Silva is a slower version Fellaini.

Yeah, Dubbed, it's close between the two of them, but I prefer Silva.

The difference between Silva, and Cazorla + Mata is too much to be placing him with them.

All four are top players though.

8bit

Mata has style, his entance was out of this world. A helicopter and a sexy suit. He reminds me of bollywood superstar Akshay Kumar.

The Spanish selectors are in for a lot of grief for Brazil. A lot of big names this season won't be on that plane.

To be honest it's a Mata of who the best is between Slva and Ozil and Mesut just edges it for me. Juan is just below that bracket

"He reminds me of bollywood superstar Akshay Kumar."

Out of all the celebrities you pick some guy from Bollywood?
Well that pretty much sums you up. Go and watch cricket mate.

comment by Infamous Ninja (U18090)
posted 1 minute ago
Mata has style, his entance was out of this world. A helicopter and a sexy suit. He reminds me of bollywood superstar Akshay Kumar.
________________________________________________

Wait..... What?

All very good players. Overt he last 2 years you would have toe ah it's pretty close between 3 of those, but Cazorla isn't quite on their level IMO.

I've always seen Ozil as a player who is great when he going is good, he rarely won a game for Madrid when the chips were down. Although he is a player I've always loved to watch.

Cazorla is every bit as good as Mata. In fact, I read somewhere that Spaniards rate him higher than Mata. Could kinda see it when the national team manager constantly picks Cazorla over him.

comment by Dubbed The New Wenger- (U18614)
posted 31 seconds ago
Cazorla is every bit as good as Mata. In fact, I read somewhere that Spaniards rate him higher than Mata. Could kinda see it when the national team manager constantly picks Cazorla over him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's the managers personal choice dubbed, like mourinho's personal choice was to bench him, didn't stop Chelsea fans voting him their poty 2 years running did it?

just reading through the thread, it genuinely surprises me how some people just write cazorla off.

Incredible.

Cazorla's a better dribbler, shooter, finisher, set-piece taker. You name it.

Only thing Mata has over Santi is he gets into scoring positions more regularly. And his final pass is slightly better.

Cazorla has won nothing in his career. He is almost 30 and currently plays for a team that has won nothing in 9 years. Mata has done it all and hasn't even reached his peak yet.

Mourinho thinks Oscar is better than Mata, out of the 4 id go

Ozil > Silva > Mata > Cazorla

but in reality they are all WC players and its very close between all 4

comment by Dubbed The New Wenger- (U18614)
posted 14 seconds ago
Cazorla is every bit as good as Mata. In fact, I read somewhere that Spaniards rate him higher than Mata. Could kinda see it when the national team manager constantly picks Cazorla over him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't care what the Spaniards think, I've watched these 4 players on a regular basis for 3 years now and I still rate Cazorla the lowest of the 4.

The English rated Lampard and Gerrard as better footballers than Scholes. Don't believe all you read.

Cazorla is a born loser like David Moyes

comment by • Tu Meke Santi • (U3732)
posted 1 minute ago
just reading through the thread, it genuinely surprises me how some people just write cazorla off.

Incredible.

Cazorla's a better dribbler, shooter, finisher, set-piece taker. You name it.

Only thing Mata has over Santi is he gets into scoring positions more regularly. And his final pass is slightly better.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's probably why Mata has won things and Cazorla has won nothing?

The English rated Lampard and Gerrard as better footballers than Scholes. Don't believe all you read.

===

That's because the English are generally stupid. Plus they like to sell papers. I'd have thought this was obvious.

comment by • Tu Meke Santi • (U3732)
posted 4 seconds ago
The English rated Lampard and Gerrard as better footballers than Scholes. Don't believe all you read.

===

That's because the English are generally stupid. Plus they like to sell papers. I'd have thought this was obvious.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

dont the spanish like to sell newspapers?

comment by BusbysBabes (U9083)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by • Tu Meke Santi• (U3732)
posted 1 minute ago
just reading through the thread, it genuinely surprises me how some people just write cazorla off.

Incredible.

Cazorla's a better dribbler, shooter, finisher, set-piece taker. You name it.

Only thing Mata has over Santi is he gets into scoring positions more regularly. And his final pass is slightly better.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's probably why Mata has won things and Cazorla has won nothing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Your response makes no sense. You really basing a player's quality on what they've won in a team?

Cazola cannot improvise in the way Mata can.

Fletcher has won more than Cazorla. Guess he's better.

comment by • Tu Meke Santi • (U3732)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by BusbysBabes (U9083)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by • Tu Meke Santi• (U3732)
posted 1 minute ago
just reading through the thread, it genuinely surprises me how some people just write cazorla off.

Incredible.

Cazorla's a better dribbler, shooter, finisher, set-piece taker. You name it.

Only thing Mata has over Santi is he gets into scoring positions more regularly. And his final pass is slightly better.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's probably why Mata has won things and Cazorla has won nothing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Your response makes no sense. You really basing a player's quality on what they've won in a team?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all, but if Mata created 30 goals an d scores 15 in a season, and Cazorla only scored 5 and assists 10, from similar roles, then it's fair to say which player is more effective.

Besides, I don't need stats to tell me what I can seem and that's that the other three are more effective in the final third than Cazorla.

comment by Dubbed The New Wenger- (U18614)
posted 2 minutes ago
Fletcher has won more than Cazorla. Guess he's better.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cazorla has won less than Fletcher. Guess he's bitter

Carzola hasn't even won the prestigious Emirates cup.