comment by I'm not as think as you drunk I am.......Schizophrenia was my idea!.....No it wasn't!.....You are never alone with a Schizo :D (U2115)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by JFK - Super Nintendo Chalmers (U8919)
posted 1 minute ago
We are on for another treble.

Rangers winning a couple of old firm games doesnt change that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is our incredibly compfy blanket.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Group snuggle
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No teddy bears allowed

As Zach would say ‘Ue can stick yer orang banners up yet rse’ 😂

comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competent Wullie Collum (U3633)
posted 2 minutes ago
As Zach would say ‘Ue can stick yer orang banners up yet rse’ 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not sure he would.

comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 22 hours, 52 minutes ago
comment by ScotlandsBest (U9258)
posted 47 minutes ago
Alistair Johnston – 7
One of Celtic’s more consistent performers on the day. Defended well, put in a shift up and down the right flank, and delivered some dangerous crosses.

From " The Celts Are aHere"

Some Celtic fans on here don't agree.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why the name / number change, 67?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Canny mind really...think a wiz bored

Fvk the fitba check out these chicks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PwDFddpo4c&t=115s

These are the days of miracles and wonder.

2nd time in 3 days I've said congrats to the Bears.

Unprecedented.

2 games they scored 4 and conceded 4.

comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted about 2 hours ago

Fvk the fitba check out these chicks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PwDFddpo4c&t=115s







----------------------------------------------------------------------
Remarkable

It's a dead rubber. I don't blame the players for not bothering their erse. Do any of you still get excited about pumping the same missus year after year? Of course you don't.
------------------------------------------------------------------

You say you get bored pumping her but you still seem to get awfy excited at the prospect of seeing her getting pumped by someone else.

Give her a bit of credit - at least she tried to spice it up a bit at the weekend. Unfortunately you didnt seem to like being squirted on....

etc etc

the old firm games have been quite odd this season.

first one, celtic, easily, 3-0 win.

the second - rangers first half, celtic second half, celtic edge it.

the third, rangers, easily, 3-0 win.

fourth - rangers first half, celtic second half, rangers edge it.

the backward passing at celtic has to stop. you can't claim to be a team thats comfortable in possession but your midfield and defence can shirk responsibility and just keep sending it back to the keeper.

The goalkeeper who is forced to play the forward pass that the midfield and defence were too cowardly to play themselves, it's a real lack of responsibility.

comment by JFK - Super Nintendo Chalmers (U8919)
posted 12 minutes ago
the backward passing at celtic has to stop. you can't claim to be a team thats comfortable in possession but your midfield and defence can shirk responsibility and just keep sending it back to the keeper.

The goalkeeper who is forced to play the forward pass that the midfield and defence were too cowardly to play themselves, it's a real lack of responsibility.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hoofball

comment by JFK - Super Nintendo Chalmers (U8919)
posted 27 minutes ago
the old firm games have been quite odd this season.

first one, celtic, easily, 3-0 win.

the second - rangers first half, celtic second half, celtic edge it.

the third, rangers, easily, 3-0 win.

fourth - rangers first half, celtic second half, rangers edge it.



----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whats more perprplexing given the above is that;

the league - Celtic strolled it

If Celtic rock up at Ibrox with their flip flops on having secured the league already and Rangers win that game then surely it must be the first time one of the OF has won 9 points out of 12 in head to heads but lost the league by double digits.

Rangers gift wrapped the title and handed it to celtic by clinging on to Clement for so long.

I dont think we have the squad to win the league but we could at least have put some pressure on Celtic if we had made the change sooner - and when most fans were calling for it.

celtic have a chance to get their house in order for next season, i feel like if the league was closer we would look more up for it than we have been.

the problems at celtic aren't going to change because they are ego driven by the manager, its brendans style to pass the ball about the back 4, he is fine with that we have seen it plenty from him.

celtic cant play that way, we dont get enough practice at it in domestic football.

It definitely should be more interesting next season.

Of course anything can happen with the takeover but in theory if a well run sporting organisation comes in that has some money to invest, can put a couple of well aligned experienced and qualified guys on the board, that bring their established recruitment analytics models wrt players and even a manager, then Ranger have the potential to move up a couple of levels pretty quickly.

No Rangers fan is under any illusion that the way club has been run has been shambolic for years. Its been far to easy for celtic to sweep everything up with no real challenge.

As much as agree there is a chasm in how the clubs have been run I dont think there is such a chasm between the teams. Rangers runs in europe and the last three OF games have shown there is a basis of a decent team there.

The 'rebuild' was only about 60% complete last two transfer windows and it wasnt entirely successful. Its been clear all season where our weaknesses were in squad in terms of sheer numbers and quality. But when most folk are fit we can do ok. Nowhere near enough to win a league but enough to show promise.

But there are 7 or 8 players there I would keep that you could consider good enough to challenge regularly for a first team slot that you could really add to.

I am optimistic about the takeover. I think it could truly transform Rangers and hopefully the era of free trophies for Celtic can be put to bed.

i'm not fussed on the takeover, its more lucrative to put money into leeds and they dont really seem to have done that.

dont get me wrong, all rangers need to start with is to be managed better in the boardroom. Scotlands a fickle enough league that they just need to start beating the other teams and hope more than 50% of the old firm games go their way.

Celtic need to toughen up, its a riddy that "get intae them" is enough to make us panic.

I see the rangers players couldn't behave at full time and caused a lot of trouble.

What is it with them and this nonsense? You never see any other clubs players behave like this.

comment by JFK - Super Nintendo Chalmers (U8919)
posted 21 minutes ago
i'm not fussed on the takeover, its more lucrative to put money into leeds and they dont really seem to have done that.

dont get me wrong, all rangers need to start with is to be managed better in the boardroom. Scotlands a fickle enough league that they just need to start beating the other teams and hope more than 50% of the old firm games go their way.

Celtic need to toughen up, its a riddy that "get intae them" is enough to make us panic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They had a 100m net spend in their first 2 years at Leeds, 2m net spend season 3.

130m positive year 4 and they sit top of the Championship.

I think that's looks like a good omen, front loading the investment at then selling when the time is right.

comment by Timmy (U14278)
posted 3 minutes ago
I see the rangers players couldn't behave at full time and caused a lot of trouble.

What is it with them and this nonsense? You never see any other clubs players behave like this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's cause you only watch us you mad cant

when you look at outs vs in though, accoridng to transfer market of course, its odd reading.

22/23 spent more than they brought in but they still brought in 100 million and thats when they were in the premiership.

23/24 - spent roughly what they brought in

24/25 - 130 million difference in what they brought in v what they spent.

point is, they arent going to spend megabucks without bringing in cash surely

comment by JFK - Super Nintendo Chalmers (U8919)
posted 39 minutes ago
when you look at outs vs in though, accoridng to transfer market of course, its odd reading.

22/23 spent more than they brought in but they still brought in 100 million and thats when they were in the premiership.

23/24 - spent roughly what they brought in

24/25 - 130 million difference in what they brought in v what they spent.

point is, they arent going to spend megabucks without bringing in cash surely
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think the three recent OF games and our Euro run show they dont need to spend megabucks.

There is the core of a decent team there. They just need to plug the gaps in the squad and add a few of the right types of players that can help us beat the block.

Celtic have winger and a target man they can call on to mix it up when all else fails. We dont.

If the 49ers dudes put in say £25m which bought us 5 or 6 of the right £4-5m players and added another 3 or 4 very strong Bosmans to that then our squad would be in a very happy place. Probably a couple of levels above where it is now.

Yes there has to be outgoings to balance the wages for that but its not too difficult to identify 8-10 players currently still on the books we would happily offload.

i cant see rangers getting in 5 or 6 players at 5 million a pop.

celtic need work. tierney if he is fit is massive for us.

we need a CB who can organise the defence, that was absolute chaos yesterday and its not an isolated incident, the slightest press and we panic.

a cdm in fron of them, absolute must.

comment by JFK - Super Nintendo Chalmers (U8919)
posted 2 hours, 18 minutes ago
celtic have a chance to get their house in order for next season, i feel like if the league was closer we would look more up for it than we have been.

the problems at celtic aren't going to change because they are ego driven by the manager, its brendans style to pass the ball about the back 4, he is fine with that we have seen it plenty from him.

celtic cant play that way, we dont get enough practice at it in domestic football.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it is less the practice of it than if you're going to do it you have to be damn good at it because it is going nowhere if you keep giving the ball away under pressure and we are not good enough at it. He'll still bleat about doing it better.

The penny should have dropped when Calmac was out. Instead of hubris that the £11m man could do the job just accept that a derby will be a battle, a midfield battle - win the battle & win the war. In hindsight, should have maybe matched up in there moving AJ up and putting Ralston in or putting GT in front of Schlupp cos we were relying on one winger anyway.

comment by JFK - Super Nintendo Chalmers (U8919)
posted 12 minutes ago
i cant see rangers getting in 5 or 6 players at 5 million a pop.

celtic need work. tierney if he is fit is massive for us.

we need a CB who can organise the defence, that was absolute chaos yesterday and its not an isolated incident, the slightest press and we panic.

a cdm in fron of them, absolute must.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CCV & Rocky cutting about like a pair of mute swans.

You should write Rodgers a letter.

I think the three recent OF games
---
Can't be *that* recent.

i cant see rangers getting in 5 or 6 players at 5 million a pop.

celtic need work. tierney if he is fit is massive for us.
---
Do you know, I actually wouldn't be against this. I think we need the arms-race aspect to buck us up a wee bit. I know Rangers have done well in Europe recently, but how nice would it be to have two improved teams there?