of claims to Aboriginal ancestry, despite knowing that their not being 'pure blooded' would owe to the forced raape of their ancestors.
You then argued that 'pure-blooded' indigenous Australians are (quote) 'special needs' by Western standards.
What seems to follow in your train of logic is that by mass raaping their women, white settlers were actually doing them a favour by providing them with the right genes to survive in 'Western' society.
On a related note, contrasting 'hunter-gatherers' and 'Western societies' also has a strong whiff to it. Why would someone so clued-up on human anthropology choose such a clumsy opposition of terms?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's nonsense
You're interpreting what I said for you own agenda
You also make some strange claims, such as:
"You seemed to wave away the legitimacy of claims to Aboriginal ancestry, despite knowing that their not being 'pure blooded' would owe to the forced raape of their ancestors."
Undoubtedly some of these Aboriginal woman became pregnant with the kids of white men by rape.
However, the majority wouldn't have been by rape
Women are attracted by men from incoming dominant cultures., that's a biological fact.
Female hypergamy is hardwired
Most of these aboriginal women would have voluntarily got into sexual relationships with white men
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The abduction and rape of indigenous girls and women is known to have occurred on a very wide scale. That is by no means a strange claim, but a well-known fact and one you intentionally and disingenuously ignored.
Now, you're brushing it aside as negligible in the grand scheme.
Well done for finding a straw to clutch amidst your claims of indigenous Australians being 'special needs' people and the favour white invaders did by copulating either consensually or non-consensually with them. Carry on. Each passing post makes you look better and better.
(Still no explanation for your weird hunter-gatherer vs 'Western society' opposition either.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
when did i say:
"(Still no explanation for your weird hunter-gatherer vs 'Western society' opposition either.)"
link the post I made with this in it
This reminds of when Peks said men were hard wired to be attracted to 13 year old girls but in reality he just means he’s a nonce.
comment by Peks - Rabbit Proof since 1974 (U6618)
posted 54 minutes ago
IOAG , you're the one who is twisting historical events for your own agenda, not me
I'm just saying what happened in a matter of fact impartial way, you're not
I also do have a genuine interest in Australian aborigines and a genuine feeling of remorse for what's happened to them since Europeans settled Australia
You know nothing about these people & only "care" about them as it plays in to your woke agenda
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You literally said "the reason" indigenous tribes supported Cortés against the Aztecs reason was "the extreme cruelty of these people...human sacrifice was v common"
As much as you might strive to dehumanise the Aztecs and portray the Spaniards as a 'civilising' source, it is merely your own tendentious interpretation, not "historical fact".
For one, almost all of the historical accounts of the events come from Spanish sources; those taken from indigenous accounts were filtered by the Spaniards themselves, much of it burned, and much of the surviving record was written well after the events.
Secondly, you cannot possibly know that the "extreme cruelty" was the primary factor in the support of rival tribes, much less when human sacrifice was common to the belief systems of many Mesoamerican peoples.
Thirdly, that the Spaniards were supported by some indigenous tribes does not make them "better" invaders, since their own atrocities and widespread destruction of indigenous cultures are well documented.
Again, by your same logic, you could say the Naazis were good for Germany because a lot of Germans supported them.
Great logic that.
"genuine feeling of remorse for what's happened to [Australian aborigines] since Europeans settled Australia"
Pull the other one, it's got bells on.
comment by Peks - Rabbit Proof since 1974 (U6618)
posted 43 minutes ago
when did i say:
"(Still no explanation for your weird hunter-gatherer vs 'Western society' opposition either.)"
link the post I made with this in it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was part of your Naazi-Eugenicist diatribe here:
"There are major problems with full blooded Aboriginals integrating into WESTERN society & cities though...culturally & intellectually
These people have evolved separate from most of the rest of humanity for >50,000 years & they still, like our ancestors are incredible HUNTER GATHERERS with the best eyesight & spatial memory of any contemporary humans
However to navigate the WESTERN world requires other mental tasks that our ancestors evolved and became selected for during the Neolithic and beyond
I believe from what I've read the average full blooded Australian Aborigine has an IQ of around 60-70
IQ is ofcourse a measure of "intelligence" in the WESTERN sense.
These people in terms of certain mental abilities, in the WEST, would be regarded as special needs.
This makes WESTERN societies very difficult for them unfortunately.
The European colonisation of Australia was a disaster for them
Their brain wiring has evolved to be excellent HUNTER GATHERERS... in which they would far excel any of us
comment by ai'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Peks - Rabbit Proof since 1974 (U6618)
posted 54 minutes ago
IOAG , you're the one who is twisting historical events for your own agenda, not me
I'm just saying what happened in a matter of fact impartial way, you're not
I also do have a genuine interest in Australian aborigines and a genuine feeling of remorse for what's happened to them since Europeans settled Australia
You know nothing about these people & only "care" about them as it plays in to your woke agenda
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You literally said "the reason" indigenous tribes supported Cortés against the Aztecs reason was "the extreme cruelty of these people...human sacrifice was v common"
As much as you might strive to dehumanise the Aztecs and portray the Spaniards as a 'civilising' source, it is merely your own tendentious interpretation, not "historical fact".
For one, almost all of the historical accounts of the events come from Spanish sources; those taken from indigenous accounts were filtered by the Spaniards themselves, much of it burned, and much of the surviving record was written well after the events.
Secondly, you cannot possibly know that the "extreme cruelty" was the primary factor in the support of rival tribes, much less when human sacrifice was common to the belief systems of many Mesoamerican peoples.
Thirdly, that the Spaniards were supported by some indigenous tribes does not make them "better" invaders, since their own atrocities and widespread destruction of indigenous cultures are well documented.
Again, by your same logic, you could say the Naazis were good for Germany because a lot of Germans supported them.
Great logic that.
"genuine feeling of remorse for what's happened to [Australian aborigines] since Europeans settled Australia"
Pull the other one, it's got bells on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you're putting implications into my comments that aren't there
the Spaniards were better invaders than the native american tribes (who tried to invade & conquer eachother) as they were more technologically advanced simple as that
I know you can't get you head around it, because it's clear to me your thinking is very rigid & you want to pigeon hole people & their thoughts into categories like "naaazi" or "fascist" etc, but I genuinely do feel very sorry for the Aboriginals in Australia. They should have been left to continue living in the stone age were they where happy & well adjusted
I've quoted you literally on a lot of what you've said. Your constant denial of what you are is in stark contradiction with years of posts on this site.
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted 48 minutes ago
This reminds of when Peks said men were hard wired to be attracted to 13 year old girls but in reality he just means he’s a nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
👍
I never said that...nonsense
comment by Peks - Rabbit Proof since 1974 (U6618)
posted 36 seconds ago
I never said that...noncense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
12?
Can someone help me out with what this woman is saying? I think it's something along the lines of, "Thank you to your people for making me not special needs."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lDcSw399QU
comment by Peks - Rabbit Proof since 1974 (U6618)
posted 2 days ago
I never said that...nonsense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You did say that Peks. If I cba I’ll find it. It was the day Mane’s marriage was reported.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 22 minutes ago
Must be after a handout
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Idiot.^^^
Maybe she'd just like to collect the rent due for the last couple of hundred years.
that woman barely has any Aboriginal blood in her...that's blindingly obvious by the way she looks
she is far more coloniser than abused native
she should be paying reparations to the proper aboriginals just as much as the King , by her reckoning
comment by Peks - Rabbit Proof since 1974 (U6618)
posted 10 minutes ago
that woman barely has any Aboriginal blood in her...that's blindingly obvious by the way she looks
she is far more coloniser than abused native
she should be paying reparations to the proper aboriginals just as much as the King , by her reckoning
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe her granny shrugged a a super Uber mensch, sawdust brain.
Every thread, same people, same discussions.
I'm just saying what happened in a matter of fact impartial way, you're not
———
I love it when peks pretends he’s historically literate.
comment by Joshua The King Of Kings Zirkzee (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
I'm just saying what happened in a matter of fact impartial way, you're not
———
I love it when peks pretends he’s historically literate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. The guy claims he's not a fascist, but just last week he was bigging up the Spanish "volunteers" who sided the Germans in the Battle of Stalingrad. I believe they called them the Blue Waffle Brigade.
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 3 hours, 4 minutes ago
comment by Joshua The King Of Kings Zirkzee (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
I'm just saying what happened in a matter of fact impartial way, you're not
———
I love it when peks pretends he’s historically literate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. The guy claims he's not a fascist, but just last week he was bigging up the Spanish "volunteers" who sided the Germans in the Battle of Stalingrad. I believe they called them the Blue Waffle Brigade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also posted an image of the Cross of Burgundy the other day, the old flag of the Spanish Empire which the far right have embraced as one of their symbols of identity.
When he celebrates Spain's sporting victories, I quietly revel in the knowledge that it must be like a kick in the gut to him that they're largely thanks to Catalans, Basques and immigrants.
comment by ai'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 3 hours, 4 minutes ago
comment by Joshua The King Of Kings Zirkzee (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
I'm just saying what happened in a matter of fact impartial way, you're not
———
I love it when peks pretends he’s historically literate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. The guy claims he's not a fascist, but just last week he was bigging up the Spanish "volunteers" who sided the Germans in the Battle of Stalingrad. I believe they called them the Blue Waffle Brigade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also posted an image of the Cross of Burgundy the other day, the old flag of the Spanish Empire which the far right have embraced as one of their symbols of identity.
When he celebrates Spain's sporting victories, I quietly revel in the knowledge that it must be like a kick in the gut to him that they're largely thanks to Catalans, Basques and immigrants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Makes it even funnier when you remember he’s a scouser.
Sign in if you want to comment
A difference between England and Australia
Page 6 of 7
6 | 7
posted on 19/10/24
IOAG , you're the one who is twisting historical events for your own agenda, not me
I'm just saying what happened in a matter of fact impartial way, you're not
I also do have a genuine interest in Australian aborigines and a genuine feeling of remorse for what's happened to them since Europeans settled Australia
You know nothing about these people & only "care" about them as it plays in to your woke agenda
posted on 19/10/24
i see the biggest khunt on the site is at it again, just in time for the year-end vote
posted on 19/10/24
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTcDeeHPyeE
posted on 19/10/24
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 11 seconds ago
i see the biggest khunt on the site is at it again, just in time for the year-end vote
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Edin's not that tbh
he's a good lad most of the time
posted on 19/10/24
comment by Peks - El Cid Campeador (U6618)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by ai'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Peks - El Cid Campeador (U6618)
posted 2 hours, 58 minutes ago
I was aware of that actually
I have watched the brilliant Oz film, Rabbit Proof Fence a number of times
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jM49rUQjkd4
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you think that makes your opening claims any better?
You seemed to wave away the legitimacy of claims to Aboriginal ancestry, despite knowing that their not being 'pure blooded' would owe to the forced raape of their ancestors.
You then argued that 'pure-blooded' indigenous Australians are (quote) 'special needs' by Western standards.
What seems to follow in your train of logic is that by mass raaping their women, white settlers were actually doing them a favour by providing them with the right genes to survive in 'Western' society.
On a related note, contrasting 'hunter-gatherers' and 'Western societies' also has a strong whiff to it. Why would someone so clued-up on human anthropology choose such a clumsy opposition of terms?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's nonsense
You're interpreting what I said for you own agenda
You also make some strange claims, such as:
"You seemed to wave away the legitimacy of claims to Aboriginal ancestry, despite knowing that their not being 'pure blooded' would owe to the forced raape of their ancestors."
Undoubtedly some of these Aboriginal woman became pregnant with the kids of white men by rape.
However, the majority wouldn't have been by rape
Women are attracted by men from incoming dominant cultures., that's a biological fact.
Female hypergamy is hardwired
Most of these aboriginal women would have voluntarily got into sexual relationships with white men
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The abduction and rape of indigenous girls and women is known to have occurred on a very wide scale. That is by no means a strange claim, but a well-known fact and one you intentionally and disingenuously ignored.
Now, you're brushing it aside as negligible in the grand scheme.
Well done for finding a straw to clutch amidst your claims of indigenous Australians being 'special needs' people and the favour white invaders did by copulating either consensually or non-consensually with them. Carry on. Each passing post makes you look better and better.
(Still no explanation for your weird hunter-gatherer vs 'Western society' opposition either.)
posted on 19/10/24
comment by ai'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Peks - El Cid Campeador (U6618)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by ai'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Peks - El Cid Campeador (U6618)
posted 2 hours, 58 minutes ago
I was aware of that actually
I have watched the brilliant Oz film, Rabbit Proof Fence a number of times
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jM49rUQjkd4
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you think that makes your opening claims any better?
You seemed to wave away the legitimacy of claims to Aboriginal ancestry, despite knowing that their not being 'pure blooded' would owe to the forced raape of their ancestors.
You then argued that 'pure-blooded' indigenous Australians are (quote) 'special needs' by Western standards.
What seems to follow in your train of logic is that by mass raaping their women, white settlers were actually doing them a favour by providing them with the right genes to survive in 'Western' society.
On a related note, contrasting 'hunter-gatherers' and 'Western societies' also has a strong whiff to it. Why would someone so clued-up on human anthropology choose such a clumsy opposition of terms?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's nonsense
You're interpreting what I said for you own agenda
You also make some strange claims, such as:
"You seemed to wave away the legitimacy of claims to Aboriginal ancestry, despite knowing that their not being 'pure blooded' would owe to the forced raape of their ancestors."
Undoubtedly some of these Aboriginal woman became pregnant with the kids of white men by rape.
However, the majority wouldn't have been by rape
Women are attracted by men from incoming dominant cultures., that's a biological fact.
Female hypergamy is hardwired
Most of these aboriginal women would have voluntarily got into sexual relationships with white men
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The abduction and rape of indigenous girls and women is known to have occurred on a very wide scale. That is by no means a strange claim, but a well-known fact and one you intentionally and disingenuously ignored.
Now, you're brushing it aside as negligible in the grand scheme.
Well done for finding a straw to clutch amidst your claims of indigenous Australians being 'special needs' people and the favour white invaders did by copulating either consensually or non-consensually with them. Carry on. Each passing post makes you look better and better.
(Still no explanation for your weird hunter-gatherer vs 'Western society' opposition either.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
when did i say:
"(Still no explanation for your weird hunter-gatherer vs 'Western society' opposition either.)"
link the post I made with this in it
posted on 19/10/24
This reminds of when Peks said men were hard wired to be attracted to 13 year old girls but in reality he just means he’s a nonce.
posted on 19/10/24
comment by Peks - Rabbit Proof since 1974 (U6618)
posted 54 minutes ago
IOAG , you're the one who is twisting historical events for your own agenda, not me
I'm just saying what happened in a matter of fact impartial way, you're not
I also do have a genuine interest in Australian aborigines and a genuine feeling of remorse for what's happened to them since Europeans settled Australia
You know nothing about these people & only "care" about them as it plays in to your woke agenda
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You literally said "the reason" indigenous tribes supported Cortés against the Aztecs reason was "the extreme cruelty of these people...human sacrifice was v common"
As much as you might strive to dehumanise the Aztecs and portray the Spaniards as a 'civilising' source, it is merely your own tendentious interpretation, not "historical fact".
For one, almost all of the historical accounts of the events come from Spanish sources; those taken from indigenous accounts were filtered by the Spaniards themselves, much of it burned, and much of the surviving record was written well after the events.
Secondly, you cannot possibly know that the "extreme cruelty" was the primary factor in the support of rival tribes, much less when human sacrifice was common to the belief systems of many Mesoamerican peoples.
Thirdly, that the Spaniards were supported by some indigenous tribes does not make them "better" invaders, since their own atrocities and widespread destruction of indigenous cultures are well documented.
Again, by your same logic, you could say the Naazis were good for Germany because a lot of Germans supported them.
Great logic that.
"genuine feeling of remorse for what's happened to [Australian aborigines] since Europeans settled Australia"
Pull the other one, it's got bells on.
posted on 19/10/24
comment by Peks - Rabbit Proof since 1974 (U6618)
posted 43 minutes ago
when did i say:
"(Still no explanation for your weird hunter-gatherer vs 'Western society' opposition either.)"
link the post I made with this in it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was part of your Naazi-Eugenicist diatribe here:
"There are major problems with full blooded Aboriginals integrating into WESTERN society & cities though...culturally & intellectually
These people have evolved separate from most of the rest of humanity for >50,000 years & they still, like our ancestors are incredible HUNTER GATHERERS with the best eyesight & spatial memory of any contemporary humans
However to navigate the WESTERN world requires other mental tasks that our ancestors evolved and became selected for during the Neolithic and beyond
I believe from what I've read the average full blooded Australian Aborigine has an IQ of around 60-70
IQ is ofcourse a measure of "intelligence" in the WESTERN sense.
These people in terms of certain mental abilities, in the WEST, would be regarded as special needs.
This makes WESTERN societies very difficult for them unfortunately.
The European colonisation of Australia was a disaster for them
Their brain wiring has evolved to be excellent HUNTER GATHERERS... in which they would far excel any of us
posted on 19/10/24
comment by ai'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Peks - Rabbit Proof since 1974 (U6618)
posted 54 minutes ago
IOAG , you're the one who is twisting historical events for your own agenda, not me
I'm just saying what happened in a matter of fact impartial way, you're not
I also do have a genuine interest in Australian aborigines and a genuine feeling of remorse for what's happened to them since Europeans settled Australia
You know nothing about these people & only "care" about them as it plays in to your woke agenda
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You literally said "the reason" indigenous tribes supported Cortés against the Aztecs reason was "the extreme cruelty of these people...human sacrifice was v common"
As much as you might strive to dehumanise the Aztecs and portray the Spaniards as a 'civilising' source, it is merely your own tendentious interpretation, not "historical fact".
For one, almost all of the historical accounts of the events come from Spanish sources; those taken from indigenous accounts were filtered by the Spaniards themselves, much of it burned, and much of the surviving record was written well after the events.
Secondly, you cannot possibly know that the "extreme cruelty" was the primary factor in the support of rival tribes, much less when human sacrifice was common to the belief systems of many Mesoamerican peoples.
Thirdly, that the Spaniards were supported by some indigenous tribes does not make them "better" invaders, since their own atrocities and widespread destruction of indigenous cultures are well documented.
Again, by your same logic, you could say the Naazis were good for Germany because a lot of Germans supported them.
Great logic that.
"genuine feeling of remorse for what's happened to [Australian aborigines] since Europeans settled Australia"
Pull the other one, it's got bells on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you're putting implications into my comments that aren't there
the Spaniards were better invaders than the native american tribes (who tried to invade & conquer eachother) as they were more technologically advanced simple as that
I know you can't get you head around it, because it's clear to me your thinking is very rigid & you want to pigeon hole people & their thoughts into categories like "naaazi" or "fascist" etc, but I genuinely do feel very sorry for the Aboriginals in Australia. They should have been left to continue living in the stone age were they where happy & well adjusted
posted on 19/10/24
I've quoted you literally on a lot of what you've said. Your constant denial of what you are is in stark contradiction with years of posts on this site.
posted on 19/10/24
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted 48 minutes ago
This reminds of when Peks said men were hard wired to be attracted to 13 year old girls but in reality he just means he’s a nonce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
👍
posted on 19/10/24
I never said that...nonsense
posted on 19/10/24
comment by Peks - Rabbit Proof since 1974 (U6618)
posted 36 seconds ago
I never said that...noncense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
12?
posted on 21/10/24
Can someone help me out with what this woman is saying? I think it's something along the lines of, "Thank you to your people for making me not special needs."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lDcSw399QU
posted on 21/10/24
Must be after a handout
posted on 21/10/24
comment by Peks - Rabbit Proof since 1974 (U6618)
posted 2 days ago
I never said that...nonsense
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You did say that Peks. If I cba I’ll find it. It was the day Mane’s marriage was reported.
posted on 21/10/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 22 minutes ago
Must be after a handout
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Idiot.^^^
Maybe she'd just like to collect the rent due for the last couple of hundred years.
posted on 21/10/24
that woman barely has any Aboriginal blood in her...that's blindingly obvious by the way she looks
she is far more coloniser than abused native
she should be paying reparations to the proper aboriginals just as much as the King , by her reckoning
posted on 21/10/24
comment by Peks - Rabbit Proof since 1974 (U6618)
posted 10 minutes ago
that woman barely has any Aboriginal blood in her...that's blindingly obvious by the way she looks
she is far more coloniser than abused native
she should be paying reparations to the proper aboriginals just as much as the King , by her reckoning
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe her granny shrugged a a super Uber mensch, sawdust brain.
posted on 21/10/24
Every thread, same people, same discussions.
posted on 21/10/24
I'm just saying what happened in a matter of fact impartial way, you're not
———
I love it when peks pretends he’s historically literate.
posted on 21/10/24
comment by Joshua The King Of Kings Zirkzee (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
I'm just saying what happened in a matter of fact impartial way, you're not
———
I love it when peks pretends he’s historically literate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. The guy claims he's not a fascist, but just last week he was bigging up the Spanish "volunteers" who sided the Germans in the Battle of Stalingrad. I believe they called them the Blue Waffle Brigade.
posted on 21/10/24
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 3 hours, 4 minutes ago
comment by Joshua The King Of Kings Zirkzee (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
I'm just saying what happened in a matter of fact impartial way, you're not
———
I love it when peks pretends he’s historically literate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. The guy claims he's not a fascist, but just last week he was bigging up the Spanish "volunteers" who sided the Germans in the Battle of Stalingrad. I believe they called them the Blue Waffle Brigade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also posted an image of the Cross of Burgundy the other day, the old flag of the Spanish Empire which the far right have embraced as one of their symbols of identity.
When he celebrates Spain's sporting victories, I quietly revel in the knowledge that it must be like a kick in the gut to him that they're largely thanks to Catalans, Basques and immigrants.
posted on 21/10/24
comment by ai'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 3 hours, 4 minutes ago
comment by Joshua The King Of Kings Zirkzee (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
I'm just saying what happened in a matter of fact impartial way, you're not
———
I love it when peks pretends he’s historically literate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. The guy claims he's not a fascist, but just last week he was bigging up the Spanish "volunteers" who sided the Germans in the Battle of Stalingrad. I believe they called them the Blue Waffle Brigade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also posted an image of the Cross of Burgundy the other day, the old flag of the Spanish Empire which the far right have embraced as one of their symbols of identity.
When he celebrates Spain's sporting victories, I quietly revel in the knowledge that it must be like a kick in the gut to him that they're largely thanks to Catalans, Basques and immigrants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Makes it even funnier when you remember he’s a scouser.
Page 6 of 7
6 | 7