comment by Lexballielegend (U22945)
posted 9 minutes ago
Be interesting to see what kind of budget DD has sanctioned should BR arrive, not fussed about his salary that’s purely between an employer and their employee and IMO their business and no one else’s. In all walks of life you agree your salary with your employer football is no different. It’s the budget to improve the squad I am curious about
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You also agree your working conditions and all the available tools and resources at your disposal that you believe will let you meet their desired targets.
The salary is just reflective of all that
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 39 seconds ago
Even the Liverpool game, we were winning or drawing when Goldson went off.
-----
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did someone write that?
Oh ffs 😂😂😂
It is “Stupid morning”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't write it but don't understand whats stupid about it? Underlines the point on how significant Goldson's injury was.
To make the point further, Rangers points total in games if taken over the season with Goldson was 1st in the league and without him was 7th.
In the Liverpool game he got injured at 1-1 just before half time and we lost 7-1. He's the most important player we have by a mile.
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 39 seconds ago
Even the Liverpool game, we were winning or drawing when Goldson went off.
-----
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did someone write that?
Oh ffs 😂😂😂
It is “Stupid morning”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't write it but don't understand whats stupid about it? Underlines the point on how significant Goldson's injury was.
To make the point further, Rangers points total in games if taken over the season with Goldson was 1st in the league and without him was 7th.
In the Liverpool game he got injured at 1-1 just before half time and we lost 7-1. He's the most important player we have by a mile.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. You’d probably as likely lost 6-1
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 39 seconds ago
Even the Liverpool game, we were winning or drawing when Goldson went off.
-----
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did someone write that?
Oh ffs 😂😂😂
It is “Stupid morning”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't write it but don't understand whats stupid about it? Underlines the point on how significant Goldson's injury was.
To make the point further, Rangers points total in games if taken over the season with Goldson was 1st in the league and without him was 7th.
In the Liverpool game he got injured at 1-1 just before half time and we lost 7-1. He's the most important player we have by a mile.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. You’d probably as likely lost 6-1
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think anyone was really trying to make the point the Liverpool game would have been different and more highlighting the extent of the difference made when he played vs didn't play.
Surely a decent sample is a 90 minute game of 2 halves against the same opposition where an individual player plays one half vs not the other?
“Rangers points total in games if taken over the season with Goldson was 1st in the league and without him was 7th”
Wait. Rangers were never first in the league. Are you suggesting that it he’d played every game you’d have won the league?
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 39 seconds ago
Even the Liverpool game, we were winning or drawing when Goldson went off.
-----
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did someone write that?
Oh ffs 😂😂😂
It is “Stupid morning”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't write it but don't understand whats stupid about it? Underlines the point on how significant Goldson's injury was.
To make the point further, Rangers points total in games if taken over the season with Goldson was 1st in the league and without him was 7th.
In the Liverpool game he got injured at 1-1 just before half time and we lost 7-1. He's the most important player we have by a mile.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. You’d probably as likely lost 6-1
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think anyone was really trying to make the point the Liverpool game would have been different and more highlighting the extent of the difference made when he played vs didn't play.
Surely a decent sample is a 90 minute game of 2 halves against the same opposition where an individual player plays one half vs not the other?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’re equally ridiculous as “samples”
Leagues aren’t won or lost on samples.
Best left as he was likely your best and most influential player. To suggest any results would have been different had he played when he didn’t is pure guesswork.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
“Rangers points total in games if taken over the season with Goldson was 1st in the league and without him was 7th”
Wait. Rangers were never first in the league. Are you suggesting that it he’d played every game you’d have won the league?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. I'm highlighting that if you take the games Goldson played and accumulate points won by all teams in their respective fixtures Rangers have more points than anyone else.
If you take the games he didn't play Rangers have the 7th most points.
It's too simplistic to say if he played every game we would have won the league. It's not a stretch to say though that his injury was a significant moment in the season for us. I don't think thats unusual, most teams see variation in results when their important players are out. I think Celtic see something similar when CCV doesn't play.
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
“Rangers points total in games if taken over the season with Goldson was 1st in the league and without him was 7th”
Wait. Rangers were never first in the league. Are you suggesting that it he’d played every game you’d have won the league?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. I'm highlighting that if you take the games Goldson played and accumulate points won by all teams in their respective fixtures Rangers have more points than anyone else.
If you take the games he didn't play Rangers have the 7th most points.
It's too simplistic to say if he played every game we would have won the league. It's not a stretch to say though that his injury was a significant moment in the season for us. I don't think thats unusual, most teams see variation in results when their important players are out. I think Celtic see something similar when CCV doesn't play.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah. I see what you mean.
We might have won the last game at Ibrox if CCV had played.
I highly doubt it mind.
Right. Gym, swim then ruin it all by heading to bar.
Well if it is BR and it’s looking that way I wish they would just get on with it and make the announcement. There is a squad to analyse, targets to identify and sound out, a pre-season training camp followed by a trip to Japan and S Korea all in the pipeline. Get the finger oot.
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 39 seconds ago
Even the Liverpool game, we were winning or drawing when Goldson went off.
-----
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did someone write that?
Oh ffs 😂😂😂
It is “Stupid morning”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't write it but don't understand whats stupid about it? Underlines the point on how significant Goldson's injury was.
To make the point further, Rangers points total in games if taken over the season with Goldson was 1st in the league and without him was 7th.
In the Liverpool game he got injured at 1-1 just before half time and we lost 7-1. He's the most important player we have by a mile.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
have heard it all now
Can we have the Robby McCrorie league as well ? pretty sure you would have won that ?
Robby McCrorie only played 3 or 4 games. Goldson played over 20. Think its a stretch to say McCrorie is as important to Rangers as Goldson but each to their own.
Not sure what you disagree with?
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
comment by HB Fashion Sakala is offside again (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lexballielegend (U22945)
posted 1 minute ago
Be interesting to see what kind of budget DD has sanctioned should BR arrive, not fussed about his salary that’s purely between an employer and their employee and IMO their business and no one else’s. In all walks of life you agree your salary with your employer football is no different. It’s the budget to improve the squad I am curious about
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There will no doubt be 10-15m available plus the potential money from the Hatate and Kyogo sales.
Don't see you spending it all if they are sold though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think he’s going to come back on a massively increased salary to be given such a tiny budget and be asked to sell players if he wants to increase those transfer kitty funds?
Have I woken up to “Stupid Morning” or something?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said he would get 10m or 15m before any sales plus whatever money from sales on top. if you could take some deep breaths relax and read. Sounds like your on holiday, why you so nippy?
Think its a stretch to say McCrorie is as important to Rangers as Goldson but each to their own.
============
Indeed , that would be silly to say
as would if Goldson had played things would have been any different
this season he played when we won the league cup final , he played when we got the draw at Ibrox , he played when we pumped Rangers 4-0 .
Im not saying youre not a better team with with him , which would have been fine for anyone to say
but to say shiitt like - the league would have been different - and then give a sample that includes dead rubbers when the league is done or his injury before HT was the reason Liverpool beat rangers is just a laughable comfort blanket in all honesty
Rangers were getting scudded by Liverpool regardless but it wouldn't have been as hugely embarrassing a result as it was.
Sands was horrific and he had people defending him for ages. If he was a Wilson signing or Gio i'm not sure but by god he was a chore to watch.
Not good at anything but because he played in loads of positions our fans would defend him by saying it's not his natural position. Aye because none of them were
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 10 minutes ago
Think its a stretch to say McCrorie is as important to Rangers as Goldson but each to their own.
============
Indeed , that would be silly to say
as would if Goldson had played things would have been any different
this season he played when we won the league cup final , he played when we got the draw at Ibrox , he played when we pumped Rangers 4-0 .
Im not saying youre not a better team with with him , which would have been fine for anyone to say
but to say shiitt like - the league would have been different - and then give a sample that includes dead rubbers when the league is done or his injury before HT was the reason Liverpool beat rangers is just a laughable comfort blanket in all honesty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think anyone said the league would have been different?
All anyone said was how significant Goldson's injury was both for our season and in the demise of GVB and gave examples as to why he's so important and the difference between when he plays and doesn't play.
For some reason you have got a bit excited about conclusions no one drew.
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 24 minutes ago
Think its a stretch to say McCrorie is as important to Rangers as Goldson but each to their own.
============
Indeed , that would be silly to say
as would if Goldson had played things would have been any different
this season he played when we won the league cup final , he played when we got the draw at Ibrox , he played when we pumped Rangers 4-0 .
Im not saying youre not a better team with with him , which would have been fine for anyone to say
but to say shiitt like - the league would have been different - and then give a sample that includes dead rubbers when the league is done or his injury before HT was the reason Liverpool beat rangers is just a laughable comfort blanket in all honesty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no one said the league would be different just as no one said the Liverpool result would have been different.
they gave examples of how the team was poorer when Goldson was missing.
comment by HB Fashion Sakala is offside again (U21935)
posted 10 minutes ago
Rangers were getting scudded by Liverpool regardless but it wouldn't have been as hugely embarrassing a result as it was.
Sands was horrific and he had people defending him for ages. If he was a Wilson signing or Gio i'm not sure but by god he was a chore to watch.
Not good at anything but because he played in loads of positions our fans would defend him by saying it's not his natural position. Aye because none of them were
----------------------------------------------------------------------
dreadful player , i was sad to see him go
comment by HB Fashion Sakala is offside again (U21935)
posted 15 minutes ago
Rangers were getting scudded by Liverpool regardless but it wouldn't have been as hugely embarrassing a result as it was.
Sands was horrific and he had people defending him for ages. If he was a Wilson signing or Gio i'm not sure but by god he was a chore to watch.
Not good at anything but because he played in loads of positions our fans would defend him by saying it's not his natural position. Aye because none of them were
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sands .... poor boy, was thrown in at the deepend, didnt look like he could deal with the mentality needed at us. A solid looking player who wasnt able to physically dominate his man regardless of where he played. If you cant do what your best at here then you have no chance.
comment by HB Fashion Sakala is offside again (U21935)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
Agree Gio fooked us last season.
Injuries hampered an already domestically pash manager. We would have done a bit better with our best players available no doubt but we still would have done schite imo.
The Balogun release was pure stupidity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was delighted when Gio finally left. But as points totals go he did well compared to managers of past. Fine to say injuries, but likes of Kamara, Morelos and Kent had checked out.
In defence we had Goldson, Souttar, Helander, Davies, King plus Sands. Never mind Lundstram as an option. Simply we can’t afford to have more than that. Money has to come in to it, suggestion we should have more cb options than that is crazy. Balogun was seen as a poor signing in the end for QPR, it is revisionism to suggest he wasn’t a liability for us at times.
McGregor I agree keeping was ridiculous.
Gio got us to the CL groups, an achievement that was under rated. Credit has to go to Celtic. Gio wasn’t good enough in end. He did better than new manager bounce though, performances in Europe and the Cup last season show that. Fell apart this season. Players that cost him in league that season.
'Wife is snoozing away in sunshine while I relax by the pool overlooking the China Sea'
Cracking restaurant in the city centre...
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 24 minutes ago
Think its a stretch to say McCrorie is as important to Rangers as Goldson but each to their own.
============
Indeed , that would be silly to say
as would if Goldson had played things would have been any different
this season he played when we won the league cup final , he played when we got the draw at Ibrox , he played when we pumped Rangers 4-0 .
Im not saying youre not a better team with with him , which would have been fine for anyone to say
but to say shiitt like - the league would have been different - and then give a sample that includes dead rubbers when the league is done or his injury before HT was the reason Liverpool beat rangers is just a laughable comfort blanket in all honesty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no one said the league would be different just as no one said the Liverpool result would have been different.
they gave examples of how the team was poorer when Goldson was missing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cool , we agree - it wouldnt have been different
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 24 minutes ago
Think its a stretch to say McCrorie is as important to Rangers as Goldson but each to their own.
============
Indeed , that would be silly to say
as would if Goldson had played things would have been any different
this season he played when we won the league cup final , he played when we got the draw at Ibrox , he played when we pumped Rangers 4-0 .
Im not saying youre not a better team with with him , which would have been fine for anyone to say
but to say shiitt like - the league would have been different - and then give a sample that includes dead rubbers when the league is done or his injury before HT was the reason Liverpool beat rangers is just a laughable comfort blanket in all honesty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no one said the league would be different just as no one said the Liverpool result would have been different.
they gave examples of how the team was poorer when Goldson was missing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cool , we agree - it wouldnt have been different
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never said it wouldnt be different , I dont know, same as you.
I dont know, same as you
===============
well ...i think we all know . But lets leave it there
Hatate starting for Japan
Hope he runs amok
Sign in if you want to comment
Latest Celtic Manager Gossip
Page 8 of 13
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
posted on 15/6/23
comment by Lexballielegend (U22945)
posted 9 minutes ago
Be interesting to see what kind of budget DD has sanctioned should BR arrive, not fussed about his salary that’s purely between an employer and their employee and IMO their business and no one else’s. In all walks of life you agree your salary with your employer football is no different. It’s the budget to improve the squad I am curious about
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You also agree your working conditions and all the available tools and resources at your disposal that you believe will let you meet their desired targets.
The salary is just reflective of all that
posted on 15/6/23
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 39 seconds ago
Even the Liverpool game, we were winning or drawing when Goldson went off.
-----
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did someone write that?
Oh ffs 😂😂😂
It is “Stupid morning”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't write it but don't understand whats stupid about it? Underlines the point on how significant Goldson's injury was.
To make the point further, Rangers points total in games if taken over the season with Goldson was 1st in the league and without him was 7th.
In the Liverpool game he got injured at 1-1 just before half time and we lost 7-1. He's the most important player we have by a mile.
posted on 15/6/23
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 39 seconds ago
Even the Liverpool game, we were winning or drawing when Goldson went off.
-----
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did someone write that?
Oh ffs 😂😂😂
It is “Stupid morning”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't write it but don't understand whats stupid about it? Underlines the point on how significant Goldson's injury was.
To make the point further, Rangers points total in games if taken over the season with Goldson was 1st in the league and without him was 7th.
In the Liverpool game he got injured at 1-1 just before half time and we lost 7-1. He's the most important player we have by a mile.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. You’d probably as likely lost 6-1
posted on 15/6/23
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 39 seconds ago
Even the Liverpool game, we were winning or drawing when Goldson went off.
-----
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did someone write that?
Oh ffs 😂😂😂
It is “Stupid morning”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't write it but don't understand whats stupid about it? Underlines the point on how significant Goldson's injury was.
To make the point further, Rangers points total in games if taken over the season with Goldson was 1st in the league and without him was 7th.
In the Liverpool game he got injured at 1-1 just before half time and we lost 7-1. He's the most important player we have by a mile.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. You’d probably as likely lost 6-1
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think anyone was really trying to make the point the Liverpool game would have been different and more highlighting the extent of the difference made when he played vs didn't play.
Surely a decent sample is a 90 minute game of 2 halves against the same opposition where an individual player plays one half vs not the other?
posted on 15/6/23
“Rangers points total in games if taken over the season with Goldson was 1st in the league and without him was 7th”
Wait. Rangers were never first in the league. Are you suggesting that it he’d played every game you’d have won the league?
posted on 15/6/23
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 39 seconds ago
Even the Liverpool game, we were winning or drawing when Goldson went off.
-----
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did someone write that?
Oh ffs 😂😂😂
It is “Stupid morning”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't write it but don't understand whats stupid about it? Underlines the point on how significant Goldson's injury was.
To make the point further, Rangers points total in games if taken over the season with Goldson was 1st in the league and without him was 7th.
In the Liverpool game he got injured at 1-1 just before half time and we lost 7-1. He's the most important player we have by a mile.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. You’d probably as likely lost 6-1
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think anyone was really trying to make the point the Liverpool game would have been different and more highlighting the extent of the difference made when he played vs didn't play.
Surely a decent sample is a 90 minute game of 2 halves against the same opposition where an individual player plays one half vs not the other?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’re equally ridiculous as “samples”
Leagues aren’t won or lost on samples.
Best left as he was likely your best and most influential player. To suggest any results would have been different had he played when he didn’t is pure guesswork.
posted on 15/6/23
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
“Rangers points total in games if taken over the season with Goldson was 1st in the league and without him was 7th”
Wait. Rangers were never first in the league. Are you suggesting that it he’d played every game you’d have won the league?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. I'm highlighting that if you take the games Goldson played and accumulate points won by all teams in their respective fixtures Rangers have more points than anyone else.
If you take the games he didn't play Rangers have the 7th most points.
It's too simplistic to say if he played every game we would have won the league. It's not a stretch to say though that his injury was a significant moment in the season for us. I don't think thats unusual, most teams see variation in results when their important players are out. I think Celtic see something similar when CCV doesn't play.
posted on 15/6/23
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
“Rangers points total in games if taken over the season with Goldson was 1st in the league and without him was 7th”
Wait. Rangers were never first in the league. Are you suggesting that it he’d played every game you’d have won the league?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. I'm highlighting that if you take the games Goldson played and accumulate points won by all teams in their respective fixtures Rangers have more points than anyone else.
If you take the games he didn't play Rangers have the 7th most points.
It's too simplistic to say if he played every game we would have won the league. It's not a stretch to say though that his injury was a significant moment in the season for us. I don't think thats unusual, most teams see variation in results when their important players are out. I think Celtic see something similar when CCV doesn't play.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah. I see what you mean.
We might have won the last game at Ibrox if CCV had played.
I highly doubt it mind.
Right. Gym, swim then ruin it all by heading to bar.
posted on 15/6/23
Well if it is BR and it’s looking that way I wish they would just get on with it and make the announcement. There is a squad to analyse, targets to identify and sound out, a pre-season training camp followed by a trip to Japan and S Korea all in the pipeline. Get the finger oot.
posted on 15/6/23
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 39 seconds ago
Even the Liverpool game, we were winning or drawing when Goldson went off.
-----
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did someone write that?
Oh ffs 😂😂😂
It is “Stupid morning”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't write it but don't understand whats stupid about it? Underlines the point on how significant Goldson's injury was.
To make the point further, Rangers points total in games if taken over the season with Goldson was 1st in the league and without him was 7th.
In the Liverpool game he got injured at 1-1 just before half time and we lost 7-1. He's the most important player we have by a mile.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
have heard it all now
posted on 15/6/23
Can we have the Robby McCrorie league as well ? pretty sure you would have won that ?
posted on 15/6/23
Robby McCrorie only played 3 or 4 games. Goldson played over 20. Think its a stretch to say McCrorie is as important to Rangers as Goldson but each to their own.
Not sure what you disagree with?
posted on 15/6/23
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
comment by HB Fashion Sakala is offside again (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lexballielegend (U22945)
posted 1 minute ago
Be interesting to see what kind of budget DD has sanctioned should BR arrive, not fussed about his salary that’s purely between an employer and their employee and IMO their business and no one else’s. In all walks of life you agree your salary with your employer football is no different. It’s the budget to improve the squad I am curious about
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There will no doubt be 10-15m available plus the potential money from the Hatate and Kyogo sales.
Don't see you spending it all if they are sold though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think he’s going to come back on a massively increased salary to be given such a tiny budget and be asked to sell players if he wants to increase those transfer kitty funds?
Have I woken up to “Stupid Morning” or something?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said he would get 10m or 15m before any sales plus whatever money from sales on top. if you could take some deep breaths relax and read. Sounds like your on holiday, why you so nippy?
posted on 15/6/23
Think its a stretch to say McCrorie is as important to Rangers as Goldson but each to their own.
============
Indeed , that would be silly to say
as would if Goldson had played things would have been any different
this season he played when we won the league cup final , he played when we got the draw at Ibrox , he played when we pumped Rangers 4-0 .
Im not saying youre not a better team with with him , which would have been fine for anyone to say
but to say shiitt like - the league would have been different - and then give a sample that includes dead rubbers when the league is done or his injury before HT was the reason Liverpool beat rangers is just a laughable comfort blanket in all honesty
posted on 15/6/23
Rangers were getting scudded by Liverpool regardless but it wouldn't have been as hugely embarrassing a result as it was.
Sands was horrific and he had people defending him for ages. If he was a Wilson signing or Gio i'm not sure but by god he was a chore to watch.
Not good at anything but because he played in loads of positions our fans would defend him by saying it's not his natural position. Aye because none of them were
posted on 15/6/23
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 10 minutes ago
Think its a stretch to say McCrorie is as important to Rangers as Goldson but each to their own.
============
Indeed , that would be silly to say
as would if Goldson had played things would have been any different
this season he played when we won the league cup final , he played when we got the draw at Ibrox , he played when we pumped Rangers 4-0 .
Im not saying youre not a better team with with him , which would have been fine for anyone to say
but to say shiitt like - the league would have been different - and then give a sample that includes dead rubbers when the league is done or his injury before HT was the reason Liverpool beat rangers is just a laughable comfort blanket in all honesty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think anyone said the league would have been different?
All anyone said was how significant Goldson's injury was both for our season and in the demise of GVB and gave examples as to why he's so important and the difference between when he plays and doesn't play.
For some reason you have got a bit excited about conclusions no one drew.
posted on 15/6/23
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 24 minutes ago
Think its a stretch to say McCrorie is as important to Rangers as Goldson but each to their own.
============
Indeed , that would be silly to say
as would if Goldson had played things would have been any different
this season he played when we won the league cup final , he played when we got the draw at Ibrox , he played when we pumped Rangers 4-0 .
Im not saying youre not a better team with with him , which would have been fine for anyone to say
but to say shiitt like - the league would have been different - and then give a sample that includes dead rubbers when the league is done or his injury before HT was the reason Liverpool beat rangers is just a laughable comfort blanket in all honesty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no one said the league would be different just as no one said the Liverpool result would have been different.
they gave examples of how the team was poorer when Goldson was missing.
posted on 15/6/23
comment by HB Fashion Sakala is offside again (U21935)
posted 10 minutes ago
Rangers were getting scudded by Liverpool regardless but it wouldn't have been as hugely embarrassing a result as it was.
Sands was horrific and he had people defending him for ages. If he was a Wilson signing or Gio i'm not sure but by god he was a chore to watch.
Not good at anything but because he played in loads of positions our fans would defend him by saying it's not his natural position. Aye because none of them were
----------------------------------------------------------------------
dreadful player , i was sad to see him go
posted on 15/6/23
comment by HB Fashion Sakala is offside again (U21935)
posted 15 minutes ago
Rangers were getting scudded by Liverpool regardless but it wouldn't have been as hugely embarrassing a result as it was.
Sands was horrific and he had people defending him for ages. If he was a Wilson signing or Gio i'm not sure but by god he was a chore to watch.
Not good at anything but because he played in loads of positions our fans would defend him by saying it's not his natural position. Aye because none of them were
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sands .... poor boy, was thrown in at the deepend, didnt look like he could deal with the mentality needed at us. A solid looking player who wasnt able to physically dominate his man regardless of where he played. If you cant do what your best at here then you have no chance.
posted on 15/6/23
comment by HB Fashion Sakala is offside again (U21935)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
Agree Gio fooked us last season.
Injuries hampered an already domestically pash manager. We would have done a bit better with our best players available no doubt but we still would have done schite imo.
The Balogun release was pure stupidity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was delighted when Gio finally left. But as points totals go he did well compared to managers of past. Fine to say injuries, but likes of Kamara, Morelos and Kent had checked out.
In defence we had Goldson, Souttar, Helander, Davies, King plus Sands. Never mind Lundstram as an option. Simply we can’t afford to have more than that. Money has to come in to it, suggestion we should have more cb options than that is crazy. Balogun was seen as a poor signing in the end for QPR, it is revisionism to suggest he wasn’t a liability for us at times.
McGregor I agree keeping was ridiculous.
Gio got us to the CL groups, an achievement that was under rated. Credit has to go to Celtic. Gio wasn’t good enough in end. He did better than new manager bounce though, performances in Europe and the Cup last season show that. Fell apart this season. Players that cost him in league that season.
posted on 15/6/23
'Wife is snoozing away in sunshine while I relax by the pool overlooking the China Sea'
Cracking restaurant in the city centre...
posted on 15/6/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 24 minutes ago
Think its a stretch to say McCrorie is as important to Rangers as Goldson but each to their own.
============
Indeed , that would be silly to say
as would if Goldson had played things would have been any different
this season he played when we won the league cup final , he played when we got the draw at Ibrox , he played when we pumped Rangers 4-0 .
Im not saying youre not a better team with with him , which would have been fine for anyone to say
but to say shiitt like - the league would have been different - and then give a sample that includes dead rubbers when the league is done or his injury before HT was the reason Liverpool beat rangers is just a laughable comfort blanket in all honesty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no one said the league would be different just as no one said the Liverpool result would have been different.
they gave examples of how the team was poorer when Goldson was missing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cool , we agree - it wouldnt have been different
posted on 15/6/23
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 24 minutes ago
Think its a stretch to say McCrorie is as important to Rangers as Goldson but each to their own.
============
Indeed , that would be silly to say
as would if Goldson had played things would have been any different
this season he played when we won the league cup final , he played when we got the draw at Ibrox , he played when we pumped Rangers 4-0 .
Im not saying youre not a better team with with him , which would have been fine for anyone to say
but to say shiitt like - the league would have been different - and then give a sample that includes dead rubbers when the league is done or his injury before HT was the reason Liverpool beat rangers is just a laughable comfort blanket in all honesty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no one said the league would be different just as no one said the Liverpool result would have been different.
they gave examples of how the team was poorer when Goldson was missing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cool , we agree - it wouldnt have been different
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never said it wouldnt be different , I dont know, same as you.
posted on 15/6/23
I dont know, same as you
===============
well ...i think we all know . But lets leave it there
posted on 15/6/23
Hatate starting for Japan
Hope he runs amok
Page 8 of 13
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13