comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 1 hour, 55 minutes ago
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 3 minutes ago
About time we dealt with all those racist babies
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Woke Baby
Antiracist Baby
Feminist Baby

Sounds like a right hoot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We really must set up a counter culture paper.

Inappropriate comment baby.

Fight club baby.

Drunk n disorderly baby.

Not a Fook was given baby.

Biker baby.

Etc


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not my baby

Where's my dad


----------------------------------------------------------------------
What is the height of confusion?

Fathers Day in north Belfast.

Petrolhead baby.

Farty Baby.

Annoying Baby.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 13 seconds ago
Its actually quite easy to activate someone's camera without them knowing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can buy a camera cover for a webcam, or one with one on very easily, or just use tape. I do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Omg do you? What kind of journalism are you actually into?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Undercovers.....No...Undercover.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by Blarmy (U14547)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeah npe I hope you are not labouring under the impression that if say GCHQ want info on you it would take them all of like like 5 minutes to get what they need
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I probably have spent more time on Snoopers Charter discourse than you have on anything in your life.

So, I am aware.

My point is that is a really rubbish argument - GCHQ can take online data therefore let’s go the whole hog on ID cards!

No need to sneer at me mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Walk it back npe

I did say i dont want ID cards at polling as well

comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Blarmy (U14547)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted less than a minute ago
Rather ridiculous for a free marketeer to conflate a transaction and agreement with a private company for a product with the state surveilling you. I
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The laws are a little loose

They can gain your consent without really explaining what they are doing openly
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Uh huh, I agree. I also think in many ways private surveillance is more concerning, nevertheless it is a transactional agreement not a legally compelled one and Apple has pivoted significantly to being pro consumer privacy for a reason. It is likely to be the case Google will also be compelled that way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a transactional agreement that is deliberately misleading and not fully advertising what people are agreeing to.
Governments have access to this data and whilst you might turn your smart phone off whilst not using it, I suspect that you use whilst on the move a fair bit and even if you don’t, millions of people who also make the same concerns over surveillance and bopping around with their smartphone using it 16/7.

My point is that long gone are the days that most people cannot be tracked & traced. Everything you ever type into your phone or PC is logged somewhere, VPNs, AVG, peerblocker, wiping history and cookies doesn’t really achieve much when concerned about state surveillance and monitoring.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You mean the pictures of my massive d*ck are still out there???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes and the ones before you edited them
----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Speaking of massive diqs, has anyone heard from......Insert here.

Not that Insert here....Insert poster name here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)
posted 2 hours, 58 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 31 minutes ago
Can migrants who come to the US illegally vote? Can those who come legally vote?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes to first, no to second.

As stated yesterday, 50 million more people in the US from 2000 and you wound think some dems will use immigration to get votes?

In opposition, Biden and dems said come on over, and now he power he changes tune, but people got his message.

A cynic may also wonder if dems are playing an immigration demographic card in order to increase potential voter numbers, but then Obama deported more Hispanics than any other pres and Obama alienated Cuban voters in Florida, so dems give out mixed messages.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes to first? The only people proven to have fraudently voting in the last election were Trumpists. Google it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry chum, I was eating and watching tv while posting with only one frre finger and got this erse about face.

Can I have my fingers back now?

comment by Blarmy (U14547)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by Blarmy (U14547)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeah npe I hope you are not labouring under the impression that if say GCHQ want info on you it would take them all of like like 5 minutes to get what they need
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I probably have spent more time on Snoopers Charter discourse than you have on anything in your life.

So, I am aware.

My point is that is a really rubbish argument - GCHQ can take online data therefore let’s go the whole hog on ID cards!

No need to sneer at me mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Walk it back npe
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Michael Jackson out of this.

You can see why Q anon is popular. Lots of conspiracy nutcases about.

comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted 2 minutes ago
Several points to make to your broader argument:

1) Regardless of how misleading or deceptive private harvesting of data is, it is still a fundamentally different relationship to that between state surveillance and a person. One is volunteered, one is compelled.

2) The government has access to data courtesy of the Snoopers Charter, however Apple has routinely refused to help governments looking to bypass security measures to access people’s data. For all its wokery it is very good on personal privacy.

3) The sunk cost fallacy, that because much of our freedom is curtailed, we may as well invest the rest of our freedoms to the state is bizarre. There are increasingly good conversations on the issue of consumer privacy and freedom that I think will prove fruitful.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. But the terms are not fully understood. That is actually worse than state compelled. At least you know what the deal is. With tech firms, we don’t know what we’re agreeing to. Either way the end result is the same - your location, data, s3xuality fantasies, financial situations, personal relationships, hobbies even personality traits are all most likely recorded somewhere.

2. I doubt that anything substantial will change. Rebranded version of the same thing.

3. Not really a fair representation - most of our privacy is already gone and has been for decades; so why moan about a plastic voting ID card in 2021. That’s not the same as ‘the rest of our freedoms’. Given what privacy is already gone, a plastic photo card doesn’t make any real difference to our lives. Your argument here holds up better when discussing minority report level surveillance but not voter ID cards

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by De Gea's Legs (U14210)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by The Crystal Skull from thon Indiana Jones Disa... (U21917)
posted about a minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 1 minute ago
UK putting up a few barriers to voting ourselves now

We love importing America's worst idea
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s being proposed? Thought our systems were pretty robust already.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/mar/09/warning-over-photo-id-law-change-for-uk-wide-and-english-elections
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be honest, sounds like a sensible idea. Dont they have this in Northern Ireland already ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We do DGL, mate, as small flats containing no occupants often returned 33 votes for SF, as did local graveyards and the term Vote early, Vote Often was taken literally, lol.

Should probably sort this out Sat Nav before we start inserting tech into humans

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 13 seconds ago
Its actually quite easy to activate someone's camera without them knowing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can buy a camera cover for a webcam, or one with one on very easily, or just use tape. I do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Omg do you? What kind of journalism are you actually into?
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Just aware of reality, little more than that. As none of this is debating my points and is veering into ad hominem and sneers I am off for a bit. Adios

----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a mixture NPE. Surely you’re aware that your opinions & actions on this matter are very much in the minority and people are always going to question you on it. No-one is calling you a nutter. I can’t speak for everyone but I’m just interested. It’s not an opinion I have directly come into contact with.

My sister & dad until recently refused to bank online and I don’t know anyone else that covers their phone cameras but appreciate that people do.

comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by The Crystal Skull from thon Indiana Jones Disaster (U21917)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by De Gea's Legs (U14210)
posted less than a minute ago
Showing ID when coming to vote. How is this not a thing already should be the question!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah so you are in favour of mandatory id cards?

Should every citizen should have one?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We need ID to vote in NI...
Electoral card and passport or D Licence.

Shiftless and dodgy bastirts, so proper order.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi TBAB,

Hard to believe it's been 20 years since the Electoral Fraud Act came into force here.

Personally, handing over my driving licence when voting has been of little inconvenience.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Blarmy (U14547)
posted 55 seconds ago
Should probably sort this out Sat Nav before we start inserting tech into humans
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aha!!! It's all becoming clear... Sat Nav isn't just an innocent handle, it's his plan!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The clue is in the username people. Satellite is always tracking and Navigating you accordingly.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sir Digby (U6039)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Blarmy (U14547)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted less than a minute ago
Rather ridiculous for a free marketeer to conflate a transaction and agreement with a private company for a product with the state surveilling you. I
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The laws are a little loose

They can gain your consent without really explaining what they are doing openly
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Uh huh, I agree. I also think in many ways private surveillance is more concerning, nevertheless it is a transactional agreement not a legally compelled one and Apple has pivoted significantly to being pro consumer privacy for a reason. It is likely to be the case Google will also be compelled that way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a transactional agreement that is deliberately misleading and not fully advertising what people are agreeing to.
Governments have access to this data and whilst you might turn your smart phone off whilst not using it, I suspect that you use whilst on the move a fair bit and even if you don’t, millions of people who also make the same concerns over surveillance and bopping around with their smartphone using it 16/7.

My point is that long gone are the days that most people cannot be tracked & traced. Everything you ever type into your phone or PC is logged somewhere, VPNs, AVG, peerblocker, wiping history and cookies doesn’t really achieve much when concerned about state surveillance and monitoring.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You mean the pictures of my massive d*ck are still out there???
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes and the ones before you edited them
----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Speaking of massive diqs, has anyone heard from......Insert here.

Not that Insert here....Insert poster name here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------------
During my little hiatus, I made another account with the name:

Just Shoot (Insert)
😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brilliant

I used to be We Are Rangers or WAR, and was never outta bother?

Why Always Me, Bloody Ass Mods, or WAM BAM next?

comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 13 seconds ago
Its actually quite easy to activate someone's camera without them knowing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can buy a camera cover for a webcam, or one with one on very easily, or just use tape. I do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Omg do you? What kind of journalism are you actually into?
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Just aware of reality, little more than that. As none of this is debating my points and is veering into ad hominem and sneers I am off for a bit. Adios

----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a mixture NPE. Surely you’re aware that your opinions & actions on this matter are very much in the minority and people are always going to question you on it. No-one is calling you a nutter. I can’t speak for everyone but I’m just interested. It’s not an opinion I have directly come into contact with.

My sister & dad until recently refused to bank online and I don’t know anyone else that covers their phone cameras but appreciate that people do.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
I chose a phone just because it has a pop up camera. 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When were these pop up cameras? I don’t think I remember them.

comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by NPEEE (U22521)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by Just Shoot (U10408)
posted 13 seconds ago
Its actually quite easy to activate someone's camera without them knowing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can buy a camera cover for a webcam, or one with one on very easily, or just use tape. I do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Omg do you? What kind of journalism are you actually into?
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Just aware of reality, little more than that. As none of this is debating my points and is veering into ad hominem and sneers I am off for a bit. Adios

----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a mixture NPE. Surely you’re aware that your opinions & actions on this matter are very much in the minority and people are always going to question you on it. No-one is calling you a nutter. I can’t speak for everyone but I’m just interested. It’s not an opinion I have directly come into contact with.

My sister & dad until recently refused to bank online and I don’t know anyone else that covers their phone cameras but appreciate that people do.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
I chose a phone just because it has a pop up camera. 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's how I picked my Mrs.