comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 24 minutes ago
The reaction to Emma Watson saying "I'm here for all the witches" is quite amusing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She’s entitled to her views on men who think they are women and women who think they are men but I find it a little sheeety to use her very brief time at the podium to make a dig at JK Rowling. A woman who has received an incredible amount of abuse, death threats etc for her views that women are women and that a man who believes he is a woman is not a woman.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well this is the thing.

She never mentioned Rowling, I find the "bite the hand that feeds her" narrative to be very stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it’s pretty obvious.

I’m not fussed about Rowling having started her career and made her a megastar nonsense. If my boss murdered a load of people, I would be perfectly reasonable to call them out on it.

However Rowling has done nothing of the sort. She expresses a view that many feminists have and has received a hell of a lot of consequences for it.

If anything people like Watson should be defending her saying that she is entitled to her opinions and that she is not a horrible person that deserves death threats.

Instead she chooses to use her time in the limelight to have a dig at her.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She chooses to use her time in the limelight to show support for the trans community. 🤷‍♂️
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think it had nothing to do with Rowling
----------------------------------------------------------------------
People congratulating Watson for her subtle dig so it’s not just one side reading it as a dig
----------------------------------------------------------------------
🤷‍♂️ I mean I can’t control how other people choose to interpret things
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can’t you? Oh, I learned how to do that years ago….
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You learned how to control how other people choose to interpret things another person said? Impressive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. Surprised you didn’t.

comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 24 minutes ago
The reaction to Emma Watson saying "I'm here for all the witches" is quite amusing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She’s entitled to her views on men who think they are women and women who think they are men but I find it a little sheeety to use her very brief time at the podium to make a dig at JK Rowling. A woman who has received an incredible amount of abuse, death threats etc for her views that women are women and that a man who believes he is a woman is not a woman.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well this is the thing.

She never mentioned Rowling, I find the "bite the hand that feeds her" narrative to be very stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it’s pretty obvious.

I’m not fussed about Rowling having started her career and made her a megastar nonsense. If my boss murdered a load of people, I would be perfectly reasonable to call them out on it.

However Rowling has done nothing of the sort. She expresses a view that many feminists have and has received a hell of a lot of consequences for it.

If anything people like Watson should be defending her saying that she is entitled to her opinions and that she is not a horrible person that deserves death threats.

Instead she chooses to use her time in the limelight to have a dig at her.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She chooses to use her time in the limelight to show support for the trans community. 🤷‍♂️
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think it had nothing to do with Rowling
----------------------------------------------------------------------
People congratulating Watson for her subtle dig so it’s not just one side reading it as a dig
----------------------------------------------------------------------
🤷‍♂️ I mean I can’t control how other people choose to interpret things
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can’t you? Oh, I learned how to do that years ago….
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You learned how to control how other people choose to interpret things another person said? Impressive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Vulcan mind meld, or Obi Dan's mind control trick.
These are not the bots you're looking for.

Obi Wan. Obi Dan's brother.

See? SoQ was on the same training course 😂😂

Professor TBAB headed the lesson but all he did was feed us ale & mushrooms

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 38 minutes ago
Yet no-one is abusing Corbyn, unless I misheard his comments….
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is different🤣😉

When Corbyn, Abbott, mcdonnell, Burgon (those who some wanted to lead the UK) have a go at NATO and the west for inciting Putin, in a letter Starmer had to quash, that is not to be spoken off in this hallowed place 🤥

This is the tucker Carlson show 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many pages did we have to read when you made similar points?

Yet Corbyn mentions NATO and it’s tumbleweed….
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How relevant is Corbyn? Compared to say Tucker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just posted, Cucker spouts schite to millions 5 days a week. Corbyn talks to his cat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn’t this where you lot cry whataboutery?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like we did earlier?

Your first response to the link about Tucker was "What about Corbyn?!?"



I'm still none the wiser to what he's done,

comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 38 minutes ago
Yet no-one is abusing Corbyn, unless I misheard his comments….
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is different🤣😉

When Corbyn, Abbott, mcdonnell, Burgon (those who some wanted to lead the UK) have a go at NATO and the west for inciting Putin, in a letter Starmer had to quash, that is not to be spoken off in this hallowed place 🤥

This is the tucker Carlson show 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many pages did we have to read when you made similar points?

Yet Corbyn mentions NATO and it’s tumbleweed….
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How relevant is Corbyn? Compared to say Tucker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just posted, Cucker spouts schite to millions 5 days a week. Corbyn talks to his cat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn’t this where you lot cry whataboutery?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like we did earlier?

Your first response to the link about Tucker was "What about Corbyn?!?"



I'm still none the wiser to what he's done,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My years of razor sharp wit have clearly clouded your mind as to my influencing skills 😘

On the transgender matter, seeing as we’re getting the predicted tumbleweeds on Corbyn…..

What I really don’t understand is why, why why why why….can’t we just have men, women and trans? There’s nothing wrong with trans and I know that a trans person feels the same as a woman or a man but obviously they aren’t the same and there’s no problem with being different; we’re all different.

Changing society as we’re slowly being forced to just seems like a crazy amount of change instead of simply having: men, women & trans.

comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 38 minutes ago
Yet no-one is abusing Corbyn, unless I misheard his comments….
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is different🤣😉

When Corbyn, Abbott, mcdonnell, Burgon (those who some wanted to lead the UK) have a go at NATO and the west for inciting Putin, in a letter Starmer had to quash, that is not to be spoken off in this hallowed place 🤥

This is the tucker Carlson show 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many pages did we have to read when you made similar points?

Yet Corbyn mentions NATO and it’s tumbleweed….
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How relevant is Corbyn? Compared to say Tucker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just posted, Cucker spouts schite to millions 5 days a week. Corbyn talks to his cat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn’t this where you lot cry whataboutery?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like we did earlier?

Your first response to the link about Tucker was "What about Corbyn?!?"



I'm still none the wiser to what he's done,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://bfy.tw/Simg

You like complaining that no one is engaging on what Corbyns said but you aren't being forthcoming ffs.

I've just checked the front pages of the Guardian + independent and there was nothing... Just the far more relevant tucker Carlson, so I figured if it's going to be anywhere...

The Daily Mail right? nothing, The express? Nothing.

So we had a little bit of whataboutery to deflect from a right winger spreading russian propoganda, with a story about Corbyn that's so irrelevant not even the two publications that hate him the most are running the story on their website...

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 5 minutes ago
On the transgender matter, seeing as we’re getting the predicted tumbleweeds on Corbyn…..

What I really don’t understand is why, why why why why….can’t we just have men, women and trans? There’s nothing wrong with trans and I know that a trans person feels the same as a woman or a man but obviously they aren’t the same and there’s no problem with being different; we’re all different.

Changing society as we’re slowly being forced to just seems like a crazy amount of change instead of simply having: men, women & trans.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you believe people should only use the toilets assigned to the gender these people were assigned at birth?

comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 17 minutes ago
You like complaining that no one is engaging on what Corbyns said but you aren't being forthcoming ffs.

I've just checked the front pages of the Guardian + independent and there was nothing... Just the far more relevant tucker Carlson, so I figured if it's going to be anywhere...

The Daily Mail right? nothing, The express? Nothing.

So we had a little bit of whataboutery to deflect from a right winger spreading russian propoganda, with a story about Corbyn that's so irrelevant not even the two publications that hate him the most are running the story on their website...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm….

Even after the invasion today Mr Corbyn was unable to level blame at Russia alone. In a tweet this afternoon he said: 'The Russian forces that have entered Eastern Ukraine should immediately withdraw.

'The UK government should encourage a return to the Minsk-2 agreement to end the crisis and oppose further eastward NATO expansion.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10538829/amp/Jeremy-Corbyn-slammed-attacking-Nato-UKs-aggressive-posturing-Ukraine.html

comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 5 minutes ago
On the transgender matter, seeing as we’re getting the predicted tumbleweeds on Corbyn…..

What I really don’t understand is why, why why why why….can’t we just have men, women and trans? There’s nothing wrong with trans and I know that a trans person feels the same as a woman or a man but obviously they aren’t the same and there’s no problem with being different; we’re all different.

Changing society as we’re slowly being forced to just seems like a crazy amount of change instead of simply having: men, women & trans.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you believe people should only use the toilets assigned to the gender these people were assigned at birth?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you want to only ask about toilets and ignore the multitude of additional consequences such as prisons, school changing rooms, sports etc then go right ahead.

Yes would be my simple answer to your simple questions

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 17 minutes ago
You like complaining that no one is engaging on what Corbyns said but you aren't being forthcoming ffs.

I've just checked the front pages of the Guardian + independent and there was nothing... Just the far more relevant tucker Carlson, so I figured if it's going to be anywhere...

The Daily Mail right? nothing, The express? Nothing.

So we had a little bit of whataboutery to deflect from a right winger spreading russian propoganda, with a story about Corbyn that's so irrelevant not even the two publications that hate him the most are running the story on their website...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm….

Even after the invasion today Mr Corbyn was unable to level blame at Russia alone. In a tweet this afternoon he said: 'The Russian forces that have entered Eastern Ukraine should immediately withdraw.

'The UK government should encourage a return to the Minsk-2 agreement to end the crisis and oppose further eastward NATO expansion.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10538829/amp/Jeremy-Corbyn-slammed-attacking-Nato-UKs-aggressive-posturing-Ukraine.html


----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's from February 22nd

comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 17 minutes ago
You like complaining that no one is engaging on what Corbyns said but you aren't being forthcoming ffs.

I've just checked the front pages of the Guardian + independent and there was nothing... Just the far more relevant tucker Carlson, so I figured if it's going to be anywhere...

The Daily Mail right? nothing, The express? Nothing.

So we had a little bit of whataboutery to deflect from a right winger spreading russian propoganda, with a story about Corbyn that's so irrelevant not even the two publications that hate him the most are running the story on their website...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm….

Even after the invasion today Mr Corbyn was unable to level blame at Russia alone. In a tweet this afternoon he said: 'The Russian forces that have entered Eastern Ukraine should immediately withdraw.

'The UK government should encourage a return to the Minsk-2 agreement to end the crisis and oppose further eastward NATO expansion.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10538829/amp/Jeremy-Corbyn-slammed-attacking-Nato-UKs-aggressive-posturing-Ukraine.html


----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's from February 22nd
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And?

And if you go back that far on this thread you'll see people criticising the far left for their position on NATO and the timing of it

comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 2 weeks, 2 days ago
comment by Black Hawk (U16342)
posted 11 minutes ago
Looking at some of the far left response to Ukraine on Reddit, is shocking.

They have grievances on western foreign policy and Nato - I get it (although, do not entirely agree). The sheer amount of deflection they do for Russian aggression, makes them very useful idiots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a nightmare trawling back on this site but see a I've for example

See above*

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 17 minutes ago
You like complaining that no one is engaging on what Corbyns said but you aren't being forthcoming ffs.

I've just checked the front pages of the Guardian + independent and there was nothing... Just the far more relevant tucker Carlson, so I figured if it's going to be anywhere...

The Daily Mail right? nothing, The express? Nothing.

So we had a little bit of whataboutery to deflect from a right winger spreading russian propoganda, with a story about Corbyn that's so irrelevant not even the two publications that hate him the most are running the story on their website...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm….

Even after the invasion today Mr Corbyn was unable to level blame at Russia alone. In a tweet this afternoon he said: 'The Russian forces that have entered Eastern Ukraine should immediately withdraw.

'The UK government should encourage a return to the Minsk-2 agreement to end the crisis and oppose further eastward NATO expansion.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10538829/amp/Jeremy-Corbyn-slammed-attacking-Nato-UKs-aggressive-posturing-Ukraine.html


----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's from February 22nd
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was criticised at the time...

Lol.. whataboutery with a three week old story

How long after the events should we mention it daily?

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 5 minutes ago
On the transgender matter, seeing as we’re getting the predicted tumbleweeds on Corbyn…..

What I really don’t understand is why, why why why why….can’t we just have men, women and trans? There’s nothing wrong with trans and I know that a trans person feels the same as a woman or a man but obviously they aren’t the same and there’s no problem with being different; we’re all different.

Changing society as we’re slowly being forced to just seems like a crazy amount of change instead of simply having: men, women & trans.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you believe people should only use the toilets assigned to the gender these people were assigned at birth?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you want to only ask about toilets and ignore the multitude of additional consequences such as prisons, school changing rooms, sports etc then go right ahead.

Yes would be my simple answer to your simple questions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're a big picture guy. But the minutiae are often lost in taking that view.
I'm a simple man.
So a man who was assigned as female at birth should use women only toilets?
I've seen 16 stone men with full beards who were assigned female gender at birth. How would you feel about girls using the same toilet as these "females"?

Also musk fighting Putin..

comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 2 minutes ago
Also musk fighting Putin..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it a duel with choice of weapons, or a bare-knuckle brawl? And have the bookies given odds?

Any idea why JS unsubbed?

comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 2 weeks, 2 days ago
comment by Black Hawk (U16342)
posted 11 minutes ago
Looking at some of the far left response to Ukraine on Reddit, is shocking.

They have grievances on western foreign policy and Nato - I get it (although, do not entirely agree). The sheer amount of deflection they do for Russian aggression, makes them very useful idiots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a nightmare trawling back on this site but see a I've for example
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well done. I missed those two posts, I wouldn’t have missed pages of abuse similar to what TBAB suffered.

Black Hawk even says that he got it, which is fine but no-one seemed to ‘get it’ when TBAB was saying similar.

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 30 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 28 seconds ago
Corbyn getting abuse for his NATO views from the very same posters that regularly berated the West on here for Sabre rattling against Putins Russia.

You couldn't make it up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn’t make it up that you wouldn’t have an issue with what Corbyn said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've no idea what he said, I know his opinion of NATO, pretty much the same as NPE and TBAB.

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 4 hours, 7 minutes ago
Did Corbyn talk about removing Nato forces on the border?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This wasn’t whataboutery at all Insert