comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Clockwork Red: With or Wout You (U4892)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 5 minutes ago
Are you sure she's pregnant? Culèr announced this 11 months ago?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't think she's pregnant...

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wait, culer is the father? I guess it would explain masons anger if culer had wined and dined her in M&C before doing the deed…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Copy of rashfords book to seal the deal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Putty in his hands. Greenwood stood no chance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That was a grate thread

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 32 minutes ago
Ohnono, give an example of other evidence, that seems believable
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Il give you an example.

A copy of the full recording

An unedited version of the record

An E Mail from an unknown 3rd party blackmailing him.

Texts between his missus and friends saying she would cause him a lot of trouble if he cheated on her.

It could by anything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But none of the above
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What do you mean?

comment by Shinjury list (U1700)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 9 minutes ago
It's genuinely disappointing to support the same team as RDD and Scholay. scholes who seem to support Greenwood with zero evidence that the recording could mean anything other than what we heard.
If there was enough to exonerate him I would be delighted, but zilch, even from his own side.
Are they the same with every criminal? I doubt it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Is Greenwood a criminal?

Just playing the advocate of the devil here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think so, yes

comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by Clockwork Red: With or Wout You (U4892)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 4 minutes ago
People saying they won't change their relationship with the club over this, appear to be forgetting that it is the club who will make the contentious decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well, it's the people who currently represent the club, most of whom are not popular anyway. The club itself, the thing that people love, is an institution that's been around since the late nineteenth century. It won't be deciding anything.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
He'll ignore this
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The current custodians, like them or not, are a massive part of the club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, and they will leave at some point and the club will remain. Its entirely possible to keep having a strong emotional attachment to the club whilst wholeheartedly disagreeing with decisions that the current leadership make. Its bizarre to argue otherwise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I’m. Or arguing otherwise.

Simply that when you support the club, you support the staff / custodians
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Support in what sense? Are you saying everyone who supports MUFC also supports the Glazers?

I guess financially, but that has nothing to do with this. Again from an emotional point of view, it is absolute bollox.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Back them.

They represent your club.

Buy the players, appoint the manager, negotiate commercial deals, set ticket prices,

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 5 minutes ago
It's not so much the woman was prepared to accept a bung, that her family pointed out she was happy before. And if she believed he was remorseful, then she could have a far better life staying with him the otherwise,
----------------------------------------------------------------------

She could have sold her story, took him to civil court and still been very wealthy if it was about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You really do talk an amazing amount of shiiiiiiiiiiit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s pretty special isn’t it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I like the inference that she would have won a civil court case but at the same time the case was dropped and as such he's innocent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You know the. Harden of proof in civil court is significantly smaller. It’s on balance of probability rather than beyond reasonable doubt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which means he probably did it and meant it n'est ce pas
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Isnt that what is being argued, that he did it but paid her off?

comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 32 minutes ago
Ohnono, give an example of other evidence, that seems believable
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Il give you an example.

A copy of the full recording

An unedited version of the record

An E Mail from an unknown 3rd party blackmailing him.

Texts between his missus and friends saying she would cause him a lot of trouble if he cheated on her.

It could by anything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But none of the above
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean it would all be public knowledge in that case, if it exonerated him

comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 5 minutes ago
It's not so much the woman was prepared to accept a bung, that her family pointed out she was happy before. And if she believed he was remorseful, then she could have a far better life staying with him the otherwise,
----------------------------------------------------------------------

She could have sold her story, took him to civil court and still been very wealthy if it was about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You really do talk an amazing amount of shiiiiiiiiiiit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s pretty special isn’t it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I like the inference that she would have won a civil court case but at the same time the case was dropped and as such he's innocent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You know the. Harden of proof in civil court is significantly smaller. It’s on balance of probability rather than beyond reasonable doubt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, I do know that, I just find it amusing that you have peddled the "He's innocent because he's not found guilty in a court of law" and as such we should all just let him off and yet in the same breath you'll push the fact it's a very real possibility he'd be found guilty in a civil court.

You're a moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This, rdd is tearing an argument apart. Yours.

comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 5 minutes ago
It's not so much the woman was prepared to accept a bung, that her family pointed out she was happy before. And if she believed he was remorseful, then she could have a far better life staying with him the otherwise,
----------------------------------------------------------------------

She could have sold her story, took him to civil court and still been very wealthy if it was about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You really do talk an amazing amount of shiiiiiiiiiiit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s pretty special isn’t it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I like the inference that she would have won a civil court case but at the same time the case was dropped and as such he's innocent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You know the. Harden of proof in civil court is significantly smaller. It’s on balance of probability rather than beyond reasonable doubt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, I do know that, I just find it amusing that you have peddled the "He's innocent because he's not found guilty in a court of law" and as such we should all just let him off and yet in the same breath you'll push the fact it's a very real possibility he'd be found guilty in a civil court.

You're a moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I haven’t said he is innocent, you moron.

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 32 minutes ago
Ohnono, give an example of other evidence, that seems believable
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Il give you an example.

A copy of the full recording

An unedited version of the record

An E Mail from an unknown 3rd party blackmailing him.

Texts between his missus and friends saying she would cause him a lot of trouble if he cheated on her.

It could by anything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But none of the above
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean it would all be public knowledge in that case, if it exonerated him
----------------------------------------------------------------------

How would it become public knowledge?

These are legal cases, not transfer gossip.

Could be part of a different legal case for all you know.

comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 5 minutes ago
It's not so much the woman was prepared to accept a bung, that her family pointed out she was happy before. And if she believed he was remorseful, then she could have a far better life staying with him the otherwise,
----------------------------------------------------------------------

She could have sold her story, took him to civil court and still been very wealthy if it was about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You really do talk an amazing amount of shiiiiiiiiiiit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s pretty special isn’t it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I like the inference that she would have won a civil court case but at the same time the case was dropped and as such he's innocent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You know the. Harden of proof in civil court is significantly smaller. It’s on balance of probability rather than beyond reasonable doubt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which means he probably did it and meant it n'est ce pas
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Isnt that what is being argued, that he did it but paid her off?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean if the balance of probability is the rule, it's probable he's found guilty

comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 5 minutes ago
It's not so much the woman was prepared to accept a bung, that her family pointed out she was happy before. And if she believed he was remorseful, then she could have a far better life staying with him the otherwise,
----------------------------------------------------------------------

She could have sold her story, took him to civil court and still been very wealthy if it was about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You really do talk an amazing amount of shiiiiiiiiiiit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s pretty special isn’t it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I like the inference that she would have won a civil court case but at the same time the case was dropped and as such he's innocent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You know the. Harden of proof in civil court is significantly smaller. It’s on balance of probability rather than beyond reasonable doubt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, I do know that, I just find it amusing that you have peddled the "He's innocent because he's not found guilty in a court of law" and as such we should all just let him off and yet in the same breath you'll push the fact it's a very real possibility he'd be found guilty in a civil court.

You're a moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This, rdd is tearing an argument apart. Yours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except I haven’t said Greenwood is innocent.

comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 5 minutes ago
It's not so much the woman was prepared to accept a bung, that her family pointed out she was happy before. And if she believed he was remorseful, then she could have a far better life staying with him the otherwise,
----------------------------------------------------------------------

She could have sold her story, took him to civil court and still been very wealthy if it was about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You really do talk an amazing amount of shiiiiiiiiiiit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s pretty special isn’t it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I like the inference that she would have won a civil court case but at the same time the case was dropped and as such he's innocent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You know the. Harden of proof in civil court is significantly smaller. It’s on balance of probability rather than beyond reasonable doubt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, I do know that, I just find it amusing that you have peddled the "He's innocent because he's not found guilty in a court of law" and as such we should all just let him off and yet in the same breath you'll push the fact it's a very real possibility he'd be found guilty in a civil court.

You're a moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I haven’t said he is innocent, you moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well then that makes your stance even stranger, doesn't it. As said, you're a moron.

comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 5 minutes ago
It's not so much the woman was prepared to accept a bung, that her family pointed out she was happy before. And if she believed he was remorseful, then she could have a far better life staying with him the otherwise,
----------------------------------------------------------------------

She could have sold her story, took him to civil court and still been very wealthy if it was about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You really do talk an amazing amount of shiiiiiiiiiiit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s pretty special isn’t it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I like the inference that she would have won a civil court case but at the same time the case was dropped and as such he's innocent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You know the. Harden of proof in civil court is significantly smaller. It’s on balance of probability rather than beyond reasonable doubt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, I do know that, I just find it amusing that you have peddled the "He's innocent because he's not found guilty in a court of law" and as such we should all just let him off and yet in the same breath you'll push the fact it's a very real possibility he'd be found guilty in a civil court.

You're a moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This, rdd is tearing an argument apart. Yours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except I haven’t said Greenwood is innocent.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’ve been pretty much making excuses and presenting him as innocent the entire time.

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 5 minutes ago
It's not so much the woman was prepared to accept a bung, that her family pointed out she was happy before. And if she believed he was remorseful, then she could have a far better life staying with him the otherwise,
----------------------------------------------------------------------

She could have sold her story, took him to civil court and still been very wealthy if it was about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You really do talk an amazing amount of shiiiiiiiiiiit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s pretty special isn’t it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I like the inference that she would have won a civil court case but at the same time the case was dropped and as such he's innocent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You know the. Harden of proof in civil court is significantly smaller. It’s on balance of probability rather than beyond reasonable doubt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which means he probably did it and meant it n'est ce pas
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Isnt that what is being argued, that he did it but paid her off?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean if the balance of probability is the rule, it's probable he's found guilty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So then why wouldn’t she take him to civil court, take all his money without having to marry and have a child with him?

comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 32 minutes ago
Ohnono, give an example of other evidence, that seems believable
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Il give you an example.

A copy of the full recording

An unedited version of the record

An E Mail from an unknown 3rd party blackmailing him.

Texts between his missus and friends saying she would cause him a lot of trouble if he cheated on her.

It could by anything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But none of the above
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean it would all be public knowledge in that case, if it exonerated him
----------------------------------------------------------------------

How would it become public knowledge?

These are legal cases, not transfer gossip.

Could be part of a different legal case for all you know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He would have said immediately, thus stopping any investigation

comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 5 minutes ago
It's not so much the woman was prepared to accept a bung, that her family pointed out she was happy before. And if she believed he was remorseful, then she could have a far better life staying with him the otherwise,
----------------------------------------------------------------------

She could have sold her story, took him to civil court and still been very wealthy if it was about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You really do talk an amazing amount of shiiiiiiiiiiit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s pretty special isn’t it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I like the inference that she would have won a civil court case but at the same time the case was dropped and as such he's innocent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You know the. Harden of proof in civil court is significantly smaller. It’s on balance of probability rather than beyond reasonable doubt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, I do know that, I just find it amusing that you have peddled the "He's innocent because he's not found guilty in a court of law" and as such we should all just let him off and yet in the same breath you'll push the fact it's a very real possibility he'd be found guilty in a civil court.

You're a moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I haven’t said he is innocent, you moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well then that makes your stance even stranger, doesn't it. As said, you're a moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

My stance is and has always been, there is more to it, let’s see what the club decide.

comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 5 minutes ago
It's not so much the woman was prepared to accept a bung, that her family pointed out she was happy before. And if she believed he was remorseful, then she could have a far better life staying with him the otherwise,
----------------------------------------------------------------------

She could have sold her story, took him to civil court and still been very wealthy if it was about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You really do talk an amazing amount of shiiiiiiiiiiit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s pretty special isn’t it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I like the inference that she would have won a civil court case but at the same time the case was dropped and as such he's innocent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You know the. Harden of proof in civil court is significantly smaller. It’s on balance of probability rather than beyond reasonable doubt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, I do know that, I just find it amusing that you have peddled the "He's innocent because he's not found guilty in a court of law" and as such we should all just let him off and yet in the same breath you'll push the fact it's a very real possibility he'd be found guilty in a civil court.

You're a moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This, rdd is tearing an argument apart. Yours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except I haven’t said Greenwood is innocent.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’ve been pretty much making excuses and presenting him as innocent the entire time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Iv said there is obviously more to it and let’s see what comes out and where we go with it before labelling him a monster and boating him to Oz

You'll say anything

comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 5 minutes ago
It's not so much the woman was prepared to accept a bung, that her family pointed out she was happy before. And if she believed he was remorseful, then she could have a far better life staying with him the otherwise,
----------------------------------------------------------------------

She could have sold her story, took him to civil court and still been very wealthy if it was about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You really do talk an amazing amount of shiiiiiiiiiiit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s pretty special isn’t it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I like the inference that she would have won a civil court case but at the same time the case was dropped and as such he's innocent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You know the. Harden of proof in civil court is significantly smaller. It’s on balance of probability rather than beyond reasonable doubt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which means he probably did it and meant it n'est ce pas
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Isnt that what is being argued, that he did it but paid her off?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean if the balance of probability is the rule, it's probable he's found guilty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So then why wouldn’t she take him to civil court, take all his money without having to marry and have a child with him?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Much more certain if he offers the money 6her and family immediately m

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 32 minutes ago
Ohnono, give an example of other evidence, that seems believable
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Il give you an example.

A copy of the full recording

An unedited version of the record

An E Mail from an unknown 3rd party blackmailing him.

Texts between his missus and friends saying she would cause him a lot of trouble if he cheated on her.

It could by anything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But none of the above
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean it would all be public knowledge in that case, if it exonerated him
----------------------------------------------------------------------

How would it become public knowledge?

These are legal cases, not transfer gossip.

Could be part of a different legal case for all you know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He would have said immediately, thus stopping any investigation
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There are a million reasons he hasn’t said anything.

Come on, you aren’t silly.

comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 52 seconds ago
You'll say anything
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Again, vocal idiots who have their facts wrong.

comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 51 seconds ago
You'll say anything
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Literally anything. The hackers and sxx game are particular highlights

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 5 minutes ago
It's not so much the woman was prepared to accept a bung, that her family pointed out she was happy before. And if she believed he was remorseful, then she could have a far better life staying with him the otherwise,
----------------------------------------------------------------------

She could have sold her story, took him to civil court and still been very wealthy if it was about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You really do talk an amazing amount of shiiiiiiiiiiit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s pretty special isn’t it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I like the inference that she would have won a civil court case but at the same time the case was dropped and as such he's innocent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You know the. Harden of proof in civil court is significantly smaller. It’s on balance of probability rather than beyond reasonable doubt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which means he probably did it and meant it n'est ce pas
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Isnt that what is being argued, that he did it but paid her off?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean if the balance of probability is the rule, it's probable he's found guilty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So then why wouldn’t she take him to civil court, take all his money without having to marry and have a child with him?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Much more certain if he offers the money 6her and family immediately m
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So you believe he is guilty, the audio is a smoking gun, yet she might. It have a civil case?

Also, how disrespectful that you will suggest a victim would marry and have a child with her abuser to gain a comfortable lifestyle.

comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 51 seconds ago
You'll say anything
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Literally anything. The hackers and sxx game are particular highlights
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I’m right. Prove me wrong.

comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 51 seconds ago
You'll say anything
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Literally anything. The hackers and sxx game are particular highlights
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I’m right. Prove me wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
oh so it was a sxx game then? What proof do you have?