601

Why would the US fire a missile at the pentagon?

Where are the passengers that were booked on the flight?

.................

And:

Where is the airplane itself?

Why did all the eyewitness lie, when they said thay saw the plane hit the Pentagon.

I like the Bermuda triangle stuff

There is definitely something there that eventually will get solved

VC

Just out of interest, is the Pentagon in a remote area or a builtup area?

Presumably, the plane/missile actualy made a noise before it hit and one or two people might just have thought. what the fek is that loud noise and looked up?

Are there any actual confirmed sitings of a missile? I simply cannot believe a missile could travel through the air towards the Pentagon both invisibly and without sound

by UnitedRedMacca-The Original Rooney Fanboy (U2024)
posted 31 seconds ago
VC

Just out of interest, is the Pentagon in a remote area or a builtup area?

..............

It is a massive built up area, a stones throw from the Potomac and Washington DC.

Three major highways go around it into DC. Coming up the I 395, you can't miss seeing it,amd on that road alone at that tome of day, at least 100 cars would have been in a position to see the plane fly intop the building.

Then you have Crystal City that houses around 200,000 people, that overlooks the pentagon.

so for the record metro was it flight 77 that hit the pentagon in your view?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You're asking me to theorise.
=================

in other words "no"- thanks!

Haha ok VC

Seems very feasible that the US government could fly a missile into the Pentagon without it being seen then

Perhaps the outer shell was mirrored and it was a hybrid missile that could run on electricity under 30mph and so remain silent

Maybe they even installed missile launch pads across the road years earlier without being seen. What's good enough for WTC7.......

Bit late to the party here, but when it comes to 9/11, I've found this to be the best argument against conspiracy theories:

How a conspiracy theoriest would carry out 9/11:
Secretly fill 2 of the largest towers in the world with hundreds of tonnes of top-secret silent explosives, hoping no staff memeber or janitor ever comes across them. Also rig up WTC7, for some reason.
Hijack 4 planes and fly them secretly to Area 51, hoping no radar station notices them missing, then kill all of the passengers & air crew. Fly 2 drone fighter jets into WTC, launch a missile into side of Pentagon & crash a fake passenger aircraft into a field, again hoping that nobody notices the lack of wreckage or that the planes are the wrong shape. Also, fake the final phone calls to all of the families involved, using highly talented voice actors.

How the CIA would carry out 9/11:
Travel to the Middle East and fund some Islamic extremists.

I like the Bermuda triangle stuff

There is definitely something there that eventually will get solved
----------------------------
Apparently its already been proven to be due to the Gulf Stream.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
Metro

That isn't proof.

Jesus, you are gullible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh dear - what on earth are you talking about?

You stated that it's not millions that doubt the official story

I then post a link that blew you out of the water

you then respond with 'that's not proof'

You're talking out of your backside as usual.

As for the missile comment. If you go back to the original thread, I stated that I doubt the official story.

You're struggling here - that's clear

The Bermuda Triangle is just another myth like the Loch Ness Monster. The number of ships & planes lost aren't any greater than you'd expect from a busy shipping lane.

I don't know why people like to believe in such myths, when real life is so much more interesting: http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/figures/PIA17172_fig2.jpg

That's a photo of Saturn eclipsing the Sun, taken from a probe 1.5 billion kilometres from Earth. Earth incedently, is seen as nothing more than a blueish speck in the bottom-right of the image.
That's much more interesting than a mythical triangle of water.

The Bermuda Triangle is just another myth like the Loch Ness Monster.
---------------------------------
Anyone see the programme about the Yeti a couple of weeks ago? Expected the DNA analysis of hair samples to prove to be something mundane like a dog or native species of bear..

Two samples collected in different Himalayan countries by 2 different people at different times both proved to be a match for a 40,000 year old species of polar bear. Interesting (...well I thought so anyway)

"The Bermuda Triangle is just another myth"

heathen

I then post a link that blew you out of the water

..........

Your link was a poll, not the actual view of the population, you cretin.

is this still goin on

If you go back to the original thread, I stated that I doubt the official story.

..........

In your opinion, what do you think happened at the Pentagon, just so that we can have it on record.

Me, I am going with the official version on that one.

My opinion is based on the fact that on my way home on that fateful day I drove past that part of the Pentagon where a bloody great hole was visible in the side of it, and it was still on fire.

The reasons why I believe this was an aircraft are many.

1. The bloody great hole and fire did not appear by themselves. This was not done as an internal job, and there is no evidence to support that there was.

2. Eyewitnesses said they saw the an aircraft crash into the pentagon.

3. An aircraft full of passengers can not be accounted for, if it didn't fly into the Penatgon.

If you go back to the original thread, I stated that I doubt the official story.

..........

In your opinion, what do you think happened at the Pentagon, just so that we can have it on record.

Me, I am going with the official version on that one.
.......

First of all I accept your apology of putting comments in my mouth.

Secondly, I do not know what happened at the Pentagon, nor at Shanksville.

It would be futile for me to suggest alternatives - that would be theorising.

I doubt the official story - it's as simple as that

Secondly, I do not know what happened at the Pentagon, nor at Shanksville.
=======

what are you unclear about wrt the pentagon and shanksville?

Joely I refer you to:

http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/229831

Where you can see Metro's full views on 9/11

"Bermuda Triangle"?

Awful song. Not one of Manilows best...

Classic line from JAG fifteen odd years ago.

Bud says to Mac ' Maam do you know how many planes and ships have dissapeared in the Bermuda Triangle"

Mac deadpans him with "Do you know how many haven't".

The Brentford Triangle has more credibility.

Bermuda Triangle?

I have always believed that there were three sides to that story.

Joely I refer you to:

http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/229831

Where you can see Metro's full views on 9/11
======

Robert van persie.

I took part in that debate. the problem with metro is that when he is faced with overwhelming facts he will come back at you with claims which have no basis or fact. for instance the pentagon is a classic example. there are 2 possible outcomes

1-it was flight 77
2-it was not flight 77

facts supporting outcome 1 include forensic debris, the cockpit recorder etc
facts supporting outcome 2 include....well nothing!

with regards to flight 93 there is no physical evidence whatsoever to support that it was shot down. there is overwhelming evidence to prove it was not shot down