Mata's a quality player, but he wouldn't start for us. Just shows how far ahead of Man Utd we are.
The 50mill posted pretty much proves the point Heisenberg.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Ozil just doesn't seem happy at arsenal and it shows with his very average performances.
Even Zidane said Ozil doesn't have the "stomach" to fight for his place at Madrid.
Not good enough for an elite club like Real Madrid and Manchester United, it's why we rejected him and he ended up at arsenal.
Mata would start for Arsenal, as would Ozil. Ramsey would be benched.
Who cares who is better, we'll eventually sign Ozil anyway..
Best Fulham player 2002/03 = Saha (then signed for United)
Best Fulham player 2003/2005 = Van Der Saar (then signed for United)
Best West Ham player of 2006/07 = Tevez (then signed for United)
Best upcoming Spurs player 2005 = Carrick (then signed for United)
Best Spurs player 2007/09 = Berbatov (then signed for United)
Best Arsenal player 2010/2012 = RVP (then signed for United)
Best Chelsea player 2011/2013 = Mata (then signed for United)
Best Crystal Palace player 2012/13 = Zaha (...)
History doesn't lie
comment by merrysupersteve (U1132)
posted 1 minute ago
Mata would start for Arsenal, as would Ozil. Ramsey would be benched.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would Ramsey be benched when he's a cm and those two are no 10's?
comment by Iron Man.. Utd Man: All London clubs = Mufc feeder clubs (U17162)
posted 7 seconds ago
Who cares who is better, we'll eventually sign Ozil anyway..
Best Fulham player 2002/03 = Saha (then signed for United)
Best Fulham player 2003/2005 = Van Der Saar (then signed for United)
Best West Ham player of 2006/07 = Tevez (then signed for United)
Best upcoming Spurs player 2005 = Carrick (then signed for United)
Best Spurs player 2007/09 = Berbatov (then signed for United)
Best Arsenal player 2010/2012 = RVP (then signed for United)
Best Chelsea player 2011/2013 = Mata (then signed for United)
Best Crystal Palace player 2012/13 = Zaha (...)
History doesn't lie
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This
So many WUMs here...
Ozil is far closer to Iniesta than Mata. Mata is good, but come on.
comment by merrysupersteve (U1132)
posted 1 minute ago
Mata would start for Arsenal, as would Ozil. Ramsey would be benched.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is Mata a box-to-box midfielder? No. So explain how Ramsey would be the one benched?
Ramsey who's been one of the best CMs in the Prem this season benched for a bench warmer? Haha Best one yet.
How would Mata, a #10, displace Ramsey, a CM, who's been better this season anyway?
Szczesny
Sagna Mert Kos Gibbs
Arteta/Flamini Ramsey/Wilshere
Fio Ozil Santi
Giroud
Absolutely no way Mata displaces any of the 3 behind Giroud.
comment by merrysupersteve (U1132)
posted 1 minute ago
Mata would start for Arsenal, as would Ozil. Ramsey would be benched.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why you trying to be sensible here?
Just cover your ear and shout out Mata is better
it's what these dumb gooner fans do
Mata will replace Cazorla surely not even arsenal fans are that stupid
Playing with wingbacks demands a lot of defensive play from the attacking mids. Özil and Mata struggle with this aspect of their game but Özil has been tracking back more of late.
comment by OOH_AH_Cantona (U3577)
posted 6 seconds ago
Mata will replace Cazorla surely not even arsenal fans are that stupid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
good one.
If mata was at Arsenal this would be the front 6
Giroud
Cazorla Özil Walcott
Ramsey Flamini/Wilshere/Arteta
Mata on the bench next to Saint Niklas
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Ramsey is not box to box. The only time he went near his own box this year, he assisted a Dortmund goal. Why would Ramsey be dropped for Mata? Because Mata is a better player
comment by OOH_AH_Cantona (U3577)
posted 49 seconds ago
Mata will replace Cazorla surely not even arsenal fans are that stupid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mata's work-rate is even worse than Cazorla's.
he would play on the left or behind the striker, wouldn't get in ahead of Ozil and I prefer Cazorla to Mata although they are about level on ability. We could play him on the other flank but we need a pacy option there not another playmaker.
Kamran, you trying say arteta/flamini are similar level? Flamini is garbage
anyone seens arsenals fixtures coming up?
man utd/liverpool x 2/bayern x2
then spurs, chelsea, city, everton
i predict they will drop to fifth by then, they will be demoralised after losing most of the big games
Sign in if you want to comment
Mata or Ozil
Page 4 of 15
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 26/1/14
Mata's a quality player, but he wouldn't start for us. Just shows how far ahead of Man Utd we are.
posted on 26/1/14
The 50mill posted pretty much proves the point Heisenberg.
posted on 26/1/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/1/14
Ozil just doesn't seem happy at arsenal and it shows with his very average performances.
posted on 26/1/14
Even Zidane said Ozil doesn't have the "stomach" to fight for his place at Madrid.
Not good enough for an elite club like Real Madrid and Manchester United, it's why we rejected him and he ended up at arsenal.
posted on 26/1/14
Mata would start for Arsenal, as would Ozil. Ramsey would be benched.
posted on 26/1/14
Who cares who is better, we'll eventually sign Ozil anyway..
Best Fulham player 2002/03 = Saha (then signed for United)
Best Fulham player 2003/2005 = Van Der Saar (then signed for United)
Best West Ham player of 2006/07 = Tevez (then signed for United)
Best upcoming Spurs player 2005 = Carrick (then signed for United)
Best Spurs player 2007/09 = Berbatov (then signed for United)
Best Arsenal player 2010/2012 = RVP (then signed for United)
Best Chelsea player 2011/2013 = Mata (then signed for United)
Best Crystal Palace player 2012/13 = Zaha (...)
History doesn't lie
posted on 26/1/14
comment by merrysupersteve (U1132)
posted 1 minute ago
Mata would start for Arsenal, as would Ozil. Ramsey would be benched.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would Ramsey be benched when he's a cm and those two are no 10's?
posted on 26/1/14
comment by Iron Man.. Utd Man: All London clubs = Mufc feeder clubs (U17162)
posted 7 seconds ago
Who cares who is better, we'll eventually sign Ozil anyway..
Best Fulham player 2002/03 = Saha (then signed for United)
Best Fulham player 2003/2005 = Van Der Saar (then signed for United)
Best West Ham player of 2006/07 = Tevez (then signed for United)
Best upcoming Spurs player 2005 = Carrick (then signed for United)
Best Spurs player 2007/09 = Berbatov (then signed for United)
Best Arsenal player 2010/2012 = RVP (then signed for United)
Best Chelsea player 2011/2013 = Mata (then signed for United)
Best Crystal Palace player 2012/13 = Zaha (...)
History doesn't lie
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This
posted on 26/1/14
So many WUMs here...
Ozil is far closer to Iniesta than Mata. Mata is good, but come on.
posted on 26/1/14
comment by merrysupersteve (U1132)
posted 1 minute ago
Mata would start for Arsenal, as would Ozil. Ramsey would be benched.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is Mata a box-to-box midfielder? No. So explain how Ramsey would be the one benched?
posted on 26/1/14
Ramsey who's been one of the best CMs in the Prem this season benched for a bench warmer? Haha Best one yet.
posted on 26/1/14
How would Mata, a #10, displace Ramsey, a CM, who's been better this season anyway?
posted on 26/1/14
Szczesny
Sagna Mert Kos Gibbs
Arteta/Flamini Ramsey/Wilshere
Fio Ozil Santi
Giroud
Absolutely no way Mata displaces any of the 3 behind Giroud.
posted on 26/1/14
comment by merrysupersteve (U1132)
posted 1 minute ago
Mata would start for Arsenal, as would Ozil. Ramsey would be benched.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why you trying to be sensible here?
Just cover your ear and shout out Mata is better
it's what these dumb gooner fans do
posted on 26/1/14
Mata will replace Cazorla surely not even arsenal fans are that stupid
posted on 26/1/14
Playing with wingbacks demands a lot of defensive play from the attacking mids. Özil and Mata struggle with this aspect of their game but Özil has been tracking back more of late.
posted on 26/1/14
Cazorla > Mata
posted on 26/1/14
comment by OOH_AH_Cantona (U3577)
posted 6 seconds ago
Mata will replace Cazorla surely not even arsenal fans are that stupid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
good one.
If mata was at Arsenal this would be the front 6
Giroud
Cazorla Özil Walcott
Ramsey Flamini/Wilshere/Arteta
Mata on the bench next to Saint Niklas
posted on 26/1/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/1/14
Ramsey is not box to box. The only time he went near his own box this year, he assisted a Dortmund goal. Why would Ramsey be dropped for Mata? Because Mata is a better player
posted on 26/1/14
comment by OOH_AH_Cantona (U3577)
posted 49 seconds ago
Mata will replace Cazorla surely not even arsenal fans are that stupid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mata's work-rate is even worse than Cazorla's.
posted on 26/1/14
he would play on the left or behind the striker, wouldn't get in ahead of Ozil and I prefer Cazorla to Mata although they are about level on ability. We could play him on the other flank but we need a pacy option there not another playmaker.
posted on 26/1/14
Kamran, you trying say arteta/flamini are similar level? Flamini is garbage
posted on 26/1/14
anyone seens arsenals fixtures coming up?
man utd/liverpool x 2/bayern x2
then spurs, chelsea, city, everton
i predict they will drop to fifth by then, they will be demoralised after losing most of the big games
Page 4 of 15
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10