posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
comment by Salah Time. (U23032)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by T-BAD (U11806)
posted 3 minutes ago
I think don't think with the injuries we had we were able to match you fully. Maybe we were too submissive but it's a fairly understandable approach
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe if there was 10-15 mins to go? But from what I saw it was most of the 2nd half. These tactics don't regularly win you championships and you're already a bit behind City so imo it was terrible management
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough. No offence, but even your post history today shows that your opinion isn't worth much weight.
You're obviously entitled to it, but you come across as kind of embarrassing to the other Liverpools fans.
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
comment by T-BAD (U11806)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Salah Time. (U23032)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by T-BAD (U11806)
posted 3 minutes ago
I think don't think with the injuries we had we were able to match you fully. Maybe we were too submissive but it's a fairly understandable approach
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe if there was 10-15 mins to go? But from what I saw it was most of the 2nd half. These tactics don't regularly win you championships and you're already a bit behind City so imo it was terrible management
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough. No offence, but even your post history today shows that your opinion isn't worth much weight.
You're obviously entitled to it, but you come across as kind of embarrassing to the other Liverpools fans.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
Both sets of fans will be slightly disappointed that they didn't win the game. But the Spurs and Nan Utd results gave cheered me up 😀
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
A good argument, well made. Got_Better would be proud
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
*Man Utd
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
comment by Ras Clar Teta (U22980)
posted 31 minutes ago
Both sets of fans will be slightly disappointed that they didn't win the game. But the Spurs and Nan Utd results gave cheered me up 😀
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't give a crap about the United or Spurs results. I just wanted a win today and unfortunately we couldn't break you down enough. We didn't really manufacture any clear chances apart from the two goals and second half that wasn't good enough when we dominated most of it. But when up against four centre backs and two defensive midfielders it's tough to create, even TAA struggled in that sense despite one of his trademark passes creating one of the goals.
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
And van dijk got nothing for kicking havertz. Liverpool fans man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kicking you opponent is allowed when your name is van Dijk.
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
And van dijk got nothing for kicking havertz. Liverpool fans man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kicking you opponent is allowed when your name is van Dijk.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wasn't allowed. You got a freekick. What are you talking about? Are you still claiming its violent conduct even after I pasted the law for you? I'll try again.
Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.
In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
And van dijk got nothing for kicking havertz. Liverpool fans man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kicking you opponent is allowed when your name is van Dijk.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wasn't allowed. You got a freekick. What are you talking about? Are you still claiming its violent conduct even after I pasted the law for you? I'll try again.
Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.
In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is. Straight red card should be the only answer.
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
Yeah well you got away with playing basketball last season so suck it up.
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 1 hour, 22 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
And van dijk got nothing for kicking havertz. Liverpool fans man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kicking you opponent is allowed when your name is van Dijk.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wasn't allowed. You got a freekick. What are you talking about? Are you still claiming its violent conduct even after I pasted the law for you? I'll try again.
Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.
In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is. Straight red card should be the only answer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like VvD should have been sent off by that explanation...
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 7 hours, 50 minutes ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 1 hour, 22 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
And van dijk got nothing for kicking havertz. Liverpool fans man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kicking you opponent is allowed when your name is van Dijk.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wasn't allowed. You got a freekick. What are you talking about? Are you still claiming its violent conduct even after I pasted the law for you? I'll try again.
Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.
In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is. Straight red card should be the only answer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like VvD should have been sent off by that explanation...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One of your players kicked the ball away and nothing was done
comment by Ras Clar Teta (U22980)
posted 28 minutes ago
One of your players kicked the ball away and nothing was done
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could have got a yellow for that tbf, if the ref thought he was trying to delay the free kick.
Really doubt Luis Diaz being on a yellow would have changed the game though.
Sign in if you want to comment
Arsenal 2 Liverpool 2
Page 5 of 5
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
comment by Salah Time. (U23032)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by T-BAD (U11806)
posted 3 minutes ago
I think don't think with the injuries we had we were able to match you fully. Maybe we were too submissive but it's a fairly understandable approach
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe if there was 10-15 mins to go? But from what I saw it was most of the 2nd half. These tactics don't regularly win you championships and you're already a bit behind City so imo it was terrible management
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough. No offence, but even your post history today shows that your opinion isn't worth much weight.
You're obviously entitled to it, but you come across as kind of embarrassing to the other Liverpools fans.
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
comment by T-BAD (U11806)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Salah Time. (U23032)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by T-BAD (U11806)
posted 3 minutes ago
I think don't think with the injuries we had we were able to match you fully. Maybe we were too submissive but it's a fairly understandable approach
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe if there was 10-15 mins to go? But from what I saw it was most of the 2nd half. These tactics don't regularly win you championships and you're already a bit behind City so imo it was terrible management
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough. No offence, but even your post history today shows that your opinion isn't worth much weight.
You're obviously entitled to it, but you come across as kind of embarrassing to the other Liverpools fans.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
Both sets of fans will be slightly disappointed that they didn't win the game. But the Spurs and Nan Utd results gave cheered me up 😀
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
A good argument, well made. Got_Better would be proud
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
*Man Utd
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
comment by Ras Clar Teta (U22980)
posted 31 minutes ago
Both sets of fans will be slightly disappointed that they didn't win the game. But the Spurs and Nan Utd results gave cheered me up 😀
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't give a crap about the United or Spurs results. I just wanted a win today and unfortunately we couldn't break you down enough. We didn't really manufacture any clear chances apart from the two goals and second half that wasn't good enough when we dominated most of it. But when up against four centre backs and two defensive midfielders it's tough to create, even TAA struggled in that sense despite one of his trademark passes creating one of the goals.
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
And van dijk got nothing for kicking havertz. Liverpool fans man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kicking you opponent is allowed when your name is van Dijk.
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
And van dijk got nothing for kicking havertz. Liverpool fans man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kicking you opponent is allowed when your name is van Dijk.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wasn't allowed. You got a freekick. What are you talking about? Are you still claiming its violent conduct even after I pasted the law for you? I'll try again.
Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.
In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
And van dijk got nothing for kicking havertz. Liverpool fans man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kicking you opponent is allowed when your name is van Dijk.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wasn't allowed. You got a freekick. What are you talking about? Are you still claiming its violent conduct even after I pasted the law for you? I'll try again.
Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.
In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is. Straight red card should be the only answer.
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
Yeah well you got away with playing basketball last season so suck it up.
posted 4 weeks, 1 day ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 1 hour, 22 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
And van dijk got nothing for kicking havertz. Liverpool fans man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kicking you opponent is allowed when your name is van Dijk.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wasn't allowed. You got a freekick. What are you talking about? Are you still claiming its violent conduct even after I pasted the law for you? I'll try again.
Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.
In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is. Straight red card should be the only answer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like VvD should have been sent off by that explanation...
posted 4 weeks ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 7 hours, 50 minutes ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 1 hour, 22 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke (U3732)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
And van dijk got nothing for kicking havertz. Liverpool fans man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kicking you opponent is allowed when your name is van Dijk.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wasn't allowed. You got a freekick. What are you talking about? Are you still claiming its violent conduct even after I pasted the law for you? I'll try again.
Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made.
In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is. Straight red card should be the only answer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like VvD should have been sent off by that explanation...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted 4 weeks ago
One of your players kicked the ball away and nothing was done
posted 4 weeks ago
comment by Ras Clar Teta (U22980)
posted 28 minutes ago
One of your players kicked the ball away and nothing was done
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could have got a yellow for that tbf, if the ref thought he was trying to delay the free kick.
Really doubt Luis Diaz being on a yellow would have changed the game though.
Page 5 of 5