"You do know your posts are tantamount to "I know you are" don't you?

Be a good boy and think up something for yourself. Or at the very least document where you think I have used a soundbite and back up your spurious and unfounded aspertions.

Personally I don't think you're capable."

You do realise that you are using (your version of) clever wordplay to again not address my post right? For your benefit (since clicking and reading is not something you have graduated to, yet), I reattach my post:
""Giroud record built in the most part on lower league football? Yes

Podolski dropped at Bayern and had an average strike rate in a weaker league? Yes.

Cazorla start for Spain? No."

Still not clear how it makes him a French Grant Holt, or Podolski a German reject. How is it factual? Drogba's record was mostly lower league till a certain stage in his career. So was Grant Holt, the English Drogba? And what exactly is a German reject?

And regarding your appraisal, what kind of analysis have you done? Please do state how many club games you have seen of Giroud (especially lower league ones of course) and Podolski (since according to you your appraisals are so correct , while none of us have been blessed with your foreign-league-watching abilities)"

Please answer? And please tell me how "French Grant Holt" is an original soundbite and you have thought of it yourself? It almost seems like you are making <shit> up and trying to compensate for an absolute dearth of knowledge, you know.

Lets see if you respond (with common sense and some grace, because if so you'll receive an answer with the same ingredients). I know you're capable.

Yeah, it was. Gary Neville actually wrote an article about that. Whatever they aimed to do. It certainly worked.

Samir (U2630)

Ok. Think you're a very good poster for what that is worth.

Cereal Spiller - apparently Chamakh's goal bonus is stored in a piggy bank (U12126)

I've seen Giroud play about 5 -8 times tops. Not great I know but I think he lacks pace to be a threat or the touch (although good for a big man) to play up top on his own which I think is what Wenger will ask him to play. I just don't see it in him. He does score different types of goals though and I do like that but ultimately I don't rate the league, especially defensively. The vast majority of success has come in the lower leagues and as such I'm not sure about him at all. Drogba did also come from the lower leagues but there are some glaring differences.

Podolski is direct but for me not all that. In fairness I think he will suit this league due to power and pace but again I'm not rating the league too highly. His record, even from playing on the left, does not put the fear of god into me. I've seen him play a lot and I find him one dimensional. I think a good defender would be able to shackle him.

Cazorla - could destroy this league. Could go missing. Not sure. Saw a bit of him in Europe and the odd game in Spain.

I've made nothing up. You handle yourself with a severe lack of grace. Why didn't you just write that instead of coming across as an angry child?

Thats a much better response, and while I don't agree with your points, I do get where you are coming from.

As for the last sentence, you once again spoil a nicely written post with total barf (still not commenting on "French Grant Holt" - I'm confused, is that a soundbite, or have you made it up) None of what any of us are writing sounds like its written by an "angry child". And you are not exactly proving your maturity by jumping to rhetoric when you actually had a chance to come across as a well-reasoning individual.

Really?

So you didn't call me a ret*rd, bring Adam and Downing into it with a "My Dad is bigger than yours" style argument or call me stupid instead of reasoning otherwise then?

You're full of it I'm afraid.

"So you didn't call me a ret*rd,"
No I didn't
" bring Adam and Downing into it with a "My Dad is bigger than yours" style argument"
No I didn't. And I'm not really clear how that is relevant, or was a response to you?

Still don't get your point?

comment by Cereal Spiller - apparently Chamakh's goal bonus is stored in a piggy bank (U12126)
posted 1 hour, 25 minutes ago

Except that it isn't. Unles factual actually means "retar*ed"
-----------------------------------------

comment by Cereal Spiller - apparently Chamakh's goal bonus is stored in a piggy bank (U12126)
posted 54 minutes ago

Please be kidding. It breaks my heart to think you are just that stupid."
---------------------------------------------

comment by Cereal Spiller - apparently Chamakh's goal bonus is stored in a piggy bank (U12126)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
adam and downing would be the new gillett and hicks
------------------------------

I think a lot of the posts from your fans are childish and angry.

I think a lot of the posts from your fans are childish and angry.

--------------------

Can't argue with the childish part but I don't care enough about your opinion to even get close to anger.

Sorry if that sounds harsh.

I don't think any arsenal fans actually get angry about stuff on here

"Except that it isn't. Unles factual actually means "retar*ed""

That was a response to your childish and totally unqualified statement.

"Please be kidding. It breaks my heart to think you are just that stupid.""

I didn't even say that. That was Melo

"adam and downing would be the new gillett and hicks"
That was a response to Sir Digby...how exactly is that relevant to you

If you think our fans are so childish and angry, why visit our forum? I personally don't think Liverpool fans in general are "angry", they are childish sometimes though but almost every fan here is. You on the other hand do seem to have anger management issues

"Please be kidding. It breaks my heart to think you are just that stupid.""

I didn't even say that. That was Melo

------------------

Another informative and thought-provoking contribution by everyone's favourite , Melo.

"Another informative and thought-provoking contribution by everyone's favourite , Melo."

Don't insult Melo. I love Melo
Melo

Cerial;

Oh my mistake. It's just the way it appeared under your name and user ID. Must be a glitch.

I'm angry?

Yeah what with my lack of insults, responding to requests by answering posts and giving out praise I can see where you get that.

Lack of insults, didn't you just call our fans childish and angry?

"Okay but if people are going to start insults they need to back up their aspertions otherwise you look like children. Not that anyone would accuse the Arsenal 606 users of being young of course."

Sounds like a happy camper to me

Straight out of Viz them eh?

Man up please. How is saying that you're angry an insult? Both are observations.

Apparently this is me

Oh they're "observations" now.

When will you childish gooners learn...He's the adult here!

We must do as he says not as he does

Cereal;

How's your request with the clutching at straws smiley going?

It's a reasoned and structured post and anger by it's very nature denotes a lack of control.

You're not very good at this are you.

guys this is a serious forum for serious people only, silliness is not allowed You must all come here for heavy discussion not enjoyment

Good at what? Do you get a payrise from honing your skills on this site or something?

Donald Vito (U4098)

Yep. Of course. It's actually obvious.

it quite clearly shows he is the dominant male on the site as his discussion skills are top notch