comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
Rwandan spokeswoman on Sky just confirmed that the new deal between the UK and Rwanda will break international law, as those processed and found to have a valid claim won’t be able to return to the UK and will be settled in Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A layperson knows this so how can the government with access to the best legal advice in the world does not boogles the mind
🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how are Australia getting away with it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where are they trafficking asylum seekers to?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Manus & Nauru (sp) ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't be legal!
If the Aussies are doing it doesn't mean we should!
I've never understood why a refugee isn't made to claim in the first EU nation they touch soil on, bar a specific reason they need to come to the UK. If there was some sort of charter between nations it'd be far fairer in my view.
———
People like this are allowed to vote.
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
Rwandan spokeswoman on Sky just confirmed that the new deal between the UK and Rwanda will break international law, as those processed and found to have a valid claim won’t be able to return to the UK and will be settled in Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A layperson knows this so how can the government with access to the best legal advice in the world does not boogles the mind
🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how are Australia getting away with it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where are they trafficking asylum seekers to?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Manus & Nauru (sp) ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't be legal!
If the Aussies are doing it doesn't mean we should!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It isn’t legal.
The International Criminal Court has said it’s unlawful and forms the basis of a crime against humanity.
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbb Lasso 🇺🇦 🇦🇺 🇪🇸 (U22716)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 2 minutes ago
I find it strange people say we have lost our caring identity as a nation, when the reason most refugees pass through other EU states to get here is because we have the most generous benefit system.
Genuine asylum seekers should always be handled on a case by case basis but we cannot endorse a system where refugees refuse to seek refuge in EU countries because it's more beneficial to come here.
It isn't about race it's about a generous benefit system being stretched to the point it can no longer help the people it's intended to aid.
I've never understood why a refugee isn't made to claim in the first EU nation they touch soil on, bar a specific reason they need to come to the UK. If there was some sort of charter between nations it'd be far fairer in my view.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does every refugee get access to benefits?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They have access to the NHS for starters
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And what else, for finishers?
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
Rwandan spokeswoman on Sky just confirmed that the new deal between the UK and Rwanda will break international law, as those processed and found to have a valid claim won’t be able to return to the UK and will be settled in Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A layperson knows this so how can the government with access to the best legal advice in the world does not boogles the mind
🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how are Australia getting away with it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where are they trafficking asylum seekers to?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Manus & Nauru (sp) ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't be legal!
If the Aussies are doing it doesn't mean we should!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It isn’t legal.
The International Criminal Court has said it’s unlawful and forms the basis of a crime against humanity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There you go!
comment by Robbb Lasso 🇺🇦 🇦🇺 🇪🇸 (U22716)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Robbb Lasso 🇺🇦 🇦🇺 🇪🇸 (U22716)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 2 minutes ago
I find it strange people say we have lost our caring identity as a nation, when the reason most refugees pass through other EU states to get here is because we have the most generous benefit system.
Genuine asylum seekers should always be handled on a case by case basis but we cannot endorse a system where refugees refuse to seek refuge in EU countries because it's more beneficial to come here.
It isn't about race it's about a generous benefit system being stretched to the point it can no longer help the people it's intended to aid.
I've never understood why a refugee isn't made to claim in the first EU nation they touch soil on, bar a specific reason they need to come to the UK. If there was some sort of charter between nations it'd be far fairer in my view.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does every refugee get access to benefits?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They have access to the NHS for starters
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s great but not everyone needs medical assistance in their day to day life. Do they get access to benefits straight away? Or at all?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thay get access to social housing IF they have children with them.
Before anyone asks, I think the Australian model is horrific so don’t confuse my nationality with how I view the refugee crisis
I implore you guys to watch Stateless on Netflix. A 6 (I think) drama series with Cate Blanchett about now bad the whole thing is . Might get you coming away from it with a bit of sympathy whereas you had less before
^ Sorry, that’s the new policy.
I don’t believe the Aussies are still sending asylum seekers to be processed in Nauru or Indonesia (probably partly because it was an eye-wateringly expensive process, just like the UK-Rwandan deal).
Typical Aussies, eh ? It's in their blood
(Sorry Robb )
Let’s also be clear, the British state has an obligation to many refugees as a result of being directly, or indirectly, responsible for them seeking refuge in the first place.
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 1 second ago
^ Sorry, that’s the new policy.
I don’t believe the Aussies are still sending asylum seekers to be processed in Nauru or Indonesia (probably partly because it was an eye-wateringly expensive process, just like the UK-Rwandan deal).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Every way is expensive...
The government recently revealed it was costing more than $56,000 a night to house 32 refugees and asylum seekers in the Park hotel in Melbourne. Labor said the government would save $19m by shifting the detainees into community detention, describing the ongoing cost as “an unbelievable waste of taxpayer money”.
One UK NGO spokesperson this morning pointed out that it’d be cheaper to house all asylum seekers in 4* hotels in the UK on a permanent basis than send them to Rwanda under this deal
I’m sure the low-tax, small-state Tories will be loving that detail.
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 1 second ago
^ Sorry, that’s the new policy.
I don’t believe the Aussies are still sending asylum seekers to be processed in Nauru or Indonesia (probably partly because it was an eye-wateringly expensive process, just like the UK-Rwandan deal).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Every way is expensive...
The government recently revealed it was costing more than $56,000 a night to house 32 refugees and asylum seekers in the Park hotel in Melbourne. Labor said the government would save $19m by shifting the detainees into community detention, describing the ongoing cost as “an unbelievable waste of taxpayer money”.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here’s a facking crazy idea, but bear with me…
How about maintaining sufficient purpose-built facilities to house people in whilst their applications are being processed?
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 5 minutes ago
Simply exporting the issue to another country rather than coming up with a solution to crack down on illegal human trafficking.
This government can't stoop any lower.
Down to the courts now to challenge and defeat this stupid plan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair it’s a bit like coming up with a solution for illegal drug taking. There ain’t one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What if these drugs were legalised?
Eh? What then?
Ultimately, we all know what the problem is.
Its racism.
comment by Assassin Baby - (U1282)
posted 34 seconds ago
Ultimately, we all know what the problem is.
Its racism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet they strike a deal with a black country?
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
Rwandan spokeswoman on Sky just confirmed that the new deal between the UK and Rwanda will break international law, as those processed and found to have a valid claim won’t be able to return to the UK and will be settled in Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A layperson knows this so how can the government with access to the best legal advice in the world does not boogles the mind
🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how are Australia getting away with it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where are they trafficking asylum seekers to?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Manus & Nauru (sp) ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't be legal!
If the Aussies are doing it doesn't mean we should!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It isn’t legal.
The International Criminal Court has said it’s unlawful and forms the basis of a crime against humanity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Problem is the Aussies won the knifey spoony match so got to implement the policy
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 5 minutes ago
Simply exporting the issue to another country rather than coming up with a solution to crack down on illegal human trafficking.
This government can't stoop any lower.
Down to the courts now to challenge and defeat this stupid plan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair it’s a bit like coming up with a solution for illegal drug taking. There ain’t one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What if these drugs were legalised?
Eh? What then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of these drugs are recreational, has no medical merit or use. Will never be legalised therefore the black market will always have a role, sadly.
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 5 minutes ago
Simply exporting the issue to another country rather than coming up with a solution to crack down on illegal human trafficking.
This government can't stoop any lower.
Down to the courts now to challenge and defeat this stupid plan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair it’s a bit like coming up with a solution for illegal drug taking. There ain’t one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Two separate issues
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes and no. Two markets with insatiable demand and criminals willing to make money out of that. That the end product is different is largely irrelevant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Two separate root causes of the issues
Migration - motivation? Leaving war torn country. Escape poverty, etc
Drugs - satisfy addiction
I agree the black market satisfies a demand. I'm talking about tackling roots cause of migration generally.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Immigration and human trafficking are also two separate issues.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't say it wasn't
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Simply exporting the issue to another country rather than coming up with a solution to crack down on illegal human trafficking."
This law has nothing to do with human trafficing.
Problem is the Aussies won the knifey spoony match so got to implement the policy
———
comment by Anthony The King Elanga (U10026)
posted 52 seconds ago
Problem is the Aussies won the knifey spoony match so got to implement the policy
———
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought you'd like that
comment by Assassin Baby - (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
Ultimately, we all know what the problem is.
Its racism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it racism?
Could it be linked to the fact we just had a NI hike to cover our already bloated social welfare system?
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 5 minutes ago
Simply exporting the issue to another country rather than coming up with a solution to crack down on illegal human trafficking.
This government can't stoop any lower.
Down to the courts now to challenge and defeat this stupid plan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair it’s a bit like coming up with a solution for illegal drug taking. There ain’t one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Two separate issues
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes and no. Two markets with insatiable demand and criminals willing to make money out of that. That the end product is different is largely irrelevant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Two separate root causes of the issues
Migration - motivation? Leaving war torn country. Escape poverty, etc
Drugs - satisfy addiction
I agree the black market satisfies a demand. I'm talking about tackling roots cause of migration generally.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Immigration and human trafficking are also two separate issues.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't say it wasn't
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Simply exporting the issue to another country rather than coming up with a solution to crack down on illegal human trafficking."
This law has nothing to do with human trafficing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which law?
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 15 minutes ago
I find it strange people say we have lost our caring identity as a nation, when the reason most refugees pass through other EU states to get here is because we have the most generous benefit system.
Genuine asylum seekers should always be handled on a case by case basis but we cannot endorse a system where refugees refuse to seek refuge in EU countries because it's more beneficial to come here.
It isn't about race it's about a generous benefit system being stretched to the point it can no longer help the people it's intended to aid.
I've never understood why a refugee isn't made to claim in the first EU nation they touch soil on, bar a specific reason they need to come to the UK. If there was some sort of charter between nations it'd be far fairer in my view.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty much everything in this post is simply not true, or opinions based on not true things.
The UK does not have the most generous benefits system, the UK does not receive the most asylum seekers (far, far from it) and asylum seeker do not qualify for benefits when they arrive anyway. Most refugees do stop in the first safe country they set foot in, but to refuse to do our bit simply because we're an island or because our immediate neighbours aren't total cvnts seems fairly unsporting.
Sign in if you want to comment
Rwanda
Page 8 of 20
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
posted on 14/4/22
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
Rwandan spokeswoman on Sky just confirmed that the new deal between the UK and Rwanda will break international law, as those processed and found to have a valid claim won’t be able to return to the UK and will be settled in Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A layperson knows this so how can the government with access to the best legal advice in the world does not boogles the mind
🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how are Australia getting away with it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where are they trafficking asylum seekers to?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Manus & Nauru (sp) ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't be legal!
If the Aussies are doing it doesn't mean we should!
posted on 14/4/22
I've never understood why a refugee isn't made to claim in the first EU nation they touch soil on, bar a specific reason they need to come to the UK. If there was some sort of charter between nations it'd be far fairer in my view.
———
People like this are allowed to vote.
posted on 14/4/22
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
Rwandan spokeswoman on Sky just confirmed that the new deal between the UK and Rwanda will break international law, as those processed and found to have a valid claim won’t be able to return to the UK and will be settled in Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A layperson knows this so how can the government with access to the best legal advice in the world does not boogles the mind
🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how are Australia getting away with it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where are they trafficking asylum seekers to?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Manus & Nauru (sp) ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't be legal!
If the Aussies are doing it doesn't mean we should!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It isn’t legal.
The International Criminal Court has said it’s unlawful and forms the basis of a crime against humanity.
posted on 14/4/22
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbb Lasso 🇺🇦 🇦🇺 🇪🇸 (U22716)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 2 minutes ago
I find it strange people say we have lost our caring identity as a nation, when the reason most refugees pass through other EU states to get here is because we have the most generous benefit system.
Genuine asylum seekers should always be handled on a case by case basis but we cannot endorse a system where refugees refuse to seek refuge in EU countries because it's more beneficial to come here.
It isn't about race it's about a generous benefit system being stretched to the point it can no longer help the people it's intended to aid.
I've never understood why a refugee isn't made to claim in the first EU nation they touch soil on, bar a specific reason they need to come to the UK. If there was some sort of charter between nations it'd be far fairer in my view.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does every refugee get access to benefits?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They have access to the NHS for starters
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And what else, for finishers?
posted on 14/4/22
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
Rwandan spokeswoman on Sky just confirmed that the new deal between the UK and Rwanda will break international law, as those processed and found to have a valid claim won’t be able to return to the UK and will be settled in Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A layperson knows this so how can the government with access to the best legal advice in the world does not boogles the mind
🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how are Australia getting away with it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where are they trafficking asylum seekers to?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Manus & Nauru (sp) ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't be legal!
If the Aussies are doing it doesn't mean we should!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It isn’t legal.
The International Criminal Court has said it’s unlawful and forms the basis of a crime against humanity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There you go!
posted on 14/4/22
comment by Robbb Lasso 🇺🇦 🇦🇺 🇪🇸 (U22716)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Robbb Lasso 🇺🇦 🇦🇺 🇪🇸 (U22716)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 2 minutes ago
I find it strange people say we have lost our caring identity as a nation, when the reason most refugees pass through other EU states to get here is because we have the most generous benefit system.
Genuine asylum seekers should always be handled on a case by case basis but we cannot endorse a system where refugees refuse to seek refuge in EU countries because it's more beneficial to come here.
It isn't about race it's about a generous benefit system being stretched to the point it can no longer help the people it's intended to aid.
I've never understood why a refugee isn't made to claim in the first EU nation they touch soil on, bar a specific reason they need to come to the UK. If there was some sort of charter between nations it'd be far fairer in my view.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does every refugee get access to benefits?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They have access to the NHS for starters
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s great but not everyone needs medical assistance in their day to day life. Do they get access to benefits straight away? Or at all?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thay get access to social housing IF they have children with them.
posted on 14/4/22
Before anyone asks, I think the Australian model is horrific so don’t confuse my nationality with how I view the refugee crisis
I implore you guys to watch Stateless on Netflix. A 6 (I think) drama series with Cate Blanchett about now bad the whole thing is . Might get you coming away from it with a bit of sympathy whereas you had less before
posted on 14/4/22
^ Sorry, that’s the new policy.
I don’t believe the Aussies are still sending asylum seekers to be processed in Nauru or Indonesia (probably partly because it was an eye-wateringly expensive process, just like the UK-Rwandan deal).
posted on 14/4/22
Typical Aussies, eh ? It's in their blood
(Sorry Robb )
posted on 14/4/22
Let’s also be clear, the British state has an obligation to many refugees as a result of being directly, or indirectly, responsible for them seeking refuge in the first place.
posted on 14/4/22
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 1 second ago
^ Sorry, that’s the new policy.
I don’t believe the Aussies are still sending asylum seekers to be processed in Nauru or Indonesia (probably partly because it was an eye-wateringly expensive process, just like the UK-Rwandan deal).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Every way is expensive...
The government recently revealed it was costing more than $56,000 a night to house 32 refugees and asylum seekers in the Park hotel in Melbourne. Labor said the government would save $19m by shifting the detainees into community detention, describing the ongoing cost as “an unbelievable waste of taxpayer money”.
posted on 14/4/22
One UK NGO spokesperson this morning pointed out that it’d be cheaper to house all asylum seekers in 4* hotels in the UK on a permanent basis than send them to Rwanda under this deal
I’m sure the low-tax, small-state Tories will be loving that detail.
posted on 14/4/22
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 1 second ago
^ Sorry, that’s the new policy.
I don’t believe the Aussies are still sending asylum seekers to be processed in Nauru or Indonesia (probably partly because it was an eye-wateringly expensive process, just like the UK-Rwandan deal).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Every way is expensive...
The government recently revealed it was costing more than $56,000 a night to house 32 refugees and asylum seekers in the Park hotel in Melbourne. Labor said the government would save $19m by shifting the detainees into community detention, describing the ongoing cost as “an unbelievable waste of taxpayer money”.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here’s a facking crazy idea, but bear with me…
How about maintaining sufficient purpose-built facilities to house people in whilst their applications are being processed?
posted on 14/4/22
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 5 minutes ago
Simply exporting the issue to another country rather than coming up with a solution to crack down on illegal human trafficking.
This government can't stoop any lower.
Down to the courts now to challenge and defeat this stupid plan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair it’s a bit like coming up with a solution for illegal drug taking. There ain’t one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What if these drugs were legalised?
Eh? What then?
posted on 14/4/22
Ultimately, we all know what the problem is.
Its racism.
posted on 14/4/22
comment by Assassin Baby - (U1282)
posted 34 seconds ago
Ultimately, we all know what the problem is.
Its racism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet they strike a deal with a black country?
posted on 14/4/22
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
Rwandan spokeswoman on Sky just confirmed that the new deal between the UK and Rwanda will break international law, as those processed and found to have a valid claim won’t be able to return to the UK and will be settled in Rwanda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A layperson knows this so how can the government with access to the best legal advice in the world does not boogles the mind
🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how are Australia getting away with it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where are they trafficking asylum seekers to?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Manus & Nauru (sp) ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't be legal!
If the Aussies are doing it doesn't mean we should!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It isn’t legal.
The International Criminal Court has said it’s unlawful and forms the basis of a crime against humanity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Problem is the Aussies won the knifey spoony match so got to implement the policy
posted on 14/4/22
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 5 minutes ago
Simply exporting the issue to another country rather than coming up with a solution to crack down on illegal human trafficking.
This government can't stoop any lower.
Down to the courts now to challenge and defeat this stupid plan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair it’s a bit like coming up with a solution for illegal drug taking. There ain’t one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What if these drugs were legalised?
Eh? What then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of these drugs are recreational, has no medical merit or use. Will never be legalised therefore the black market will always have a role, sadly.
posted on 14/4/22
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 5 minutes ago
Simply exporting the issue to another country rather than coming up with a solution to crack down on illegal human trafficking.
This government can't stoop any lower.
Down to the courts now to challenge and defeat this stupid plan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair it’s a bit like coming up with a solution for illegal drug taking. There ain’t one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Two separate issues
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes and no. Two markets with insatiable demand and criminals willing to make money out of that. That the end product is different is largely irrelevant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Two separate root causes of the issues
Migration - motivation? Leaving war torn country. Escape poverty, etc
Drugs - satisfy addiction
I agree the black market satisfies a demand. I'm talking about tackling roots cause of migration generally.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Immigration and human trafficking are also two separate issues.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't say it wasn't
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Simply exporting the issue to another country rather than coming up with a solution to crack down on illegal human trafficking."
This law has nothing to do with human trafficing.
posted on 14/4/22
Problem is the Aussies won the knifey spoony match so got to implement the policy
———
posted on 14/4/22
comment by Anthony The King Elanga (U10026)
posted 52 seconds ago
Problem is the Aussies won the knifey spoony match so got to implement the policy
———
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought you'd like that
posted on 14/4/22
comment by Assassin Baby - (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
Ultimately, we all know what the problem is.
Its racism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it racism?
Could it be linked to the fact we just had a NI hike to cover our already bloated social welfare system?
posted on 14/4/22
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Salam Reds (Pro ETH) (U22803)
posted 5 minutes ago
Simply exporting the issue to another country rather than coming up with a solution to crack down on illegal human trafficking.
This government can't stoop any lower.
Down to the courts now to challenge and defeat this stupid plan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair it’s a bit like coming up with a solution for illegal drug taking. There ain’t one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Two separate issues
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes and no. Two markets with insatiable demand and criminals willing to make money out of that. That the end product is different is largely irrelevant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Two separate root causes of the issues
Migration - motivation? Leaving war torn country. Escape poverty, etc
Drugs - satisfy addiction
I agree the black market satisfies a demand. I'm talking about tackling roots cause of migration generally.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Immigration and human trafficking are also two separate issues.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't say it wasn't
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Simply exporting the issue to another country rather than coming up with a solution to crack down on illegal human trafficking."
This law has nothing to do with human trafficing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which law?
posted on 14/4/22
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 15 minutes ago
I find it strange people say we have lost our caring identity as a nation, when the reason most refugees pass through other EU states to get here is because we have the most generous benefit system.
Genuine asylum seekers should always be handled on a case by case basis but we cannot endorse a system where refugees refuse to seek refuge in EU countries because it's more beneficial to come here.
It isn't about race it's about a generous benefit system being stretched to the point it can no longer help the people it's intended to aid.
I've never understood why a refugee isn't made to claim in the first EU nation they touch soil on, bar a specific reason they need to come to the UK. If there was some sort of charter between nations it'd be far fairer in my view.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty much everything in this post is simply not true, or opinions based on not true things.
The UK does not have the most generous benefits system, the UK does not receive the most asylum seekers (far, far from it) and asylum seeker do not qualify for benefits when they arrive anyway. Most refugees do stop in the first safe country they set foot in, but to refuse to do our bit simply because we're an island or because our immediate neighbours aren't total cvnts seems fairly unsporting.
posted on 14/4/22
200
Page 8 of 20
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13