They are legitimate protests in Southport. It is simply British people who have had enough after a Muslim migrant stabbed children in Southport after crossing the channel illegally last year and lying about being 17 in order to not be named. Get your facts straight before calling it a riot and not a legitimate protest

comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 2 hours, 1 minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 59 minutes ago
If you've been following the discussion then I'm not dismissing any theory. Elvis said this about Tommy Robinson

"A lot of his anger come from the authorities covering up the systematic abuse of young girls in towns and cities, ala Rochdale"

I simply challenged that statement and don't see any evidence to support it. It is actually a very dangerous thing to believe without proof. Didn't you see Tommy Robinson's clip yesterday? Or was it day before yesterday? He basically said people are angry and protesting because the authorities are covering up the systematic abuse of young girls in towns and cities. So the same thing as Elvis. I am querying what that is based on and indicated that the report didn't back it up as Elvis claimed and now he's switched from Rochdale to Keighley, which also doesn't back it up IMO.

Is that what dismissing a theory so easily but stating your own as absolute certainty but with nothing to back it up looks like to you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But when you look at the reports you simply can’t dismiss the idea of a cover up, can you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Its like whitewahses don't exist.

I am pretty sure that Child A, who gave key evidence, called the Rochdale report a whitewash.

comment by John McGlashan (U1734)
posted 2 minutes ago
They are legitimate protests in Southport. It is simply British people who have had enough after a Muslim migrant stabbed children in Southport after crossing the channel illegally last year and lying about being 17 in order to not be named. Get your facts straight before calling it a riot and not a legitimate protest
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shut up Barry

comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 2 hours, 1 minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 59 minutes ago
If you've been following the discussion then I'm not dismissing any theory. Elvis said this about Tommy Robinson

"A lot of his anger come from the authorities covering up the systematic abuse of young girls in towns and cities, ala Rochdale"

I simply challenged that statement and don't see any evidence to support it. It is actually a very dangerous thing to believe without proof. Didn't you see Tommy Robinson's clip yesterday? Or was it day before yesterday? He basically said people are angry and protesting because the authorities are covering up the systematic abuse of young girls in towns and cities. So the same thing as Elvis. I am querying what that is based on and indicated that the report didn't back it up as Elvis claimed and now he's switched from Rochdale to Keighley, which also doesn't back it up IMO.

Is that what dismissing a theory so easily but stating your own as absolute certainty but with nothing to back it up looks like to you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But when you look at the reports you simply can’t dismiss the idea of a cover up, can you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Its like whitewahses don't exist.

I am pretty sure that Child A, who gave key evidence, called the Rochdale report a whitewash.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually, I think she called the report into GMP's handling of the case a whitewash.

Can anyone think of any other examples of protesting something that didn't actually happen? But then just going with it anyway?

Need some sort of competition to see who can start a riot based on the most ridiculous lie, all through social media. Trump's was pretty decent with his "Stop the steal".

Probably some funny covid related ones too.

The future is going to be fun.

The people causing havoc, the state of them. Instead of the "stop the boats" sh!te, those people need deporting to an island in the middle of nowhere.
These people look like degenerates, the very worst of society, most likely on benefits themselves.
Scuumbags

comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 42 seconds ago
The people causing havoc, the state of them. Instead of the "stop the boats" sh!te, those people need deporting to an island in the middle of nowhere.
These people look like degenerates, the very worst of society, most likely on benefits themselves.
Scuumbags
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The don’t look like degenerates, they ARE degenerates

comment by Brian Gittins (U1449)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 42 seconds ago
The people causing havoc, the state of them. Instead of the "stop the boats" sh!te, those people need deporting to an island in the middle of nowhere.
These people look like degenerates, the very worst of society, most likely on benefits themselves.
Scuumbags
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The don’t look like degenerates, they ARE degenerates
----------------------------------------------------------------------
True.. true..

So they’ve named him now

17 yr old Axel Rudakubana

That's it! Let's get to Cardiff and start protesting against Christians

comment by John McGlashan (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
That's it! Let's get to Cardiff and start protesting against Christians
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do we need to bring our own stones?

comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 3 hours, 4 minutes ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 59 minutes ago
If you've been following the discussion then I'm not dismissing any theory. Elvis said this about Tommy Robinson

"A lot of his anger come from the authorities covering up the systematic abuse of young girls in towns and cities, ala Rochdale"

I simply challenged that statement and don't see any evidence to support it. It is actually a very dangerous thing to believe without proof. Didn't you see Tommy Robinson's clip yesterday? Or was it day before yesterday? He basically said people are angry and protesting because the authorities are covering up the systematic abuse of young girls in towns and cities. So the same thing as Elvis. I am querying what that is based on and indicated that the report didn't back it up as Elvis claimed and now he's switched from Rochdale to Keighley, which also doesn't back it up IMO.

Is that what dismissing a theory so easily but stating your own as absolute certainty but with nothing to back it up looks like to you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But when you look at the reports you simply can’t dismiss the idea of a cover up, can you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think you know what dismiss means. I put forward arguments against that conclusion, poked holes in it and sufficiently discredited it which is how discussions work. In the absence of additional evidence then I don't know what you expect.

Also forgive me if I just refuse to believe that a UK police force allowed young white girls to be assaulted and raped by brown men for decades because they were afraid of racial tensions. As I said, it might have happened anecdotally, but it doesn't even make sense to make that argument if you look at the numbers and time scales. It's stoopid. It's also coming from the cops themselves who have a motive to push that theory and anyone parroting that theory also picked it up from the cops who needed an excuse for not doing their jobs.

I just hope this doesn't cause ridiculous racism towards blacks now, no doubt it will with the state of these people out in force the last few days.

comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 1 minute ago
I just hope this doesn't cause ridiculous racism towards blacks now, no doubt it will with the state of these people out in force the last few days.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's like winning the PL and CL double this for racists. Even though they didn't legitimately win the PL. They claimed they did anyway so now after celebrating that they can celebrate the CL.

Translation: They went after the muslims unjustifiably, based on misinformation and got their day out doing that, now they have the blacks to go after. What a week.

comment by John McGlashan (U1734)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Ali - 🇪🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 (U1192)
posted 1 minute ago
I just hope this doesn't cause ridiculous racism towards blacks now, no doubt it will with the state of these people out in force the last few days.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's like winning the PL and CL double this for racists. Even though they didn't legitimately win the PL. They claimed they did anyway so now after celebrating that they can celebrate the CL.

Translation: They went after the muslims unjustifiably, based on misinformation and got their day out doing that, now they have the blacks to go after. What a week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Unfortunately yes, a fair analogy .

comment by Brian Gittins (U1449)
posted 30 minutes ago
So they’ve named him now

17 yr old Axel Rudakubana
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Disgusting. Should be put in isolation for life.

Also I reckon the "free speech" they fought so hard to get on twitter probably influenced this young boy into wanting to murder children.

Can't have a one way system where only YOUR free speech should be allowed. Where only your incitement of racial violence is fine.

I am sure the same people who craved "free speech" on twitter are more than happy with people being brainwashed by terrorists etc.

Oh but that's not the free speech we meant. We just meant our free speech.

comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 3 hours, 4 minutes ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 59 minutes ago
If you've been following the discussion then I'm not dismissing any theory. Elvis said this about Tommy Robinson

"A lot of his anger come from the authorities covering up the systematic abuse of young girls in towns and cities, ala Rochdale"

I simply challenged that statement and don't see any evidence to support it. It is actually a very dangerous thing to believe without proof. Didn't you see Tommy Robinson's clip yesterday? Or was it day before yesterday? He basically said people are angry and protesting because the authorities are covering up the systematic abuse of young girls in towns and cities. So the same thing as Elvis. I am querying what that is based on and indicated that the report didn't back it up as Elvis claimed and now he's switched from Rochdale to Keighley, which also doesn't back it up IMO.

Is that what dismissing a theory so easily but stating your own as absolute certainty but with nothing to back it up looks like to you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But when you look at the reports you simply can’t dismiss the idea of a cover up, can you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think you know what dismiss means. I put forward arguments against that conclusion, poked holes in it and sufficiently discredited it which is how discussions work. In the absence of additional evidence then I don't know what you expect.

Also forgive me if I just refuse to believe that a UK police force allowed young white girls to be assaulted and raped by brown men for decades because they were afraid of racial tensions. As I said, it might have happened anecdotally, but it doesn't even make sense to make that argument if you look at the numbers and time scales. It's stoopid. It's also coming from the cops themselves who have a motive to push that theory and anyone parroting that theory also picked it up from the cops who needed an excuse for not doing their jobs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It the Keighley case it is coming from the MP who was the first public person to raise the abuse happening in Keighley.

And Dennis McShane, who was MP for Rotherham, has admitted that he didn't look into the abuse rumours as he didn't want to "rock the multicultural community boat".

But you won't want to hear that will you?

comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Brian Gittins (U1449)
posted 30 minutes ago
So they’ve named him now

17 yr old Axel Rudakubana
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Disgusting. Should be put in isolation for life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wonder what his motivation was. Such a horrible incident

It the Keighley case it is coming from the MP who was the first public person to raise the abuse happening in Keighley
=====
Have a link that demonstrates that? Have to be honest, I can't find anything like that. We might be discussing something you pulled out of your ass.

comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Brian Gittins (U1449)
posted 30 minutes ago
So they’ve named him now

17 yr old Axel Rudakubana
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Disgusting. Should be put in isolation for life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wonder what his motivation was. Such a horrible incident
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Voices in the head is a common one. Send him back to Wales.

You talking about Anne Cryer, right?

And Dennis McShane, who was MP for Rotherham, has admitted that he didn't look into the abuse rumours as he didn't want to "rock the multicultural community boat".
=====
If course. Same principle the cops. He failed to look into even though it was brought to his attention. His one and only way out is to say that. Cops ignore a lot of stuff until they can't ignore it anymore. It's not just the abuse of white girls that they don't do sheet about. Others don't get this far.

The fact that people actually see it as a valid excuse is amazing. You let young girls be abused for that? A whole facking MP allowed girls to continue to be abused? I'm just not buying that.

He didn't do anything because he didn't want to lose votes. How can you be buying this bullsheet?

comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
It the Keighley case it is coming from the MP who was the first public person to raise the abuse happening in Keighley
=====
Have a link that demonstrates that? Have to be honest, I can't find anything like that. We might be discussing something you pulled out of your ass.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just Google Ann Cryer Rotherham abuse case. She has detailed at length the fact the authorities wouldn't act. She has stated that it was down to fear of escalating racial tensions. She has stated that other MPs congratulated her for having the courage to highlight these issues when they themselves didn't dare go near.

The woman was branded a racist, despite the fact she had done a lot throughout her years to help immigrants integrate within the community.

And as I've said earlier, with the Rotherham case, Dennis McShane admitted to being scared of rockong the boat.

But please continue to make out like I have made these things up.