Source? I very much doubt our squad cost £191M.
Is that for values or transfer fees paid, if its the second i think its wrong
Is that team 'worth', or what was paid for players? ie they value Gerrard at £20M (or whatever, no WUMS...) but he cost us nothing?
Oops, sorry Albert - great minds and all that...
i think its transfer fees summed up
Yeah, would like to see a link to this.
Reina - 6m
Johnson - 17m
Carragher - free
Agger - 5m
Enrique - 7m?
Kuyt - 10.5m
Lucas - 5m
Gerrard - free
Adam - 9m
Suarez - 23m
Downing - 19m
Carrol 35m
Doni - 1.5m
Kelly - free
Skrtel - 6m
Maxi - free
Henderson 16m
Bellamy - free
Aurelio - free
165m. Few of the prices might be a little out. Anyhow - explain yourself.
Total -
Its not available on their website, Its got to be values as, as Batmanu says, there is no way Wenger has spent £191m on his current squad.
... and if it was on fee's spent surely big spending Spurs should be up there!?
Maybe the figures quoted are in dollars?
Definitely team 'worth'. And that's how the league will finish on the last day, too...
... oh, Torres cost nearly a quarter of the whole Chelsea squad! lol..
Torres 50
Drogba 25
Essien 25
Thats 3 players near £100M are the rest of the Chelsea squad only worth £113M???
Yeh right.
This is obviously based on the websites values for the players, which makes it about as pointless as Kamrans existance
Almunia - Free
Diaby - £2M
Sagna - £9M
Mertesacker - £7M
Vermaelen - £10M
Koscielny - £8M
Rosicky - £8M
Arteta - £10M
Park - £3.5M
Van Persie - £2.3M
Santos - £6.2M
Szczesney - Free
AOC - £12M
Walcott - £9M
Ramsey - £5M
Song - £1M
Squillaci - £3M
Wilshere - Free
Djourou - Free
Fabianski - £3.5M
Arshavin - £15M
Jenkinson - £1M
Mannone - £350K
Gervinho - £10.8M
Frimpong - Free
Chamakh - Free
Miyaichi - Free
Total Cost - £126.65M
Is it at all possible for the OP to post a link to his article?
The real question would be, WHAT are individual players valued at by Optimum Sports? Love to see some of those figures - and how they're worked out?
Be interesting to see if they have the smiley next to Carroll's name in their report, it seems to be mandatory...
Arsenal: £126m
Liverpool: £165m
Converted into US dollars:
Arsenal: $199m
Liverpool: $260m
I think RipleysCat may have cracked it
Reckon its balls to be honest, a Chelsea fans posting on the Utd and Liverpool pages???
Saying money bags Chelsea have spent less than Utd and Liverpool????
Yeh right, one thinks he's on the WUM
City have spent 500 million on players since the Arabs came along.
Roman has spent about the same if not more.
Probably did all teams in Dollars then did Chelsea in Sterling. I wouldn't be surprised the lengths this idiot would go to to get a rise.
It sort of backfired here though, didn't it?
An shambles if ever I saw one.
1) City haven't spent £500m on players since the owners took control
2) Several players signed by City during this time have since left.
Young 16
Jones 16
Smalling 12
De gea 20
Berbatov 30
Rooney 27
Ferdinand 30
Vidic 7
Evra 5.5
Javier hernandez 7
Nani 17
ando 17
Carrick 18
Park 5
"Probably did all teams in Dollars then did Chelsea in Sterling"
Yep, looks that way.
Bout 200+ but I dont think enough to get to 261.
Sign in if you want to comment
EPL most expensive squads
Page 1 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9
posted on 16/9/11
Source? I very much doubt our squad cost £191M.
posted on 16/9/11
Triffic
posted on 16/9/11
Is that for values or transfer fees paid, if its the second i think its wrong
posted on 16/9/11
Is that team 'worth', or what was paid for players? ie they value Gerrard at £20M (or whatever, no WUMS...) but he cost us nothing?
posted on 16/9/11
Oops, sorry Albert - great minds and all that...
posted on 16/9/11
i think its transfer fees summed up
posted on 16/9/11
Yeah, would like to see a link to this.
posted on 16/9/11
Reina - 6m
Johnson - 17m
Carragher - free
Agger - 5m
Enrique - 7m?
Kuyt - 10.5m
Lucas - 5m
Gerrard - free
Adam - 9m
Suarez - 23m
Downing - 19m
Carrol 35m
Doni - 1.5m
Kelly - free
Skrtel - 6m
Maxi - free
Henderson 16m
Bellamy - free
Aurelio - free
165m. Few of the prices might be a little out. Anyhow - explain yourself.
Total -
posted on 16/9/11
Its not available on their website, Its got to be values as, as Batmanu says, there is no way Wenger has spent £191m on his current squad.
posted on 16/9/11
... and if it was on fee's spent surely big spending Spurs should be up there!?
posted on 16/9/11
Maybe the figures quoted are in dollars?
posted on 16/9/11
Definitely team 'worth'. And that's how the league will finish on the last day, too...
posted on 16/9/11
... oh, Torres cost nearly a quarter of the whole Chelsea squad! lol..
Torres 50
Drogba 25
Essien 25
Thats 3 players near £100M are the rest of the Chelsea squad only worth £113M???
Yeh right.
This is obviously based on the websites values for the players, which makes it about as pointless as Kamrans existance
posted on 16/9/11
Almunia - Free
Diaby - £2M
Sagna - £9M
Mertesacker - £7M
Vermaelen - £10M
Koscielny - £8M
Rosicky - £8M
Arteta - £10M
Park - £3.5M
Van Persie - £2.3M
Santos - £6.2M
Szczesney - Free
AOC - £12M
Walcott - £9M
Ramsey - £5M
Song - £1M
Squillaci - £3M
Wilshere - Free
Djourou - Free
Fabianski - £3.5M
Arshavin - £15M
Jenkinson - £1M
Mannone - £350K
Gervinho - £10.8M
Frimpong - Free
Chamakh - Free
Miyaichi - Free
Total Cost - £126.65M
posted on 16/9/11
Is it at all possible for the OP to post a link to his article?
posted on 16/9/11
The real question would be, WHAT are individual players valued at by Optimum Sports? Love to see some of those figures - and how they're worked out?
Be interesting to see if they have the smiley next to Carroll's name in their report, it seems to be mandatory...
posted on 16/9/11
Arsenal: £126m
Liverpool: £165m
Converted into US dollars:
Arsenal: $199m
Liverpool: $260m
posted on 16/9/11
I think RipleysCat may have cracked it
posted on 16/9/11
Reckon its balls to be honest, a Chelsea fans posting on the Utd and Liverpool pages???
Saying money bags Chelsea have spent less than Utd and Liverpool????
Yeh right, one thinks he's on the WUM
posted on 16/9/11
City have spent 500 million on players since the Arabs came along.
Roman has spent about the same if not more.
posted on 16/9/11
Probably did all teams in Dollars then did Chelsea in Sterling. I wouldn't be surprised the lengths this idiot would go to to get a rise.
It sort of backfired here though, didn't it?
An shambles if ever I saw one.
posted on 16/9/11
1) City haven't spent £500m on players since the owners took control
2) Several players signed by City during this time have since left.
posted on 16/9/11
Young 16
Jones 16
Smalling 12
De gea 20
Berbatov 30
Rooney 27
Ferdinand 30
Vidic 7
Evra 5.5
Javier hernandez 7
Nani 17
ando 17
Carrick 18
Park 5
posted on 16/9/11
"Probably did all teams in Dollars then did Chelsea in Sterling"
Yep, looks that way.
posted on 16/9/11
Bout 200+ but I dont think enough to get to 261.
Page 1 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9