No idea why we are being distracted by Brick Top's antics, Usyk won fair and square.
comment by NPE - Bottom Half FC (U22712)
posted 55 minutes ago
No idea why we are being distracted by Brick Top's antics, Usyk won fair and square.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a way to deflect from the fact that Dubois quit, again.
comment by Oscar #TeamFury. #Trump2024 (U12980)
posted 2 hours, 13 minutes ago
Yawn, it wasn’t a low blow we all know that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
tbf there is videos from either side and one makes the shot look legit and one makes it look low.
I think its inconclusive, I think the benefit of the doubt should be given to Dubios but cant argue with it going in favour of Usyk.
I dont think if its ruled a legal shot Usyk gets up from it, he looks gone there and I dont think he last the rest of the round either without his 5 mins rest.
The appeal will do nothing, I dont think they will appeal just a waste of money, what do you appeal, its unwinnable IMO.
Even if the appeal rule the shot legal there is no way they can say Usyk wouldnt have gotten up from it. so nothing can come of an appeal. thats just all for show IMO to (as someone else said) to save fce for Dubios.
comment by The Guvnor XI -Iron sharpens Iron- (U12889)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by NPE - Bottom Half FC (U22712)
posted 55 minutes ago
No idea why we are being distracted by Brick Top's antics, Usyk won fair and square.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a way to deflect from the fact that Dubois quit, again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suspect it's also another excuse for the Bricktop/Fury camp to keep putting barriers up to stop the Usyk fight from happening.
Talksport are fairly shameless, they're like Bricktop's mouthpiece these days.
It wasn't a low blow, but there shouldn't be a rematch anyway. It was a boring fight and nobody wants to see Dubois quit again.
Sky Sports Boxing explaining what a low blow is and that it was definitely an illegal punch:
https://youtu.be/LpBieiD6qDw?si=x3C9LAIyHGloZymh
do we just ignore the other videos and other boxers and trainers that say its legal then ?
i dont need anyones opinions tbh, I know the rules, iv practiced the rules. I am able to to look at all the angles and stuff we have to be able to say IMO you cant really prove either or ... to me its inconclusive.
But instantly I cant dismiss that video he says below the navel is a low blow ... its not.
the actual queenberry rule states that its below the waistband. the waistband is the top of the hip to below the rib cage. thats factually the definition of the waistband.
the navel falls into that zone but is not the threshold line. its used as a parameter to gauge.
do we just ignore the other videos and other boxers and trainers that say its legal then ?
--------------
By all means post any videos of anyone of merit saying it's a legal punch and explaining why they think that.
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
do we just ignore the other videos and other boxers and trainers that say its legal then ?
--------------
By all means post any videos of anyone of merit saying it's a legal punch and explaining why they think that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
define merit.... If i give you a boxer or a trainer saying you will dismiss it as no merit.
But Dom Ingle for one or many.
Like I said the rule is NOT south of the navel its south of the waistband . go google the queensberry rules and find out. Sky promote Usyk not Dubios Im sure there is zero agenda there.
Im sure the guy saying the navel is the cut off point for a low blow is legit and or just making a mistake !
If he is gonna quote rules he should really get them correct.
there is plenty of fighters and trainers out there saying the shot is borderline.
they really aint hard to find.
I could say me, I have merit !
boxed for about 4 years , still spar regular but dont compete (well I say compete it was inter club fights)
Like I said the rule is NOT south of the navel its south of the waistband . go google the queensberry rules and find out.
--------------
David Bellew said after the fight: "Anything below the naval is classed as low in boxing! That’s not my opinion that’s a FACT! That’s the rules!".
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
Like I said the rule is NOT south of the navel its south of the waistband . go google the queensberry rules and find out.
--------------
David Bellew said after the fight: "Anything below the naval is classed as low in boxing! That’s not my opinion that’s a FACT! That’s the rules!".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then he is wrong . like I said google the rules and tell me what they say.... Queensberry define the rules not Bellew
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
Like I said the rule is NOT south of the navel its south of the waistband . go google the queensberry rules and find out.
--------------
David Bellew said after the fight: "Anything below the naval is classed as low in boxing! That’s not my opinion that’s a FACT! That’s the rules!".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then he is wrong . like I said google the rules and tell me what they say.... Queensberry define the rules not Bellew
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you have a link to the Queensbury rules saying that then ?
It is actually an imaginary "belt line", not below the waistband - as obviously boxers can wear their shorts so the waistband is high.
The belt line is around the top of the hips. The ref should make clear to both boxers before the start of the fight where that line is on their opponent, as it is easy to confuse the shorts waistband to the belt line.
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
Like I said the rule is NOT south of the navel its south of the waistband . go google the queensberry rules and find out.
--------------
David Bellew said after the fight: "Anything below the naval is classed as low in boxing! That’s not my opinion that’s a FACT! That’s the rules!".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then he is wrong . like I said google the rules and tell me what they say.... Queensberry define the rules not Bellew
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you have a link to the Queensbury rules saying that then ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mate its the queensberry rules ... google it . google queensberry rules and low blow.
If you havent even looked at the rule prior to not knowing it then that says a lot.
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
Like I said the rule is NOT south of the navel its south of the waistband . go google the queensberry rules and find out.
--------------
David Bellew said after the fight: "Anything below the naval is classed as low in boxing! That’s not my opinion that’s a FACT! That’s the rules!".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then he is wrong . like I said google the rules and tell me what they say.... Queensberry define the rules not Bellew
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you have a link to the Queensbury rules saying that then ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mate its the queensberry rules ... google it . google queensberry rules and low blow.
If you havent even looked at the rule prior to not knowing it then that says a lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if it's that easy to google it then it should be really easy you to provide a link to what you're saying.
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 3 minutes ago
It is actually an imaginary "belt line", not below the waistband - as obviously boxers can wear their shorts so the waistband is high.
The belt line is around the top of the hips. The ref should make clear to both boxers before the start of the fight where that line is on their opponent, as it is easy to confuse the shorts waistband to the belt line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the rule clearly states the waist. The waist is the area between the top of your hip bone and the bottom of your rib cage.
therefore the cut off point for a low blow is the top of the hip.
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
Like I said the rule is NOT south of the navel its south of the waistband . go google the queensberry rules and find out.
--------------
David Bellew said after the fight: "Anything below the naval is classed as low in boxing! That’s not my opinion that’s a FACT! That’s the rules!".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then he is wrong . like I said google the rules and tell me what they say.... Queensberry define the rules not Bellew
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you have a link to the Queensbury rules saying that then ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mate its the queensberry rules ... google it . google queensberry rules and low blow.
If you havent even looked at the rule prior to not knowing it then that says a lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if it's that easy to google it then it should be really easy you to provide a link to what you're saying.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
im no doing the leg work of someone too lazy to find out themselves. Continue this argument in ignorance if you want.
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 3 minutes ago
It is actually an imaginary "belt line", not below the waistband - as obviously boxers can wear their shorts so the waistband is high.
The belt line is around the top of the hips. The ref should make clear to both boxers before the start of the fight where that line is on their opponent, as it is easy to confuse the shorts waistband to the belt line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the rule clearly states the waist. The waist is the area between the top of your hip bone and the bottom of your rib cage.
therefore the cut off point for a low blow is the top of the hip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. So not the waistband
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 3 minutes ago
It is actually an imaginary "belt line", not below the waistband - as obviously boxers can wear their shorts so the waistband is high.
The belt line is around the top of the hips. The ref should make clear to both boxers before the start of the fight where that line is on their opponent, as it is easy to confuse the shorts waistband to the belt line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the rule clearly states the waist. The waist is the area between the top of your hip bone and the bottom of your rib cage.
therefore the cut off point for a low blow is the top of the hip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. So not the waistband
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs the waistband is the entire area that I described the waist and the waistband are the same thing.
the waist and the waistband but have the same the cutoff point for being low. Ie below the top of the hip/
Now what does the Queensberry rule state for a low blow.
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
Like I said the rule is NOT south of the navel its south of the waistband . go google the queensberry rules and find out.
--------------
David Bellew said after the fight: "Anything below the naval is classed as low in boxing! That’s not my opinion that’s a FACT! That’s the rules!".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then he is wrong . like I said google the rules and tell me what they say.... Queensberry define the rules not Bellew
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you have a link to the Queensbury rules saying that then ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mate its the queensberry rules ... google it . google queensberry rules and low blow.
If you havent even looked at the rule prior to not knowing it then that says a lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if it's that easy to google it then it should be really easy you to provide a link to what you're saying.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
im no doing the leg work of someone too lazy to find out themselves. Continue this argument in ignorance if you want.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have Googled it and I can't see what you're seeing hence why I'm asking you for a link. If it's as easy to see as you keep saying then surely just provide the link so we can all see it.
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
Like I said the rule is NOT south of the navel its south of the waistband . go google the queensberry rules and find out.
--------------
David Bellew said after the fight: "Anything below the naval is classed as low in boxing! That’s not my opinion that’s a FACT! That’s the rules!".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then he is wrong . like I said google the rules and tell me what they say.... Queensberry define the rules not Bellew
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you have a link to the Queensbury rules saying that then ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mate its the queensberry rules ... google it . google queensberry rules and low blow.
If you havent even looked at the rule prior to not knowing it then that says a lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if it's that easy to google it then it should be really easy you to provide a link to what you're saying.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
im no doing the leg work of someone too lazy to find out themselves. Continue this argument in ignorance if you want.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have Googled it and I can't see what you're seeing hence why I'm asking you for a link. If it's as easy to see as you keep saying then surely just provide the link so we can all see it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
its easy go find it . admit it you gave your opinion as fact without actually reading the rules
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 47 seconds ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
Like I said the rule is NOT south of the navel its south of the waistband . go google the queensberry rules and find out.
--------------
David Bellew said after the fight: "Anything below the naval is classed as low in boxing! That’s not my opinion that’s a FACT! That’s the rules!".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then he is wrong . like I said google the rules and tell me what they say.... Queensberry define the rules not Bellew
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you have a link to the Queensbury rules saying that then ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mate its the queensberry rules ... google it . google queensberry rules and low blow.
If you havent even looked at the rule prior to not knowing it then that says a lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if it's that easy to google it then it should be really easy you to provide a link to what you're saying.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
im no doing the leg work of someone too lazy to find out themselves. Continue this argument in ignorance if you want.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have Googled it and I can't see what you're seeing hence why I'm asking you for a link. If it's as easy to see as you keep saying then surely just provide the link so we can all see it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
its easy go find it . admit it you gave your opinion as fact without actually reading the rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can't find it which is why I'm asking you for it. You've claimed it's very easy to find but you're unwilling to provide a link for some reason.
Sign in if you want to comment
Live Boxing Fight Thread!!!!
Page 409 of 548
410 | 411 | 412 | 413 | 414
posted on 30/8/23
No idea why we are being distracted by Brick Top's antics, Usyk won fair and square.
posted on 30/8/23
comment by NPE - Bottom Half FC (U22712)
posted 55 minutes ago
No idea why we are being distracted by Brick Top's antics, Usyk won fair and square.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a way to deflect from the fact that Dubois quit, again.
posted on 30/8/23
comment by Oscar #TeamFury. #Trump2024 (U12980)
posted 2 hours, 13 minutes ago
Yawn, it wasn’t a low blow we all know that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
tbf there is videos from either side and one makes the shot look legit and one makes it look low.
I think its inconclusive, I think the benefit of the doubt should be given to Dubios but cant argue with it going in favour of Usyk.
I dont think if its ruled a legal shot Usyk gets up from it, he looks gone there and I dont think he last the rest of the round either without his 5 mins rest.
The appeal will do nothing, I dont think they will appeal just a waste of money, what do you appeal, its unwinnable IMO.
Even if the appeal rule the shot legal there is no way they can say Usyk wouldnt have gotten up from it. so nothing can come of an appeal. thats just all for show IMO to (as someone else said) to save fce for Dubios.
posted on 30/8/23
comment by The Guvnor XI -Iron sharpens Iron- (U12889)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by NPE - Bottom Half FC (U22712)
posted 55 minutes ago
No idea why we are being distracted by Brick Top's antics, Usyk won fair and square.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a way to deflect from the fact that Dubois quit, again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suspect it's also another excuse for the Bricktop/Fury camp to keep putting barriers up to stop the Usyk fight from happening.
Talksport are fairly shameless, they're like Bricktop's mouthpiece these days.
posted on 30/8/23
It wasn't a low blow, but there shouldn't be a rematch anyway. It was a boring fight and nobody wants to see Dubois quit again.
posted on 30/8/23
Sky Sports Boxing explaining what a low blow is and that it was definitely an illegal punch:
https://youtu.be/LpBieiD6qDw?si=x3C9LAIyHGloZymh
posted on 30/8/23
do we just ignore the other videos and other boxers and trainers that say its legal then ?
i dont need anyones opinions tbh, I know the rules, iv practiced the rules. I am able to to look at all the angles and stuff we have to be able to say IMO you cant really prove either or ... to me its inconclusive.
But instantly I cant dismiss that video he says below the navel is a low blow ... its not.
the actual queenberry rule states that its below the waistband. the waistband is the top of the hip to below the rib cage. thats factually the definition of the waistband.
the navel falls into that zone but is not the threshold line. its used as a parameter to gauge.
posted on 30/8/23
do we just ignore the other videos and other boxers and trainers that say its legal then ?
--------------
By all means post any videos of anyone of merit saying it's a legal punch and explaining why they think that.
posted on 30/8/23
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
do we just ignore the other videos and other boxers and trainers that say its legal then ?
--------------
By all means post any videos of anyone of merit saying it's a legal punch and explaining why they think that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
define merit.... If i give you a boxer or a trainer saying you will dismiss it as no merit.
But Dom Ingle for one or many.
Like I said the rule is NOT south of the navel its south of the waistband . go google the queensberry rules and find out. Sky promote Usyk not Dubios Im sure there is zero agenda there.
Im sure the guy saying the navel is the cut off point for a low blow is legit and or just making a mistake !
If he is gonna quote rules he should really get them correct.
posted on 30/8/23
there is plenty of fighters and trainers out there saying the shot is borderline.
they really aint hard to find.
posted on 30/8/23
I could say me, I have merit !
boxed for about 4 years , still spar regular but dont compete (well I say compete it was inter club fights)
posted on 30/8/23
Like I said the rule is NOT south of the navel its south of the waistband . go google the queensberry rules and find out.
--------------
David Bellew said after the fight: "Anything below the naval is classed as low in boxing! That’s not my opinion that’s a FACT! That’s the rules!".
posted on 30/8/23
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
Like I said the rule is NOT south of the navel its south of the waistband . go google the queensberry rules and find out.
--------------
David Bellew said after the fight: "Anything below the naval is classed as low in boxing! That’s not my opinion that’s a FACT! That’s the rules!".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then he is wrong . like I said google the rules and tell me what they say.... Queensberry define the rules not Bellew
posted on 30/8/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
Like I said the rule is NOT south of the navel its south of the waistband . go google the queensberry rules and find out.
--------------
David Bellew said after the fight: "Anything below the naval is classed as low in boxing! That’s not my opinion that’s a FACT! That’s the rules!".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then he is wrong . like I said google the rules and tell me what they say.... Queensberry define the rules not Bellew
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you have a link to the Queensbury rules saying that then ?
posted on 30/8/23
It is actually an imaginary "belt line", not below the waistband - as obviously boxers can wear their shorts so the waistband is high.
The belt line is around the top of the hips. The ref should make clear to both boxers before the start of the fight where that line is on their opponent, as it is easy to confuse the shorts waistband to the belt line.
posted on 30/8/23
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
Like I said the rule is NOT south of the navel its south of the waistband . go google the queensberry rules and find out.
--------------
David Bellew said after the fight: "Anything below the naval is classed as low in boxing! That’s not my opinion that’s a FACT! That’s the rules!".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then he is wrong . like I said google the rules and tell me what they say.... Queensberry define the rules not Bellew
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you have a link to the Queensbury rules saying that then ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mate its the queensberry rules ... google it . google queensberry rules and low blow.
If you havent even looked at the rule prior to not knowing it then that says a lot.
posted on 30/8/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
Like I said the rule is NOT south of the navel its south of the waistband . go google the queensberry rules and find out.
--------------
David Bellew said after the fight: "Anything below the naval is classed as low in boxing! That’s not my opinion that’s a FACT! That’s the rules!".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then he is wrong . like I said google the rules and tell me what they say.... Queensberry define the rules not Bellew
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you have a link to the Queensbury rules saying that then ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mate its the queensberry rules ... google it . google queensberry rules and low blow.
If you havent even looked at the rule prior to not knowing it then that says a lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if it's that easy to google it then it should be really easy you to provide a link to what you're saying.
posted on 30/8/23
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 3 minutes ago
It is actually an imaginary "belt line", not below the waistband - as obviously boxers can wear their shorts so the waistband is high.
The belt line is around the top of the hips. The ref should make clear to both boxers before the start of the fight where that line is on their opponent, as it is easy to confuse the shorts waistband to the belt line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the rule clearly states the waist. The waist is the area between the top of your hip bone and the bottom of your rib cage.
therefore the cut off point for a low blow is the top of the hip.
posted on 30/8/23
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
Like I said the rule is NOT south of the navel its south of the waistband . go google the queensberry rules and find out.
--------------
David Bellew said after the fight: "Anything below the naval is classed as low in boxing! That’s not my opinion that’s a FACT! That’s the rules!".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then he is wrong . like I said google the rules and tell me what they say.... Queensberry define the rules not Bellew
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you have a link to the Queensbury rules saying that then ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mate its the queensberry rules ... google it . google queensberry rules and low blow.
If you havent even looked at the rule prior to not knowing it then that says a lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if it's that easy to google it then it should be really easy you to provide a link to what you're saying.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
im no doing the leg work of someone too lazy to find out themselves. Continue this argument in ignorance if you want.
posted on 30/8/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 3 minutes ago
It is actually an imaginary "belt line", not below the waistband - as obviously boxers can wear their shorts so the waistband is high.
The belt line is around the top of the hips. The ref should make clear to both boxers before the start of the fight where that line is on their opponent, as it is easy to confuse the shorts waistband to the belt line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the rule clearly states the waist. The waist is the area between the top of your hip bone and the bottom of your rib cage.
therefore the cut off point for a low blow is the top of the hip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. So not the waistband
posted on 30/8/23
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 3 minutes ago
It is actually an imaginary "belt line", not below the waistband - as obviously boxers can wear their shorts so the waistband is high.
The belt line is around the top of the hips. The ref should make clear to both boxers before the start of the fight where that line is on their opponent, as it is easy to confuse the shorts waistband to the belt line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the rule clearly states the waist. The waist is the area between the top of your hip bone and the bottom of your rib cage.
therefore the cut off point for a low blow is the top of the hip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. So not the waistband
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs the waistband is the entire area that I described the waist and the waistband are the same thing.
posted on 30/8/23
the waist and the waistband but have the same the cutoff point for being low. Ie below the top of the hip/
Now what does the Queensberry rule state for a low blow.
posted on 30/8/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
Like I said the rule is NOT south of the navel its south of the waistband . go google the queensberry rules and find out.
--------------
David Bellew said after the fight: "Anything below the naval is classed as low in boxing! That’s not my opinion that’s a FACT! That’s the rules!".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then he is wrong . like I said google the rules and tell me what they say.... Queensberry define the rules not Bellew
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you have a link to the Queensbury rules saying that then ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mate its the queensberry rules ... google it . google queensberry rules and low blow.
If you havent even looked at the rule prior to not knowing it then that says a lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if it's that easy to google it then it should be really easy you to provide a link to what you're saying.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
im no doing the leg work of someone too lazy to find out themselves. Continue this argument in ignorance if you want.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have Googled it and I can't see what you're seeing hence why I'm asking you for a link. If it's as easy to see as you keep saying then surely just provide the link so we can all see it.
posted on 30/8/23
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
Like I said the rule is NOT south of the navel its south of the waistband . go google the queensberry rules and find out.
--------------
David Bellew said after the fight: "Anything below the naval is classed as low in boxing! That’s not my opinion that’s a FACT! That’s the rules!".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then he is wrong . like I said google the rules and tell me what they say.... Queensberry define the rules not Bellew
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you have a link to the Queensbury rules saying that then ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mate its the queensberry rules ... google it . google queensberry rules and low blow.
If you havent even looked at the rule prior to not knowing it then that says a lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if it's that easy to google it then it should be really easy you to provide a link to what you're saying.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
im no doing the leg work of someone too lazy to find out themselves. Continue this argument in ignorance if you want.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have Googled it and I can't see what you're seeing hence why I'm asking you for a link. If it's as easy to see as you keep saying then surely just provide the link so we can all see it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
its easy go find it . admit it you gave your opinion as fact without actually reading the rules
posted on 30/8/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 47 seconds ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Superbettino (U6486)
posted 1 minute ago
Like I said the rule is NOT south of the navel its south of the waistband . go google the queensberry rules and find out.
--------------
David Bellew said after the fight: "Anything below the naval is classed as low in boxing! That’s not my opinion that’s a FACT! That’s the rules!".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
then he is wrong . like I said google the rules and tell me what they say.... Queensberry define the rules not Bellew
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you have a link to the Queensbury rules saying that then ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mate its the queensberry rules ... google it . google queensberry rules and low blow.
If you havent even looked at the rule prior to not knowing it then that says a lot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if it's that easy to google it then it should be really easy you to provide a link to what you're saying.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
im no doing the leg work of someone too lazy to find out themselves. Continue this argument in ignorance if you want.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have Googled it and I can't see what you're seeing hence why I'm asking you for a link. If it's as easy to see as you keep saying then surely just provide the link so we can all see it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
its easy go find it . admit it you gave your opinion as fact without actually reading the rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can't find it which is why I'm asking you for it. You've claimed it's very easy to find but you're unwilling to provide a link for some reason.
Page 409 of 548
410 | 411 | 412 | 413 | 414