comment by There'sOnlyOneReds(Spurs 0-5 LFC Know your place (U1721)posted 1 minute agocomment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga... (U1308) posted 2 minutes agocomment by There'sOnlyOneReds(Spurs 0-5 LFC Know your place(U1721)====That listing is just your personal opinion.----------------------------------------------------------------------As was his assertion that Everton have a better squad. Which players would you debate in my personal opinion?
====<
Why debate, you will stick with what you believe no matter what. You are more stubborn than I am
We're we not discussing why we finished above you.
And the chances of repeating it this season?
Next season will take care of itself.
As you pointed out earlier,who knows what will happen
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds(Spurs 0-5 LFC Know your place (U1721)
The monetary value of a player is of no consequence unless you wanted to sell them.
Are you telling us Liverpool are a selling club now or are you just talking nonsense again
comment by The Voice Of Reason (U19014)
posted 4 seconds ago
We're we not discussing why we finished above you.
----------------------
He asked me why you finished above us.
You don't own your best players. They're not yours and then some of you talk about how much the squad cost. How stupid is that?
So as the general consensus on here.
Your view is in the minority ( of one)
Not stupid at all.
It is fact
Anyone can take advantage of the loan system.
Some managers are more on the ball than others
That was to Toor re minority
Why loan out Borini and then take Moses on loan...utter utter madness I tell you
I'm just saying it pretty silly to have a pound for pound value on squads discussion when 3 of your best players cost no pounds.
As I said.
There are loans...and there are loans
How much did Gerrard cost you btw
Robbing,
You don't understand my original question either do you?
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga... (U1308)
posted 10 minutes ago
Sorry TOOR but you said Everton players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are former players, Everton players? I'll answer that for you. No. They are former players. Sorry.
No, it's stupid to have a pound for pound conversation when you've got players that you've loaned as the ones that you think swing the argument. The article is just smacks of insecure opportunism to me.
comment by The Voice Of Reason (U19014)
posted 2 minutes ago
Robbing,
You don't understand my original question either do you?
------------------
Yes I do. I don't think you even attempt to take on board other peoples point of view though.
comment by phil neville has three left feet (U13806)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds(Spurs 0-5 LFC Know your place(U1721)
The monetary value of a player is of no consequence unless you wanted to sell them.
Are you telling us Liverpool are a selling club now or are you just talking nonsense again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely the value of a squad is a factor in determining who has the most value for money? If not then I'm insane! Am I insane Phil? Am I?!
The article is just smacks of insecure opportunism to me.
Explain
comment by phil neville has three left feet (U13806)
posted 5 minutes ago
Why loan out Borini and then take Moses on loan...utter utter madness I tell you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because Borini needed games and to play more as a striker to recover confidence after a bad injury. He has got that and it's going well.
comment by The Voice Of Reason (U19014)
posted 4 minutes ago
Robbing,
You don't understand my original question either do you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think you understand your question.
urely the value of a squad is a factor in determining who has the most value for money? If not then I'm insane! Am I insane Phil? Am I?!
Here we have the nub of the argument.Gaining more point over you in the league over the last 2 seasons with a squad that cost far less to assemble denotes Everton have the better value for money squad
Not at all Robbing,I will debate and accept the other point of view.
But feel it a duty to point out if the person opposite does not grasp the root of the debate.
My original question was plain and simple.
It asked the question of both squads for THIS SEASON.
Players may leave both squads next season,we can debate that if and when that situation arises.
For now we are debating this seasons squads
comment by phil neville has three left feet (U13806)
posted 25 seconds ago
urely the value of a squad is a factor in determining who has the most value for money? If not then I'm insane! Am I insane Phil? Am I?!
Here we have the nub of the argument.Gaining more point over you in the league over the last 2 seasons with a squad that cost far less to assemble denotes Everton have the better value for money squad
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not sure it does Phil. I'm even more unsure as to why two years are used. Why that timeframe Phillip?
"Am I insane phil?Am I?
Probably not.
Very highly strung though
4 years then...you were above us the first 2 seasons but we have been above you the past 2.We are currently a point apart this season.So again value wise we have the best value for money squad here and now 7th jan 2014
comment by The Voice Of Reason (U19014)
posted 8 seconds ago
"Am I insane phil?Am I?
Probably not.
Very highly strung though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You need to be strung.
Sign in if you want to comment
POUND FOR POUND CHAMPION
Page 11 of 15
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
posted on 7/1/14
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds(Spurs 0-5 LFC Know your place (U1721)posted 1 minute agocomment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga... (U1308) posted 2 minutes agocomment by There'sOnlyOneReds(Spurs 0-5 LFC Know your place(U1721)====That listing is just your personal opinion.----------------------------------------------------------------------As was his assertion that Everton have a better squad. Which players would you debate in my personal opinion?
====<
Why debate, you will stick with what you believe no matter what. You are more stubborn than I am
posted on 7/1/14
We're we not discussing why we finished above you.
And the chances of repeating it this season?
Next season will take care of itself.
As you pointed out earlier,who knows what will happen
posted on 7/1/14
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds(Spurs 0-5 LFC Know your place (U1721)
The monetary value of a player is of no consequence unless you wanted to sell them.
Are you telling us Liverpool are a selling club now or are you just talking nonsense again
posted on 7/1/14
comment by The Voice Of Reason (U19014)
posted 4 seconds ago
We're we not discussing why we finished above you.
----------------------
He asked me why you finished above us.
You don't own your best players. They're not yours and then some of you talk about how much the squad cost. How stupid is that?
posted on 7/1/14
So as the general consensus on here.
Your view is in the minority ( of one)
posted on 7/1/14
Not stupid at all.
It is fact
Anyone can take advantage of the loan system.
Some managers are more on the ball than others
posted on 7/1/14
That was to Toor re minority
posted on 7/1/14
Why loan out Borini and then take Moses on loan...utter utter madness I tell you
posted on 7/1/14
I'm just saying it pretty silly to have a pound for pound value on squads discussion when 3 of your best players cost no pounds.
posted on 7/1/14
As I said.
There are loans...and there are loans
posted on 7/1/14
How much did Gerrard cost you btw
posted on 7/1/14
Robbing,
You don't understand my original question either do you?
posted on 7/1/14
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga... (U1308)
posted 10 minutes ago
Sorry TOOR but you said Everton players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are former players, Everton players? I'll answer that for you. No. They are former players. Sorry.
posted on 7/1/14
No, it's stupid to have a pound for pound conversation when you've got players that you've loaned as the ones that you think swing the argument. The article is just smacks of insecure opportunism to me.
posted on 7/1/14
comment by The Voice Of Reason (U19014)
posted 2 minutes ago
Robbing,
You don't understand my original question either do you?
------------------
Yes I do. I don't think you even attempt to take on board other peoples point of view though.
posted on 7/1/14
comment by phil neville has three left feet (U13806)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds(Spurs 0-5 LFC Know your place(U1721)
The monetary value of a player is of no consequence unless you wanted to sell them.
Are you telling us Liverpool are a selling club now or are you just talking nonsense again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely the value of a squad is a factor in determining who has the most value for money? If not then I'm insane! Am I insane Phil? Am I?!
posted on 7/1/14
The article is just smacks of insecure opportunism to me.
Explain
posted on 7/1/14
comment by phil neville has three left feet (U13806)
posted 5 minutes ago
Why loan out Borini and then take Moses on loan...utter utter madness I tell you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because Borini needed games and to play more as a striker to recover confidence after a bad injury. He has got that and it's going well.
posted on 7/1/14
comment by The Voice Of Reason (U19014)
posted 4 minutes ago
Robbing,
You don't understand my original question either do you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think you understand your question.
posted on 7/1/14
urely the value of a squad is a factor in determining who has the most value for money? If not then I'm insane! Am I insane Phil? Am I?!
Here we have the nub of the argument.Gaining more point over you in the league over the last 2 seasons with a squad that cost far less to assemble denotes Everton have the better value for money squad
posted on 7/1/14
Not at all Robbing,I will debate and accept the other point of view.
But feel it a duty to point out if the person opposite does not grasp the root of the debate.
My original question was plain and simple.
It asked the question of both squads for THIS SEASON.
Players may leave both squads next season,we can debate that if and when that situation arises.
For now we are debating this seasons squads
posted on 7/1/14
comment by phil neville has three left feet (U13806)
posted 25 seconds ago
urely the value of a squad is a factor in determining who has the most value for money? If not then I'm insane! Am I insane Phil? Am I?!
Here we have the nub of the argument.Gaining more point over you in the league over the last 2 seasons with a squad that cost far less to assemble denotes Everton have the better value for money squad
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not sure it does Phil. I'm even more unsure as to why two years are used. Why that timeframe Phillip?
posted on 7/1/14
"Am I insane phil?Am I?
Probably not.
Very highly strung though
posted on 7/1/14
4 years then...you were above us the first 2 seasons but we have been above you the past 2.We are currently a point apart this season.So again value wise we have the best value for money squad here and now 7th jan 2014
posted on 7/1/14
comment by The Voice Of Reason (U19014)
posted 8 seconds ago
"Am I insane phil?Am I?
Probably not.
Very highly strung though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You need to be strung.
Page 11 of 15
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15