Well I was close... with my prediction of 75 for none by lunch
what the hell's going on with blofeld's commentary ? he was trying to take the mickey out of viv's english a minute ago, and now he's jsut changed his mind on whether an appeal was out about 6 times.
You shouldn't lose a review for that, If it's umpire's call then you should keep the review that you've used
Oh my dear old thing.....
I'm reading on cricinfo & they said it looked out. I'm 100% for DRS but if it's out then it's out.
SIMPLES
lmao.. he nicked that one
Trott's got to go and make a ton now after being LBW and just snicking off
You shouldn't lose a review for that, If it's umpire's call then you should keep the review that you've used
=====================
im amazed at how many of them are umpire's calls.
im quite comfrtable with it as it is tbh. i wouldnt want to see the umpires becoming redundant.
you two....get a shift on
It worked!!!
Sammy to Strauss, FOUR, 124.2 kph, ptiched up, back-foot punch down the ground and there are fielders diving all over the place, like pest controllers trying to catch a rat, the ball evading at least three dives on its way to the rope
Who's on the thread then? Where's JT??
Trott's nick just there proves that almost every1 is hypocritical.
Why shouldn't a fielding claim a catch when it wasn't when its perfectly OK for a batsman to not walk if he edges it.
Its got to be both are OK or none are.
On a side note, hope this does a lot for Strauss's confidence
I didn't see it Viren - would trott have known?
Where's Narine, Shillingford, Bishoo?
Does Sammy know he's allowed to pick a spinner?
Sign in if you want to comment
*England v West Indies Live Match Thread*
Page 11 of 21
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16
posted on 18/5/12
Well I was close... with my prediction of 75 for none by lunch
posted on 18/5/12
what the hell's going on with blofeld's commentary ? he was trying to take the mickey out of viv's english a minute ago, and now he's jsut changed his mind on whether an appeal was out about 6 times.
posted on 18/5/12
You shouldn't lose a review for that, If it's umpire's call then you should keep the review that you've used
posted on 18/5/12
Oh my dear old thing.....
posted on 18/5/12
I'm reading on cricinfo & they said it looked out. I'm 100% for DRS but if it's out then it's out.
SIMPLES
posted on 18/5/12
lmao.. he nicked that one
posted on 18/5/12
Trott's got to go and make a ton now after being LBW and just snicking off
posted on 18/5/12
You shouldn't lose a review for that, If it's umpire's call then you should keep the review that you've used
=====================
im amazed at how many of them are umpire's calls.
im quite comfrtable with it as it is tbh. i wouldnt want to see the umpires becoming redundant.
posted on 18/5/12
Trott edged that.
posted on 18/5/12
Trott
posted on 18/5/12
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
posted on 18/5/12
you two....get a shift on
posted on 18/5/12
10 off the over...
posted on 18/5/12
posted on 18/5/12
That worked then....
posted on 18/5/12
posted on 18/5/12
It worked!!!
Sammy to Strauss, FOUR, 124.2 kph, ptiched up, back-foot punch down the ground and there are fielders diving all over the place, like pest controllers trying to catch a rat, the ball evading at least three dives on its way to the rope
posted on 18/5/12
Strauss
posted on 18/5/12
Keep it going, captain
posted on 18/5/12
Who's on the thread then? Where's JT??
posted on 18/5/12
well done Strauss..<ok.
posted on 18/5/12
Trott's nick just there proves that almost every1 is hypocritical.
Why shouldn't a fielding claim a catch when it wasn't when its perfectly OK for a batsman to not walk if he edges it.
Its got to be both are OK or none are.
posted on 18/5/12
On a side note, hope this does a lot for Strauss's confidence
posted on 18/5/12
I didn't see it Viren - would trott have known?
posted on 18/5/12
Where's Narine, Shillingford, Bishoo?
Does Sammy know he's allowed to pick a spinner?
Page 11 of 21
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16