comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 2 weeks, 2 days ago
comment by Black Hawk (U16342)
posted 11 minutes ago
Looking at some of the far left response to Ukraine on Reddit, is shocking.
They have grievances on western foreign policy and Nato - I get it (although, do not entirely agree). The sheer amount of deflection they do for Russian aggression, makes them very useful idiots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a nightmare trawling back on this site but see a I've for example
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well done. I missed those two posts, I wouldn’t have missed pages of abuse similar to what TBAB suffered.
Black Hawk even says that he got it, which is fine but no-one seemed to ‘get it’ when TBAB was saying similar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbab posts on here, Corbyn doesn't
There are numerous posts of people diagreeong with tbab because of the ignorance of his takes and the frequency of his posts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is one way to view a politics thread.
Ignore or at least downplay and skip over quickly leading political figures and the party you vote for, but go into great depth to hammer every word from a random punter, because that matters more π€£π€£
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I understand what Crouchy is saying and it makes sense as you’re posting here not Jeremy Corbyn.
But on the one hand we’re saying that Corbyn is irrelevant vs Tucker but now TBAB is more relevant than Corbyn just because he is here?
Doesn’t really sit well with me. Honestly, some of the relies TBAB received were a joke. He was clearly not supporting Putin (neither is Corbyn) and one being an MP should receive a lot more criticism than an individual on a football forum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would be the rational, objective and balanced approach, but this place is too party political, partizan and personal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Och, 'mere you. You need wan o these.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cheers chum π°
You know we all love itπ€£π
Pretending to be all moral and righteous and worldly wise, posting on a sports forum FFSπ€£π°
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 2 weeks, 2 days ago
comment by Black Hawk (U16342)
posted 11 minutes ago
Looking at some of the far left response to Ukraine on Reddit, is shocking.
They have grievances on western foreign policy and Nato - I get it (although, do not entirely agree). The sheer amount of deflection they do for Russian aggression, makes them very useful idiots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a nightmare trawling back on this site but see a I've for example
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well done. I missed those two posts, I wouldn’t have missed pages of abuse similar to what TBAB suffered.
Black Hawk even says that he got it, which is fine but no-one seemed to ‘get it’ when TBAB was saying similar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbab posts on here, Corbyn doesn't
There are numerous posts of people diagreeong with tbab because of the ignorance of his takes and the frequency of his posts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is one way to view a politics thread.
Ignore or at least downplay and skip over quickly leading political figures and the party you vote for, but go into great depth to hammer every word from a random punter, because that matters more π€£π€£
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I understand what Crouchy is saying and it makes sense as you’re posting here not Jeremy Corbyn.
But on the one hand we’re saying that Corbyn is irrelevant vs Tucker but now TBAB is more relevant than Corbyn just because he is here?
Doesn’t really sit well with me. Honestly, some of the relies TBAB received were a joke. He was clearly not supporting Putin (neither is Corbyn) and one being an MP should receive a lot more criticism than an individual on a football forum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would be the rational, objective and balanced approach, but this place is too party political, partizan and personal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Och, 'mere you. You need wan o these.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cheers chum π°
You know we all love itπ€£π
Pretending to be all moral and righteous and worldly wise, posting on a sports forum FFSπ€£π°
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm retired. The ret of yooz are just skiving bastirts.
Aaaah I feel morally superior to all the wage thrives on here.
Sounds like I missed the martyrdom of TBAB in the last few weeks.
It's about productivity not presenteeism
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 46 seconds ago
It's about productivity not presenteeism
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Justifying your title of two pump chump eh?
comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 10 seconds ago
Sounds like I missed the martyrdom of TBAB in the last few weeks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mind the several (dozen) posts about the azov (spelt a variety of different ways so you know that at least it wasn’t a copy-paste job) brigade and repeating the Putin narrative while giving it apparent credence. Took a while but I think tbbab got to the position where he acknowledged that actually the Putin propaganda that he was repeating (whether knowingly that it was Putin propaganda or not) was not accurate and he was merely repeating what Putin was saying. AFAICT all posters here knew what Putin was erroneously claiming, so it was all rather odd. I did ask about the sources that tbbab had used to be coming out with what he was, but I think at that time he adopted an Elsa approach (Let it go) without actually providing the sources he was relying on to come out with what he was. An odd situation all round!
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 2 minutes ago
It's about productivity not presenteeism
----------------------------------------------------------------------
π aye I don’t think my employer would like you!
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 46 seconds ago
It's about productivity not presenteeism
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Justifying your title of two pump chump eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what the ladies call me
If we go all the way back to BH’s comment, can we all at least now agree, without prejudice, that anyone engaged in deflecting from Russian aggression in the last fortnight or so could and should *in context* be considered a useful idiot?
And then maybe just draw a line under all that?
I have done my fair bit of NATO bashing - particularly relating to military-aggressive acts - over the years, and stand by all of that. But there has been a time and a place for it, and it really isn’t now.
I’m sure that everyone barring pekski would agree on that now.
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 43 seconds ago
What is a woman?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I just realised that saying that directly after Crouchys last comment leaves me vulnerable to mockery
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 43 seconds ago
What is a woman?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I just realised that saying that directly after Crouchys last comment leaves me vulnerable to mockery
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m requesting a definition as many people are struggling to define it currently. Even on IWD
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 16 minutes ago
Both yourself and NPE frequently berated NATO for its bear poking, sabre rattling. Not saying you approve of Putin at all, but let's not be revisionist about previous postings re: NATO.
Glad you've changed your mind now though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Zelensky was calling for calm too, then everything changed.
My main thoughts were no war between anyone and no more UK and USA troops policing the globe.
I have never been hostile to NATO, the west, UK or USA,, unlike others.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye okay then
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you views on Corbyn and the eleven odd letter signers from Labour?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gies a link to this letter and I'll offer an opinion.
Generally, Ithink he's a progressive with views he's held solidly for his entire decades in parliament.
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 10 seconds ago
Sounds like I missed the martyrdom of TBAB in the last few weeks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mind the several (dozen) posts about the azov (spelt a variety of different ways so you know that at least it wasn’t a copy-paste job) brigade and repeating the Putin narrative while giving it apparent credence. Took a while but I think tbbab got to the position where he acknowledged that actually the Putin propaganda that he was repeating (whether knowingly that it was Putin propaganda or not) was not accurate and he was merely repeating what Putin was saying. AFAICT all posters here knew what Putin was erroneously claiming, so it was all rather odd. I did ask about the sources that tbbab had used to be coming out with what he was, but I think at that time he adopted an Elsa approach (Let it go) without actually providing the sources he was relying on to come out with what he was. An odd situation all round!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So, adopting an intentionally provocative position in an argument whilst not really understanding the subject? Sounds like a man trying to provide balance to me.
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 10 seconds ago
Sounds like I missed the martyrdom of TBAB in the last few weeks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mind the several (dozen) posts about the azov (spelt a variety of different ways so you know that at least it wasn’t a copy-paste job) brigade and repeating the Putin narrative while giving it apparent credence. Took a while but I think tbbab got to the position where he acknowledged that actually the Putin propaganda that he was repeating (whether knowingly that it was Putin propaganda or not) was not accurate and he was merely repeating what Putin was saying. AFAICT all posters here knew what Putin was erroneously claiming, so it was all rather odd. I did ask about the sources that tbbab had used to be coming out with what he was, but I think at that time he adopted an Elsa approach (Let it go) without actually providing the sources he was relying on to come out with what he was. An odd situation all round!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is more or less how I remember it. Then there were a lot of derogatory posts about him when he wasn't even on here.
I calls 'em as I sees 'em.
Why can't we be friends.
Why can't we be friends
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 43 seconds ago
What is a woman?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I just realised that saying that directly after Crouchys last comment leaves me vulnerable to mockery
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Booooooooooo
urns π
I got the impression it was just parroting of GB News
...which funnily enough is now accused of being part owned by a suspected Russian spy
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 9 minutes ago
What is a woman?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is this a "simple" question?
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 44 minutes ago
You like complaining that no one is engaging on what Corbyns said but you aren't being forthcoming ffs.
I've just checked the front pages of the Guardian + independent and there was nothing... Just the far more relevant tucker Carlson, so I figured if it's going to be anywhere...
The Daily Mail right? nothing, The express? Nothing.
So we had a little bit of whataboutery to deflect from a right winger spreading russian propoganda, with a story about Corbyn that's so irrelevant not even the two publications that hate him the most are running the story on their website...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The stance taken by Corbyn,...And
McDonnell, Abbott, Ali, Burgon etc on NATO and the west regarding Putin and Ukraine is not relevant, as it was days ago.
Ok then, brilliant stuff.
Meanwhile, forensic analysis, filtering, abuse, scores of posts on my posts on the topicπ€£π€£
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You realise that you comment on here so people will respond to you when they agree/disagree
If you want to talk about Corbyn then talk about him but don't use it as some weird reactionary point scoring
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m sorry but unless there was pages and pages of people complaining about Corbyn then there’s no excuses for TBAB getting what he got
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dude, thanks for having my back, but be careful as they wil turn on you more, and after decades in politics here and there, it is water off a π¦
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not a problem. Not really having your back but I just thought the pages and pages of crap that was posted at you was way OTT when compared to Corbyn saying similar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No worries mate, just do not want you dragged in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He brought it up ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Feel free not to comment π
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You see it's comments like this mate π
You can't say you don't want someone getting dragged in when they started the facking chat in the first place
And your response of "feel free not to comment" doesn't make any sense in the context nor does it come across well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was chatting to Say Nav.
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 9 minutes ago
What is a woman?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is this a "simple" question?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes now give me a simple answer like I did
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 44 minutes ago
You like complaining that no one is engaging on what Corbyns said but you aren't being forthcoming ffs.
I've just checked the front pages of the Guardian + independent and there was nothing... Just the far more relevant tucker Carlson, so I figured if it's going to be anywhere...
The Daily Mail right? nothing, The express? Nothing.
So we had a little bit of whataboutery to deflect from a right winger spreading russian propoganda, with a story about Corbyn that's so irrelevant not even the two publications that hate him the most are running the story on their website...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The stance taken by Corbyn,...And
McDonnell, Abbott, Ali, Burgon etc on NATO and the west regarding Putin and Ukraine is not relevant, as it was days ago.
Ok then, brilliant stuff.
Meanwhile, forensic analysis, filtering, abuse, scores of posts on my posts on the topicπ€£π€£
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You realise that you comment on here so people will respond to you when they agree/disagree
If you want to talk about Corbyn then talk about him but don't use it as some weird reactionary point scoring
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m sorry but unless there was pages and pages of people complaining about Corbyn then there’s no excuses for TBAB getting what he got
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dude, thanks for having my back, but be careful as they wil turn on you more, and after decades in politics here and there, it is water off a π¦
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not a problem. Not really having your back but I just thought the pages and pages of crap that was posted at you was way OTT when compared to Corbyn saying similar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No worries mate, just do not want you dragged in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He brought it up ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Feel free not to comment π
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You see it's comments like this mate π
You can't say you don't want someone getting dragged in when they started the facking chat in the first place
And your response of "feel free not to comment" doesn't make any sense in the context nor does it come across well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was chatting to Say Nav.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nav
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 16 minutes ago
Both yourself and NPE frequently berated NATO for its bear poking, sabre rattling. Not saying you approve of Putin at all, but let's not be revisionist about previous postings re: NATO.
Glad you've changed your mind now though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Zelensky was calling for calm too, then everything changed.
My main thoughts were no war between anyone and no more UK and USA troops policing the globe.
I have never been hostile to NATO, the west, UK or USA,, unlike others.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye okay then
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you views on Corbyn and the eleven odd letter signers from Labour?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gies a link to this letter and I'll offer an opinion.
Generally, Ithink he's a progressive with views he's held solidly for his entire decades in parliament.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You lazy fellow...look it up yourself.
Aye, he was Eurosceptic on the EU and friends with terrorists for decades, then empowered antisemitism in Labour and lost to clown bojo, with a massive defeat going back to the war.
He's some pup.ππ€£
Michael Gove - "I've had it up to here with people trying to suggest that this country is not generous... all the stuff about hostile environments, that was invented under a Labour home secretary... so can we just chuck it on the partisan nonsense & get on with delivering" https://t.co/EsKqbv4Xk7
He's had an absolute tantrum
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 9 minutes ago
What is a woman?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is this a "simple" question?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes now give me a simple answer like I did
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sooo tempted to use the how to keep an azzole in suspense joke.
I'd say whoever identifies as such.
Because its none of my business.
But then you look at folk like Caitlin Jenner. Did she have a $ex change just to get some lesbian action?
Sign in if you want to comment
Arguing w/strangers cause I'm lonely thread
Page 2579 of 4858
2580 | 2581 | 2582 | 2583 | 2584
posted on 14/3/22
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 2 weeks, 2 days ago
comment by Black Hawk (U16342)
posted 11 minutes ago
Looking at some of the far left response to Ukraine on Reddit, is shocking.
They have grievances on western foreign policy and Nato - I get it (although, do not entirely agree). The sheer amount of deflection they do for Russian aggression, makes them very useful idiots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a nightmare trawling back on this site but see a I've for example
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well done. I missed those two posts, I wouldn’t have missed pages of abuse similar to what TBAB suffered.
Black Hawk even says that he got it, which is fine but no-one seemed to ‘get it’ when TBAB was saying similar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbab posts on here, Corbyn doesn't
There are numerous posts of people diagreeong with tbab because of the ignorance of his takes and the frequency of his posts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is one way to view a politics thread.
Ignore or at least downplay and skip over quickly leading political figures and the party you vote for, but go into great depth to hammer every word from a random punter, because that matters more π€£π€£
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I understand what Crouchy is saying and it makes sense as you’re posting here not Jeremy Corbyn.
But on the one hand we’re saying that Corbyn is irrelevant vs Tucker but now TBAB is more relevant than Corbyn just because he is here?
Doesn’t really sit well with me. Honestly, some of the relies TBAB received were a joke. He was clearly not supporting Putin (neither is Corbyn) and one being an MP should receive a lot more criticism than an individual on a football forum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would be the rational, objective and balanced approach, but this place is too party political, partizan and personal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Och, 'mere you. You need wan o these.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cheers chum π°
You know we all love itπ€£π
Pretending to be all moral and righteous and worldly wise, posting on a sports forum FFSπ€£π°
posted on 14/3/22
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 2 weeks, 2 days ago
comment by Black Hawk (U16342)
posted 11 minutes ago
Looking at some of the far left response to Ukraine on Reddit, is shocking.
They have grievances on western foreign policy and Nato - I get it (although, do not entirely agree). The sheer amount of deflection they do for Russian aggression, makes them very useful idiots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a nightmare trawling back on this site but see a I've for example
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well done. I missed those two posts, I wouldn’t have missed pages of abuse similar to what TBAB suffered.
Black Hawk even says that he got it, which is fine but no-one seemed to ‘get it’ when TBAB was saying similar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbab posts on here, Corbyn doesn't
There are numerous posts of people diagreeong with tbab because of the ignorance of his takes and the frequency of his posts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is one way to view a politics thread.
Ignore or at least downplay and skip over quickly leading political figures and the party you vote for, but go into great depth to hammer every word from a random punter, because that matters more π€£π€£
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I understand what Crouchy is saying and it makes sense as you’re posting here not Jeremy Corbyn.
But on the one hand we’re saying that Corbyn is irrelevant vs Tucker but now TBAB is more relevant than Corbyn just because he is here?
Doesn’t really sit well with me. Honestly, some of the relies TBAB received were a joke. He was clearly not supporting Putin (neither is Corbyn) and one being an MP should receive a lot more criticism than an individual on a football forum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would be the rational, objective and balanced approach, but this place is too party political, partizan and personal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Och, 'mere you. You need wan o these.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cheers chum π°
You know we all love itπ€£π
Pretending to be all moral and righteous and worldly wise, posting on a sports forum FFSπ€£π°
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm retired. The ret of yooz are just skiving bastirts.
Aaaah I feel morally superior to all the wage thrives on here.
posted on 14/3/22
Sounds like I missed the martyrdom of TBAB in the last few weeks.
posted on 14/3/22
*rest
**theives.
posted on 14/3/22
It's about productivity not presenteeism
posted on 14/3/22
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 46 seconds ago
It's about productivity not presenteeism
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Justifying your title of two pump chump eh?
posted on 14/3/22
comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 10 seconds ago
Sounds like I missed the martyrdom of TBAB in the last few weeks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mind the several (dozen) posts about the azov (spelt a variety of different ways so you know that at least it wasn’t a copy-paste job) brigade and repeating the Putin narrative while giving it apparent credence. Took a while but I think tbbab got to the position where he acknowledged that actually the Putin propaganda that he was repeating (whether knowingly that it was Putin propaganda or not) was not accurate and he was merely repeating what Putin was saying. AFAICT all posters here knew what Putin was erroneously claiming, so it was all rather odd. I did ask about the sources that tbbab had used to be coming out with what he was, but I think at that time he adopted an Elsa approach (Let it go) without actually providing the sources he was relying on to come out with what he was. An odd situation all round!
posted on 14/3/22
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 2 minutes ago
It's about productivity not presenteeism
----------------------------------------------------------------------
π aye I don’t think my employer would like you!
posted on 14/3/22
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 46 seconds ago
It's about productivity not presenteeism
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Justifying your title of two pump chump eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what the ladies call me
posted on 14/3/22
What is a woman?
posted on 14/3/22
If we go all the way back to BH’s comment, can we all at least now agree, without prejudice, that anyone engaged in deflecting from Russian aggression in the last fortnight or so could and should *in context* be considered a useful idiot?
And then maybe just draw a line under all that?
I have done my fair bit of NATO bashing - particularly relating to military-aggressive acts - over the years, and stand by all of that. But there has been a time and a place for it, and it really isn’t now.
I’m sure that everyone barring pekski would agree on that now.
posted on 14/3/22
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 43 seconds ago
What is a woman?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I just realised that saying that directly after Crouchys last comment leaves me vulnerable to mockery
posted on 14/3/22
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 43 seconds ago
What is a woman?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I just realised that saying that directly after Crouchys last comment leaves me vulnerable to mockery
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m requesting a definition as many people are struggling to define it currently. Even on IWD
posted on 14/3/22
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 16 minutes ago
Both yourself and NPE frequently berated NATO for its bear poking, sabre rattling. Not saying you approve of Putin at all, but let's not be revisionist about previous postings re: NATO.
Glad you've changed your mind now though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Zelensky was calling for calm too, then everything changed.
My main thoughts were no war between anyone and no more UK and USA troops policing the globe.
I have never been hostile to NATO, the west, UK or USA,, unlike others.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye okay then
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you views on Corbyn and the eleven odd letter signers from Labour?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gies a link to this letter and I'll offer an opinion.
Generally, Ithink he's a progressive with views he's held solidly for his entire decades in parliament.
posted on 14/3/22
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 10 seconds ago
Sounds like I missed the martyrdom of TBAB in the last few weeks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mind the several (dozen) posts about the azov (spelt a variety of different ways so you know that at least it wasn’t a copy-paste job) brigade and repeating the Putin narrative while giving it apparent credence. Took a while but I think tbbab got to the position where he acknowledged that actually the Putin propaganda that he was repeating (whether knowingly that it was Putin propaganda or not) was not accurate and he was merely repeating what Putin was saying. AFAICT all posters here knew what Putin was erroneously claiming, so it was all rather odd. I did ask about the sources that tbbab had used to be coming out with what he was, but I think at that time he adopted an Elsa approach (Let it go) without actually providing the sources he was relying on to come out with what he was. An odd situation all round!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So, adopting an intentionally provocative position in an argument whilst not really understanding the subject? Sounds like a man trying to provide balance to me.
posted on 14/3/22
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by HenrysCat (U3608)
posted 10 seconds ago
Sounds like I missed the martyrdom of TBAB in the last few weeks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mind the several (dozen) posts about the azov (spelt a variety of different ways so you know that at least it wasn’t a copy-paste job) brigade and repeating the Putin narrative while giving it apparent credence. Took a while but I think tbbab got to the position where he acknowledged that actually the Putin propaganda that he was repeating (whether knowingly that it was Putin propaganda or not) was not accurate and he was merely repeating what Putin was saying. AFAICT all posters here knew what Putin was erroneously claiming, so it was all rather odd. I did ask about the sources that tbbab had used to be coming out with what he was, but I think at that time he adopted an Elsa approach (Let it go) without actually providing the sources he was relying on to come out with what he was. An odd situation all round!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is more or less how I remember it. Then there were a lot of derogatory posts about him when he wasn't even on here.
I calls 'em as I sees 'em.
Why can't we be friends.
Why can't we be friends
posted on 14/3/22
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 43 seconds ago
What is a woman?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I just realised that saying that directly after Crouchys last comment leaves me vulnerable to mockery
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Booooooooooo
urns π
posted on 14/3/22
I got the impression it was just parroting of GB News
...which funnily enough is now accused of being part owned by a suspected Russian spy
posted on 14/3/22
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 9 minutes ago
What is a woman?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is this a "simple" question?
posted on 14/3/22
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 44 minutes ago
You like complaining that no one is engaging on what Corbyns said but you aren't being forthcoming ffs.
I've just checked the front pages of the Guardian + independent and there was nothing... Just the far more relevant tucker Carlson, so I figured if it's going to be anywhere...
The Daily Mail right? nothing, The express? Nothing.
So we had a little bit of whataboutery to deflect from a right winger spreading russian propoganda, with a story about Corbyn that's so irrelevant not even the two publications that hate him the most are running the story on their website...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The stance taken by Corbyn,...And
McDonnell, Abbott, Ali, Burgon etc on NATO and the west regarding Putin and Ukraine is not relevant, as it was days ago.
Ok then, brilliant stuff.
Meanwhile, forensic analysis, filtering, abuse, scores of posts on my posts on the topicπ€£π€£
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You realise that you comment on here so people will respond to you when they agree/disagree
If you want to talk about Corbyn then talk about him but don't use it as some weird reactionary point scoring
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m sorry but unless there was pages and pages of people complaining about Corbyn then there’s no excuses for TBAB getting what he got
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dude, thanks for having my back, but be careful as they wil turn on you more, and after decades in politics here and there, it is water off a π¦
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not a problem. Not really having your back but I just thought the pages and pages of crap that was posted at you was way OTT when compared to Corbyn saying similar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No worries mate, just do not want you dragged in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He brought it up ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Feel free not to comment π
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You see it's comments like this mate π
You can't say you don't want someone getting dragged in when they started the facking chat in the first place
And your response of "feel free not to comment" doesn't make any sense in the context nor does it come across well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was chatting to Say Nav.
posted on 14/3/22
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 9 minutes ago
What is a woman?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is this a "simple" question?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes now give me a simple answer like I did
posted on 14/3/22
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 44 minutes ago
You like complaining that no one is engaging on what Corbyns said but you aren't being forthcoming ffs.
I've just checked the front pages of the Guardian + independent and there was nothing... Just the far more relevant tucker Carlson, so I figured if it's going to be anywhere...
The Daily Mail right? nothing, The express? Nothing.
So we had a little bit of whataboutery to deflect from a right winger spreading russian propoganda, with a story about Corbyn that's so irrelevant not even the two publications that hate him the most are running the story on their website...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The stance taken by Corbyn,...And
McDonnell, Abbott, Ali, Burgon etc on NATO and the west regarding Putin and Ukraine is not relevant, as it was days ago.
Ok then, brilliant stuff.
Meanwhile, forensic analysis, filtering, abuse, scores of posts on my posts on the topicπ€£π€£
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You realise that you comment on here so people will respond to you when they agree/disagree
If you want to talk about Corbyn then talk about him but don't use it as some weird reactionary point scoring
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m sorry but unless there was pages and pages of people complaining about Corbyn then there’s no excuses for TBAB getting what he got
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dude, thanks for having my back, but be careful as they wil turn on you more, and after decades in politics here and there, it is water off a π¦
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not a problem. Not really having your back but I just thought the pages and pages of crap that was posted at you was way OTT when compared to Corbyn saying similar.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No worries mate, just do not want you dragged in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He brought it up ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Feel free not to comment π
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You see it's comments like this mate π
You can't say you don't want someone getting dragged in when they started the facking chat in the first place
And your response of "feel free not to comment" doesn't make any sense in the context nor does it come across well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was chatting to Say Nav.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nav
posted on 14/3/22
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by TBABlue and Yellow. (U9292)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 16 minutes ago
Both yourself and NPE frequently berated NATO for its bear poking, sabre rattling. Not saying you approve of Putin at all, but let's not be revisionist about previous postings re: NATO.
Glad you've changed your mind now though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Zelensky was calling for calm too, then everything changed.
My main thoughts were no war between anyone and no more UK and USA troops policing the globe.
I have never been hostile to NATO, the west, UK or USA,, unlike others.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye okay then
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you views on Corbyn and the eleven odd letter signers from Labour?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gies a link to this letter and I'll offer an opinion.
Generally, Ithink he's a progressive with views he's held solidly for his entire decades in parliament.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You lazy fellow...look it up yourself.
Aye, he was Eurosceptic on the EU and friends with terrorists for decades, then empowered antisemitism in Labour and lost to clown bojo, with a massive defeat going back to the war.
He's some pup.ππ€£
posted on 14/3/22
Michael Gove - "I've had it up to here with people trying to suggest that this country is not generous... all the stuff about hostile environments, that was invented under a Labour home secretary... so can we just chuck it on the partisan nonsense & get on with delivering" https://t.co/EsKqbv4Xk7
He's had an absolute tantrum
posted on 14/3/22
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 9 minutes ago
What is a woman?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is this a "simple" question?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes now give me a simple answer like I did
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sooo tempted to use the how to keep an azzole in suspense joke.
I'd say whoever identifies as such.
Because its none of my business.
But then you look at folk like Caitlin Jenner. Did she have a $ex change just to get some lesbian action?
Page 2579 of 4858
2580 | 2581 | 2582 | 2583 | 2584